Despite a steep rise in income inequality over the past five decades, Americans’ preferences for redistribution have remained stagnant. Previous research suggests that redistributive preferences are rooted in stable institutional and cultural contexts but can change with exposure to information. We investigate the role of understandings of the link between income and psychological well-being in shaping policy preferences. Further, we consider whether effects differ if similar information is framed in terms of disadvantages for the poor versus advantages for the affluent. In a large, preregistered online experiment (N = 2,751), we examined the effects of three common themes in scholarship on happiness and well-being: Money Prevents Unhappiness, Money Provides Happiness, and Money Doesn’t Matter. Results show that learning that Money Prevents Unhappiness (versus the other two themes) increased egalitarian preferences. Effects were moderated by political ideology, income, and subjective social class but not by race. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of the current cultural discourse about happiness, which often privileges non-income causes and positive emotions.
AikenLeona S.WestStephen G.RenoRaymond R.1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. New York: Sage.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoGiulianoPaola. 2011. “Preferences for Redistribution.” Pp. 93–131 in Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1, edited by BenhabibJ.BisinA.JacksonM. O.San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoStantchevaStefanieTesoEdoardo. 2018. “Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution.”American Economic Review108(2): 521–54.
4.
AlvesWayne M.RossiPeter H.1978. “Who Should Get What? Fairness Judgments of the Distribution of Earnings.”American Journal of Sociology84(3):541–64.
5.
AronowPeter M.BaronJonathonPinsonLauren. 2019. “A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check.”Political Analysis27(4):572–89.
6.
BaronJonathan. 1995. “Blind Justice: Fairness to Groups and the Do-No-Harm Principle.”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making8(2):71–83.
7.
BateSimonKarpNatasha A.2014. “A Common Control Group: Optimising the Experiment Design to Maximise Sensitivity.”PLoS One9(12):1–12.
8.
BeckerBastian. 2021. “Significant Others? Social Groups, Income Expectations, and Redistributive Preferences.”Social Science Research100:102612.
9.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.”Annual Review of Sociology26(1):611–39.
10.
Boyd-SwanCaseyHerbstChris M.IfcherJohnZarghameeHoma. 2016. “The Earned Income Tax Credit, Mental Health, and Happiness.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization126:18–38.
11.
BradyDavidBosticAmie. 2015. “Paradoxes of Social Policy: Welfare Transfers, Relative Poverty, and Redistribution Preferences.”American Sociological Review80(2):268–98.
12.
BrickmanPhilipCampbellDonald. 1971. “Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society.” Pp. 287–302 in Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium, edited by AppleyM. H.New York: Academic Press.
13.
BrooksClemHarterElijah. 2021. “Redistribution Preferences, Inequality Information, and Partisan Motivated Reasoning in the United States.”Societies11(2):65.
14.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 2013. “A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession.”American Sociological Review78(5):727–48.
16.
BrossardDominiqueNisbetMatthew C.2007. “Deference to Scientific Authority among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research19(1):24–52.
17.
BursteinPaul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.”Political Research Quarterly56(1):29–40.
18.
BusinelleMichael S.MillsBritain A.ChartierKaren G.KendzorDarla E.ReingleJennifer M.ShuvalKerem. 2014. “Do Stressful Events Account for the Link between Socioeconomic Status and Mental Health?”Journal of Public Health36(2):205–12.
19.
CampbellJohn L.2002. “Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy.”Annual Review of Sociology28(1):21–38.
20.
CantrilHadley. 1965. The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21.
CarteRussell. 2003. “In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions.”MIS Quarterly27(3):479.
22.
CavailléCharlotteTrumpKris Stella. 2015. “The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences.”Journal of Politics77(1):146–60.
23.
CederstromCarl. 2018. The Happiness Fantasy. Medford, MA: Polity.
24.
CeruloKaren A.2006. Never Saw It Coming: Cultural Challenges to Envisioning the Worst. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
ChoiMinyoungKarnazeMelissa M.LenchHeather C.LevineLinda J.2023. “DoLiberals Value Emotion More Than Conservatives? Political Partisanship and Lay Beliefs about the Functionality of Emotion.”Motivation and Emotion47(3): 364–80.
26.
ChowRosalind M.GalakJeff. 2012. “The Effect of Inequality Frames on Support for Redistributive Tax Policies.”Psychological Science23(12):1467–69.
27.
