The main purpose of this article is to present a model for information-seeking behaviour with an emphasis on unplanned and planned behaviour of users in using library resources and services. The working method was that, reviewing the literature and previous information behaviour models, such as Wilson, Ellis, Kuhlthau, and Dervin models, this article proposes a novel model of information-seeking behaviour for library users. Our model of information-seeking behaviour was developed by combining the existing models of planned information-seeking behaviour with the focus on the factors affecting unplanned rather than planned behaviour of users in accessing resources or services. Our proposed model for information-seeking behaviour of clients has two main parts. The first part planned behaviour resulting from a problem or a certain information need according to which the user seeks to find information in a planned manner. The second part deals with unplanned behaviour shaped by a hidden or uncertain information need. Finally, both types of behaviour can result in the discovery, extraction, collection and use of information.
CloverVT. Relative importance of impulse-buying in retail stores. J Mark1950; 15(1): 66–70.
3.
RookDW. The buying impulse. J Consum Res1987; 14(2): 189–199.
4.
KimJ. College students’ apparel impulse buying behaviors in relation to visual merchandising. Master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, 2003.
5.
BurnettSE. Internal and external trigger cues of impulse buying online. Thesis, Non Peer Reviewed-Master of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 2006.
6.
BrindesiHMonopoliMKapidakisS. Information seeking and searching habits of Greek physicists and astronomers: a case study of undergraduate students. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci2013; 73: 785–793.
7.
MohammadzadehHBozorgiAA. Users of the national library of Iran and their methods for using the resources and services of the national library: is it in accord with the library’s statute or not?Natl Stud Librariansh Inf Organ2013; 23(4): 22–39.
8.
FosterAE. A non-linear model of information seeking behaviour. Inf Res2005; 10(2): 222.
9.
OlatokunWMAjagbeE. Analyzing traditional medical practitioners’ information-seeking behaviour using Taylor’s information-use environment model. J Librariansh Inf Sci2010; 42(2): 122–135.
10.
JosephPDebowskiSGoldschmidtP. Models of information search: a comparative analysis. Inf Res2013; 18(1): 1–19.
11.
KumarASalmaniNBawejaS. Information Seeking behaviour by the research scholars & faculty members: a survey study of Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra in the disciplines of life science. IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci2014; 19(6): 119–138.
12.
NgoziOVUcheEUEjiroAK. Information seeking behaviour of faculty members in a Nigerian university. Int J Acad Res Reflect2015; 3(4): 95–102.
13.
Al ShboulMKAbrizahA. Modes of information seeking: developing personas of humanities scholars. Inf Dev2016; 32(5): 1786–1805.
14.
HossainMUHossainMAIslamMS. An assessment of the information needs and information-seeking behaviour of members of parliament (MPs) in Bangladesh. Inf Learn Sci2017; 118(1/2): 48–66.
15.
DestaAGdu PreezMNgulubeP. Factors affecting the information-seeking behaviour of postgraduate students at the University of South Africa Ethiopia Regional Learning Centre. Inf Dev2017; 35(3): 362–373.
16.
SalajeghehMHayatiZ. Modelling information-seeking behaviour patterns of iranian medical school academic staff. Libri2009; 59(4): 290–307.
17.
HaqueERahmanASKA. Information seeking behaviour of faculty members and research scholar of agricultural university libraries in Bangladesh. Res J Libr Sci2016; 4(2): 1–8.
18.
PoitrasEGFazeliNMayneZR. Modeling student teachers’ information-seeking behaviors while learning with network-based tutors. J Educ Technol Syst2018; 47(2): 227–247.
19.
SuperioDLCanamanJBJacoJP, et al. The information-seeking behavior of aquaculture researchers at the Southeast Asian fisheries development center. Inf Dev2018; 35(3): 397–412.
20.
GorichanazT. Information creation and models of information behavior: grounding synthesis and further research. J Librariansh Inf Sci2019; 51(4): 998–1006.
21.
AhmedSRehmanFSheikhA. Impact of personality traits on information needs and seeking behavior of LIS students in Pakistan. Inf Discov Deliv2019; 47(3): 125–134.
22.
