Research has found that prejudiced people avoid friendships with members of ethnic outgroups. Results of this study suggest that this effect is mediated by a social network process. Longitudinal network analysis of a three-wave panel study of 12- to 13-year-olds (N = 453) found that more prejudiced majority group members formed fewer intergroup friendships than less prejudiced majority group members. This was caused indirectly by the preference to become friends of one’s friends’ friends (triadic closure). More prejudiced majority members did not have a preference for actively avoiding minority group members. Rather, they had the tendency to avoid friends who already had minority group friends and thus could not be introduced to potential minority group friends. Instead they became friends with the majority group friends of their friends. This research shows how a social networks perspective can further our understanding of the processes underlying intergroup contact.
AllportGordon W.1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A.1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51:1173–82.
3.
BinderJensZagefkaHannaBrownRupertFunkeFriederichKesslerThomasMummendeyAmelieMaquilAnnemieDemoulinStephanieLeyensJacques-Philippe. 2009. “Does Contact Reduce Prejudice or Does Prejudice Reduce Contact? A Longitudinal Test of the Contact Hypothesis among Majority and Minority Groups in Three European Countries.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96:843–56.
4.
BrownRupertEllerAnjaLeedsSarahStaceKim. 2007. “Intergroup Contact and Intergroup Attitudes: A Longitudinal Study.” European Journal of Social Psychology37:692–703.
5.
BrownRupertHewstoneMiles. 2005. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Contact.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37:255–343.
6.
CartwrightDorwinHararyFrank. 1956. “Structural Balance—a Generalization of Heider Theory.” Psychological Review63:277–93.
7.
ChristOliverWagnerUlrich. 2013. “Methodological Issues in the Study of Intergroup Contact: Towards a New Wave of Research.” Pp. 233–61 in Advances in Intergroup Contact, edited by HodsonG.HewstoneM.London: Psychology Press.
8.
DaviesKristinTroppLinda R.AronArthurPettigrewThomas F.WrightStephen C.2011. “Cross-Group Friendships and Intergroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review15:332–51.
9.
DavisJames A.1963. “Structural Balance, Mechanical Solidarity, and Interpersonal Relations.” American Journal of Sociology68:444–62.
10.
DovidioJohn F.EllerAnjaHewstoneMiles. 2011. “Improving Intergroup Relations through Direct, Extended and Other Forms of Indirect Contact.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14:147–60.
11.
EllerAnjaAbramsDominic. 2003. “‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Effects of Language School-Promoted Contact on Intergroup Bias.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6:55–75.
12.
FeddesAllard R.NoackPeterRutlandAdam. 2009. “Direct and Extended Friendship Effects on Minority and Majority Children’s Interethnic Attitudes: A Longitudinal Study.” Child Development80:377–90.
13.
GoodreauSteven M.KittsJames A.MorrisMartina. 2009. “Birds of a Feather, or Friend of a Friend? Using Statistical Network Analysis to Investigate Adolescent Social Networks.” Demography45:103–25.
14.
HeiderFritz. 1946. “Attitudes and Cognitive Organization.” Journal of Psychology21:107–12.
15.
HeiderFritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
16.
HewstoneMilesSwartHermann. 2011. “Fifty-Odd Years of Inter-Group Contact: From Hypothesis to Integrated Theory.” British Journal of Social Psychology50:374–86.
17.
HodsonGordon. 2011. “Do Ideologically Intolerant People Benefit from Intergroup Contact?”Current Directions in Psychological Science20:154–59.
18.
HuismanMarkSteglichChristian E.G.2008. “Treatment of Non-Response in Longitudinal Network Studies.” Social Networks30:297–308.
19.
LevinShanavan LaarColetteSidaniusJim. 2003. “The Effects of Ingroup and Outgroup Friendships on Ethnic Attitudes in College: A Longitudinal Study.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6:76–92.
20.
MaliepaardMiekePhaletKaren. 2012. “Religious Identity Expression among Dutch Muslims: The Role of Minority and Majority Group Contact.” Social Psychology Quarterly75:131–48.
21.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
22.
MunniksmaAnkeStarkTobias H.VerkuytenMaykelFlacheAndreasVeenstraD. Rene. 2013. “Extended Intergroup Friendships within Social Settings: The Moderating Role of Initial Outgroup Attitudes.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations16:752–70.
23.
PaluckElizabeth L.GreenDonald P.2009. “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology60:339–67.
24.
PettigrewThomas F.2008. “Future Directions for Intergroup Contact Theory and Research.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations32:187–99.
25.
PettigrewThomas F.ChristO.WagnerU.StellmacherJ.2007. “Direct and Indirect Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice: A Normative Interpretation.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations31:411–25.