CicourelAaron V.1982. “Interviews, Surveys, and the Problem of Ecological Validity.”American Sociologist17(1):11–20.
28.
CondonMeghanWichowskyAmber. 2020. “Inequality in the Social Mind: Social Comparison and Support for Redistribution.”Journal of Politics82(1):149–61.
29.
DaviesWilliam. 2011. “The Political Economy of Unhappiness.” New Left Review (71): 65–80.
30.
DaviesWilliam. 2015. The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold Us Well-Being. London: Verso.
31.
DienerEdSandvikEdSeidlitzLarryDienerMarissa. 1993. “The Relationship between Income and Subjective Well-Being: Relative or Absolute?”Social Indicators Research28:195–223.
32.
DietzePiaCraigMaureen A.2021. “Framing Economic Inequality and Policy as Group Disadvantages (versus Group Advantages) Spurs Support for Action.”Nature Human Behaviour5(3):349–60.
33.
DolanPaul. 2019. Happy Ever After: Escaping the Myth of the Perfect Life. New York: Penguin Books.
34.
DoyleJoshua. 2021. “The Effect of Cultural Trust on Cooperation in Two Behavioral Experiments.”Social Psychology Quarterly84(3):246–66.
35.
DunnElizabeth W.GilbertDaniel T.WilsonTimothy D.2011. “If Money Doesn’t Make You Happy, Then You Probably Aren’t Spending It Right.”Journal of Consumer Psychology21(2):115–25.
36.
DunnElizabethNortonMichael I.2013. Happy Money: The Science of Smarter Spending. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
EasterlinRichard A.1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence.” Pp. 89–125 in Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, edited by DavidP.RederM.New York: Academic Press.
38.
EasterlinRichard A.O’ConnorKelsey. 2022. “The Easterlin Paradox.” Pp. 1–25 in Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, edited by ZimmermannK. F.Springer.
39.
EhrenreichBarbara. 2009. Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
40.
EllisChristopherFaricyChristopher. 2020. “Race, ‘Deservingness,’ and Social Spending Attitudes: The Role of Policy Delivery Mechanism.”Political Behavior42(3):819–43.
41.
EntmanRobert M.1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.”Journal of Communication43(4):51–58.
42.
EvansM. D. R.KelleyJonathanPeoplesClayton D.2010. “Justifications of Inequality: The Normative Basis of Pay Differentials in 31 Nations.”Social Science Quarterly91(5):1405–31.
43.
FischerClaude S.2014. Lurching toward Happiness in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
FoxCybelle. 2004. “The Changing Color of Welfare? How Whites’ Attitudes toward Latinos Influence Support for Welfare.”American Journal of Sociology110(3):580–625.
45.
FrawleyAshley. 2018. “‘Unhappy News’: Process, Rhetoric, and Context in the Making of the Happiness Problem.”Sociological Research Online23(1):43–66.
46.
GilbertDaniel T.2006. Stumbling on Happiness. New York: Knopf.
47.
GilensMartin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
GoffmanErving. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
49.
HallettTimStapletonOrlaSauderMichael. 2019. “Public Ideas: Their Varieties and Careers.”American Sociological Review84(3):545–76.
50.
HaselswerdtJake. 2022. “Who Benefits? Race, Immigration, and Assumptions about Policy.”Political Behavior44(1):271–318.
51.
HeadeyBruce. 2008. “Life Goals Matter to Happiness: A Revision of Set-Point Theory.”Social Indicators Research86(2): 213–31.
52.
HeflinColleen M.IcelandJohn. 2009. “Poverty, Material Hardship, and Depression.”Social Science Quarterly90(5): 1051–71.
53.
HeisermanNicholasSimpsonBrent. 2017. “Higher Inequality Increases the Gap in the Perceived Merit of the Rich and Poor.”Social Psychology Quarterly80(3):243–53.
54.
HillsThomas T.ProtoEugenioSgroiDanielSeresinheChanuki Illushka. 2019. “Historical Analysis of National Subjective Wellbeing Using Millions of Digitized Books.”Nature Human Behaviour3(12):1271–75.
55.
HochschildJennifer L.1979. “Why the Dog Doesn’t Bark: Income, Attitudes and the Redistribution of Wealth.”Polity11(4):478–511.
56.
HorneChristineJohnsonMonica Kirkpatrick. 2022. “Rationales and Support for Norms in the Context of Covid-19.”Social Psychology Quarterly85(3):237–58.
