Collaboration during aesthetic production is inherently complex, involving difficult-to-articulate aspects of aesthetic judgement as well as relational questions that are inherently power-laden. Particularly in situations where actors do not share background conditions or judgement criteria, aesthetic collaboration poses conceptual and practical challenges. Through an in-depth case study of a French haute cuisine programme in Shanghai, China, we propose a relational-epistemic approach to aesthetic collaboration, in which aesthetic judgement and relational positioning mutually shape how chef trainees come to understand their creative products. Specifically, aesthetic collaboration was shaped by whether participants understood their mutual relationships as antagonistic or integrative, and whether they considered aesthetics as a matter of objective knowledge, cultural tradition or co-construction. Based on our results, we explore the implications of the relationalepistemic approach in understanding organizational aesthetics, especially in the context of the culture industries and haute cuisine specifically.
AlcadipaniR.IslamG. (2017). Modalities of opposition: Control and resistance via visual materiality. Organization, 24, 866–891.
2.
AvorgbedorG. (2003). Preface: Cross-cultural aesthetics. World of Music, 45(2), 7–11.
3.
AzmatF.FerdousA.RentschlerR.WinstonE. (2018). Arts-based initiatives in museums: Creating value for sustainable development. Journal of Business Research, 85, 386–395.
4.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BoutyI.GomezM. L. (2010). Des ressources à la pratique. Revue Française de Gestion (4), 149–161.
6.
BoutyI.GomezM. L.Godard-DruckerC. (2015). Sociomateriality and the transnational expansion of soft regulation: Michelin in haute cuisine around the world. Materiality, Rules and Regulation (pp. 267–292). New York: Springer.
7.
BurrowR.SmithJ.YakinthouC. (2015). ‘Yes Chef’: Life at the vanguard of culinary excellence. Work, Employment and Society, 29, 673–681.
8.
CarlucciD.SchiumaG. (2018). An introduction to the special issue. The arts as sources of value creation for business: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Business Research, 85, 337–341.
9.
CarrollG. R.WheatonD.R. (2009). The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the US. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 255–282.
10.
ClassenC. (1993) Worlds of sense: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge.
11.
CreedW. E. D.TaylorS. S.HudsonB. A. (2019). Institutional aesthetics: Embodied ways of encountering, evaluating, and enacting institutions. Organization Studies, online first.
12.
DionD.de BoissieuE. (2013). Construction et mise en scène d’un lignage dans le luxe: le cas des chefs dans la haute cuisine. Décisions Marketing, 25–42.
13.
Di StefanoG.KingA.VeronaG. (2014). Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1645–1670.
14.
Di StefanoG.KingA.VeronaG. (2015). Sanctioning in the wild: Rational calculus and retributive instincts in gourmet cuisine. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 906–931.
15.
EagletonT. (1990). The ideology of the aesthetic. Poetics Today, 9(2), 327–338.
16.
EarleyC. P. (2006). Leading cultural research in the future: A matter of paradigms and taste. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 922–931.
17.
ElsbachK. D.FlynnF. J. (2013). Creative collaboration and the self-concept: A study of toy designers. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 515–544.
18.
EmirbayerM. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.
19.
EndrissatN.IslamG.NoppeneyC. (2016). Visual organizing: Balancing coordination and creative freedom via mood boards. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2353–2362.
20.
FarrerJ. (2014). Imported culinary heritage: The case of localized Western cuisine in Shanghai. Rethinking Asian Food Heritage, 75–104.
21.
FarrerJ. (2015). Shanghai’s Western restaurants as culinary contact zones in a transnational culinary field. The Globalization of Asian Cuisines (pp. 103–124). New York: Springer.
22.
FauchartE.von HippelE. (2008). Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organization Science, 19, 187–201.
23.
FineG. (1996): Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 90–115.
24.
FrenkelM. (2006). From binarism back to hybridity: A postcolonial reading of management and organization studies. Organization Studies, 27, 855–876.
25.
GertsenM. C.SøderbergA. M. (2010). Expatriate stories about cultural encounters: A narrative approach to cultural learning processes in multinational companies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 248–257.
26.
GillM. J.BurrowR. D. (2017). The function of fear in institutional maintenance: Feeling frightened as an essential ingredient in haute cuisine. Organization Studies, 39, 445–465.
27.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
28.
GomezM. L.BoutyI. (2011). The emergence of an influential practice: Food for thought. Organization Studies, 32, 921–940.
29.
HardyC.LawrenceT. B.GrantD. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77.
30.
HarterL. M.YoungS. L.RawlinsW. K. (2008). The intermingling of instrumental rationalities in a collaborative arts studio. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 423–453.
31.
HindmarshJ.PilnickA. (2002). The tacit order of teamwork: Collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia. Sociological Quarterly, 43, 139–164.
32.
HsuC. L. (2005). A taste of ‘modernity’ working in a western restaurant in market socialist China. Ethnography, 6, 543–565.
33.