WilliamsonK. Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Libr Inf Sci Res1998; 20(1): 23–40.
23.
ErdelezS. Investigation of information encountering in the controlled research environment. Inf Process Manag2004; 40(6): 1013–1025.
24.
MakriSRavemMMcKayD. After serendipity strikes: creating value from encountered information. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol2017; 54(1): 279–288.
25.
WaughSMcKayDMakriS. Too much serendipity’: the tension between information seeking and encountering at the library shelves. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’17), Oslo, Norway, 2017, pp. 277–280. NewYork: Association for Computing Machinery.
26.
RiceJ. Serendipity and holism: the beauty of OPACs. Libr J1988; 113(3): 138–141.
27.
LiestmanD. Chance in the midst of design: approaches to library research serendipity. RQ1992; 31(4): 524–532.
28.
FosterAFordN. Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. J Doc2003; 59(3): 321–340.
29.
BjornebornL. Serendipity dimensions and users’ information behaviour in the physical library interface. Inf Res2008; 13(4): 38.
ConnawayLSDickeyTJRadfordML. ‘If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it’: Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Libr Inf Sci Res2011; 33(3): 179–190.
32.
MakriSBlandfordA. Coming across information serendipitously – part 1: a process model. J Doc2012; 68(5): 684–705.
33.
TwidaleMRiehSY. Information seeking at the intersection of search, learning, inquiry, and creativity: sharing stories to inform creative research. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol2019; 56(1): 582–585.
34.
AgarwalNK. Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. Inf Res2015; 20(3): n3.
35.
SavolainenR. Elaborating the conceptual space of information-seeking phenomena. Inf Res2016; 21(3): n3.
36.
McKayDChangSSmithW, et al. The things we talk about when we talk about browsing: an empirical typology of library browsing behavior. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2019; 70(12): 1383–1394.
37.
ZhangHBuchananGKellyR, et al. It’s still rock and roll to me: a model of online browsing behaviour. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol2022; 59(1): 381–392.
38.
McKayDMakriSChangS, et al. On birthing dancing stars: the need for bounded chaos in information interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on human information interaction and retrieval (CHIIR ’20), Oslo, Norway, 14–18 March 2020; pp. 292–302. NewYork: Association for Computing Machinery.
39.
ErdelezSMakriS. Information encountering re-encountered: a conceptual re-examination of serendipity in the context of information acquisition. J Doc2020; 76(3): 731–751.
40.
HaratiHNooshinfardFIsfandyari-MoghaddamA, et al. Factors affecting the unplanned use behavior of academic libraries users: towards an axial coding pattern. Aslib J Inf Manag2019; 71(2): 138–154.
MarchioniniG. Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
43.
WilsonTD. Models in information behaviour research. J Doc1999; 55(3): 249–270.
44.
LeeLOcepekMGMakriS. Information behavior patterns: a new theoretical perspective from an empirical study of naturalistic information acquisition. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2022; 73(4): 594–608.
45.
KalbachJ. ‘I’m feeling lucky’: the role of emotions in seeking information on the web. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2006; 57(6): 813–818.
46.
MorrisRCT. Toward a user-centered information service. J Am Soc Inf Sci1994; 45(1): 20–30.
47.
EllisD. A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. J Doc1989; 45(3): 171–212.
48.
KuhlthauCC. Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J Am Soc Inf Sci1991; 42(5): 361–371.
49.
WuDDangWHeD, et al. Undergraduate information behaviors in thesis writing: a study using the information search process model. J Librariansh Inf Sci2017; 49(3): 256–268.
50.
NiedźwiedzkaB. A proposed general model of information behaviour. Inf Res2003; 9(1): 27–36.
51.
IngwersenP. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive ir theory. J Doc1996; 52(1): 3–50.
52.
SaracevicT. Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR): a review and proposal. Proc ASIS Annu Meet1996; 33: 3–9.
53.
SpinkA. Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval. J Am Soc Inf Sci1997; 48(5): 382–394.
54.
BatesMJ. Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching. New Rev Inf Behav Res2002; 3: 1–15.
55.
MehoLITibboHR. Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis’s study revisited. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol2003; 54(6): 570–587.