57.
HoutMichael. 2004. Getting the Most out of the GSS Income Measures. GSS Methodological Report No. 101. NORC, Chicago.
58.
HowlettShayna A.JarvisShoshana N.EversEllen R. K.2021. “Advantage versus Disadvantage Framing Effects on Preferences for Redistributive Policies.”PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/7jwfu/.
59.
HoyChristopherMagerFranziska. 2021. “Why Are Relatively Poor People Not More Supportive of Redistribution? Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment across Ten Countries.”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy13(4):299–328.
60.
HoytCrystal L.BurnetteJeni L.ForsythRachel B.ParryMitchellDeShieldsBrenten H.2021. “Believing in the American Dream Sustains Negative Attitudes toward Those in Poverty.”Social Psychology Quarterly84(3):203–15.
61.
HuddyLeonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.”Political Psychology22(1):127–56.
62.
IyengarShanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
IyengarShantoHahnKyu S.2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.”Journal of Communication59(1):19–39.
64.
JebbAndrew T.TayLouisDienerEdOishiShigehiro. 2018. “Happiness, Income Satiation and Turning Points around the World.” Nature Human Behaviour2(1): 33–38.
65.
JohnstonChristopher D.NewmanBenjamin J.2016. “Economic Inequality and U.S. Public Policy Mood across Space and Time.”American Politics Research44(1): 164–91.
66.
JostJohn T.2019. “A Quarter Century of System Justification Theory: Questions, Answers, Criticisms, and Societal Applications.”British Journal of Social Psychology58(2):263–314.
67.
KahnemanDanielDeatonAngus. 2010. “High Income Improves Evaluation of Life but Not Emotional Well-Being.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences31(4):475–81.
68.
KaneJohn V.VelezYamil R.BarabasJason. 2020. “Analyze the Attentive and Bypass Bias: Mock Vignette Checks in Survey Experiments.” APSA preprint. doi:10.33774/apsa-2020-96t72.
69.
KarneyBenjamin R.2021. “Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships.”Annual Review of Psychology72(1):391–414.
70.
KayAaron C.JostJohn T.2003. “Complementary Justice: Effects of ‘Poor but Happy’ and ‘Poor but Honest’ Stereotype Exemplars on System Justification and Implicit Activation of the Justice Motive.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(5):823–37.
71.
KeelyLouise C.TanChih Ming. 2008. “Understanding Preferences for Income Redistribution.”Journal of Public Economics92(5–6):944–61.
72.
KleresJochen. 2018. “Emotions in the Crisis: Mobilising for Refugees in Germany and Sweden.” Pp. 209–41 in Solidarity Mobilizations in the “Refugee Crisis,” edited by PortaD. della. Basingstoke, UK: Springer International.
73.
KuhnAndreas. 2019. “The Subversive Nature of Inequality: Subjective Inequality Perceptions and Attitudes to Social Inequality.”European Journal of Political Economy59:331–44.
74.
LaneRobert E.1959. “The Fear of Equality.”American Political Science Review53(1): 35–51.
75.
LangsætherPeter EggeEvansGeoffrey. 2020. “More Than Self-Interest: Why Different Classes Have Different Attitudes to Income Inequality.”British Journal of Sociology71(4):594–607.
76.
LinkBruce G.PhelanJo. 1995. “Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Disease.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior35:80–94.
77.
LipsetSeymor Martin. 1992. “Equal Chances and Equal Results.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science9(2):63–74.
78.
LoweryBrian S.ChowRosalind M.CrosbyJennifer Randall. 2009. “Taking from Those That Have More and Giving to Those That Have Less: How Inequity Frames Affect Corrections for Inequity.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45(2): 375–78.
79.
LuhmannMaikeIntelisanoSabrina. 2018. “Hedonic Adaptation and the Set Point for Subjective Well-Being.” Ch. 21 in Handbook of Well-Being, edited by DienerE.OishiS.TayL.Salt Lake City, UT: DEF.
80.
LuttmerErzo F. P.SinghalMonica. 2011. “Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution.”American Economic Journal3(1):157–79.
81.
LyubomirskySonja. 2008. The How of Happiness: A New Approach to Getting the Life You Want. New York: Penguin Books.
82.
MaestriGajaMonfortePierre. 2020. “Who Deserves Compassion? The Moral and Emotional Dilemmas of Volunteering in the ‘Refugee Crisis.’”Sociology54(5): 920–35.
