BARROWS, L. K.
(1980) “Findings and implications of the thirteen schools study.” Presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, Boston, April.
2.
BERMAN, P.
(1978) Designing Implementation to Match Policy Situations: A Contingency Analysis of Programmed and Adaptive Implementation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
3.
CATES, C. S.
and S. WARD [eds.](1979) Dissemination and the Improvement of Practice: Cooperation and Support in the School Improvement Process. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
4.
CHARTERS, W. W., Jr.
and R. J. PELLEGRIN (1973) “Barriers to the innovation process: four case studies of differentiated staffing.”Admin. Sci. Q.9, 1: 3-14.
5.
CLARK, D. L.
and E. G. Guba (1974) The Configurational Perspective: A View of Educational Knowledge Production and Utilization. Washington, DC: Council for Educational Research and Development.
6.
COHEN, M. D.
, J. C., MAUCH, and J. P. OLSEN (1972) “A garbage can model of organizational choice.”Admin. Sci. Q. (March): 1-25.
7.
DeVRIES, D. L.
, P. R. LUCASSE, and S. L. SHACKMAN (1980) Small Group vs. Individualized Instruction: A Field Test of Relative Effectiveness. Report 293. Baltimore, MD: Center for Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
8.
Dissemination Analysis Group
(1976) Educational Dissemination in Relation to Public Elementary and Secondary Schools. Preliminary Final Report to the Dissemination Policy Council.
9.
FOREHAND, G. A.
, M. RAGOSTA, and D. A. ROCK (1976) Conditions and Processes of Effective School Desegregation. Final Report. U. S. Office of Education, Contract OEC-0-73-6341. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10.
FULLAN, M.
and A. POMFRET (1977) “Research on curriculum and instruction implementation.”Rev. of Educ. Research47, 1 (Winter): 335-397.
11.
GOODLAD, J. I.
(1975) The Dynamics of Educational Change: Toward Responsive Schools. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
GROSS, N.
, J. B. GIACQUINTA, and M. BERNSTEIN (1971) Implementing Educational Innovations: A Sociological Analysis of Planned Educational Change. New York: Basic Books.
13.
HOOD, P. D.
(1980) Communication Technology in the 80's: Back to Basics? Presented to the CEDAR Communication Division, Far West Laboratory, San Francisco, July 26.
14.
HOUSE, E. R.
(1976) “The micropolitics of innovation: nine propositions.”Phi Delta Kappan (January): 337-340.
15.
LOUIS K. S.
, J. A. MOLITOR, G. J. SPENCER, and R. K. YIN (1979) Linking R & D with Schools: An Interim Report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
16.
McLAUGHLIN, M. W.
(1976) “Implementation as mutual adaptation: change in classroom organization.”Teachers College Record77, 3: 339-351.
17.
MANN, D.
(1976a) “For the record: making change happen?”Teachers College Record77, 3: 313-322.
18.
MANN, D.
(1976b) “The politics of training teachers in schools.”Teachers College Record773: 323-338.
19.
PINCUS, J.
(1976) “Incentives for innovation in the public schools.”Rev. of Educ. Research44, 1: 113-144.
20.
ROGERS, E. M.
and F. F. SHOEMAKER (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross-cultural Approach. New York: Free Press.
21.
RUSSELL, S. H.
, D. C. HALL, P. HAMILTON, and B. BIRMAN (1979) Desegregation Case Studies: Volume I Final Report. Research Report EPRC 24. Educational Policy Research Center.
22.
SHARAN, S.
(1980) “Cooperative learning in small groups: recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations.”Rev. of Educ. Research50, 2: 241-272.
23.
SLAVIN, R. E.
(1980a) Using Student Team Learning. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
24.
SLAVIN, R. E.
(1980b) “Cooperative learning.”Rev. of Educ. Research50, 2: 315-342.
25.
SLAVIN, R. E.
and N. A. MADDEN (1979) “School practices that improve race relations.”Amer. Educ. Research J.16: 169-180.
26.
WEICK, K. E.
(1976) “Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.”Admin. Sci. Q.21, (March): 1-19.
27.
WILLIAMS, W.
(1977) “Implementation analysis and assessment.”Policy Analysis1, 3: 531-567.
