Increasing use of the Internet for health information delivery has created considerable discussion among digital divide scholars (i.e. how online information delivery benefits those individuals in higher socioeconomic brackets more than their counterparts). Because it is health information, we need to integrate how patients seek out online information. This study included patients’ information-seeking behaviour along with digital divide scholars’ constructs (i.e. literacy and computer skills). Using 1617 observations from the 2010 Pew Internet and American Life Project, this study found that individuals with a significant number of health problems, who are likely to be in a lower income bracket, are proactive online health information seekers; however, they are less likely to search general information. This finding adds value to existing research revealing that usefulness, which has been overlooked in online health information seeking, is important and should be a part of the research model.
DartJ. The Internet as a source of health information in three disparate communities. Austalian Health Review2008; 32: 559–569.
2.
FordEHuertaTSchilhavyR. Effective US health system websites: Establishing benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement. Journal of Healthcare Management2012; 57: 47–65.
3.
LemireMParéGSicotteC. Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health. International Journal of Medical Informatics2008; 77: 723–734.
4.
WrightMGrabowskyA. The role of the adult educator in helping learners access and select quality health information on the Internet. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education2011; 2011: 79–88.
5.
NicholasDHuntingtonPWilliamsP. Digital health information provision and health outcomes. Journal of Information Science2001; 27: 265–276.
6.
ReidPBoryckiE. Emergence of a new consumer health informatics framework: Introducing the healthcare organization. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics2011: 353–357.
7.
KeeleyBWrightLConditC. Functions of health fatalism: Fatalistic talk as face saving, uncertainty management, stress relief and sense making. Sociology of Health and Illness2009; 31: 734–747.
8.
LangeLPietteJ. Personal models for diabetes in context and patients’ health status. Journal of Behavioral Medicine2006; 29: 239–253.
9.
RamirezJCranoWQuistR. Effects of fatalism and family communication on HIV/AIDS awareness variations in Native American and Anglo parents and children. AIDS Education and Prevention2002; 14: 29–40.
10.
PoweBFinnieR. Cancer fatalism: The state of the science. Cancer Nursing2003; 26: 454–467.
11.
LustriaM.SmithSHinnantC. Exploring digital divides: An examination of eHealth technology use in health information seeking, communication and personal health information management in the USA. Health Informatics Journal2011; 17: 224–243.
ZimmerZHouseJ. Education, income, and functional limitation transitions among American adults: Contrasting onset and progression. International Journal of Epidemiology2003; 32: 1089–1097.
14.
CsikeszNSinglaASimonsJ. The impact of socioeconomic status on presentation and treatment of diverticular disease. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery2009; 13: 1993–2002.
15.
ArnoldMHsuLPipkinS. Race, place and AIDS: The role of socioeconomic context on racial disparities in treatment and survival in San Francisco. Social Science and Medicine2009; 69: 121–128.
16.
FriedmanDHoffman-GoetzLArochaJ. Readability of cancer information on the Internet. Journal of Cancer Education2004; 19: 117–122.
17.
ElliottJShnekerB. A health literacy assessment of the epilepsy.com website. Seizure2009; 18: 434–439.
18.
LeafferTMickelbergL. The digital health-care revolution: Empowering health consumers. Futurist2006; 40: 53.
19.
StraughanPSeowA. Fatalism reconceptualized: A concept to predict health screening behavior. Journal of Gender, Culture and Health1998; 3: 85–100.
20.
MayoRUredaJParkerV. Importance of fatalism in understanding mammography screening in rural elderly women. Journal of Women and Aging2001; 13: 57–72.
21.
JensenJKingAGuntzvillerL. Patient–provider communication and low-income adults: Age, race, literacy, and optimism predict communication satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling2010; 79: 30–35.
22.
NeterEBraininE. eHealth literacy: Extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. Journal of Medical Internet Research2012; 14.
23.
NeuhauserLKrepsG. Online cancer communication: Meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Education and Counseling2008; 71: 365–377.
24.
SarkarUKarterALiuJ. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: Evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2011; 18: 318–321.
