Two experiments examined how the ways in which people mentally represent their personal networks affect perceptions of social support. Social support research often uses “name generators” in which individuals are asked to choose how many people they receive support from, resulting in cognitive networks that confound size and density. Taking a fixed size approach, Study 1 showed that the density of chronically activated networks predicted perceived support in both emotional and informational domains. Study 2 assigned participants to think of a dense or sparse personal network of equal size to test whether experimentally manipulated density can influence perceived support. Results indicated that thinking of a dense (vs. sparse) network led to higher perceived support, which in turn promoted more confidence in coping with life stressors. Collectively, these studies highlight how moment-to-moment changes in cognitive networks can influence social resources and explicate key psychological mechanisms tied to cognitive social structures.
AcockAlan C.HurlbertJeanne S.1993. “Social Networks, Marital Status, and Well-Being.” Social Networks15(3):309–34.
2.
BarreraManuel. 1986. “Distinctions between Social Support Concepts, Measures, and Models.” American Journal of Community Psychology14(4):413–45.
3.
BayerJoseph B.HofstraBas. 2020. “Toward Curation and Personality-Driven Social Networks.” Nature Human Behaviour4:123–25.
4.
BayerJoseph B.LewisNeil A.StahlJonathan L.2020. “Who Comes to Mind? Dynamic Construction of Social Networks.” Current Directions in Psychological Science29(3):279–85.
5.
BayerJoseph B.O’DonnellMatthew B.CascioChristopher N.FalkEmily B.2018. “Brain Sensitivity to Exclusion Is Associated with Core Network Closure.” Scientific Reports8(1):16037. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33624-3.
6.
BerkmanLisa F.SymeS. Leonard. 1979. “Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality: A Nine-Year Follow-Up Study of Alameda County Residents.” American Journal of Epidemiology109(2):186–204.
7.
BorgattiStephen P.CarleyKathleen M.KrackhardtDavid. 2006. “On the Robustness of Centrality Measures under Conditions of Imperfect Data.” Social Networks28(2):124–36.
8.
BrandsRaina A.2013. “Cognitive Social Structures in Social Network Research: A Review.” Journal of Organizational Behavior34:S82–103.
9.
BrueningMegBrennhoferStephanievan WoerdenIreneToddMichaelLaskaMelissa. 2016. “Factors Related to the High Rates of Food Insecurity among Diverse, Urban College Freshmen.” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics116(9):1450–57.
10.
BurtRonald S.KilduffMartinTasselliStefano. 2013. “Social Network Analysis: Foundations and Frontiers on Advantage.” Annual Review of Psychology64:527–47.
11.
ChengYingMengJingboLiuShuangqing. 2018. “Personal Network Structure and Perceived Social Support in the Contexts of Intercultural Adjustment.” Communication Quarterly66(5):576–94.
12.
CobbSidney. 1976. “Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress.” Psychosomatic Medicine38(5):300–14.
13.
CohenSheldonJanicki-DevertsDenise. 2009. “Can We Improve Our Physical Health by Altering Our Social Networks?”Perspectives on Psychological Science4(4):375–78.
14.
CohenSheldonWillsThomas A.1985. “Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin98(2):310–57.
15.
CollinsNancy L.FeeneyBrooke C.2004. “Working Models of Attachment Shape Perceptions of Social Support: Evidence from Experimental and Observational Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(3):363–83.
16.
CornwellBenjaminLaumannEdward O.SchummL. Philip. 2008. “The Social Connectedness of Older Adults: A National Profile.” American Sociological Review73(2):185–203.
17.
CutronaCarolyn, E.RussellDaniel W.1987. “The Provisions of Social Relationships and Adaptation to Stress.” Pp. 37-67 in Advances in Personal Relationships, edited by JonesW. H.PerlmanD.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
EllemersNaomiSpearsRussellDoosjeBertjan. 2002. “Self and Social Identity.” Annual Review of Psychology53(1):161–86.