26.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90:751–83.
27.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.WagnerUlrichChristOliver. 2011. “Recent Advances in Intergroup Contact Theory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations35:271–80.
28.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F.2004. “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers36:717–31.
29.
RipleyRuth M.SnijdersTom A. B.PreciadoPaulina. 2011. Manual for Siena Version 4.0 (Version August 27, 2013). Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/.
30.
RutlandAdamBrownRupert J.CameronLindseyAhmavaaraAnniArnoldKatieSamsonJenni. 2007. “Development of the Positive-Negative Asymmetry Effect: In-Group Exclusion Norm as a Mediator of Children’s Evaluations on Negative Attributes.” European Journal of Social Psychology37:171–90.
31.
SchaeferDavid R.KornienkoOlgaFoxAndrew M.2011. “Misery Does Not Love Company: Network Selection Mechanisms and Depression Homophily.” American Sociological Review76:764–85.
32.
SchmidKatharinaHewstoneMilesKüpperBeateZickAndreasWagnerUlrich. 2012. “Secondary Transfer Effects of Intergroup Contact: A Cross-National Comparison in Europe.” Social Psychology Quarterly75:28–51.
33.
SidaniusJimLevinShanaVan LaarColetteSearsDavid O.2008. The Diversity Challenge: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations on the College Campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
SnijdersTom A. B.Van de BuntGerhard G.SteglichChristian E. G.2010. “Introduction to Stochastic Actor-Based Models for Network Dynamics.” Social Networks32:44–60.
35.
StarkTobias H.FlacheAndreas. 2012. “The Double Edge of Common Interest: Ethnic Segregation as an Unintended Byproduct of Opinion Homophily.” Sociology of Education85:179–99.
36.
SteglichChristian E. G.SnijdersTom A. B.PearsonMichael. 2010. “Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence.” Sociological Methodology40:329–93.
37.
SwartHermannHewstoneMilesChristOliverVociAlberto. 2011. “Affective Mediators of Intergroup Contact: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in South Africa.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101:1221–38.
38.
Van ZalkMaarten H. W.KerrMargaretVan ZalkNejraStattinHakan. 2013. “Xenophobia and Tolerance toward Immigrants in Adolescence: Cross-Influence Processes within Friendships.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology41:627–39.
39.
VermeijLotteVan DuijnMarijtje A. J.BaerveldtChris. 2009. “Ethnic Segregation in Context: Social Discrimination among Native Dutch Pupils and Their Ethnic Minority Classmates.” Social Networks31:230–39.
40.
VervoortMiranda H. M.ScholteRon H. J.ScheepersPeer L. H.2011. “Ethnic Composition of School Classes, Majority-Minority Friendships, and Adolescents’ Intergroup Attitudes in the Netherlands.” Journal of Adolescence34:257–67.
41.
VezzaliLorisGiovanniniDinoCapozzaDora. 2010. “Longitudinal Effects of Contact on Intergroup Relations: The Role of Majority and Minority Group Membership and Intergroup Emotions.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology20:462–79.
42.
VorauerJacquie D.2006. “An Information Search Model of Evaluative Concerns in Intergroup Interaction.” Psychological Review113:862–86.
43.
VorauerJacquie D.2013. “Getting Past the Self: Understanding and Removing Evaluative Concerns as an Obstacle to Positive Intergroup Contact Effects.” Pp. 23–48 in Advances in Intergroup Contact, edited by HodsonG.HewstoneM.London: Psychology Press.
44.
VorauerJacquie D.SakamotoYumiko. 2006. “I Thought We Could Be Friends, but . . . Systematic Miscommunication and Defensive Distancing as Obstacles to Cross-Group Friendship Formation.” Psychological Science17:326–31.
45.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: University Press.
46.
WestabyJ. D.PfaffD. L.ReddingN.2014. “Psychology and Social Networks a Dynamic Network Theory Perspective.” American Psychologist69:269–84.
47.
WimmerAndreasLewisKevin. 2010. “Below and Beyond Racial Homophily. Erg Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook.” American Journal of Sociology116:583–642.
48.
WrightStephen C.AronArthurMcLaughlin-VolpeTracyRoppStacy A.1997. “The Extended Contact Effect: Knowledge of Cross-Group Friendships and Prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73:73–90.
49.
WölferRalfFaberNadira S.HewstoneMiles. 2015. “Social Network Analysis in the Science of Groups: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Applications for Studying Intra- and Intergroup Behavior.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice19:45–61.
50.
ZhaoXinshuLunchJohn G.Jr.ChenQimei. 2010. “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Research37:197–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
