Although widely known as an approach to positive youth development, Lerner and Lerner’s Five Cs model characterizes thriving in ways that reflect an age-general relational developmental systems perspective. A narrow focus on youth tethers the Five Cs model to a period of the life span often described as an ontogenetic laboratory—a period marked by relatively high plasticity during which malleability can be observed readily. As such, research on the five Cs largely overlooks the model’s utility across other stages of the life span. We argue that it is past time to take the Five Cs model outside this ontogenetic laboratory, and we illustrate how such work may be done by evaluating a measure of the five Cs in a sample of 2,704 adults spanning well into midlife (MAge = 44.49 years, SD = 7.81, range = 24–66). Our results show that the five Cs exhibit a meaningful factor structure and appropriately correlate with key criterion variables in adults. We close by discussing implications and future directions for work that explores the Five Cs as a lifelong model of positive human development.
Abdul KadirN. B.MohdR. H. (2021). The 5Cs of positive youth development, purpose in life, hope, and well-being among emerging adults in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 641876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641876
2.
AhrensC. J. C.RyffC. D. (2006). Multiple roles and well-being: Sociodemographic and psychological moderators. Sex Roles, 55(11–12), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9134-8
3.
AldwinC.ChounS.SpiroA. (2024). The coping, appraisal, and resilience in aging (CARA) model: Longitudinal findings from the Normative Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 39(8), 884. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000863
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
5.
BairdB. M.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9
6.
BensonP. L.MannesM.PittmanK.FerberT. (2004). Youth development, developmental assets, and public policy. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 781–814). John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2016). Antidepressants and age: A new form of evidence for U-shaped well-being through life. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 127, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.04.010
8.
BosmaH.SchrijversC.MackenbachJ. P. (1999). Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and importance of perceived control: Cohort study. BMJ, 319(7223), 1469–1470. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1469
9.
BrandtstädterJ. (1998). Action perspectives on human development. In DamonW. (Series Ed.) & LernerR. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 807–863). Wiley.
10.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
11.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
12.
DimitrovaR.WiiumN. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of positive youth development. Springer Series on Child and Family Studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70262-5
13.
DvorskyM. R.KoflerM. J.BurnsG. L.LuebbeA. M.GarnerA. A.JarrettM. A.SotoE. F.BeckerS. P. (2019). Factor structure and criterion validity of the five Cs model of positive youth development in a multi-university sample of college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0938-y
14.
EriksonE. H. (1950). Growth and crises of the “healthy personality.” In SennM. J. E. (Ed.), Symposium on the healthy personality (pp. 91–146). Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.
15.
Ferrer-WrederL.EichasK.StefenelD.BuzeaC.WiiumN. (2021). The importance of positive psychological strengths in well-being and adjustment of Romanian emerging adults: A pattern and variable-oriented approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 659300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659300
16.
FreundA. M.BaltesP. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.642
17.
GalambosN. L.FangS.KrahnH. J.JohnsonM. D.LachmanM. E. (2015). Up, not down: The age curve in happiness from early adulthood to midlife in two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1664–1671. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000052
18.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.BoydM. J.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M.SchmidK. L.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2014). Creation of short and very short measures of the five Cs of positive youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12039
19.
GeldhofG. J.GestsdottirS.StefanssonK.JohnsonS. K.BowersE. P.LernerR. M. (2015). Selection, optimization, and compensation: The structure, reliability, and validity of forced-choice versus Likert-type measures in a sample of late adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414560447
20.
HendryL. B.KloepM. (2010). How universal is emerging adulthood? An empirical example. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903295067
21.
HolsenI.GeldhofJ.LarsenT.AardalE. (2017). The five Cs of positive youth development in Norway: Assessment and associations with positive and negative outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416645668
22.
Hudek-KneževićJ.KardumI. (1993). Upitnik dispozicijskog i situacijskog suo2avanja sa stresom i njegove psihometrijske zna2ajke. [Dispositional and situational coping inventory and it’s psychometric properties]. Godisnjak Zavoda za psihologiju, 2, 43–62.