19.
FeeneyBrooke C.2004. “A Secure Base: Responsive Support of Goal Strivings and Exploration in Adult Intimate Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(5):631–48.
20.
FreemanLinton C.1978–79. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks1(3):215–39.
21.
GranovetterMark. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory1:201–33.
22.
HaberMason G.CohenJay L.LucasToddBaltesBoris B.2007. “The Relationship between Self-Reported Received and Perceived Social Support: A Meta-analytic Review.” American Journal of Community Psychology39(1):133–44.
23.
HayesAndrew F.2012. “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling.”http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
24.
HouseJames S.LandisKarl R.UmbersonDebra. 1988. “Social Relationships and Health.” Science241:540–45.
25.
IgarashiTasukuKashimaYoshihisa. 2011. “Perceived Entitativity of Social Networks.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47(6):1048–58.
26.
IsraelBarbara A.AntonucciToni C.1987. “Social Network Characteristics and Psychological Well-Being: A Replication and Extension.” Health Education Quarterly14(4):461–81.
27.
KadushinCharles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks: Concepts, Theories, and Findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
KogovšekTinaHlebecValentina. 2005. “Effects of Limitation of Number of Alters and Time Frame in the Burt Name Generator.” Metodoloski Zvezki2(1):59–71.
29.
KrackhardtDavid. “Cognitive Social Structures.”1987. Social Networks9(2):109–34.
30.
LakeyBrianCassadyPatricia B.1990. “Cognitive Processes in Perceived Social Support.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(2):337–43.
31.
LakeyBrianOrehekEdward. 2011. “Relational Regulation Theory: A New Approach to Explain the Link between Perceived Social Support and Mental Health.” Psychological Review118:482–95.
32.
LeeDavid S.YbarraOscar. 2017. “Cultivating Effective Social Support through Abstraction: Reframing Social Support Promotes Goal-Pursuit.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin43(4):453–64.
33.
LeeDavid S.YbarraOscarGonzalezRichardEllsworthPhoebe. 2018. “I-through-We: How Supportive Social Relationships Facilitate Personal Growth.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(1):37–48.
34.
LeeSeungyoonChungJae EunParkNamkee. 2018. “Network Environments and Well-Being: An Examination of Personal Network Structure, Social Capital, and Perceived Social Support.” Health Communication33(1):22–31.
35.
LinNan. 1999. “Social Networks and Status Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology25(1):467–87.
36.
LinNanYeXiaolanEnselWalter M.1999. “Social Support and Depressed Mood: A Structural Analysis.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior40(4):344–59.
37.
LiuGuimeiWongLimsoonChuaHon Nian. 2009. “Complex Discovery from Weighted PPI Networks.” Bioinformatics25(15):1891–97.
38.
LunJanettaRothDanaOishiShigehiroKesebirSelin. 2013. “Residential Mobility, Social Support Concerns, and Friendship Strategy.” Social Psychological and Personality Science4(3):332–39.
39.
MaiselNatalya C.GableShelly L.2009. “The Paradox of Received Social Support: The Importance of Responsiveness.” Psychological Science20(8):928–32.
40.
MarcumChristopher S.LienertJeffreyGoldringMeganLinJieluMigginsAliciaMossMelissaSongSummiThakurHenaKoehlyLaura M.2017. “Ego-Centered Cognitive Social Structures of Close Personal Networks in the United States.” SocArXiv doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/4UGK6
41.
MarigoldDenise C.HolmesJohn G.RossMichael. 2007. “More Than Words: Reframing Compliments from Romantic Partners Fosters Security in Low Self-Esteem Individuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology92(2):232–48.
42.
MarinAlexandraHamptonKeith N.2007. “Simplifying the Personal Network Name Generator: Alternatives to Traditional Multiple and Single Name Generators.” Field Methods19(2):163–93.
43.
