Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article focuses on contemporary discussions around media regulation and Internet regulation in India and examines in particular certain events from 2011 to 2013. The aim is to present a composite narrative and historical account, a rendering of the important proposals, arguments and judicial proceedings that came about at a time of political upheaval and increased media ‘activism’. It concludes with a discussion of an August 2013 conference which offers an insight into the latest discursive developments in the field.

Keywords

censorship India Internet regulation judicial activism media regulation social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akoijam

(2012) How effective is the Press Council? The Hoot, September. Available at: http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=6292&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=9&valid=true (accessed 12 June 2014).

Baker

(2007) Media Ownership and Concentration: Why Ownership Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bakshi

(2010) Media: of burying the ‘paid news’ report. Rediff, 6 December. Available at: http://www.rediff.com/business/slide-show/slide-show-1-rajni-bakshi-column-of-burying-the-paid-news-report/20101206.htm (accessed 23 April 2015).

Berdal

SRB

(2004) Public Deliberation on the Web: A Habermasian Inquiry into Online Discourse. Oslo: University of Oslo Press.

Berners-Lee

(2010) Long live the web: a call for continued open standards and neutrality. Scientific American, December, pp. 80–85.

Brown

Picard

(eds) (2005) Digital Terrestrial Television in Europe. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chhibber

(2012) Ban & seize: congress MP bill out to gag media. Indian Express, 1 May. Available at: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ban-&-seize-congress-mp-bill-out-to-gag-media/943799/0 (accessed 26 September 2013).

Cottle

(2011) Transnational protests and the media: new departures, challenging debates. In: Cottle

Lester

(eds) Transnational Protests and the Media. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 17–40.

Creech

(2007) Electronic Media Law and Regulation. Burlington, MA: Focal Press.

10.

Croteau

Hoynes

(2006) The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.

11.

Curran

(2002) Media and Power. London: Routledge.

12.

Curran

Seaton

(2010) Power Without Responsibility: Press, Broadcasting and the Internet in Britain, 7th edn. London: Routledge.

13.

Dahlgren

(2009) Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Dasgupta

(2012) Twist in the tale: secular politics is harming the Bodo minority in Assam. The Telegraph, 3 August. Available at: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120803/jsp/opinion/story_15804467.jsp (accessed 26 September 2013).

15.

DellaPorta

Tarrow

(eds) (2005) Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

16.

Feintuck

Varney

(2006) Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

17.

Finkelstein

(2012) Report of the independent inquiry into the media and media regulation. Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Govt. of Australia. Available at: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/146994/Report-of-the-Independent-Inquiry-into-the-Media-and-Media-Regulation-web.pdf (accessed 26 September 2013).

18.

Firstpost (2014) Bangalore: youth arrested for sharing anti-Modi messages on Whatsapp. Firstpost, May. Available at: http://www.firstpost.com/india/bangalore-youth-arrested-for-sharing-anti-modi-messages-on-whatsapp-1542047.html (accessed 16 June 2014).

19.

Freedman

(2012) Media regulation. In: Oxford Bibliographies Online: Communication. Available at: http://0-www.oxfordbibliographies.com.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/view/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0095.xml (accessed 6 June 2014).

20.

Frost

(2011) Journalism Ethics and Regulation, 3rd edn. London: Longman.

21.

Gardam

Levy

(2008) The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

22.

Garg

(2012) Censor posts or face China-like ban: Delhi High Court to websites. The Times of India, 13 January. Available at: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-13/social-media/30623609_1_google-india-google-and-facebook-internet-firms (accessed 26 September 2013).

23.

Goldsmith

(2006) Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Hallin

Mancini

(2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Hitchens

(2006) Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

26.

Iyer

(ed.) (2000) Mass Media Laws and Regulations in India. New Delhi, India: Bahri Sons.

27.

Jha

(2013) Statutory, mandatory self-regulation emerging as consensus model for media. The Hindu, 6 August. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/statutory-mandatory-selfregulation-emerging-as-consensus-model-for-media/article4996150.ece (accessed 26 September 2013).

28.

Johnson

Post

(1996) Law and borders: the rise of law in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review 48(5): 1367–1402.

29.

Julka

(2012a) Google, Facebook benefit from illegal content: Delhi High Court. The Economic Times, 17 January. Available at: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-01-17/news/30632767_1_google-india-s-managing-google-and-facebook-hariharan (accessed 26 September 2013).

30.

Julka

(2012b) Internet regulation body on India’s agenda at UN. The Times of India, 25 August. Available at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Internet-regulation-body-on-Indias-agenda-at-UN/articleshow/15685996.cms (accessed 26 September 2013).

31.

Kalra

(2011) How media in India is regulated. Rediff, 10 November. Available at: http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-faq-how-media-in-india-is-regulated/20111110.htm (accessed 26 September 2013).

32.

