This article reports the method of enriching a thesaurus by differentiating the related term relationship with specific semantic relations and expanding related terms. It also tests the usefulness of an enriched thesaurus as a better question-answering tool and information retrieval aid based on users’ perceptions. A small portion of the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) thesaurus was enriched, and two enriched mini-thesauri were compiled with different levels of detail. A total of 22 participants were recruited to test the usefulness of the three mini-thesauri for facilitating question-answering and information retrieval within the ERIC Abstracts of the EBSCOHost Database and on the Web using Google. The experimental results suggest that the enriched thesauri are better question-answering tools and information retrieval aids than the original thesaurus. The findings imply that thesauri enriched with semantic relations are useful in question-answering and modern information retrieval, although the role of the traditional thesaurus in modern information retrieval has diminished.
Martínez-GonzálezMAlvite-DíezM.On the evaluation of thesaurus tools compatible with the Semantic Web. J Inf Sci2014; 40(6): 711–722.
2.
SoergelD.Building a more meaningful Web: from traditional knowledge organization systems to new semantic tools. In: Proceedings of the 6th networked knowledge organization systems/sources (NKOS) workshop, Houston, TX, 31 May 2003, http://sigir.org/files/forum/2003F/jcdl03_soergel.pdf
3.
NakashimaMSatoKQuY. Browsing-based conceptual information retrieval incorporating dictionary term relations, keyword association, and a user’s interest. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2003; 54(1): 16–28.
4.
ClarkPThompsonJHolmbackH. Exploiting a thesaurus-based semantic net for knowledge-based search. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference on AAAI/IAAI, Menlo Park, CA, 30 July–3 August 2000, pp. 988–995. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
5.
MuXLuKRyuH.Explicitly integrating MeSH thesaurus help into health information retrieval systems: an empirical user study. Inform Process Manag2014; 50: 24–40.
6.
WielingaJSchreiberTWielemakerJ. From thesaurus to ontology. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on knowledge capture, Victoria, BC, Canada, 22–23 October 2001.
7.
HjørlandB.Does the traditional thesaurus have a place in modern information retrieval?Knowl Organ2016; 43(3): 145–159.
8.
ISKO-UK. The great debate: the traditional thesaurus vs modern IR. In: Proceedings of the ISKO-UK annual general meeting, London, 19 February 2015, http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate
9.
WangJ.Automatic thesaurus development: term extraction from title metadata. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2006; 57(7): 907–920.
10.
TudhopeDBindingC.Still quite popular after all those years – the continued relevance of the information retrieval thesaurus. Knowl Organ2016; 43(3): 174–179.
11.
BatesM.Subject access in online catalogs: a design model. J Am Soc Inform Sci1986; 37(6): 357–376.
12.
HjørlandB.Theories are knowledge organizing systems (KOS). Knowl Organ2015; 42: 113–128.
13.
Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). ERIC thesaurus, 2016, http://eric.ed.gov/?ti=all (accessed 10 August 2016).
14.
TaylorRS.Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. Coll Res Libr1968; 29(3): 178–194.
15.
SwansonDSmalheiserN.Implicit text linkages between Medline records: using Arrowsmith as an aid to scientific discovery. Libr Trends1999; 48(1): 48–59.
16.
WangYVandendorpeJEvansM.Relational thesauri in information retrieval. J Am Soc Inform Sci1985; 36(1): 15–27.
17.
SoergelD. Enriched thesauri as networked knowledge bases for people and machines. In: Paper presented at the CENDI conference on controlled vocabulary and the Internet, Bethesda, MD, 29 September 1999, https://cendi.gov/presentations/cendisoergel.pdf (accessed 20 August 2009).
18.
SoergelDLauserBLiangA. Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the AGROVOC example. J Digit Inform2004; 4(4), http://www.fao.org/3/a-af234e.pdf
19.
Schmitz-EsserW. SERUBA – a new search and learning technology for the internet and intranets. In: Proceedings of the 11th ASIS SIG/CR classification research workshop, Chicago, IL, 12 November 2000, pp. 91–102.
20.
ShiriARevieC.Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment: a user-centered evaluation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2006; 57(4): 462–478.
21.
CockranePA.Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval. In: WilliamsonNJHudsonM (eds) Classification research for knowledge organization. Amsterdam: Elsevier and FID, 1992, pp. 161–178.
22.
TsengY.Automatic thesaurus generation for Chinese documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2002; 53(13): 1130–1138.
23.
LiKWYangCC.Automatic crosslingual thesaurus generated from the Hong Kong SAR Police Department Web corpus for crime analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2005; 56(3): 272–282.
24.
LuZKimWWilburWJ.Evaluation of query expansion using MeSH in PubMed. Inform Retrieval2009; 12: 69–80.
25.
SchutzeHPedersenJ.A cooccurrence-based thesaurus and two applications to information retrieval. Inform Process Manag1997; 33(3): 301–318.
26.
GreenR.A relational thesaurus: Modeling semantic relationships using frames. In: Final Report to OCLC Online Computer Library Center. Dublin, OH: OCLC, 1997, pp. 94–97.
27.
WanTEvansMWanY. Experiments with automatic indexing and a relational thesaurus in a Chinese information retrieval system (CIRS). J Am Soc Inform Sci1997; 48(12): 1086–1096.
28.
GreenbergJ.Optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods with semantically encoded structured thesauri terminology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec2001; 52(6): 487–498.
29.
ShiriARevieCWChowdhuryG.Thesaurus-assisted search term selection and query expansion: a review of user-centred studies. Knowl Organ2002; 29(1): 1–19.
AgichteinEGravanoL.Snowball: extracting relations from large plain-text collections. In: Proceedings of the 2000 international conference on digital libraries, San Antonio, TX, 2–7 June 2000.
32.
AgichteinECucerzanS. Predicting accuracy of extracting information from unstructured text collections. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM’05), Bremen, 31 October–5 November 2005.
33.
DeyLAbulaishMSharmaG. Text mining through entity-relationship based information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conferences on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Fremont, CA, 2–5 November 2007, pp. 177–180. New York: IEEE.
34.
YatesABankoMBroadheadM. TextRunner: open information extraction on the web. In: Proceedings of the NAACL, Rochester, NY, 22–27 April 2007, pp. 25–26. New York: ACM.
35.
BankoMEtzioniO. The tradeoffs between open and traditional relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, Columbus, OH, 15–20 June 2008.
36.
MaslennikovMChuaT.Combining relations for information extraction from free text. ACM T Inform Syst2010; 28(3): 1–35.
37.
WangWBesançonRFerretO. Filtering and clustering relations for unsupervised information extraction in open domain. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM’11), Glasgow, 24–28 October 2011, pp. 1405–1414. New York: ACM.
38.
LiPWangHLiH. Assessing sparse information extraction using semantic contexts. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM’13), San Francisco, CA, 27 October–1 November 2013, pp. 1709–1714. New York: ACM.
39.
ArulanandamRSavarimuthuBPurvisM.Extracting crime information from online newspaper articles. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian web conference (AWC’14), Auckland, New Zealand, 20–23 January 2014, pp. 31–38. New York: ACM.
40.
EtzioniOFaderAChristensenJ. Open information extraction: the second generation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Barcelona, 16–22 July 2011.
41.
BankoMCafarellaMJSoderlandS. Open information extraction from the web. In: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI), 2007, http://turing.cs.washington.edu/papers/ijcai07.pdf