25.
BickmoreTPaasche-OrlowM. The role of information technology in health literacy research. Journal of Health Communication2012; 17: 23–29.
HowellETrenholmC. The effect of new insurance coverage on the health status of low-income children in Santa Clara County. Health Services Research2007; 42: 867–889.
28.
McWilliamsJMearaEZaslavskyA. Health of previously uninsured adults after acquiring Medicare coverage. Journal of the American Medical Association2007; 298: 2886–2894.
29.
McWilliamsJMearaEZaslavskyA. Differences in control of cardiovascular disease and diabetes by race, ethnicity, and education: US trends from 1999 to 2006 and effects of Medicare coverage. Annals of Internal Medicine2009; 150: 505–515.
FagnanoMHaltermanJConnK. Health literacy and sources of health information for caregivers of urban children with asthma. Clinical Pediatrics2012; 51: 267–273.
32.
MagaiCConsedineNConwayF. Diversity matters: Unique populations of women and breast cancer screening. Cancer2004; 100: 2300–2307.
33.
FacioneNMiaskowskiCDoddM. The self-reported likelihood of patient delay in breast cancer: New thoughts for early detection. Preventive Medicine2002; 34: 397–407.
34.
RenahyEParizotIChauvinP. Health information seeking on the Internet: A double divide? Results from a representative survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France, 2005–2006. BMC Public Health2008; 8: 69.
35.
FabregaH.MoooreRStrawnJ. Low income medical problem patients: Some medical and behavioral features. Journal of Health and Social Behavior1969; 10 (4): 334–343.
36.
McCloudRJungMGrayS. Class, race and ethnicity and information avoidance among cancer survivors. British Journal of Cancer2013; 108: 1949–1956.
37.
GalarceERamanadhanSWeeksJ. Class, race, ethnicity and information needs in post-treatment cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling2011; 85: 432–439.
38.
BarbourJRintamakiLRamseyJ. Avoiding health information. Journal of Health Communication2011; 17: 212–229.
39.
RamanadhanSViswanathK. Health and the information nonseeker: A profile. Health Communication2006; 20: 131–139.
40.
CaseDAndrewsJJohnsonJ. Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association2005; 93: 353–362.
41.
BrashersDNeidigJCardilloL. ‘In an important way, I did die’: Uncertainty and revival in persons living with HIV or AIDS. AIDS Care1999; 11: 201–219.
42.
BrashersDNeidigJHaasS. Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Communication Monographs2000; 67: 63–84.
43.
MilesAVoorwindenSChapmanS. Psychologic predictors of cancer information avoidance among older adults: The role of cancer fear and fatalism. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention2008; 17: 1872–1879.
44.
KashKOrtega-VerdejoKDabneyM. Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: Women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Seminars in Surgical Oncology2000; 18: 333–338.
45.
ViswanathKKahnEFinneganJ. Motivation and the knowledge gap effects of a campaign to reduce diet-related cancer risk. Communication Research1993; 20: 546–563.
46.
Cook-CraigPElyGFlahertyC. Seeking health advice from social networks in low-income urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Health Behavior2012; 36: 723–735.
47.
WiltshireJRobertsVBrownR. The effects of socioeconomic status on participation in care among middle-aged and older adults. Journal of Aging and Health2009; 21: 314–335.
48.
CottonSGuptaS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social Science and Medicine2004; 59: 1795–1806.
49.
HsuJHuangJKinsmanJ. Use of e-health services between 1999 and 2002: A growing digital divide. Journal of American Medical Information Association2005; 12: 164–171.
50.
BhatnagarAGhoseS. An analysis of frequency and duration of search on the Internet. Journal of Business2004: 77(2); 311–330.
51.
BuenteWRobbinA. Trends in Internet information behavior, 2000–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2008; 59: 1743–1760.
52.
KutnerMGreenburgEJinY. The health literacy of america’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. National Center for Education Statistics, 2006, p. 483.
53.
Nielsen-BohlmanLPanzerAKindigD. Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.
54.
