This paper contributes to extending institutional theory by theorizing institutional maintenance as a process of repair and empirically examining repair work in a professional setting. Our in-depth, longitudinal case study illustrates how Italian professions—led by two professional associations—rebuffed the decisive intervention of the Italian Government to coercively reform the professional service sector and reconstituted institutional arrangements that had been severely disrupted. The paper advances theory on the resilience of institutions by showing that maintenance repair work enables powerful incumbents to reverse change and re-establish the status quo.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93–117.
2.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 55–65). New York: Doubleday.
3.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.
4.
CurrieG.LockettA.FinnR.MartinG.WaringJ. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33, 937–962.
5.
DacinM. T.GoodsteinJ.ScottW. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 43–56.
6.
DacinM. T.MunirK.TraceyP. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1393–1418.
7.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
8.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
9.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
10.
FaulconbridgeJ. R.MuzioD. (2012). Professions in a globalizing world: Towards a transnational sociology of the professions. International Sociology, 27, 136–152.
GalvinT. L. (2002). Examining institutional change: Evidence from the founding dynamics of US health care interest associations. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 673–696.
13.
GergenK. J.GergenM. M. (2004). Social construction: Entering the dialogue. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.
14.
GioiaD. A.ThomasJ. B.ClarkS. M.ChittipeddiK. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, 363–383.
15.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC.SuddabyR. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.
16.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.Sahlin-AnderssonK.SuddabyR. (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications.
17.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.
18.
HardyC.MaguireS. (2010). Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1365–1392.
19.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
20.
HwangH.ColyvasJ. A. (2011). Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 62–66.
21.
JarzabkowskiP.MatthiesenJ.van de VenA. (2008). Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 284–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
24.
LawrenceT. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25, 161–187.
25.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies, 2nd edition (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE Publications.
26.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58.
28.
LeblebiciH.SalancikG. R.CopayA.KingT. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333–363.
29.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289–331.
30.
LokJ.de RondM. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 185–207.
31.
LounsburyM. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 255–266.
32.
MaguireS.HardyC. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 148–178.
33.
MicelottaE. (2010). Professional services firms between resistance and change: Business law firms in Italy. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
34.
OlgiatiV.PocarV. (1988). The Italian legal profession: An institutional dilemma. In AbelR. L.LewisP. S. C. (Eds.), Lawyers in society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
PammolliF.CambiniC.GiannaccariA. (2007). Introduzione: Liberalizzazioni e concorrenza in Italia. In PammolliF.CambiniC.GiannaccariA. (Eds.), Politiche di Liberalizzazione e concorrenza in Italia (pp. 7–26). Rome, Italy: Il Mulino.
36.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635–652.
37.
PrattM. G. (2009). From the editors. For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 856–862.
38.
Quinn TrankC.WashingtonM. (2009). Maintaining an institution in a contested organizational field: the work of AACSB and its constituents. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 236–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
RojasF. (2010). Power through institutional work: Acquiring academic authority in the 1968 Third World strike. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1263–1280.
40.
ScottW. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29, 219–238.
41.
SeoM. G.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
42.
SereniA. P. (1949). The legal profession in Italy. Harvard Law Review, 63, 1000.
43.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20–24.
44.
SminiaH. (2011). Institutional continuity and the Dutch construction industry fiddle. Organization Studies, 32, 1559–1585.
45.
SterlacchiniA. (2002). La regolamentazione delle professioni in Italia: Evidenze empiriche e proposte di modifica. L’industria, 4, 745–770.
46.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
SuddabyR.VialeT. (2011). Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59, 423–442.
49.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843.
50.
TownleyB. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18, 261–285.
51.
YinR. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). London: SAGE Publications.
52.
ZietsmaC.LawrenceT. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 189–221.
53.
ZilberT. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234–254.
54.
ZilberT. B. (2009). Institutional maintenance as narrative acts. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 205–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