Maya-JariegoIsidro. 2018. “Why Name Generators with a Fixed Number of AltersMay Be a Pragmatic Option for Personal Network Analysis.” American Journal of Community Psychology62(1):233–38.
44.
McNeishDanielStapletonLaura M.SilvermanRebecca D.2017. “On the Unnecessary Ubiquity of Hierarchical Linear Modeling.” Psychological Methods22(1):114–40.
45.
MengJingboMinwoongChungCoxJeffrey. 2016. “Linking Network Structure to Support Messages: Effects of Brokerage and Closure on Received Social Support.” Journal of Communication66(6):982–1006.
46.
MenonTanyaSmithEdward Bishop. 2014. “Identities in Flux: Cognitive Network Activation in Times of Change.” Social Science Research45:117–30.
47.
PachuckiMark C.OzerEmily J.BarratAlainCattutoCiro. 2015. “Mental Health and Social Networks in Early Adolescence: A Dynamic Study of Objectively-Measured Social Interaction Behaviors.” Social Science & Medicine125:40–50.
48.
PaolacciGabrieleChandlerJesse. 2014. “Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool.” Current Directions in Psychological Science23(3):184–88.
49.
PerryBrea L.PescosolidoBernice A.2010. “Functional Specificity in Discussion Networks: The Influence of General and Problem-Specific Networks on Health Outcomes.” Social Networks32(4):345–57.
50.
SchwarzNorbert. 1999. “Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers.” American Psychologist54(2):93–105.
51.
SekaraVedranLehmannSune. 2014. “The Strength of Friendship Ties in Proximity Sensor Data.” PloS One9(7):e100915.
52.
SheaCatherine T.MenonTanyaSmithEdward B.EmichKyle. 2015. “The Affective Antecedents of Cognitive Social Network Activation.” Social Networks43:91–99.
53.
SmallMario LuisPamphileVontrese DeedsMcMahanPeter. 2015. “How Stable Is the Core Discussion Network?”Social Networks40:90–102.
54.
SmithEdward BishopMenonTanyaThompsonLeigh. 2012. “Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks.” Organization Science23(1):67–82.
55.
SongLijunLinNan. 2009. “Social Capital and Health Inequality: Evidence from Taiwan.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior50(2):149–63.
56.
SprecherSusan. 1988. “Investment Model, Equity, and Social Support Determinants of Relationship Commitment.” Social Psychology Quarterly51(4):318–28.
57.
StokesJoseph P.1983. “Predicting Satisfaction with Social Support from Social Network Structure.” American Journal of Community Psychology11(2):141–52.
58.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C.1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Pp. 33–47 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by AustinW. G.WorchelS.Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
59.
ThoitsPeggy A.1982. “Conceptual, Methodological and Theoretical Problems in Studying Social Support as a Buffer against Life Stress.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior23:145-59.
60.
ThoitsPeggy A.1995. “Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where Are We? What Next?”Journal of Health and Social Behavior (extra issue):53–79.
61.
ThoitsPeggy A.2011. “Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior52(2):145–61.
62.
TrieuPennyBayerJoseph B.EllisonNicole B.SchoenebeckSaritaFalkEmily. 2019. “Who Likes to Be Reachable? Availability Preferences, Weak Ties, and Bridging Social Capital.” Information, Communication & Society22(8):1096–111.
63.
TurnerJohn C.1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
64.
ValenteThomas W.CorongesKathryn A.StevensGregory D.CousineauMichael R.2008. “Collaboration and Competition in a Children’s Health Initiative Coalition: A Network Analysis.” Evaluation and Program Planning31(4):392–402.
65.
WalkerMark H.2015. “The Contingent Value of Embeddedness: Self-Affirming Social Environments, Network Density, and Well-Being.” Society and Mental Health5(2):128–44.
66.
ZhuXiumeiWooSang EunPorterCaitlinBrzezinskiMichael. 2013. “Pathways to Happiness: From Personality to Social Networks and Perceived Support.” Social Networks35(3):382–93.
