In recent years, populism has attracted a lot of scholarly attention. In this article, I investigate the relationship between structural and subjective dimensions of social isolation and populist attitudes. In particular, I account for individuals’ emotional responses to social isolation that link social isolation to populist attitudes. Analyses based on original survey data show that both forms of social isolation are positively related to populist attitudes in six European countries. More importantly, mediation analyses reveal that in line with the proposed mediation argument, anger correlated both with isolation and populist attitudes. By offering a comparative test of the relationship between social isolation and populist attitudes and the mediating role of anger, I advance the understanding of how social isolation in a globalized world relates to populist attitudes. In this vein, the study underpins that emotional reactions to social changes are particularly important in understanding how these social changes affect political attitudes.
Abou-ChadiT.KurerT. (2021). Economic risk within the household and voting for the radical right. World Politics, 73(3), 482–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000046
2.
AbtsK.RogenhoferJ. (2024). Three-pronged ressentiment: How status insecurity, relative deprivation, and powerlessness mediate between social positions and populist attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test. Part 3” (Online first).
3.
AkkermanA.MuddeC.ZasloveA. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
4.
ArendtH. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace & Company.
5.
BoletD. (2021). Drinking alone: Local socio-cultural degradation and radical right support—The case of British pub closures. Comparative Political Studies, 54(9), 1653–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997158
6.
Castanho SilvaB.AndreadisI.AnduizaE.BlanusaN.CortiY. M.DelfinoG.RicoG.RuthS. P.SpruytB.SteenbergenM.LittvayL. (2018). Public opinion surveys: A new measure. In HawkinsK. A.CarlinR. E.LittvayL.KaltwasserC. R. (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (pp. 150–178). Routledge.
7.
Castanho SilvaB.JungkunzS.HelblingM.LittvayL. (2020). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176
8.
d’HombresB.BarjakováM.SchnepfS. V. (2021). Loneliness and social isolation: An unequally shared burden in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper Series14245, 23.
9.
ErisenC. (2024). Emotional predictors of populism in the case of Turkey. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test.” Part 3 (Online first).
10.
FilsingerM. (2022). Populism as a problem of social disintegration? A comparative analysis of the socio-integrational underpinnings of populism in Europe [PhD Thesis. Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences; Institute of Political Science; University of Bern]. https://boristheses.unibe.ch/4133/
11.
FilsingerM. (2023). Perceived exclusionary disadvantages and populist attitudes: Evidence from comparative and longitudinal survey data in six European countries. Political Research Quarterly, 76(3), 1043–1057.
12.
FilsingerM.HofstetterN.FreitagM. (2023). The emotional fabric of populism during a public health crisis: How anger shapes the relationship between pandemic threat and populist attitudes. European Political Science Review, 15(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000036
13.
FreitagM.BühlmannM. (2009). Crafting trust. The role of political institutions in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1537–1566.
14.
GestJ. (2016). The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford University Press.
15.
GestJ.RenyT.MayerJ. (2018). Roots of the radical right: Nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1694–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720705
16.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2020). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879947
HawkinsK. A.Rovira KaltwasserC. (2018). Introduction: The ideational approach. In HawkinsK. A.CarlinR. E.LittvayL.KaltwasserC. R. (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
19.
HicksR.TingleyD. (2011). Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal, 11(4), 605–619.
20.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761
21.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD.YamamotoT. (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000414
22.
ImaiK.KeeleL.YamamotoT. (2010). Identification, inference, and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science, 25(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS321
23.
KornhauserW. (1959). The politics of mass society. Free Press.
24.
KriesiH.GrandeE.DolezalM.HelblingM.HöglingerD.HutterS.WüestB. (Eds.) (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
25.
KüntzlerT.HöflingT. T. A.AlpersG. W. (2021). Automatic facial expression recognition in standardized and non-standardized emotional expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 627561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627561
26.
KurerT. (2020). The declining middle: Occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10–11), 1798–1835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912283
LindholmA.LutzG.GreenE. G. T. (2024). Life dissatisfaction and the right-wing populist vote. Evidence from the European Social Survey. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test.” Part 2 (Online first).
29.
LytkinaE.ReeskensT. (2024). A rally effect or a populist response? How concerns about COVID-19 and emotional responses relate to institutional trust and populist right-wing party support. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test.” Part 1 (Online first).
30.
MacKuenM.WolakJ.KeeleL.MarcusG. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
31.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.
32.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. B. (2017). Measuring emotional response: Comparing alternative approaches to measurement. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(4), 733–754. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.65
33.
MarcusG. E.ValentinoN. A.VasilopoulosP.FoucaultM. (2019). Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571
34.
MohrenbergS.HuberR. A.FreyburgT. (2021). Love at first sight? Populist attitudes and support for direct democracy. Party Politics, 27(3), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819868908
35.
MuddeC. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
36.
MuddeC.Rovira KaltwasserC. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490
37.
NorrisP.InglehartR. F. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, brexit, and authoritarian populism (Vol. 17). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
38.
PerlmanD.PeplauL. A. (1984). Loneliness research: A survey of empirical findings. In PeplauL. A.GoldstonS. E. (Eds.), Preventing the harmful consequences of severe and persistent loneliness. (pp. 13–46). National Institute of Mental Health.
39.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
40.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
41.
Rhodes-PurdyM.NavarreR.UtychS. M. (2021). Populist psychology: economics, culture, and emotions. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1559–1572. https://doi.org/10.1086/715168
42.
RicoG. (2024). Ideological identification, threat type, and differences in how anger and fear relate to anti-immigrant and populist attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test.” Part 3 (Online first).
43.
RicoG.AnduizaE. (2019). Economic correlates of populist attitudes: An analysis of nine european countries in the aftermath of the great recession. Acta Politica, 54, 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0068-7
44.
RicoG.GuinjoanM.AnduizaE. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261
45.
RydgrenJ. (2009). Social isolation? Social capital and radical right-wing voting in Western Europe. Journal of Civil Society, 5(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680903154915
46.
SalmelaM.von ScheveC. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419
47.
SpieringsN.ZasloveA. (2017). Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: Explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties. West European Politics, 40(4), 821–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1287448
48.
SpruytB.KeppensG.van DroogenbroeckF. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138
49.
SteenbergenM.EllisC. (2006). Fear and loathing in American elections: Context, traits and negative candidate affect. In RedlawskD. (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 109–133). Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
The American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. AAPOR.
51.
van HauwaertS. M.SchimpfC. H.AzevedoF. (2020). The measurement of populist attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory. Politics, 40(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719859306
52.
VanhoutteB.HoogheM. (2012). The influence of social structure, networks and community on party choice in the Flemish region of Belgium: A multilevel analysis. Acta Politica, 48(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.28
53.
VasilopoulosP.MarcusG. E.FoucaultM. (2018). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39(3), 557–575.https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12439
54.
VasilopoulosP.MarcusG. E.ValentinoN. A.FoucaultM. (2019). Fear, anger, and voting for the far right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks. Political Psychology, 40(4), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12513
55.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
56.
WuttkeA.SchimpfC.SchoenH. (2020). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multi-dimensional constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
