The aim of this study was to examine the mediating effect of the Five Cs of Positive Youth Development (PYD) on the relationship between students’ perceived school empowerment and school satisfaction, as well as gender differences in these relationships. The data stemmed from a cross-sectional survey of 997 adolescents from four upper secondary schools in Norway. Structural equation modelling (SEM) using the statistical program AMOS was employed. Results showed that students’ perception of an empowering school climate predicted the Five Cs. However, only the competence, confidence, and connection factors predicted school satisfaction. Competence, confidence, and connection fully mediated the effect of school empowerment on school satisfaction. Based on significance tests according to gender, the Five Cs are more strongly related to school empowerment and school satisfaction for females than for males.
Backe-Hansen, E., Walhovd, K. B., & Huang, L. (2014). Kjønnsforskjeller i skoleprestasjoner: en kunnskapsoppsummering: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986) The moderator -mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
3.
BensonP. L.LeffertN.ScalesP. C.BlythD. A. (1998) Beyond the ‘village’ rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science2(3): 138–159. doi: 10.1207/s1532480xads0203_3.
4.
BensonP. L.ScalesP. C.SyvertsenA. K. (2011) The contribution of the developmental assets framework to positive youth development theory and practice. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour41: 197–230. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386492-5.00008-7.
5.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions154: 136.
6.
ByrneB. M. (2010) Multivariate applications series. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
7.
CohenJ. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin1: 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
8.
ConwayR. J.HearyC.HoganM. J. (2015) An evaluation of the measurement properties of the five Cs model of positive youth development. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1941, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01941.
9.
Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., & Barnekow, V. (2009). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the, 2010, 271.
10.
DanielsenA. G. (2010) Supportive and motivating environments in school: Main factors to make well-being and learning a reality. Norsk epidemiologi20(1): 33–39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5324/nje.v20i1.1293.
11.
DanielsenA. G.SamdalO.HetlandJ.WoldB. (2009) School-related social support and students’ perceived life satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research102(4): 303–320. doi: 10.3200/JOER.102.4.303-320.
12.
DanielsenA. G.TjomslandH. E. (2013) Mestringsforventning, trivsel og frafall. In: KrumsvikR. J.SäljöR. (eds) Praktisk pedagogisk utdanning. En antologi, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
13.
DavisM. H. (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44(1): 113.
14.
DienerE. (1994) Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social indicators Research31(2): 103–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207052.
15.
EcclesJ.GootmanJ. A. (2002) Community programs to promote youth development. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, Washington, DC: The National Academies Pressdoi: https://doi.org/10.17226/10022.
16.
EcclesJ. S.RoeserR. W. (2011) Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence21(1): 225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x.
17.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A.MurphyB.KarbonM.SmithM.MaszkP. (1996) The relations of children’s dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Developmental Psychology32(2): 195, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.195.
18.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.LernerR. M. (2013) Special section introduction: Thriving in context: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence42(1): 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9855-7.
19.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M.CallinaK. S.WalshK. J.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2014) Longitudinal analysis of a very short measure of positive youth development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence43(6): 933–949. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17166-1_9.
20.
HaraninE. C.HuebnerE. S.SuldoS. M. (2007) Predictive and incremental validity of global and domain-based adolescent life satisfaction reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment25(2): 127–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906295620.
21.
HarterS. (1988) Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents, Denver: University of Denver.
22.
HattieJ. (2009) Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, London: Routledge.
23.
Heck, K., & Subramaniam, A. (2009). Youth development frameworks. [Monograph]. Davis, CA.
24.
HelgesonV. S. (1994) Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles31(11): 653–682. doi:10.1007/bf01544286.
25.
HernesG. (2010) Gull av gråstein: tiltak for å redusere frafall i videregående opplæring, Oslo: Fafo.
26.
Holsen, I., Geldhof, J., Larsen, T., & Aardal, E. (2016). The Five Cs of Positive Youth Development in Norway: Assessment and associations with positive and negative outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development. doi: 10.1177/0165025416645668.
27.
HuebnerE. S. (1994) Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment6(2): 149, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.149.
28.
HuebnerE. S.McCulloughG. (2000) Correlates of school satisfaction among adolescents. The Journal of Educational Research93(5): 331–335.
29.
HuebnerE. S.ValoisR. F.SuldoS. M.SmithL. C.McKnightC. G.SeligsonJ. L.ZulligK. J. (2004) Perceived quality of life: A neglected component of adolescent health assessment and intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health34(4): 270–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.007.
30.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M.HoyleR. H. (1995) Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Evaluating model fit, 76–79.
31.
KaniušonytėG.MalinauskienėO.Truskauskaitė-KunevičienėI. (2014) Child-parent relationships and positive youth development components. Social Work13(1): 62–75.
32.
KirkC. M.LewisR. K.BrownK.KariboB.ParkE. (2016) The power of student empowerment: Measuring classroom predictors and individual indicators. The Journal of Educational Research109(6): 589–595. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.1002880.
33.
KlingK. C.HydeJ. S.ShowerC. J.BuswellB. N.ParkE. (1999) Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin125(4): 470, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.470.
34.
KlineR. B. (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
35.
LarsenT. M. (2016) Shifting towards positive youth development in schools in Norway–challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion18(1): 8–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2015.1079427.
