Split-ballot data are often used to study double standards. The key problem of this design is that individual double standards cannot be identified. I propose a simple two-step approach based on a matching pre-processing of the data to estimate individual double standards. Once this preliminary first step is completed, any statistical technique (e.g., regression models) can be applied on the new data. I apply the method to gender double standards on attitudes toward the age one leaves home by using data from the third round of the European Social Survey. The proposed method simplifies regression analyses of the effects of covariates on double standards and offers new opportunities for research on double standards.
AassveArnsteinArpinoBrunoBillariFrancesco C.2013. “Age Norms on Leaving Home: Multilevel Evidence from the European Social Survey.”Environment and Planning A45:383–401.
ArpinoBrunoAassveArnstein. 2013. “Estimating the Causal Effect of Fertility on Economic Wellbeing: Data Requirements, Identifying Assumptions and Estimation Methods.”Empirical Economics44:355–85.
4.
ArpinoBrunoCannasMassimo. 2016. “Propensity Score Matching with Clustered Data. An Application to the Estimation of the Impact of Caesarean Section on the Apgar Score.”Statistics in Medicine35:2074–91.
5.
CrawfordMaryPoppDanielle. 2003. “Sexual Double Standards: A Review and Methodological Critique of Two Decades of Research.”Journal of Sex Research40:13–26.
6.
DrakeChristiana. 1993. “Effects of Misspecification of the Propensity Score on Estimators of Treatment Effect.”Biometrics49:1231–36.
7.
FoschiMartha. 1996. “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women.”Social Psychology Quarterly59:237–54.
8.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2009. “CEM: Software for Coarsened Exact Matching.”Journal of Statistical Software30:1–27.
9.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2011. “Multivariate Matching Methods that are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding.”Journal of the American Statistical Association106:345–61.
10.
ImbensGuido W.RubinDonald B.2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LiaoPei-AnChangHung-HaoWangJiun-HaoHorngTai-Hsiung. 2013. “Do Rural Students Really Perform Worse Than Urban Students Do? Empirical Evidence from a University Entrance Program in Taiwan.”Rural Sociology78:109–31.
13.
ReidJulie A.ElliottSinikkaWebberGretchen R.2011. “Casual Hookups to Formal Dates Refining the Boundaries of the Sexual Double Standard.”Gender & Society25:545–68.
14.
ReissIra L.1964. “The Scaling of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness.”Journal of Marriage and the Family26:188–98.
15.
RijkenArieke J.MerzEva-Maria. 2014. “Double Standards: Differences in Norms on Voluntary Childlessness for Men and Women.”European Sociological Review30:470–82.
16.
SnidermanPaul M.GrobDouglas B.1996. “Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys.”Annual Review of Sociology22:377–99.
17.
ThompsonDoug. 2014. “Comparing Regression, Propensity Matching and Coarsened Exact Matching in Healthcare Observational Studies Using SAS: An Example from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).”Presented at MWSUG 2014 Conference, Chicago, IL.
