This study focuses on the experiences of disabled individuals in online activism in the context of China. Adopting the social model of disability, this study found an iceberg structure consisting of two levels and three layers. The explicit level included observed labels, attitudes and legislation. The implicit level involved both social and internalized stereotypes. These three layers of social structures interacted with each other and together brought about social exclusion into being. Adopting the social model as an organizing principle represents a starting point to alter social patterns and possibly change social isolation.
AlperM (2017) Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AmaroHRajA (2000) On the margin: Power and women’s HIV risk reduction strategies. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research42(7–8): 723–749.
3.
AnastasiouDKellerCE (2011) International differences in provision for exceptional learners. In: KauffmanJMHallahanDP (eds) Handbook of Special Education. London: Routledge, pp.773–787.
4.
BaileyTKChungYBWilliamsWS, et al. (2011) Development and validation of the internalized racial oppression scale for black individuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology58(4): 481–493.
5.
BakardjievaM (2005) Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: SAGE.
6.
BrockBSwintonJ (2012) Disability in Christian Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
CampbellAUrenM (2011) ‘The invisibles’. . . Disability in China in the 21st Century. International Journal of Special Education26(1): 12–24.
9.
CampbellF (2009) Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York, NY: Springer.
10.
CharltonJI (1998) Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
11.
CharltonJI (2006) The dimensions of disability oppression: An overview. In: DavidLJ (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp.217–230.
12.
ChenWBoaseJWellmanB (2008) The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In: WellmanBHaythornthwaiteC (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp.74–113.
13.
DavidEJROkazakiS (2010) Activation and automaticity of colonial mentality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology40(4): 850–887.
DuranEDuranB (1995) Native American Postcolonial Psychology. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
16.
EllcessorE (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability and the Politics of Participation. New York and London: New York University Press.
17.
EllisKKentM (2011) Disability and New Media. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
FeiXHamiltonGGZhengW (1992) From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society, A Translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
FinklesteinSPCadayCGKanoM, et al. (1990) Growth factor expression after stroke. Stroke21(11 Suppl): III122–III124.
20.
Garland-ThomsonR (2005) Disability and representation. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America120(2): 522–527.
21.
GibsonJPoussonJMLauxS, et al. (2018) Disability identity development of people who have low vision or are blind. Journal of Education and Human Development7(3): 18–27.
22.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
GoodleyD (2014) Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
GreerLLvan KleefGA (2010) Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology95(6): 1032–1044.
HoA (2010) To be labelled, or not to be labelled: That is the question. British Journal of Learning Disabilities32(2): 86–92.
27.
HolmqvistMMaraveliasCSkålénP (2013) Identity regulation in neo-liberal societies: constructing the ‘occupationally disabled’ individual. Organization20(2): 193–211.
28.
HughesB (2004) Disability and the body. In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesC, et al (eds) Disabling Barriers–Enabling Environments. New York, NY: SAGE Publishing, pp.55–61.
29.
HumphryDCliffordEGreeneA, et al. (2020) Introduction to, and interview with, Disabled People Against Cuts. City24(1–2): 376–399.
30.
ImrieR (1997) Rethinking the relationships between disability, rehabilitation, and society. Disability and Rehabilitation19(7): 263–271.
31.
JohnsonKWalmsleyJ (2003) Inclusive Research With People With Learning Disabilities: Past, Present and Futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
32.
JonesJM (1997) Prejudice and Racism. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
33.
KayeHSJansLHJonesEC (2011) Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities?Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation21(4): 526–536.
34.
LaesC (ed.) (2016) Disability in Antiquity. London: Routledge.
35.
LamCTsangHCorriganP, et al. (2010) Chinese lay theory and mental illness stigma: Implications for research and practices. Journal of Rehabilitation76(1): 35–40.
36.
LiHBoraDSalviS, et al. (2018) Slacktivists or activists?: Identity work in the virtual disability march. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (eds. MandrykRLHancockMPerryM, et al.), Montreal, Canada, 21–26 April, Paper No. 225. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
37.
LinZYangLZhangZ (2018) To include, or not to include, that is the question: Disability digital inclusion and exclusion in China. New Media & Society20(12): 4436–4452.
38.
LongmorePK (2003) Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
MaraveliasC (2020) Governing impaired jobseekers in neoliberal societies: From sheltered employment to individual placement. Organization. Epub ahead of print 15 December 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1350508420970476
41.
MitterNAliASciorK (2018) Stigma experienced by family members of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Multidimensional construct. BJPsych Open4(5): 332–338.
42.
OliverM (1990) The structuring of disabled identities. In: LeonardP (ed.) The Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave, pp.60–77.
43.
OliverM (2009) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, 2nd edn.London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
44.
OliverM (2013) The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society28(7): 1024–1026.
45.
OliverMBarnesC (1998) Social Policy and Disabled People: From Exclusion to Inclusion. London: Longman.
46.
OliverMBarnesC (2012) The New Politics of Disablement. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
47.
OwensJ (2015) Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: The transformative possibility of Arendt’s notion of power. Sociology of Health & Illness37(3): 385–403.
48.
PfeifferD (2002) The philosophical foundations of disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly22(2): 1–23.
49.
PhetersonG (1986) Alliances between women: Overcoming internalized oppression and internalized domination. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society12(1): 146–160.
50.
PinkSHorstHPostillJ, et al. (2016) Digital Ethnography. Principles and Practices. London: SAGE Publications.
51.
RabieePGlendinningC (2010) Choice: what, when and why? Exploring the importance of choice to disabled people. Disability & Society25(7): 827–839.
52.
ShakespeareT (1994) Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal?Disability & Society9(3): 283–299.
53.
ShildrickM (2009) Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. New York, NY: Springer.
54.
SiebersT (2008) Disability Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Michigan Press.
55.
ThomasC (2004) How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society19(6): 569–583.
56.
ThomasC (2010) Medical sociology and disability theory. In: ScamblerGScamblerS (eds) New Directions in the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions: Assaults on the Lifeworld. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.37–56.
57.
ThomasC (2014) Disability and impairment. In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesC, et al (eds) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments. London: SAGE Publication, pp.9–16.
58.
ThompsonD (1997) Profiling the sexually abusive behaviour of men with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities10(2): 125–139.
59.
Van LaerKJammaersEHoevenW (2020) Disabling organizational spaces: exploring the processes through which spatial environments disable employees with impairments. Organization29(6): 1–18.
60.
WalmsleyJ (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society16(2): 187–205.
61.
WangY (2007) Deconstructing karma and the aporia of the ethical in Hongzhou Chan Buddhism. In: WangY (ed.) Deconstruction and the Ethical in Asian Thought. Oxon: Routledge, pp.87–100.
62.
ZanoniP (2011) Diversity in the lean automobile factory: doing class through gender, disability and age. Organization18(1): 105–127.
