Can an exploration of managers’ real-time organizational talk make way for a profoundly revised theory of reflexivity? Indeed, our analysis of the reflexivity literature reveals four significant points of contestation – the subject/object distinction, temporality, representation and agency – all of which revolve around the interplay of an ‘I’ (at least one reflexive agent) and an ‘it’ (something to be reflexive about). The focus of this inquiry lies in how the ‘I’ and the ‘it’ are constituted communicatively and what generates, sustains and animates them in interaction. Such interactions are sourced from a post-experience master programme for practising managers, thus providing naturally occurring data amendable to a ventriloquial analysis. We identify and demonstrate three types of reflexive moments: conflating, bifurcating and animating. We subsequently theorize these as instances of ventriloquial reflexivity, using the terms conflating, bifurcating and animating to express the different moments in which speakers co-orient to the communicative constitution of the ‘I’ and the ‘it’. Ventriloquial reflexivity allows us to explore reflexivity as an interactional and situated accomplishment, thus further pointing to how reflexive practices can be understood and enhanced.
AdriansenHKKnudsenH (2013) Two ways to support reflexivity: Teaching managers to fulfil an undefined role. Teaching Public Administration31(1): 108–123.
2.
AlvessonM (1997) Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. The Leadership Quarterly7(4): 455–485.
3.
AlvessonMHardyCHarleyB (2008) Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies45(3): 480–501.
4.
AntonacopoulouEP (2005) Working life learning: Learning-in-practise. In: AntonacopoulouEPJarvisPAndersenV, et al. (eds) Learning, Working and Living: Mapping the Terrain of Working Life Learning. London: Palgrave, 234–254.
5.
ArcherM (2007) Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. CambridgeCambridge University Press.
6.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
BargeJK (2004) Reflexivity and managerial practice. Communication Monographs71(1): 70–96.
8.
BestKHindmarshJ (2019) Embodied spatial practices and everyday organization: The work of tour guides and their audiences. Human Relations72(2): 248–271.
9.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Polity Press.
10.
BoivinGBrummansBHJMBarkerJR (2017) The institutionalization of CCO scholarship: Trends from 2000 to 2015. Management Communication Quarterly31(3): 331–355.
11.
BoudDCresseyPDochertyP (2006) Productive Reflection at Work: Learning for Changing Organizations. London: Routledge.
12.
BucholtzM (2001) Reflexivity and critique in discourse analysis. Critique of Anthropology21(2): 165–183.
13.
CastorTRCoorenF (2006) Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly19(4): 570–600.
14.
CliftonJ (2017) Leaders as ventriloquists. Leader identity and influencing the communicative construction of the organisation. Leadership13(3): 301–319.
15.
CliftonJFachinFCoorenF (2021) How artefacts do leadership: A ventriloquial analysis. Management Communication Quarterly35(2): 256–280.
16.
CollinsCSStocktonCM (2018) The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods17(1): 1–10.
17.
CoorenF (2004) Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization11(3): 373–393.
18.
CoorenF (2006) The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In: CoorenFTaylorJRVan EveryEJ (eds) Communication as Organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Explorations in the Dynamic of Text and Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 81–100.
19.
CoorenF (2009) The haunting question of textual agency: Derrida and Garfinkel on iterability and eventfulness. Research on Language and Social Interaction42(1): 42–67.
20.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
21.
CoorenF (2012) Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication62(1): 1–20.
22.
CoorenF (2015) Studying agency from a ventriloqual perspective. Management Communication Quarterly29(3): 475–480.
23.
CoorenF (2016) Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility. Atlantic Journal of Communication24(1): 17–30.
CoorenFFairhurstGT (2008) Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In: PutnamLLNicoteraAM (eds) Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. New York: Routledge, 117–152.
26.
CoorenFThompsonFCanestraroD, et al. (2006) From agency to structure: Analysis of an episode in a facilitation process. Human Relations59(4): 533–565.
27.
CoorenFKuhnTCornelissenJP, et al. (2011) Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies32(9): 1149–1170.
CotterRJCullenJG (2012) Reflexive management learning: An integrative review and a conceptual typology. Human Resource Development Review11(2): 227–253.
30.
CunliffeAL (2002) Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning33(1): 35–61.
31.
CunliffeAL (2003) Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations56(8): 983–1003.
32.
CunliffeAL (2004) On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education28(4): 407–426.
33.
CunliffeALEasterby-SmithM (2004) From reflection to practical reflexivity: Experiential learning as lived experience. In: ReynoldsMVinceR (eds) Organizing Reflection. London: Taylor & Francis, 30–46.
34.
CunliffeALJunJS (2005) The need for reflexivity in public administration. Administration & Society37(2): 225–242.
35.
