Older age is reportedly protective against the detrimental psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, consistent with the theory that reduced future time extension (FTE) leads to prioritization of socioemotional well-being. We investigated whether depression severity and pandemic-related factors (regional severity, threat, social isolation) reduce FTE beyond chronological age and whether these relationships differ between younger and older adults. In May 2020, we recruited 248 adults (younger: 18–43 years, older: 55–80 years) from 13 industrialized nations. Multigroup path analysis found that depression severity was a better predictor of FTE than the reverse association in both age groups, suggesting an affective foreshortening of future time. In both age groups, older age was protective against depression severity, and younger age was associated with heightened vulnerability to the negative impacts of pandemic-related factors. Future research should consider the complex interrelationships between FTE, age, and depression severity and the potential impacts of the broader psychosocial milieu.
AddisD. R.HachS.TippettL. J. (2016). Do strategic processes contribute to the specificity of future simulation in depression?British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12103
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
3.
BaldenspergerL.WiedemannA. U.WesselL.KeilholzU.KnollN. (2018). Social network, autonomy, and adherence correlates of future time perspective in patients with head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 27(6), 1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4690
4.
BrothersA.GabrianM.WahlH. W.DiehlM. (2016). Future time perspective and awareness of age-related change: Examining their role in predicting psychological well-being. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000101
5.
CarstensenL. L.PasupathiM.MayrU.NesselroadeJ. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644
6.
CarstensenL. L.ShavitY. Z.BarnesJ. T. (2020). Age advantages in emotional experience persist even under threat from the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science, 31(11), 1374–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620967261
7.
CarstensenL. L.TuranB.ScheibeS.RamN.Ersner-HershfieldH.Samanez-LarkinG. R.BrooksK. P.NesselroadeJ. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021285
8.
CarvalhoR. G.CapeloR.NuñezD. (2018). Perspectives concerning the future when time is suspended: Analysing inmates’ discourse. Time & Society, 27(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15604533
9.
CateR. A.JohnO. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.186
10.
ChandlerM. J.LalondeC. (1998). Cultural continuity as a hedge against suicide in Canada’s First Nations. Transcultural Psychiatry, 35, 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346159803500202
11.
CheungC. S. S.CheungT. C. K.HuiN. H. H. (2003, July). Prospect of SARS: How life threatening events change future time perspective and goal pursuit of people in Hong Kong [Paper presentation]. Joint HKU/CUHK/CPU Academic Seminar ‘After SARS: Education and Research Agenda for the Future,’Hong Kong.
12.
CohenM. A.TavaresJ. (2020). Who are the most at-risk older adults in the COVID-19 era? It’s not just those in nursing homes. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 32(4–5), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1764310
13.
CoudinG.LimaM. L. (2011). Being well as time goes by: Future time perspective and well-being. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 219–232.
FieldsE. C.KensingerE. A.GarciaS. M.FordJ. H.CunninghamT. J. (2022). With age comes well-being: Older age associated with lower stress, negative affect, and depression throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Aging & Mental Health, 26(10), 2071–2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.2010183
18.
FredricksonB. L.CarstensenL. L. (1990). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5(3), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.335
19.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L. (2006). Goals change when life’s fragility is primed: Lessons learned from older adults, the September 11 attacks and Sars. Social Cognition, 24(3), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.248
20.
GableP. A.PooleB. D. (2012). Time flies when you’re having approach-motivated fun: Effects of motivational intensity on time perception. Psychological Science, 23(8), 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435817
21.
GambleB.MoreauD.TippettL. J.AddisD. R. (2019). Specificity of future thinking in depression: A meta-analysis. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 14, 816–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619851784
22.
GambleB.TippettL. J.MoreauD.AddisD. R. (2021). The futures we want: How goal-directed imagination relates to mental health. Clinical Psychological Science, 9(4), 732–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620986096
23.
GriffinS. C.MezukB.WilliamsA. B.PerrinP. B.RybarczykB. D. (2020). Isolation, not loneliness or cynical hostility, predicts cognitive decline in older Americans. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(1–2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264318800587
24.
HallfordD. J.AustinD. W.TakanoK.RaesF. (2018). Psychopathology and episodic future thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of specificity and episodic detail. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 102, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.01.003
25.
