Deconstructing social exclusions: The practice of digital activities among disabled people in China

Abstract

This study focuses on the experiences of disabled individuals in online activism in the context of China. Adopting the social model of disability, this study found an iceberg structure consisting of two levels and three layers. The explicit level included observed labels, attitudes and legislation. The implicit level involved both social and internalized stereotypes. These three layers of social structures interacted with each other and together brought about social exclusion into being. Adopting the social model as an organizing principle represents a starting point to alter social patterns and possibly change social isolation.

Keywords

digital activism disabled people iceberg model prejudice social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alper

(2017) Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Amaro

Raj

(2000) On the margin: Power and women’s HIV risk reduction strategies. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 42(7–8): 723–749.

Anastasiou

Keller

(2011) International differences in provision for exceptional learners. In: Kauffman

Hallahan

(eds) Handbook of Special Education. London: Routledge, pp.773–787.

Bailey

Chung

Williams

, et al. (2011) Development and validation of the internalized racial oppression scale for black individuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology 58(4): 481–493.

Bakardjieva

(2005) Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: SAGE.

Brock

Swinton

(2012) Disability in Christian Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Cameron

(2011) Nothing to do with me: Everything to do with me, disability, self and identity. In: Disability Arts Online. Available at: https://disabilityarts.online/magazine/opinion/nothing-everything-disability-self-identity (accessed 20 August 2022).

Campbell

Uren

(2011) ‘The invisibles’. . . Disability in China in the 21st Century. International Journal of Special Education 26(1): 12–24.

Campbell

(2009) Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York, NY: Springer.

10.

Charlton

(1998) Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

11.

Charlton

(2006) The dimensions of disability oppression: An overview. In: David

(ed.) The Disability Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp.217–230.

12.

Chen

Boase

Wellman

(2008) The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In: Wellman

Haythornthwaite

(eds) The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp.74–113.

13.

David

EJR

Okazaki

(2010) Activation and automaticity of colonial mentality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40(4): 850–887.

14.

Dodenhoff

(2014) Five faces of oppression – Disability hate crime in the UK. In: Disabled World. Available at: https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/discrimination/faces.php (accessed 15 August 2022).

15.

Duran

(1995) Native American Postcolonial Psychology. Albany, NY: Suny Press.

16.

Ellcessor

(2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability and the Politics of Participation. New York and London: New York University Press.

17.

Ellis

Kent

(2011) Disability and New Media. New York, NY: Routledge.

18.

Fei

Hamilton

Zheng

(1992) From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society, A Translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

19.

Finklestein

Caday

Kano

, et al. (1990) Growth factor expression after stroke. Stroke 21(11 Suppl): III122–III124.

20.

Garland-Thomson

(2005) Disability and representation. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 120(2): 522–527.

21.

Gibson

Pousson

Laux

, et al. (2018) Disability identity development of people who have low vision or are blind. Journal of Education and Human Development 7(3): 18–27.

22.

Goffman

(1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

23.

Goodley

(2014) Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. New York, NY: Routledge.

24.

Greer

van Kleef

(2010) Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 95(6): 1032–1044.

25.

Hine

(2000) Virtual Ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.

26.

(2010) To be labelled, or not to be labelled: That is the question. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 32(2): 86–92.

27.

Holmqvist

Maravelias

Skålén

(2013) Identity regulation in neo-liberal societies: constructing the ‘occupationally disabled’ individual. Organization 20(2): 193–211.

28.

Hughes

(2004) Disability and the body. In: Swain

French

Barnes

, et al (eds) Disabling Barriers–Enabling Environments. New York, NY: SAGE Publishing, pp.55–61.

29.

Humphry

Clifford

Greene

, et al. (2020) Introduction to, and interview with, Disabled People Against Cuts. City 24(1–2): 376–399.

30.

Imrie

(1997) Rethinking the relationships between disability, rehabilitation, and society. Disability and Rehabilitation 19(7): 263–271.

