This article explores the role of griping and joking behaviors in cross-boundary teams. Those socio-emotional behaviors often go unnoticed in studies of team communication, as does more broadly the work of building relationships. Given the growing recognition that the quality of connections among team members significantly influences the quality of coordinating and knowledge-sharing practices in cross-boundary teams, this seems an important lacuna to address. Drawing on a qualitative study of a cross-occupational team responsible for palliative care and oncology patients, I illustrate how those mundane, recurrent communicative activities, which may appear tangential to the task at hand, have important relational and emotional consequences for the functioning of cross-boundary teams. Based on the observed characteristics and effects of a variety of griping and joking behaviors, I propose to conceptualize those communicative activities as identification rituals. I discuss the implications of this work for both research on the production of positive relational realities in cross-boundary teams and the study of organizational griping and humor.
AimeF.HumphreyS.DeRueD. S.PaulJ. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 327–352.
2.
BoxerD. (1993). Complaining and commiserating: A speech act view of solidarity in spoken American English. New York: Peter Lang.
3.
BoxerD.Cortes-CondeF. (1995). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 275–294.
4.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5.
CollinsonD. (1988). Engineering humor: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop floor relations. Organization Studies, 9, 181–199.
6.
CoombsR.GoldmanL. (1973). Maintenance and discontinuity of coping mechanisms in an intensive care unit. Social Problems, 20, 342–55.
7.
CooperC. (2008). Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations, 61, 1087–1115.
8.
CoserR. (1959). Some social functions of laughter: A study of humor in a hospital setting. Human Relations, 12, 171–182.
9.
CouchC. J. (1992). Evocative transactions and social relationships. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 13, 141–54.
10.
CroninM. A.WeingartL. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761–773.
11.
DiBenignoJ.KelloggK. (2014). Beyond occupational differences: The importance of cross cutting demographics and dyadic toolkits for collaboration in a US hospital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 375–408.
12.
EdmondsonA.NembhardI. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 123–138.
13.
EllingsonL. (2003). Interdisciplinary health care teamwork in the clinic backstage. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 93–117.
14.
FarajS.YanA. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 604–617.
15.
FineG. A.DeSouceyM. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18, 1–22.
16.
FineG. A.HallettT. (2014). Group cultures and the everyday life of organizations: Interaction orders and meso-analysis. Organization Studies, 35, 1773–1792.
17.
FollettM. P. (2004 [1925]). Power. Reprinted in MetcalfH.UrwickL. (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 72–95). New York: Routledge.
18.
GabrielY. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GittellJ. H. (2006). Relational coordination: Coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. In KyriakidouO.OzbilginM. (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organizational studies: A research companion (pp. 74–94). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
20.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
21.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essay on face-to-face behavior. London: Penguin.
22.
HandelmanD. (1976). Re-thinking ‘Banana Time’: Symbolic integration in a work setting. Urban Life, 4, 433–448.
23.
HatchM. J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of management team. Organization Science, 8, 275–288.
24.
HatchM. J.EhrlichS. B. (1993). Spontaneous humor as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14, 505–526.
25.
HeaphyE.DuttonJ. (2008) Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33, 137–162.
26.
HibbertD.HanrattyB.MayC.. (2003). Negotiating palliative care expertise in the medical world. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 277–288.
27.
HolmesJ. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2, 159–185.
28.
HolmesJ.MarraM. (2002). Having a laugh at work: How humor contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1683–1710.
29.
JamesN.FieldD. (1992). The routinization of hospice: Bureaucracy and charisma. Social Science & Medicine, 34, 1363–1375.
30.
KatrielT. (1985). ‘Griping’ as a verbal ritual in some Israeli discourse. In DascalM. (Ed.), Dialogue: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 367–381). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31.
KorczynskiM. (2011). The dialectical sense of humour: Routine joking in a Taylorized factory. Organization Studies, 32, 1420–1040.
32.
KowalskiR. M. (2002). Whining, griping, and complaining: Positivity in the negativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1023–1035.
33.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.MeyersR. A.KauffeldS.NeiningerA.HenschelA. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668.
34.
LiS. (2004). ‘Symbiotic niceness’: Constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2571–2583.
35.
LindenbergS.FossN. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36, 500–525.
36.
MacPhailL. H.RoloffK.EdmondsonA. C. (2009). Collaboration across knowledge boundaries within diverse teams: Reciprocal expertise affirmation as an enabling condition. In RobertsL. M.DuttonJ. E. (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 331–332). London: Psychology Press.
37.
MarraM. (2007). Humour in workplace meetings: Challenging hierarchies. In WestwoodR.RhodesC. (Eds.), Humour, work and organization (pp. 139–157). London: Routledge.
38.
MartineauW. H. (1972). A model of the social functions of humor. In GoldsteinJ.McGheeP. (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 101–125). New York: Academic Press.
39.
McFarlandD. (2004). Resistance as a social drama: A study of change-oriented encounters. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1249–1318.
40.
MewburnI. (2011). Troubling talk: Assembling the PhD candidate. Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 321–322.
41.
MitchellR.ParkerV.GilesM. (2011). When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness. Human Relations, 64, 1321–1343.
42.
NembhardI.EdmondsonA. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941–966.
43.
ObornE.DawsonS. (2010). Learning across communities of practice: An examination of multidisciplinary work. British Journal of Management, 21, 843–858
44.
PinchotG.PinchotE. (1993). The end of bureaucracy and the rise of the intelligent organization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
45.
RaginC. (1994). Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
46.
RobinsonD. T.Smith-LovinL. (2001). Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humour in task discussions. Social Forces, 80, 123–158.
47.
RodriguesS.CollinsonD. (1995). Having fun? Workplace resistance and humour in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16, 739–768.
48.
RomeroE.PescosolidoA. (2008). Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations, 61, 395–418.
49.
SchwartzmanH. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum.
50.
SeckmanM. A.CouchC. J. (1989). Jocularity, sarcasm, and social relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 327–44.
51.
SmithK. K.BergD. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
SturdyA.ClarkT.FinchamR.HandleyK. (2008). Management consultancy and humor in action and context. In FinemanS. (Ed.), The emotional organization (pp. 134–153). Oxford: Blackwell.
53.
TerrionJ. L.AshforthB. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55, 55–88.
54.
Van der VegtG.BundersonJ. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547.
55.
WeeksJ. (2004). Unpopular culture: The ritual of complaint in a British bank. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
56.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
57.
WestwoodR.JohnstonA. (2013). Humor in organisation: From function to resistance. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 219–247.
58.
Wittenberg-LylesE. M. (2005). Information sharing in interdisciplinary team meetings: An evaluation of hospice goals. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1377–1391.
59.
YinR. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