HolmanE. A.GrishamE. L. (2020). When time falls apart: The public health implications of distorted time perception in the age of COVID-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(Suppl. 1), S63–S65. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000756
26.
HolmesE. A.O’ConnorR. C.PerryV. H.TraceyI.WesselyS.ArseneaultL.BallardC.ChristensenH.Cohen SilverR.EverallI.FordT.JohnA.KabirT.KingK.MadanI.MichieS.PrzybylskiA. K.ShafranR.SweeneyA.. . . BullmoreE. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(6), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
27.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2021). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R Package Version 0.5-5) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
29.
KooijD. T. A. M.KanferR.BettsM.RudolphC. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306
30.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
31.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125
32.
LebrasseurA.Fortin-BédardN.LettreJ.RaymondE.BussièresE.-L.LapierreN.FaietaJ.VincentC.DuchesneL.OuelletM.-C.GagnonE.TourignyA.LamontagneM.-È.RouthierF. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults: Rapid review. Journal of Medical Internet Research Aging, 4(2), Article e26474. https://doi.org/10.2196/26474
33.
LensW.PaixãoM. P.HerreraD.GroblerA. (2012). Future time perspective as a motivational variable: Content and extension of future goals affect the quantity and quality of motivation: Future time perspective as a motivational variable. Japanese Psychological Research, 54(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00520.x
34.
LewinK. (1942). Time perspective and morale. In WatsonG. (Ed.), Civilian morale: Second yearbook of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (pp. 48–70). Houghton Mifflin. https://doi.org/10.1037/13983-004
MacLeodA. K.ByrneA. (1996). Anxiety, depression, and the anticipation of future positive and negative experiences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.105.2.286
37.
MartinelliN.GilS.BelletierC.ChevalèreJ.DezecacheG.HuguetP.Droit-VoletS. (2021). Time and emotion during lockdown and the Covid-19 epidemic: Determinants of our experience of time?Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 616169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.616169
38.
McKayM. T.ColeJ. C.AndrettaJ. R. (2016). Temporal profiles relate meaningfully to anxiety and depression in university undergraduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.058
39.
MelgesF. (1982). Time and the inner future: A temporal approach to psychiatric disorders. Wiley.
40.
NicolaisenM.ThorsenK. (2017). What are friends for? Friendships and loneliness over the lifespan—from 18 to 79 years. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 84(2), 126–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415016655166
OgdenR. S. (2021). Distortions to the passage of time during England’s second national lockdown: A role for depression. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0250412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250412
43.
ParlapaniE.HolevaV.NikopoulouV. A.KaprinisS.NouskasI.DiakogiannisI. (2021). A review on the COVID-19-related psychological impact on older adults: Vulnerable or not?Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(6), 1729–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01873-4
44.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
45.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
46.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.6.2) [Computer software]. http://www.R-project.org
47.
RodriguesN. G.HanC. Q. Y.SuY.Klainin-YobasP.WuX. V. (2022). Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(3), 609–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15063
48.
RohrM. K.JohnD. T.FungH. H.LangF. R. (2017). A three-component model of future time perspective across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 32(7), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000191
49.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
50.
Rutland-LawesJ.WallinheimoA.-S.EvansS. L. (2021). Risk factors for depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study in middle-aged and older adults. BJPsych Open, 7(5), Article e161. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.997
SimonE.ZsidóA. N.BirkásB.GácsB.CsathóÁ. (2022). Negative time perspective predicts the self-perceived affective and physical components of pain independently from depression, anxiety, and early life circumstances. Acta Psychologica, 224, Article 103536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103536
53.
Sullivan-SinghS. J.StantonA. L.LowC. A. (2015). Living with limited time: Socioemotional selectivity theory in the context of health adversity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 900–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039047
54.
SunR.SauterD. (2021). Sustained stress reduces the age advantages in emotional experience of older adults: Commentary on Carstensen et al. (2020). Psychological Science, 32(12), 2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211052476
55.
TanakaJ. S. (1987). “How big is big enough?” Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130296
56.
WhittakerT. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299
57.
WickensC. M.McDonaldA. J.Elton-MarshallT.WellsS.NigatuY. T.JankowiczD.HamiltonH. A. (2021). Loneliness in the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with age, gender and their interaction. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 136, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.047
58.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