23.
InfurnaF. J.GerstorfD.LachmanM. E. (2020). Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges. The American Psychologist, 75(4), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000591
24.
JelicicH.BobekD. L.PhelpsE.LernerR. M.LernerJ. V. (2007). Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: Findings from the first two waves of the 4-H Study of positive youth development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407076439
25.
JohnsonS. K.EttekalA. V. (2023). The five Cs of positive youth development: Configurations of thriving in four US adolescent samples. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(2), 656–679.
26.
KeyesC. L. M.RyffC. D. (1999). Psychological well-being in midlife. In WillisS. L.ReidJ. D. (Eds.), Life in the middle (pp. 161–180). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012757230-7/50028-6
27.
KingP. E.DowlingE. M.MuellerR. A.WhiteK.SchultzW.OsbornP.DickersonE.BobekD. L.LernerR. M.BensonP. L.ScalesP. C. (2005). Thriving in adolescence: The voices of youth-serving practitioners, parents, and early and late adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272459
28.
KrauseN. (2007). Age and decline in role-apecific feelings of control. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 62(1), S28–S35. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.1.S28
29.
KurthM. L.WitzelD. D.CerinoE. S.AlmeidaD. M. (2025). Longitudinal changes in coping strategies across midlife and older adulthood: Findings from the midlife in the United States study. Aging & Mental Health, 29(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2396066
30.
LachmanM. E. (2004). Development in midlife. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 305–331. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141521
31.
LachmanM. E. (2006). Perceived control over aging-related declines: Adaptive beliefs and behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 282–286. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00453.x
32.
LernerR. M. (1987). A life-span perspective for early adolescence. In LernerR. M.FochT. T. (Eds.), Biological-psychosocial interactions in early adolescence (pp. 9–34). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33.
LernerR. M. (2017). Commentary: Studying and testing the positive youth development model: A tale of two approaches. Child Development, 88(4), 1183–1185.
34.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestsdottirS.NaudeauS.JelicicH.AlbertsA.MaL.SmithL. M.BobekD. L.Richman-RaphaelD.SimpsonI.ChristiansenE. D.von EyeA. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272461
35.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.BowersE. P.GeldhofG. J. (2015). Positive youth development and relational-developmental-systems. In OvertonW. F.MolenaarP. C. M.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 607–651). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy116
36.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
McAdamsD. P. (2001). Generativity in midlife. In LachmanM. E. (Ed.), Handbook of midlife development (pp. 395–443). John Wiley & Sons.
39.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E. (2007). Life course trajectories of perceived control and their relationship to education. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1339–1382. https://doi.org/10.1086/511800
40.
NovakM.ŠutićL.GačalH.RovišD.MihićJ.MaglicaT. (2023). Structural model of 5Cs of positive youth development in Croatia: Relations with mental distress and mental well-being. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2227253
41.
OishiS.TsangS. (2022). The socio-ecological psychology of residential mobility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(3), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1310
42.
OvertonW. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In OvertonW. F.MolenaarP. C. M.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 9–62). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy102
43.
PittmanK.IrbyM.FerberT. (2001). Unfinished business: Further reflections on a decade of promoting youth development. In BensonP.L.PittmanK.J. (eds.), Trends in youth development. Outreach scholarship, Vol. 6 (pp. 3–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1459-6_1
44.
Stewart-BrownS.TennantA.TennantR.PlattS.ParkinsonJ.WeichS. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-15
45.
StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.BroderickJ. E.DeatonA. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9985–9990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003744107
46.
SurteesP. G.WainwrightN. W. J.LubenR.WarehamN. J.BinghamS. A.KhawK.-T. (2010). Mastery is associated with cardiovascular disease mortality in men and women at apparently low risk. Health Psychology, 29(4), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019432
47.
TennantR.HillerL.FishwickR.FishwickR.PlattS.JosephS.WeichS.ParkinsonJ.SeckerJ.Stewart-BrownS. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