DrathWHMcCauleyCDPalusCJ, et al. (2008) Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly19(6): 635–653.
36.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
GemignaniM (2017) Toward a critical reflexivity in qualitative inquiry: Relational and posthumanist reflections on realism, researcher’s centrality, and representationalism in reflexivity. Qualitative Psychology4(2): 185–198.
38.
GiddensA (1991) The Consequences of Modernity. CambridgePolity Press.
39.
GoodwinC (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics32(10): 1489–1522.
HackingI (2004) Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society33(3): 277–302.
43.
HeathCLuffP (2012) Embodied action and organizational activity. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 281–307.
44.
HibbertP (2013) Approaching reflexivity through reflection: Issues for critical management education. Journal of Management Education37(6): 803–827.
45.
HibbertPMacintoshRCouplandC (2010) Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal5(1): 47–62.
46.
JohnsonPDuberleyJ (2003) Reflexivity in management research. Journal of Management Studies40(5): 1279–1303.
47.
KnoblauchH (2005) Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung6(3): 1–12.
48.
KnudsenM (2016) Media for reflection: A comparison of renaissance mirrors for princes and contemporary management education. Management Learning47(3): 305–323.
49.
KuhnTAshcraftKLCoorenF (2017) The Work of Communication: Relational Perspectives on Working and Organizing in Contemporary Capitalism. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
50.
KuhnTJacksonMH (2008) Accomplishing knowledge: A framework for investigating knowing in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly 21(4): 454–485.
51.
LatourB (1984) The powers of association. The Sociological Review32(1): 264–280.
52.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
LlewellynN (2010) On the reflexivity between setting and practice: The “recruitment interview.” In: LlewellynNHindmarshJ (eds) Organisation, Interaction and Practice: Studies of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–74.
54.
LongZSelzer KingABuzzanellPM (2018) Ventriloqual voicings of parenthood in graduate school: An intersectionality analysis of work-life negotiations. Journal of Applied Communication Research46(2): 223–242.
55.
LynchM (2000) Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society17(3): 26–54.
56.
LynchMPeyrotM (1992) Introduction: A reader’s guide to ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology15(2): 113–122.
57.
MacbethD (2001) On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry7(1): 35–68.
58.
MeierFCarrollB (2020) Making up leaders: Reconfiguring the executive student through profiling, text and interaction in a leadership development programme. Human Relations73(9): 1226–1248.
59.
MengisJHohmannK (2014) Temporal work in coordination: Co-orienting around a fleeting object of concern. In: CoorenFVaaraELangleyA, et al. (eds) Language and Communication At Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing. London: Oxford University Press, 261–294.
60.
MonksKConwayEFuN, et al. (2016) Enhancing knowledge exchange and combination through HR practices: Reflexivity as a translation process. Human Resource Management Journal26(3): 304–320.
61.
MorrowSL (2005) Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology52(2): 250–260.
62.
NathuesEvan VuurenMCoorenF (2021) Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more: A methodological framework for ventriloquial analyses in organization studies. Organization Studies42(9): 1457–1476.
RaelinJA (2001) Public reflection as the basis of learning. Management Learning32(1): 11–30.
67.
RennstamJAshcraftKL (2014) Knowing work: Cultivating a practice-based epistemology of knowledge in organization studies. Human Relations67(1): 3–25.
68.
ReynoldsMVinceR (2020) The History Boys: Critical reflections on our contributions to Management Learning and their ongoing implications. Management Learning51(1): 130–142.
69.
RoseG (1997) Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–320.
70.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
71.
SchoenebornDVásquezC (2017) Communicative constitution of organizations. In: ScottCRLewisL (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1–21.
72.
SchönDE (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books Inc.
73.
ShadnamM (2020) Choosing whom to be: Theorizing the scene of moral reflexivity. Journal of Business Research110: 12–23.
74.
StanleyLWiseS (2002) Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
75.
TaylorJRRobichaudD (2004) Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization11(3): 395–413.
76.
TaylorJRVan EveryEJ (2000) The Emergent Organization: Communication As Its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77.
Van WoerkomM (2010) Critical reflection as a rationalistic ideal. Adult Education Quarterly60(4): 339–356.
78.
VinceRReynoldsM (2009) Reflection, reflective practice and organizing reflection. In: ArmstrongSJFukamiC V (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development. London: SAGE, 89–103.
79.
Webster’s New Encyclopedic Dictionary (1993) New York: Black Dog & Leventhal.
80.
WoolgarS (ed.) (1988) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: SAGE.
81.
YamauchiYHiramotoT (2016) Reflexivity of routines: An ethnomethodological investigation of initial service encounters at sushi bars in Tokyo. Organization Studies37(10): 1473–1499.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