IslamG. (2019). Embodying the social: Desire and devo(r)ation at the teatro oficina. In PullenA.FotakiM. (Eds.), Diversity, embodiment and affect (pp. 249–273). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
34.
IslamG.EndrissatN.NoppeneyC. (2016). Beyond the eye of the beholder: Innovation as analogical reconfiguration in niche perfumery. Organization Studies, 37, 769–795.
35.
JayM. (2005) Songs of experience: Modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
JonesC. A. (1996). Machine in the studio: Constructing the post-war American artist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
JonesC.SvejenovaS.StrandgaardJ.TownleyB. (2016). Misfits, mavericks and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in creative industries. Organization Studies, 37,751–768.
38.
KantI. (1790/1951). Critique of judgment. BernardJ. (trans.). New York: Haffner.
39.
KaraszA.SingelisT. M. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 909–916.
40.
KochJ.WenzelM.SenfN.N.MaibierC. (2018). Organizational creativity as an attributional process: The case of haute cuisine. Organization Studies, 39, 251–270.
41.
KüpersW. (2013). A phenomenology of embodied senses: The ‘making’ of sense in organisational culture. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 5(4), 325.
42.
LadkinD. (2018). ‘The aesthetic’ and its relationship to business ethics: Philosophical underpinnings and implications for future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 35–51.
43.
LockeK. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: SAGE Pulications.
44.
LoombaA. (2015). Colonialism/post-colonialism. New York: Routledge.
45.
MarottoM.RoosJ.VictorB. (2007). Collective virtuosity in organizations: A study of peak performance in an orchestra. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 388–413.
46.
MontanariF.ScapolanA.GianecchiniM. (2016). ‘Absolutely free’? The role of relational work in sustaining artistic innovation. Organization Studies, 37, 797–821.
47.
PetersonR. A.AnandN. (2004). The production of culture perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 311–334.
48.
PinneyC.ThomasN. (2001). Beyond aesthetics: Art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: Berg.
49.
RaoH.MoninP.DurandR. (2003) Institutional change in de Toqueville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 795–843.
50.
RaoH.MoninP.DurandR. (2005). Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. American Sociological Review, 70, 968–991.
51.
RehnA. (2012). Indier than thou: On creative professions, chefs, and the sacralization of margins. Ephemera, 12(3), 344.
52.
RoseG. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: SAGE Publications.
53.
ShapinS. (2012). The tastes of wine: Towards a cultural history. Teoria Estetica, 51.
54.
SlavichB.CastellucciF. (2016). Wishing upon a star: How apprentice-master similarity, status and career stage affect critics evaluations of former apprentices in the haute cuisine industry. Organization Studies, 37, 823–843.
55.
SlavichB.SvejenovaS.OpazoM. P.PatriottaG. (2019). Politics of meaning in categorizing innovation: How chefs advanced molecular gastronomy by resisting the label. Organization Studies, online first.
56.
SorsaV.MerkkiniemiH.EndrissatN.IslamG. (2018). Little less conversation, little more action: Musical intervention as aesthetic material communication. Journal of Business Research, 85, 365–374.
57.
StierandM. (2015). Developing creativity in practice: Explorations with world-renowned chefs. Management Learning, 46, 598–617.
58.
StiglianiI.RavasiD. (2018). The shaping of form: Exploring designers’ use of aesthetic knowledge. Organization Studies, 39, 747–784.
59.
StratiA. (1992). Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 17, 568–581.
SuttonD. E. (2010). Food and the senses. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 209–223.
62.
SvejenovaS.MazzaC.PlanellasM. (2007). Cooking up change in haute cuisine: Ferran Adrià as an institutional entrepreneur. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 539–561.
63.
SvejenovaS.PlanellasM.VivesL. (2010). An individual business model in the making: A chef’s quest for creative freedom. Long Range Planning, 43, 408–430.
64.
TaylorS. S. (2002). Overcoming aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational members’ aesthetic experience. Human Relations, 55, 821–840.
65.
TimmermansS. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory30(3), 167–186.
66.
TomlinA. (2008). Introduction: Contemplating the undefinable. In ShustermanR.TomlinA. (Eds.), Aesthetic experience (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.
67.
ToraldoM. L.IslamG.MangiaG. (2018). Modes of knowing: Video research, multimodality and the problem of elusive knowledges. Organizational Research Methods, 21, 438–465.
68.
VanniniP.Ahluwalia-LopezG.WaskulD.GottschalkS. (2010). Performing taste at wine festivals: A somatic layered account of material culture. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(5), 378–396.
69.
WassermanV.FrenkelM. (2011). Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22, 503–521.
70.
WassermanV.FrenkelM. (2015). Spatial work in between glass ceilings and glass walls: Gender-class intersectionality and organizational aesthetics. Organization Studies, 36, 1485–1505.
71.
WicksR. (2009). Nineteenth- and twentieth-century continental aesthetics sets. In DaviesS.HigginsK. M. (Eds.), A companion to aesthetics (pp. 51–61). London: Blackwell Publishing.