KingMWintonAAdkinsA. Assessing the readability of mental health Internet brochures for children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies2003; 12: 91–99.
55.
AdkinsASinghN. Reading level and readability of patient education materials in mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies2001; 10: 1–8.
56.
FriedmanDHoffman-GoetzLArochaJ. Health literacy and the World Wide Web: Comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet. Informatics for Health and Social Care2006; 31: 67–87.
CroftDPetersonM. An evaluation of the quality and contents of asthma education on the World Wide Web. CHEST Journal2002; 121: 1301–1307.
59.
YuL. The divided views of the information and digital divides: A call for integrative theories of information inequality. Journal of Information Science2011; 37: 660–679.
60.
EhemanCBerkowitzZLeeJ. Information-seeking styles among cancer patients before and after treatment by demographics and use of information sources. Journal of Health Communication2009; 14: 487–502.
61.
EkSHeinströmJ. Monitoring or avoiding health information – The relation to inner inclination and health status. Health Information and Libraries Journal2011; 28: 200–209.
62.
KeselmanABrowneAKaufmanD. Consumer health information seeking as hypothesis testing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2008; 15: 484–495.
63.
KontosEBennettGViswanathK. Barriers and facilitators to home computer and internet use among urban novice computer users of low socioeconomic position. Journal of Medical Internet Research2007; 9.
64.
LuegJMooreRWarkentinM. Patient health information search: An exploratory model of web-based search behavior. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing2003; 15: 49–61.
65.
DiMaggioPHargittaiE. From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. Working Paper Series. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 2001; 15: 1–23.
66.
DickinsonAArnottJPriorS. Methods for human–computer interaction research with older people. Behaviour and Information Technology2007; 26: 343–352.
67.
AerschotLRodousakisN. The link between socio-economic background and Internet use: Barriers faced by low socio-economic status groups and possible solutions. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research2008; 21: 317–351.
68.
DickersonSReinhartAFeeleyT. Patient Internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2004; 11: 499–504.
69.
TysonT. The Internet: Tomorrow’s portal to non-traditional health care services. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management2000; 23: 1–7.
70.
YooE-YRobbinsL. Understanding middle-aged women’s health information seeking on the web: A theoretical approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2008; 59: 577–590.
71.
ChuAHuberJMastel-SmithB. ‘Partnering with seniors for better health’: Computer use and internet health information retrieval among older adults in a low socioeconomic community. Journal of the Medical Library Association2009; 97: 12.
72.
KimHParkSYBozemanI. Online health information search and evaluation: Observations and semi-structured interviews with college students and maternal health experts. Health Information and Libraries Journal2011; 28: 188–199.
BlackEThompsonLSalibaH. An analysis of healthcare providers’ online ratings. Informatics in Primary Care2009; 17: 249–253.
75.
LaguTHannonNRothbergM. Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: An analysis of physician-rating websites. Journal of General Internal Medicine2010; 25: 942–946.
76.
Pew Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project, http://www.pewinternet.org/ (2013, accessed March 2012).
HeiseD. Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analyses. Sociological Methods and Research1972; 1: 147–173.
79.
WallMGuoJAmemiyaY. Mixture factor analysis for approximating a nonnormally distributed continuous latent factor with continuous and dichotomous observed variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research2012; 47: 276–313.
80.
DiamantopoulosASiguawJ. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management2006; 17: 263–282.
81.
StraubDBoudreauM-CGefenD. Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems2004; 13: 380–427.
82.
BarkiHTitahRBoffoC. Information system use–related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Information Systems Research2007; 18: 173–192.
83.
HairJBlackWBabinB. Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010.
84.
JoreskogK. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika1971; 36(4): 409–426.
85.
AndersonJGerbingD. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin1988; 103(3): 411–423.
86.
BagozziR.PhillipsL. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly1982; 27(3): 459–489.
87.
KimY-M. Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2009; 60(6): 1178–1191.
88.
JoreskogG. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika1978; 43(4), 443–477.
89.
StellefsonMChaneyBChaneyD. The digital divide in health education. American Journal of Health Education2008; 39(2): 106–112.
