This study examined cultural specificity in how interpretations about peer provocation are associated with revenge goals and aggression. The sample consisted of young adolescents from the United States (369 seventh graders; 54.7% male; 77.2% identified as White) and from Pakistan (358 seventh graders; 39.2% male). Participants rated their interpretations and revenge goals in response to six peer provocation vignettes and completed peer nominations of aggressive behavior. Multigroup structural equation models (SEMs) indicated cultural specificity in how interpretations were related to revenge goals. Interpretations that a friendship with the provocateur was unlikely were uniquely related to revenge goals for Pakistani adolescents. For U.S adolescents, positive interpretations were negatively related to revenge but self-blame interpretations were positively related to vengeance goals. Revenge goals were related to aggression similarly across groups.
AsherS. R.MacEvoyJ. P.McDonaldK. L. (2008). Children’s peer relations, social competence, and school adjustment: A social tasks and social goals perspective. In MaehrM. L.KarabenickS.UrdanT. (Eds.), Advances in achievement and motivation, Vol. 15: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 357–390). Emerald.
2.
AsherS. R.ParkerJ. G.WalkerD. L. (1996). Distinguishing friendship from acceptance: Implications for intervention and assessment. In BukowskiW. M.NewcombA. F.HartupW. W. (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 366–405). Cambridge University Press.
3.
AsherS. R.RoseA. J.GabrielS. W. (2001). Peer rejection in everyday life. In LearyM. R. (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 105–142). Oxford University Press.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BushmanB. J. (2003). Emotions and aggressiveness. In HeitmeyerW.HaganJ. (Eds.), The international handbook of violence research (pp. 479–493). Kluwer Academic.
5.
BearG. G.Uribe-ZarainX.ManningM. A.ShiomiK. (2009). Shame, guilt, blaming, and anger: Differences between children in Japan and the US. Motivation and Emotion, 33(3), 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9130-8
6.
ChaudhryA. G.AhmedA. (2014). Biradari’s function and significance: An anthropological study of gender opinions. Science International (Lahore), 26(4), 1863–1865.
7.
ChenY. R.ChenX. P.PortnoyR. (2009). To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship, and relational-self orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.024
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
9.
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social-information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
10.
DirksM. A.CuttiniL. A.MottA.HenryD. B. (2017). Associations between victimization and adolescents’ self-reported responses to peer provocation are moderated by peer-reported aggressiveness. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(2), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12282
11.
DodgeK. A.MaloneP. S.LansfordJ. E.SorbringE.SkinnerA. T.TapanyaS.TiradoL. M. U.ZelliA.AlampayL. P.Al-HassanS. M.BacchiniD.BombiA. S.BornsteinM. H.ChangL.Deater-DeckardK.GiuntaL. D.OburuP.PastorelliC. (2015). Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(30), 9310–9315.
12.
DodgeK. A.SombergD. R. (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. Child Development, 58(1), 213–224.
13.
EbesutaniC.DrescherC. F.ReiseS. P.HeidenL.HightT. L.DamonJ. D.YoungJ. (2012). The importance of modeling method effects: Resolving the (uni)dimensionality of the loneliness questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627967
14.
FrenchD. C.PidadaS.DenomaJ.McDonaldK.LawtonA. (2005). Reported peer conflicts of children in the United States and Indonesia. Social Development, 14(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00311.x
15.
FurukawaE.TangneyJ.HigashibaraF. (2012). Cross-cultural continuities and discontinuities in shame, guilt, and pride: A study of children residing in Japan, Korea and the USA. Self and Identity, 11(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2010.512748
16.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580111002
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
JungY.HallJ.HongR.GohT.OngN.TanN. (2014). Payback: Effects of relationship and cultural norms on reciprocity. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12057
LansfordJ. E.GodwinJ.BornsteinM. H.ChangL.Deater-DeckardK.Di GiuntaL.. . . BacchiniD. (2017). Reward sensitivity, impulse control, and social cognition as mediators of the link between childhood family adversity and externalizing behavior in eight countries. Development and Psychopathology, 29(5), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417001328
23.
LaursenB.FinkelsteinB. D.BettsN. T. (2001). A developmental meta-analysis of peer conflict resolution. Developmental Review, 21(4), 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1006/DREV.2000.0531
24.
LemeriseE. A.ArsenioW. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00124
25.
LeungA. K.CohenD. (2011). Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Personality Process and Individual Differences, 100, 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022151
26.
LuP.OhJ.LeahyK. E.ChopikW. J. (2021). Friendship importance around the world: Links to cultural factors, health, and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 3568.
27.
Martínez-LozanoV.Sánchez-MedinaJ. A.GoudenaP. P. (2011). A cross-cultural study of observed conflicts between young children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381361
28.
McDonaldK. L.AsherS. R. (2013). College students’ revenge goals across friend, romantic partner, and roommate contexts: The role of interpretations and emotions. Social Development, 22, 499–521.
29.
McDonaldK. L.AsherS. R. (2018). Pacifists and revenge-seekers in response to unambiguous peer provocation. The Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1907–1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0767-4
30.
McDonaldK. L.YangJ. Y.SeoS.ErathS. E. (2021). A framework for understanding variation in youth revenge motivations and retaliatory behaviors. In RecchiaH.WainrybC. (Eds.), Retribution and revenge across childhood and adolescence (pp. 8–36). Cambridge University Press.
31.
MumtazS.MaqsoodA.RehmanG. (2017). Cognitive emotion regulation as determinants of internalizing and externalizing problems of adolescents. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 27(2), 1–16.
32.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
33.
NewcombA. F.BagwellC. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306–347.
34.
PerrenS.EttekalI.LaddG. (2013). The impact of peer victimization on later maladjustment: Mediating and moderating effects of hostile and self-blaming attributions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02618.x
RoseA. J.AsherS. R. (1999). Children’s goals and strategies in response to conflicts within a friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.69
39.
SchacterH. L.WhiteS. J.ChangV. Y.JuvonenJ. (2015). “Why me?”: Characterological self-blame and continued victimization in the first year of middle school. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.865194
40.
SeveranceL.Bui-WrzosinskaL.GelfandM. J.LyonsS.NowakA.BorkowskiW.. . . YamaguchiS. (2013). The psychological structure of aggression across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 835–865.
41.
ShelleyD.CraigW. M. (2010). Attributions and coping styles in reducing victimization. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0829573509357067
42.
TangneyJ. P. (1998). How does guilt differ from shame? In BybeeJ. (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 1–17). Academic Press.
43.
TangneyJ. P.WagnerP. E.Hill-BarlowD.MarschallD. E.GramzowR. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.797
44.
Tilghman-OsborneC.ColeD. A.FeltonJ. W.CieslaJ. A. (2008). Relation of guilt, shame, behavioral and characterological self-blame to depressive symptoms in adolescents over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 809–842. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.8.809
45.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data. (2012). Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey, 2000-01, 2005-06, 2009-10, and 2010-11.
46.
WilliamsS. C.LochmanJ. E.PhillipsN. C.BarryT. D. (2003). Aggressive and nonaggressive boys’ physiological and cognitive processes in response to peer provocations. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32(4), 568–576.
47.
YangJ. Y.McDonaldK. L.SeoS. (2022). Attributions about peer victimization in US and Korean adolescents and associations with internalizing problems. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51, 2018–2032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01622-4
48.
ZamanM. R. (2014). Parenting in Pakistan: An overview. In HelaineS. (Ed.), Parenting across cultures (pp. 91–104). Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
