A laboratory experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of computer cost and access on the selection of information for a public management decision. Subjects were asked to make a decision regarding the adoption of a flextime innovation for a social services agency. Ten different sets of information (half on a computer, half in conventional hardcopy form) were available to the subjects. In addition to a control group, subjects were divided into three treatment groups where cost of the information sets and difficulty of access to the computer-based media were manipulated. The researchers found that increased cost substantially diminished the choice of computer-based information but increased difficulty of access had only a modest effect. Increased cost also led to the selection of a more diverse set of information. Access difficulty resulted in decreased confidence in the decision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDERSON, R. E.
, (1971) “Computerization: Panacea or part of the problem.”Public Management53 (10): 20-21.
2.
BALDRIDGE, J.
and R. BURNHAM (1975) “Organizational innovation: individual, organizational and environmental impacts.”Adm. Sci. Q.20: 165-176.
3.
BARKIN, S. (1974) “An investigation into some factors affecting information system utilization.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
4.
BASS, F. M.
(1969) “A new product growth model for consumer durables.”Management Sci.15 (5): 215-226.
5.
BERKOWITZ, L.
and E. DONNERSTEIN (1982) “External validity if more than skin deep: some answers to criticism of laboratory experiments.”Applied Psychology37: 245-257.
6.
BLUMENTHAL, W. M.
(1983) “Candid reflections of businessman in Washington,” pp. 22-23 in J. Perry and K. L. Kraemer (eds.) Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
7.
BORGATTA, E. F.
and G. W. BOHRNSTEDT (1974) “Some limitations on generalizability from social psychological experiments.”Soc. Methods and Research3 (1): 111-120.
8.
BOZEMAN, B.
(1981) “Public managers' use of scientific and technical information.”R&D management14 (3): 131-139.
9.
BOZEMAN, B.
and L. V. BLANKENSHIP (1979) “Science information and government decision-making: the case of the National Science Foundation.”Public Administration Rev.39: 27-36.
10.
BOZEMAN, B.
and E. COLE (1982) “Scientific and technical information in public management: the role of gatekeeping and channel preference.”Administration and Society13 (4): 479-493.
11.
BOZEMAN, B.
and W. E. McALPINE (1977) “Goals and bureaucratic decision-making: an experiment.”Human Relations30 (5): 417-429.
12.
CHERVANY, N. L.
and G. W. DICKSON (1974) “An experimental evaluation of information overload in a production environment.”Management Sci.20 (10): 1335-1344.
13.
COHN, S. F.
and R. M. TURYN (1980) “The structure of the firm and the adoption of process innovation.”IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementEM-27: 98-102.
14.
CONNOLLY, T.
(1977) “Information processing and decision-making in organizations.” pp. 205-234 in B. Staw and G. Salancik (eds.) new Directions in Organizational Behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press.
15.
DANZIGER, J. N.
(1979) “Technology and productivity: a contingency analysis of computers in local government.”Administration and Society6 (1): 27-49.
16.
DANZIGER, J. N.
and W. H. DUTTON (1979) “Technological innovation in local government: the case of computers.”Policy and Politics6 (1): 27-49.
17.
DANZIGER, J. N.
and K. L. KRAEMER (1985) “Computerized data-based systems and productivity among professional workers: the case of detectives.”Public Administration Rev.45 (1): 196-209.
18.
DOWNS, A.
(1967) “A realistic look at the pay-offs from urban data systems.”Public Administration Rev.27 (3): 204-210.
19.
DRABEK, T.
and E. HAAS (1967) “Realism in laboratory simulation: myth or method.”Social Forces45: 337-346.
20.
EIN-DOR, P.
and E. SEGEV (1978) “Organizational context and the success of management information systems.”Management Sci.24 (10): 1064-1077.
21.
HENSHEL, R. L.
(1980) “The purpose of laboratory experimentation and the virtues of deliberate artificiality.”J. of Experimental Social Psychology16: 466-478.
22.
ISAACS, H.
(1968) “Computer systems technology: progress, projections, problems.”Public Administration Rev.28 (6): 488-494.
23.
IVES, B.
, S. HAMILTON, and G. B. DAVIS (1980) “A framework for research in computer-based management information systems.”Management Sci.26 (9): 910-934.
24.
KIEL, L. D.
(forthcoming) “Information systems education in master's programs in public affairs and administration: present state and future prospects.”Public Administration Rev.
25.
KOESTER, R.
and LUTHANS, F. (1979) “Impact of the computer on the choice activity of decision-makers: replication with actual users of computerizes MIS,”Academy of Management J.22 (2): 416-422.
26.
KRAEMER, K. L.
and J. PERRY (1979) “The federal push to bring technology to local governments.”Public Administration Rev.39 (3): 260-269.
27.
LEVIN, I. P.
, J. J. LOUVIERE, A. A. SCHEPANSKI, and K. L. NORMAN (1983) “External validity of tests of laboratory studies of information integration.”Organization Behavior and Human Performance31: 173-193.
28.
LUCAS, H. C., Jr.
(1981) “An experimental investigation of the use of computer-based graphics in decision making,”Management Sci.27 (7) 757-768.
29.
LUCAS, H. C., Jr.
and N. NIELSEN (1980) “The impact of the mode of information presentation on learning and performance,”Management Sci.26: 982-993.
30.
LUSK, E. L.
and M. KERSNICK (1979) “The effect of cognitive style and report format on task performance: the MIS design consequences.”Management Sci.25: 787-798.
31.
MYERS, I.
(1981) Introduction to Type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32.
NICKERSON, R. S.
(1981) “Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them.”Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies15: 469-483.
33.
O'REILLY, C. A., III
(1982) “Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: the impact of quality and accessibility of information,”Academy of Management J.25 (4): 756-771.
34.
O'REILLY, C. A., III
(1983) “The use of information in organization decision-making: a model and some propositions,”Research in Organization Behavior5: 103-139.
35.
PERRY, J.
and K. L. KRAEMER (1979) Technological Innovation in American Local Governments. New York: Pergamon Press.
36.
RAINEY, G.
and L. WOLF (1981) “Flex-time: short-term benefits, long term...?”Public Administration Rev.41 (1): 52-63.
37.
SHANGRAW, R. F., Jr.
(forthcoming) “How public managers use information: an experiment examining the choice of computer and printed information.”Public Administration Rev.
38.
SHANGRAW, R. F., Jr.
and B. BOZEMAN (1986) “Computers and commitment to a public management decision: an experiment,” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration. Anaheim, CA, April 14.
39.
UNGSON, G. R.
, D. N. BRAUNSTEIN, and P. D. HALL (1981) “Managerial information processing: a research review,”Admin. Sci. Q.26 (1): 116-134.
40.
WEISS, J. A.
(1982) “Coping with complexity: an experimental study of public policy decision-making,”J. of Policy Analysis and Management2 (1): 66-87.
41.
WILSON, P.
(1977) Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
42.
WINKLER, R.
and A. MURPHY (1973) “Experiments in the laboratory and the real world,”Organization Behavior and Human Performance10: 252-270