Katju

(2012) Media cannot reject regulation. The Hindu, 23 May. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/media-cannot-reject-regulation/article3374529.ece (accessed 26 September 2013).

33.

Kaul

(2013) India moves towards media regulation. Index on Censorship, July. Available at: http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/07/india-moves-toward-media-regulation/ (accessed 12 June 2014).

34.

Keane

(1991) The Media and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

35.

Kumar

(2012) Content regulation does equal media control. The Hoot, 10 May. Available at: http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5920&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=7&valid=true (accessed 26 September 2013).

36.

Kumar

(2007) Media education, regulation and public policy in India. Resource Centre for Media Education. Available at: http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/IMG/pdf/KevalKumar.pdf (accessed 26 September 2013).

37.

Lessing

(2006) Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.

38.

McCullagh

(2012) UN summit implodes as US, others spurn Internet treaty. CNET, 13 December. Available at: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57559034-38/u.n-summit-implodes-as-u.s-others-spurn-internet-treaty/ (accessed 26 September 2013).

39.

McQuail

(1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage.

40.

Mazzarella

Kaur

(2009) Between sedition and seduction: thinking censorship in South Asia. In: Mazzarella

Kaur

(eds) Censorship in South Asia: Cultural Regulation from Sedition to Seduction. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.

41.

Napoli

(2001) Foundation of Communications Policy: Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media. Cresskill, NU: Hampton.

42.

Nayar

(2012) India’s Supreme Court and the media. The Express Tribune, 6 May. Available at: http://tribune.com.pk/story/374878/indias-supreme-court-and-the-media/ (accessed 26 September 2013).

43.

O’Malley

Soley

(2000) Regulating the Press. London: Pluto Press.

44.

Phillip

(2012) After paralysis, UPA-II develops Twitter block; blocks handles of journalists, right-wing groups. The Economic Times, 24 August. Available at: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-08-24/news/33366769_1_twitter-accounts-twitter-block-websites (accessed 26 September 2013).

45.

Picard

(1985) The Press and the Decline of Democracy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

46.

Phukan

(2012) Rahul Gandhi aide’s bill on media regulation sparks criticism. NDTV, 1 May. Available at: http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-aides-bill-on-media-regulation-sparks-criticism-479955 (accessed 23 April 2015).

47.

Ramachandran

(2013) Intermediary liability and defamation: finding the right balance between free speech and reputational interests. Spicy IP, 13 September, weblog post. Available at: http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/guest-post-intermediary-liability-in.html (accessed 26 September 2013).

48.

Scrampical

Botelho

Kancharla

(eds) (1997) Media Education in India: Emerging Trends and Perspectives. New Delhi, India: NISCORT.

49.

Siebert

Peterson

Schramm

(1956) Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

50.

Singhal

Rogers

(2001) India’s Communication Revolution: From Bullock-Carts to Cyber-Marts. New Delhi, India: Sage.

51.

Sylvain

(2010) Internet governance and democratic legitimacy. Federal Communications Law Journal 62(2): 205–273.

52.

Tarrow

(2006) The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Thakurta

(2012) Media ownership trends in India. The Hoot, July. Available at: http://www.thehoot.org/web/MediaownershiptrendsinIndia/6053-1-1-16-true.html (accessed 12 June 2014).

54.

Thomas

(2004) Media ownership and communication rights in India. In: Thomas

Nain

(eds) Who Owns the Media? Global Trends and Local Resistance. London: Zed Books.

55.

Timmons

(2011a) India asks Google, Facebook to screen user content. New York Times, 5 December. Available at: http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/05/india-asks-google-facebook-others-to-screen-user-content/#h (accessed 26 September 2013).

56.

Timmons

(2011b) Any normal human being would be offended. New York Times, 6 December. Available at: http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/any-normal-human-being-would-be-offended/ (accessed 26 September 2013).

57.

Varadarajan

(2012) The public needs both gravel and pen. The Hindu, 30 March. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/columns/siddharth-varadarajan/article3259092.ece?homepage=true (accessed 26 September 2013).

58.

Venkatesan

(2012a) Supreme Court to frame norms for media on reporting court proceedings. The Hindu, 28 March. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3251747.ece (accessed 26 September 2013).

59.

Venkatesan

(2012b) Press Council for court guidelines, the Hindu opposes idea. The Hindu, 11 April. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3300971.ece (accessed 26 September 2013).

60.

Vishwanathan

(2012) The curious case of Vinay Rai. The Hindu, 15 February. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/article2893650.ece (accessed 26 September 2013).

61.

Wall

(2003) Social movement and the net: activist journalism goes digital In: Kawamoto

(ed.) Digital Journalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

62.

Zittrain

(2009) The Future of the Internet. London: Penguin Press.

The spectre of censorship: media regulation,political anxiety and public contestations in India (2011–2013)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References