83.
Magni-BertonRaul. 2019. “Is Perceived Equal Opportunity Corrosive for Support for Equal Outcomes? Individual-Based Evidence.”Social Justice Research32(4):403–30.
84.
MalkaArielKrosnickJon A.LangerGary. 2009. “The Association of Knowledge with Concern about Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking.”Risk Analysis29(5):633–47.
85.
McAdamDougSuYang. 2002. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting.”American Sociological Review67(5):696–721.
86.
McCallLeslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
McCallLeslieBurkDerekLaperrièreMarieRichesonJennifer A.2017. “Exposure to Rising Inequality Shapes Americans’ Opportunity Beliefs and Policy Support.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(36):9593–98.
88.
McCallLeslieManzaJeff. 2010. “Class Differences in Attitudes.” Pp. 552–70 in Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, edited by JacobsL.ShapiroRobert. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.001.0001
89.
McCallLesliePercheskiChristine. 2010. “Income Inequality: New Trends and Research Directions.”Annual Review of Sociology36(1):329–47.
90.
McLeodJane D.KesslerRonald C.1990. “Socioeconomic Status Differences in Vulnerability to Undesirable Life Events.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior31(2):162–72.
91.
MeyersEthan A.WalkerAlexander C.FugelsangJonathan A.KoehlerDerek J.2020. “Reducing the Number of Non-naïve Participants in Mechanical Turk Samples.”Methods in Psychology3:100032.
92.
MirowskyJohnRossCatherine E.1986. “Social Pattern of Distress.”Annual Review of Sociology12:23–45.
93.
MirowskyJohnRossCatherine E.2007. “Life Course Trajectories of Perceived Control and Their Relationship to Education.”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1339–82.
94.
MitraAniruddhaBangJames T.BiswasArnab. 2015. “Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is It Equality of Opportunity or Equality of Outcomes?”Feminist Economics21(1):110–35.
95.
MorrisMichael W.LarrickRichard P.Bazer-ManMaxBiolsiKevinCamererColinChengPatriciaGoldstoneRobMckenzieCraigNisbettRichardSmithEdward. 1995. “When One Cause Casts Doubt on Another: A Normative Analysis of Discounting in Causal Attribution.”Psychological Review102(2):331–55.
96.
MutzDiana C.2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
97.
MyrickJessica GallMajorLesa HatleyJankowskiStacie Meihaus. 2014. “The Sources and Frames Used to Tell Stories about Depression and Anxiety: A Content Analysis of 18 Years of National Television News Coverage.”Electronic News8(1): 49–63.
98.
PalanStefanSchitterChristian. 2018. “Prolific.Ac: A Subject Pool for Online Experiments.”Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance17:22–27.
99.
PeerEyalRothschildDavidGordonAndrewEverndenZakDamerEkaterina. 2021. “Data Quality of Platforms and Panels for Online Behavioral Research.”Behavior Research Methods54(4):1643–62.
100.
PetersenMichael BangSznycerDanielCosmidesLedaToobyJohn. 2012. “Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare.”Political Psychology33 (3): 395–418.
101.
PikettyThomas. 1995. “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics.”Quarterly Journal of Economics110(3):551–84.
102.
RoyzmanEdward B.BaronJonathan. 2002. “The Preference for Indirect Harm.”Social Justice Research15(2):165–84.
103.
SaezEmmanuelZucmanGabriel. 2020. “The Rise of Income and Wealth Inequality in America: Evidence from Distributional Macroeconomic Accounts.”Journal of Economic Perspectives34(4):3–26.
104.
SaitoKota. 2013. “Social Preferences under Risk: Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Outcome.”American Economic Review103(7):3084–3101.
105.
SandsMelissa L.2017. “Exposure to Inequality Affects Support for Redistribution.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(4):663–68.
106.
SarisWillemRevillaMelanieKrosnickJon A.ShaefferEric M.2010. “Comparing Questions with Agree/Disagree Response Options to Questions with Item-Specific Response Options.”Survey Research Methods4:61–79.
107.
SchefferMartenvan de LeemputIngridWeinansElsBollenJohan. 2021. “The Rise and Fall of Rationality in Language.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(51): e2107848118.
108.
SchneiderSimone M.CastilloJuan C.2015. “Poverty Attributions and the Perceived Justice of Income Inequality: A Comparison of East and West Germany.”Social Psychology Quarterly78(3):263–82.
