This study examines the discursive and semantic patterns underpinning the collective mourning activity on the digital memorial for Aaron Swartz (hacker/software developer/activist). More specifically, it questions if and how online mourning for hacktivists might result in a cultural reconfiguration of cyberspace through the grassroots and collective redefinition of the limits of users’ agency. To this end, all the comments present on Swartz’s digital memorial are collected, coded and, subsequently, analysed to detect their narrative and semantic structures. The results of this linguistic analysis are interpreted through a topological information model. Accordingly, the study discusses (1) the hero-making processes underlying online mourning for hacktivists and (2) the related redefinition of the Internet as the domain of a value-based community of users.
ChouliarakiL (2010) Self-mediation: new media and citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies7(4): 227–232.
9.
DeGrootJM (2014) ‘For whom the bell tolls’: emotional rubbernecking in Facebook memorial groups. Death Studies38(2): 79–84.
10.
GeserH (1998) Yours virtually forever: death memorials and remembrance sites in the WWW. Sociology in Switzerland Online Publications. Available at: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/38519 (accessed 4 July 2017).
11.
GibbsMMoriJArnoldMet al. (2012) Tombstones, uncanny monuments and epic quests: memorials in world of Warcraft. Game Studies12(1): 13–22.
12.
GibsonM (2015) YouTube and bereavement vlogging: emotional exchange between strangers. Journal of Sociology52: 631–645.
13.
GibsonMAltenaM (2014) The digital lives of the dead: YouTube as a practice of cybermourning. In: MoserDDunS (eds) A Digital Janus: Looking Forward, Looking Back. London: Inter-Disciplinary Press, pp. 15–27.
14.
GrahamCArnoldMKohnTet al. (2015) Gravesites and websites: a comparison of memorialisation. Visual Studies30(1): 37–53.
15.
GreimasAJ (1987) On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
HalbwachsM (1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
HaverinenA (2016) In-game and out-of-game mourning: on the complexity of grief in virtual worlds. In: ChristensenDRSandvikK (eds) Mediating and Remediating Death. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 155–178.
18.
HessA (2007) In digital remembrance: vernacular memory and the rhetorical construction of web memorials. Media, Culture & Society29(5): 812–830.
19.
IbrusIToropP (2015) Remembering and reinventing Juri Lotman for the digital age. International Journal of Cultural Studies18(1): 3–9.
20.
KjeldskovJGibbsMVetereFet al. (2004) Using cultural probes to explore mediated intimacy. Australasian Journal of Information Systems11(2): 102–115.
LatourB (1998) Piccola filosofia dell’e enuniciazone. In: BassoPierluigiCorrainLucia (Eds.), Eloqui De Senso. Dialoghi Semiotici Per Paolo Fabbri, pp. 71–94. Genova: Costa & Nolan.
23.
LocastoMEMassimiMDePasqualePJ (2011) Security and privacy considerations in digital death. In: Proceedings of the 2011 new security paradigms workshop, Marin County, CA, 12–15 September, pp. 1–10. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
24.
LotmanYM (1984) On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies33(1): 205–229.
25.
LotmanYM (1990) Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
26.
LotmanYMUspenskijBA (1973) Theses on the semiotic study of cultures. In: Van Der EngJ (ed.) Structure of Texts and Semiotics of Culture. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 51–53.
27.
LuryCParisiLTerranovaT (2012) Introduction: the becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture & Society29(4–5): 3–35.
28.
MassimiMBaeckerRM (2011) Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May, pp. 1001–1010. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
29.
MassimiMOdomWBanks(2011) Matters of life and death: locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented HCI research. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May, pp. 987–996. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
30.
MeeseJNansenBKohnTet al. (2015) Posthumous personhood and the affordances of digital media. Mortality20(4): 408–420.
31.
MoncurWKirkD (2014) An emergent framework for digital memorials. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on designing interactive systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 21–25 June, pp. 965–974. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
32.
NöthW (1995) Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
33.
NöthW (2014) The topography of Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere. International Journal of Cultural Studies18: 11–26.
34.
OdomWHarperRSellenAet al. (2010) Passing on & putting to rest: understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference, Atlanta, GA, 10–15 April, pp. 1831–1840. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
RobertsP (1999) Tangible sorrow, virtual tributes: cemeteries in cyberspace. In: De VriesB (ed.) End of Life Issues: Interdisciplinary and Multidimensional Perspectives. New York: Springer, pp. 337–358.
37.
RosewarneL (2016) Intimacy on the Internet: Media Representations of Online Connections. New York: Routledge.
38.
ShieldsR (2012) Cultural topology: the seven bridges of Königsburg, 1736. Theory, Culture & Society29(4–5): 43–57.
39.
SofkaCJ (1997) Social support ‘internetworks’, caskets for sale, and more: thanatology and the information superhighway. Death Studies21(6): 553–574
40.
WalterT (2015) Communication media and the dead: from the stone age to Facebook. Mortality20(3): 215–232.
41.
WalterTHouriziRMoncurWet al. (2012) Does the internet change how we die and mourn? Overview and analysis. Omega-Journal of Death and Dying64(4): 275–302.
