DNA microarrays usually screen a sufficiently large number of genes, including redundancies. In this paper, we study a neighbour-based method for gene assessment applied to the discovery of interesting clusters in an attempt to understand relations among cancer gene expression data. Using the gene assessment, an adaptive vector space is used for recording the genes’ saliences, where the element in this vector represents the weight of the corresponding gene. We thus compare a batch update strategy to a randomized update strategy to iteratively update vectors in the process of gene assessment. In tests on two benchmark cancer gene expression datasets, the experimental results indicate that our batch update strategy performs better than the randomized update strategy for gene assessment applied to the discovery of interesting clusters.
Marcano-CedenoAQuintanilla-DomínguezJAndinaD. Breast cancer classification applying artificial metaplasticity algorithm. Neurocomputing2011; 74(8): 1243–1250.
2.
WangZZineddinBLiangJZengNLiYDuMCaoJLiuX. A novel neural network approach to cDNA microarray image segmentation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine2013; 111(1): 189–198.
3.
Rodriguez-LujanIBailadorGSanchez-AvilaCHerreroAVidal-de-MiguelG. Analysis of pattern recognition and dimensionality reduction techniques for odor biometrics. Knowledge-based Systems2013; 52: 279–289.
4.
GuyonIWestonJBarnhillSVapnikV. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning2002; 46(1–3): 389–422.
5.
KushwahJSinghD. Classification of cancer gene selection using random forest and neural network based ensemble classifier. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research2013; 3(2): 30–34.
6.
PengPAddamOElzohbiMOzyerSTElhajjA. Reporting and analyzing alternative clustering solutions by employing multi-objective genetic algorithm and conducting experiments on cancer data. Knowledge-Based Systems2014; 56: 108–122.
7.
LinDAnXZhangJ. Double-bootstrapping source data selection for instance-based transfer learning. Pattern Recognition Letters2013; 34(11): 1279–1285.
8.
MaoQTsangIWH. A feature selection method for multivariate performance measures. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence2013; 35(9): 2051–2063.
9.
ZhaoZWangLLiuHYeJ. On similarity preserving feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering2013; 25(3): 619–632.
10.
TangJLiuH. CoSelect: Feature selection with instance selection for social media data. In: Proceedings of the 2013 SIAM International conference on data mining, Austin, TX, 2013.
11.
BouletRJouveBRossiFVillaN. Batch kernel SOM and related Laplacian methods for social network analysis. Neurocomputing2008; 1257–1273.
12.
ChenJLiuKC. On-line batch process monitoring using dynamic PCA and dynamic PLS models. Chemical Engineering Science2002; 57(1): 63–75.
13.
ZhaoCMoSGaoFLuNYaoY. Statistical analysis and online monitoring for handling multiphase batch processes with varying durations. Journal of Process Control2011; 21(6): 817–829.
14.
DuanGChenYW. Batch-incremental principal component analysis with exact mean update. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international conference on image processing, Brussels, 2011.
15.
ChenCH. A hybrid intelligent model of analyzing clinical breast cancer data using clustering techniques with feature selection. Applied Soft Computing2014; 20: 4–14.
16.
ChenCH. A semi-supervised feature selection method using a non-parametric technique with side information. Journal of Information Science2013; 39(3): 359–371.
17.
ChenCH. Feature selection based on compactness and separability: Comparison with filter-based methods. Computational Intelligence2013; article first published online 20 March2013.
18.
KohonenT. Self-organization and associative memory, 3rd edn. Springer: Berlin, 1989.
DaviesDLBouldinDW. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence1979; 1(4): 224–227.
21.
ZhangYSieuwertsAMMcGreevyMCaseyGCuferTParadisoAHarbeckNSpanPNHicksDGCroweJTubbsRRBuddGTLyonsJSweepFCGJSchmittMSchittulliFGolouhRTalantovDWangYFoekensJA. The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients that benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment2009; 116(2): 303–309.