109.
SchnittkerJason. 2004. “Education and the Changing Shape of the Income Gradient in Health.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior45(3):286–305.
110.
SchnittkerJason. 2008. “Diagnosing Our National Disease: Trends in Income and Happiness, 1973 to 2004.”Social Psychology Quarterly71(3):257–80.
111.
SeligmanMartin. 2002. Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
112.
ShariffAzim F.WiwadDylanAkninLara B.2016. “Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality: Cross-National and Experimental Evidence.”Perspectives on Psychological Science11(3): 373–80.
113.
ShepherdHana R.StephensNicole M.2010. “Using Culture to Explain Behavior: An Integrative Cultural Approach.”Social Psychology Quarterly73(4):353–57.
114.
ShostakSaraFreeseJeremyLinkBruce G.PhelanJo C.2009. “The Politics of the Gene: Social Status and Beliefs about Genetics for Individual Outcomes.”Social Psychology Quarterly72(1):77–93.
115.
SinNancy L.LyubomirskySonja. 2009. “Enhancing Well-Being and Alleviating Depressive Symptoms with Positive Psychology Interventions: A Practice-Friendly Meta-analysis.”Journal of Clinical Psychology65(5):467–87.
116.
Singh-ManouxArchanaAdlerNancy E.MarmotMichael G.2003. “Subjective Social Status: Its Determinants and Its Association with Measures of Ill-Health in the Whitehall II Study.”Social Science & Medicine56(6):1321–33.
117.
SohlbergJacobEsaiassonPeterMartinssonJohan. 2019. “The Changing Political Impact of Compassion-Evoking Pictures: The Case of the Drowned Toddler Alan Kurdi.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(13):2275–88.
118.
SouleSarah A.KingBrayden G.2008. “Competition and Resource Partitioning in Three Social Movement Industries.”American Journal of Sociology113(6):1568–1610.
119.
StevensonBetseyWolfersJustin. 2013. “Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?”American Economic Review103(3):598–604.
120.
SugdenRobertWangMengjie. 2020. “Equality of Opportunity and the Acceptability of Outcome Inequality.”European Economic Review130:103597.
121.
SznycerDanielSealMaria Florencia LopezSellAaronLimJulianPoratRoniShalviShaulHalperinEranCosmidesLedaToobyJohn. 2017. “Support for Redistribution Is Shaped by Compassion, Envy, and Self-Interest, but Not a Taste for Fairness.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(31):8420–25.
122.
TimbrookJerrySmythJolene D.OlsonKristen. 2021. “Are Self-Description Scales Better Than Agree/Disagree Scales?”International Journal of Market Research63(2):201–15.
123.
van de WeijerMargot P.de VriesLianne P.BartelsMeike. 2022. “Happiness and Well-Being: The Value and Findings from Genetic Studies.” Pp. 295–322 in Twin Research for Everyone. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
124.
VanHeuvelenTomCopasKathy. 2018. “The Intercohort Dynamics of Support for Redistribution in 54 Countries, 1985–2017.”Societies8(3):69.
125.
WeberMax. [1904] 2002. “The Protestant Ethic and the ‘Spirit’ of Capitalism.” Pp. 1–202 in The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings, edited by BaehrP.WellsG. C.New York: Penguin Books.
126.
WeinbergJillFreeseJeremyMcElhattanDavid. 2014. “Comparing Data Characteristics and Results of an Online Factorial Survey between a Population-Based and a Crowdsource-Recruited Sample.”Sociological Science1:292–310.
127.
WettsRachelWillerRobb. 2018. “Privilege on the Precipice: Perceived Racial Status Threats Lead White Americans to Oppose Welfare Programs.”Social Forces97(2):793–822.
128.
WhillansAshley V.DunnElizabeth W.SmeetsPaulBekkersReneNortonMichael I.2017. “Buying Time Promotes Happiness.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(32):8523–27.
129.
XieWenwenHoBenjaminMeierStephanZhouXinyue. 2017. “Rank Reversal Aversion Inhibits Redistribution across Societies.”Nature Human Behaviour1(8):1–5.
130.
ZhangYuanJinYanStewartSeanPorterJeannette. 2016. “Framing Responsibility for Depression: How U.S. News Media Attribute Causal and Problem-Solving Responsibilities When Covering a Major Public Health Problem.”Journal of Applied Communication Research44(2):118–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