31.

Johnson

Walmsley

(2003) Inclusive Research With People With Learning Disabilities: Past, Present and Futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

32.

Jones

(1997) Prejudice and Racism. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

33.

Kaye

Jans

Jones

(2011) Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 21(4): 526–536.

34.

Laes

(ed.) (2016) Disability in Antiquity. London: Routledge.

35.

Lam

Tsang

Corrigan

, et al. (2010) Chinese lay theory and mental illness stigma: Implications for research and practices. Journal of Rehabilitation 76(1): 35–40.

36.

Bora

Salvi

, et al. (2018) Slacktivists or activists?: Identity work in the virtual disability march. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (eds. Mandryk

Hancock

Perry

, et al.), Montreal, Canada, 21–26 April, Paper No. 225. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

37.

Lin

Yang

Zhang

(2018) To include, or not to include, that is the question: Disability digital inclusion and exclusion in China. New Media & Society 20(12): 4436–4452.

38.

Longmore

(2003) Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

39.

Mann

(2018) Survival, disability rights, and solidarity: advancing cyberprotest rhetoric through Disability March. Disability Studies Quarterly 38(1). Available at: https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/5917/4886

40.

Maravelias

(2020) Governing impaired jobseekers in neoliberal societies: From sheltered employment to individual placement. Organization. Epub ahead of print 15 December 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1350508420970476

41.

Mitter

Ali

Scior

(2018) Stigma experienced by family members of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Multidimensional construct. BJPsych Open 4(5): 332–338.

42.

Oliver

(1990) The structuring of disabled identities. In: Leonard

(ed.) The Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave, pp.60–77.

43.

Oliver

(2009) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.

44.

Oliver

(2013) The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society 28(7): 1024–1026.

45.

Oliver

Barnes

(1998) Social Policy and Disabled People: From Exclusion to Inclusion. London: Longman.

46.

Oliver

Barnes

(2012) The New Politics of Disablement. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

47.

Owens

(2015) Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: The transformative possibility of Arendt’s notion of power. Sociology of Health & Illness 37(3): 385–403.

48.

Pfeiffer

(2002) The philosophical foundations of disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly 22(2): 1–23.

49.

Pheterson

(1986) Alliances between women: Overcoming internalized oppression and internalized domination. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(1): 146–160.

50.

Pink

Horst

Postill

, et al. (2016) Digital Ethnography. Principles and Practices. London: SAGE Publications.

51.

Rabiee

Glendinning

(2010) Choice: what, when and why? Exploring the importance of choice to disabled people. Disability & Society 25(7): 827–839.

52.

Shakespeare

(1994) Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal? Disability & Society 9(3): 283–299.

53.

Shildrick

(2009) Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. New York, NY: Springer.

54.

Siebers

(2008) Disability Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Michigan Press.

55.

Thomas

(2004) How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society 19(6): 569–583.

56.

Thomas

(2010) Medical sociology and disability theory. In: Scambler

Scambler

(eds) New Directions in the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions: Assaults on the Lifeworld. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.37–56.

57.

Thomas

(2014) Disability and impairment. In: Swain

French

Barnes

, et al (eds) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments. London: SAGE Publication, pp.9–16.

58.

Thompson

(1997) Profiling the sexually abusive behaviour of men with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 10(2): 125–139.

59.

Van Laer

Jammaers

Hoeven

(2020) Disabling organizational spaces: exploring the processes through which spatial environments disable employees with impairments. Organization 29(6): 1–18.

60.

Walmsley

(2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society 16(2): 187–205.

61.

Wang

(2007) Deconstructing karma and the aporia of the ethical in Hongzhou Chan Buddhism. In: Wang

(ed.) Deconstruction and the Ethical in Asian Thought. Oxon: Routledge, pp.87–100.

62.

Zanoni

(2011) Diversity in the lean automobile factory: doing class through gender, disability and age. Organization 18(1): 105–127.