36.
LarsenT.HolsenI.TjomslandH. E.ServanA.TyssebotnG.RostadÅ. (2012) Pilotevaluering av Drømmeskolen – en casestudie av 5 skoler. Evalueringsrapport, Bergen: HEMIL-senteret, Universitetet i Bergen.
37.
LarsonR. W. (2000) Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist55(1): 170–183. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.170.
38.
LernerR. M. (2017) Commentary: Studying and testing the positive youth development model: A tale of two approaches. Child Development88(4): 1183–1185. doi:10.1111/cdev.12875.
39.
LernerR. M.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.LernerJ. V. (2005) Positive youth development a view of the issues. he journal of early adolescence25(1): 10–16. doi: 10.1177/0272431604273211.
40.
LernerJ. V.BowersE.MinorK.BoydM.MuellerM.SchmidK.NapolitanoC. M.Lewin-BizanS.LernerR. (2013) Positive youth development: Processes, philosophies, and programs. Handbook of Psychology6: 365–392.
41.
Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2013). The Positive Development of Youth: Comprehensive findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development Tufts University.
42.
LernerR.LernerJ.AlmerigiJ.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestsdottirS. N. (2010) Scoring protocol measure of PYD (4-H Study of PYD). Journal of Early Adolescence25(1): 17–71.
43.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestsdottirS.JelicicH.AlbertsA.MaL.SmithL. M.BobekD. L.Richman-RaphaelD.SimpsonI.ChristiansenE. D.von EyeA. (2005) Positive Youth Development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of Positive Youth Development. The Journal of Early Adolescence25(1): 17–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272461.
44.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Bowers, P. E., & Geldhof, J. G. (2015). Positive Youth Development and relational-developmental-systems. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 1(16), 1–45. doi: 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy116.
45.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.Lewin-BizanS.BowersE. P.BoydM. J.MuellerM. K.SchmidK. L.NapolitanoC. M. (2011) Positive Youth Development: Processes, programs, and problematics. Journal of Youth Development6(3): 38–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2011.174.
46.
LernerR. M.von EyeA.LernerJ. V.Lewin-BizanS. (2009) Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of Positive Youth Development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology30(5): 567–570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.07.002.
47.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological methods7(1): 83, doi: http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.
48.
McMullinJ. A.CairneyJ. (2004) Self-esteem and the intersection of age, class, and gender. Journal of Aging Studies18(1): 75–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2003.09.006.
49.
MorganA.ZiglioE. (2007) Revitalising the evidence base for public health: An assets model. Promotion and Education14(2 suppl.): 17–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140020701x.
50.
MurisP. (2001) A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment23(3): 145–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010961119608.
51.
NOVA (2015) Ungdata. Nasjonale resultater 2014. NOVA Rapport 7/15, Oslo: NOVA.
52.
Opplæringslova. Lov 17. juli 1998 nr. 61 om grunnskolen og den vidaregåande opplæringa.
53.
OzerE. J.SchotlandM. (2011) Psychological empowerment among urban youth: Measure development and relationship to psychosocial functioning. Health Education and Behaviour38(4): 348–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198110373734.
54.
Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science.
PatelV. (2013) Reducing the burden of depression in youth: What are the implications of neuroscience and genetics on policies and programs?Journal of Adolescent Health52(2): S36–S38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.016.
57.
PerryD. G.PaulettiR. E. (2011) Gender and adolescent development. Journal of Research on Adolescence21(1): 61–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00715.x.
58.
RothJ. L.Brooks-GunnJ. (2003) What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science7(2): 94–111. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0702_6.
59.
SamdalO.MathisenF.TorsheimT.DisethÅ. R.FismenA.-S.LarsenT.WoldB.ÅrdalE. (2016) Helse og trivsel blant barn og unge. Resultater fra den landsrepresentative spørreundersøkelsen. Helsevaner blant skoleelever. En WHO-undersøkelse i flere land, Bergen: UIB.
60.
ScalesP. C.LeffertN. (1999) Developmental assets: A synthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development, Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
TheokasC.LernerR. M. (2006) Observed ecological assets in families, schools, and neighbourhoods: Conceptualization, measurement, and relations with positive and negative developmental outcomes. Applied Developmental Science10(2): 61–74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads1002_2.
63.
TianL.ZhangJ.HuebnerE. S. (2015) Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS) among Chinese elementary school students. Child Indicators Research8(4): 907–923. doi: 10.1007/s12187-014-9295-x.
64.
VinerR. M.OzerE. M.DennyS.MarmotM.ResnickM.FatusiA.CurrieC. (2012) Adolescence and the social determinants of health. The Lancet379(9826): 1641–1652. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4.
65.
Wallerstein, N. (2006). What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: WHO.
66.
WichstrømL. (1995) Social, psychological and physical correlates of eating problems. A study of the general adolescent population in Norway. Psychological medicine25(03): 567–579. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700033481.
67.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.SchiefeleU.RoeserR.Davis- KeanP. (2006) Motivation. In: EisenbergN. (ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology, 6th ed., Vol. 3,. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 933–1002.
68.
ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988) The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment52(1): 30–41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
69.
ZuckermanM.LiC.HallJ. A. (2016) When men and women differ in self-esteem and when they don’t: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality64: 34–51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.007.
