Drawing on the triple articulation framework, this study explores the “failed domestication” of online news consumption among young visually impaired people (YVIP), focusing on technological objects, symbolic environments, and individual texts. The findings suggest that “failed domestication” is not merely a consequence of limitations in technical design or social contexts but rather the result of “negotiation” between individuals and media. YVIP develop unique media usage strategies by simplifying operational procedures, foregoing updates, filtering out news irrelevant to their daily lives, and personalizing their interpretation of texts. In contrast to the notion of “failure” rooted in ableism, these behaviors reflect a deep understanding by the visually impaired of their capabilities and specific needs, constituting a form of “alternative success.” The use of digital media by people with disabilities is a process of autonomous choice rather than the “enforcing normalcy.” Therefore, this study advocates for creating a more flexible and human-centric media ecosystem that enables people with disabilities to choose appropriate media usage patterns based on their individual needs and preferences, thus promoting genuine digital inclusivity.
AbeeleMVDe CockRRoeK (2012) Blind faith in the web? Internet use and empowerment among visually and hearing impaired adults: A qualitative study of benefits and barriers. Communications37(2): 129–151.
2.
AnderbergPJönssonB (2005) Being there. Disability & Society20(7): 719–733.
3.
AuA (2024) Digitalization in China: Who’s left behind?Information, Communication & Society27(6): 1247–1265.
4.
BaumgartnerARohrbachTSchönhagenP (2021) ‘If the phone were broken, I’d be screwed’: media use of people with disabilities in the digital era. Disability & Society, 38(1): 73–97.
ChadwickDWessonC (2016) Digital inclusion and disability. In: AttrillAFullwoodC (eds) Applied Cyberpsychology: Practical Applications of Cyberpsychological Theory and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–23.
7.
ChatmanEA (1991) Life in a small world: Applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(6): 438–449.
8.
ChatmanEA (1996) The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science47(3): 193–206.
9.
DavisLJ (1995) Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London and New York: Verso.
10.
DobranskyKHargittaiE (2016) Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics58: 18–28.
11.
EllisKKentM (2010) Disability and New Media, 1st edn. New York and London: Routledge.
12.
FoleyAFerriBA (2012) Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs12: 192–200.
13.
GBD2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators (2021) Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near visionimpairment over 30 years: an analysis for the global burden ofdisease study. The Lancet Global Health9: e130–e143.
14.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
GogginGNewellC (2003) Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
HaddonL (2003) Domestication and mobile telephony. In KatzJE (ed.) Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp.43–55.
17.
HaddonL (2006) The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society22(4): 195–203.
18.
HallS (1985) Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Media Communication2(2): 91–114.
19.
HartmannM (2006) The triple articulation of ICTs: Media as technological objects, symbolic environments and individual texts. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieY, et al (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Berkshire: Open University Press, pp.80–102.
20.
HynesDRommesE (2006) Fitting the Internet into our lives: Internet courses for disadvantaged users. In BerkerTHartmannMPunieY (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Berkshire: Open University Press, pp.125–144.
21.
JaegerPT (2012) Disability and the Internet: Confronting a Digital Divide. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
22.
JingTGaoLZhangH (2023) To move closer or farther away: Active domestication and limited role of using digital media by the visually impaired people in China. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 15 June 2023. DOI: 10.1177/14614448231178316.
23.
JohannessenLENordtugMHaldarM (2023) Multi-site domestication: Taming technologies across multiple institutional settings. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 11 September 2023. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2023.2255644
KarlsenFSyvertsenT (2016) You can’t smell roses online: Intruding media and reverse domestication. Nordicom Review37(s1): 25–39.
26.
Kueclub and Information Accessibility Research Association (2018) 2018 Insight Report on the Mobile Information Behavior of Internet Users with Visual Impairments. Available at: https://www.siaa.org.cn/knowledge_search?q=2018视障网民移动资讯行为洞察报告 (accessed 2 April 2023).
27.
KuoWP (2014) Double-articulating news text and technology: A typological-based study of online journalism consumption practice in everyday life. Communication & Society27: 27–63.
28.
LazarJAllenAKleinmanJ, et al (2007) What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction22(3): 247–269.
29.
LesageFNataleS (2019) Rethinking the distinctions between old and new media: Introduction. Convergence25(4): 575–589.
30.
LinZYangL (2020) A digital promised land? Digital landscape as a heterotopia for disabled people in China. Information, Communication & Society23(8): 1220–1234.
31.
LiuGQYanTW (2022) Why do the underclass refuse to use smartphones? – Based on the grounded research of Chongqing porter group. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication7: 74–96.
32.
MartínezCOlssonT (2021) Domestication outside of the domestic: Shaping technology and child in an educational moral economy. Media, Culture & Society43(3): 480–496.
33.
MeribeNCBasseyEIBasseyAE, et al (2023) Enhancing social connectedness: How adults with vision impairment perceive and use social media in Nigeria. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print February 1 2023. DOI: 10.1177/14614448221148980
34.
MitchellJL (1976) Communication and appropriate technology. Media Asia3(4): 224–228.
35.
NimrodGEdanY (2021) Technology domestication in later life. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction38(4): 339–350. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2021.1938395
36.
PearsonCTrevisanF (2015) Disability activism in the new media ecology: campaigning strategies in the digital era. Disability & Society30: 924–940.
37.
RieggerA-SMerfeldKKleinJF, et al (2022) Technology-enabled personalization: Impact of smart technology choice on consumer shopping behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change181: 121752.
38.
RimmermanA (2013) Social Inclusion of People With Disabilities: National and International Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SachdevaNTuikkaAMKimppaKK, et al (2015) Digital disability divide in information society: A framework based on a structured literature review. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society13(3/4): 283–298.
40.
SchiemerMProyerM (2013) Teaching children with disabilities: ICTs in Bangkok and Addis Ababa. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal7(2–3): 99–112.
41.
ShankarVInmanJMantralaM, et al (2011) Innovations in shopper marketing: Current insights and future research issues. Journal of Retailing87: 29–42.
42.
SheldonA (2004) ‘Changing technology.’ In SwainJFrenchSBarnesC, et al (eds) Disabling Barriers: Enabling Environments. London: Sage, pp.155–160.
43.
SilverstoneR (2003) Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
44.
SilverstoneRHaddonL (1996) Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In: MansellRSilverstoneR (eds) Communication by Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.44–74.
45.
SujonZVineyLToker-TurnalarE (2018) Domesticating Facebook: The shift from compulsive connection to personal service platform. Social Media + Society4(4): 1–12.
46.
TichenorPJDonohueGAOlienCN (1970) Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 159–170.
47.
TsatsouP (2011) Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their research?Media, Culture & Society33(2): 317–331.
