Emotion regulation is essential to the maintenance of institutions. To date, institutional scholars have focused on how individual actors express or suppress emotions according to internalized institutional “feeling rules.” Drawing on an empirical study of police officers, this article offers emotion absenting as a socially practiced, embodied form of emotion regulation. Police officers’ shared emotion absenting enabled them to practice fear in unarticulated yet highly coordinated ways in alignment with their institutional role. The practice of emotion absenting is learned through socialization into policework and the institution of law enforcement. Because police officers learn to regulate emotions together in subtle ways through the coordination of their bodies, emotion absenting can be functionally invisible in social interactions. This suggests that inappropriate emotions are not necessarily suppressed—that is, removed from the situation. Rather, our study shows that such emotions may function as a resource among members of a group, especially when these emotions are practiced in institutionally competent ways.
Bento da SilvaJoseQuattronePaoloLlewellynNick (2022). Turning to mystery in institutional theory: The Jesuit spiritual exercises. Organization Studies, 43, 1379–1400.
2.
CrawfordBrettDacinTina M. (2021). Policing work: Emotions and violence in institutional work. Organization Studies, 42, 1219–1240.
3.
CreedDouglas W. E.HudsonBryant A.OkhuysenGerardo A.Smith-CroweKristin (2014). Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review, 39, 275–301.
4.
DiMaggioPaul J. (1983). State expansion and organizational fields. In HallRichard H.QuinnRobert E. (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 147–161). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
EmersonRobert M.PollnerMelvin (1988). On the uses of members’ responses to researchers’ accounts. Human Organization, 47, 189–198.
6.
FletcherJoyce K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
FriedlandRoger (2018). Moving institutional logics forward: Emotion and meaningful material practice. Organization Studies, 39, 515–542.
8.
GillMichael J.BurrowRobin (2018). The function of fear in institutional maintenance: Feeling frightened as an essential ingredient in haute cuisine. Organization Studies, 39, 445–465.
9.
GoffmanErving (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
10.
HenryVincent E. (2004). Death work: Police, trauma, and the psychology of survival. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
HochschildArlie R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.
12.
HochschildArlie R. (2012 [1983]). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
JarvisLee C. (2017). Feigned versus felt: Feigning behaviors and the dynamics of institutional logics. Academy of Management Review, 42, 306–333.
14.
JarvisLee C.GoodrickElizabethHudsonBryant A. (2019). Where the heart functions best: Reactive-affective conflict and the disruptive work of animal rights organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1358–1387.
LawrenceThomas B.SchlindweinEvaJohiniJalanHeaphyEmily D. (2022). Organizational body work: Efforts to shape human bodies in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 37–73.
17.
LawrenceThomas B.SuddabyRoy (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggStewart R.HardyCynthiaLawrenceThomas B.NordWalter (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
18.
LokJacoCreedDouglas W. E.DeJordyRichVoronovMaxim (2017). Living institutions: Bringing emotions into organizational institutionalism. In RoystonGreenwoodChristineOliverMeyerRenate E.LawrenceThomas B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd edition, pp. 191–617). London: Sage.
19.
MêskoGorazdTankebeJustice (2015). Trust and legitimacy in criminal justice: European perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
20.
RafaeliAnatSuttonRobert I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Academy of Management Review, 12, 23–37.
21.
ReckwitzAndreas (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263.
22.
SpradleyJames P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
23.
StarSusan L.StraussAnselm (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 9–30.
24.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30, 167–186.
25.
Van MaanenJohn (1973). Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization, 32, 407–418.
26.
VoronovMaximVinceRuss (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37, 58–81.
27.
VoronovMaximWeberKlaus (2016). The heart of institutions: Emotional competence and institutional actorhood. Academy of Management Review, 41, 456–478.
28.
WhartonAmy S. (2009). The sociology of emotional labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 147–165.
29.
YakhlefAli (2010). The corporeality of practice-based learning. Organization Studies, 31, 409–430.
30.
ZietsmaCharleneToubianaMadeline (2018). The valuable, the constitutive, and the energetic: Exploring the impact and importance of studying emotions and institutions. Organization Studies, 39, 427–443.
31.
ZilberTammar B. (2020). The methodology/theory interface: Ethnography and the microfoundations of institutions. Organization Theory, 1(2), 1–27.
