While a growing literature is exploring blogs and blogospheres as loci for informal political engagement, the development of political discourse via specific framing dynamics in blogging practice has so far been overlooked. By investigating the content of 62 blogs from four different ideological streams, this study specifically focuses on the Cuban blogosphere to address the question of how political consciousness and potential for collective action may emerge in blogging practice. Findings show that (1) critical evaluations, personal narratives and traditional socialist rhetoric mix as the raw materials of an emerging online political debate; (2) this particular mix varies depending on the political leaning of the bloggers; (3) the potential for collective action is very limited mostly due to the lack of a strong agency component among critical bloggers and the still heavy presence of an outdated socialist rhetoric among state-aligned bloggers.
AdamicLGlanceN (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery (Chicago, IL, 21 August). New York: ACM, pp. 36–43.
2.
BatesonG (1972) A theory of play and fantasy. In: BatesonG (ed.) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Philadelphia, PA: Intext.
3.
BenfordRD (1993a) Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces71: 677–701.
4.
BenfordRD (1993b) ‘You could be the hundredth monkey’: collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. Sociological Quarterly34: 195–216.
5.
BenfordRD (1997) An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry67: 409–430.
6.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
EtlingBKellyJFarisR et al. (2009) Mapping the Arabic Blogosphere: Politics, Culture and Dissent. Internet and Democracy Case Study Series, Berkman Center Research Publication no. 2009-06. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. Available at: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Mapping_the_Arabic_Blogosphere_0.pdf (accessed December 2013).
9.
EtlingBKellyJFarisRPalfreyJ (2010) Mapping the Arabic blogosphere: politics and dissent online. New Media & Society12: 1225–1243.
10.
FaircloughIFaircloughN (2012) Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Abingdon: Routledge.
11.
FranzosiR (2004) From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FranzosiRVicariS (n.d.) What’s in a text? Answers from frame analysis and rhetoric for measuring meaning systems and argumentative structure. Unpublished manuscript.
13.
GamsonWA (1992a) Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GamsonWA (1992b) The social psychology of collective action. In: MorrisADMuellerCM (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 53–76.
15.
GiugniM (1998) Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology98: 371–393.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.
18.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenCMIM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Edward Arnold.
19.
HenkenT (2011) A bloggers’ polemic: debating independent Cuban blogger projects in a polarized political context. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy (ASCE). Miami, FL, 4–6 August. Available at: http://www.ascecuba.org/publications/proceedings/volume21/pdfs/henken.pdf (accessed December 2013).
20.
Hernandez-ReguantA (2009a) Writing the special period: an introduction. In: Hernandez-ReguantA (ed.) Cuba in the Special Period: Culture and Ideology in the 1990s. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18.
21.
Hernandez-ReguantA (2009b) Multicubanidad. In: Hernandez-ReguantA (ed.) Cuba in the Special Period: Culture and Ideology in the 1990s. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 69–88.
22.
HerringSCKouperIPaolilloJCScheidtLATyworthM (2005) Conversations in the blogosphere: an analysis ‘from the bottom up’. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, 3–6 January). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
23.
HoffmanB (2011) Civil society 2.0? How the internet changes state–society relations in authoritarian regimes: the case of Cuba. GIGA working papers, No. 156. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47847 (accessed December 2013).
24.
ITU (International Telecommunication Union) (2012) Measuring the Information Society. Geneva: ITU.
25.
MeyerDWhittierN (1994) Social movement spillover. Social Problems41(2): 277–298.
26.
MoeH (2011) Mapping the Norwegian blogosphere: methodological challenges in internationalizing. Social Science Computer Review29(3): 313–326.
27.
PapacharissiZ (2008) The virtual sphere 2.0: the internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In: ChadwickAHowardPN (eds) Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 230–245.
28.
ParkHWKluverR (2009) Affiliation in political blogs in South Korea: comparing online and offline social networks. In: GogginGMcLellandM (eds) Internationalizing Internet Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 252–265.
29.
PriceR (2011) New media’s new literature. Review: Literature and Arts of the Americas44(1): 39–46.
30.
RadschC (2008) Core to commonplace: the evolution of Egypt’s blogosphere. Arab Media and Society6. Available at: http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=692 (accessed December 2013).
31.
RahimiB (2011) The agonistic social media: cyberspace in the formation of dissent and consolidation of state power in postelection Iran. Communication Review14(3): 158–178.
32.
RochonTR (1994) Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism and Changing Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
SnowD (2004) Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In: SnowDSouleSAKriesiH (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 380–412.
34.
SnowDABenfordRD (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research1: 197–218.
35.
SnowDABenfordRD (1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. In: MorrisAMuellerCM (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 133–156.
SnowDARochfordBEWordenSBenfordRD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review51: 464–481.
38.
SnowDAVliegenthartRCorigall-BrownC (2007) Framing the French riots: a comparative study of frame variation. Social Forces86: 385–415.
39.
UxoC (2010) Internet politics in Cuba telecommunications. Journal of Australia60(1): 12.1–12.16.
40.
Van DijkL (1997) What is political discourse analysis? In: BlommaertJBulcaenC (eds) Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 11–52.
41.
Van DijkL (2002) Political discourse and political cognition In: ChiltonPASchäffnerC (eds) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamin, pp. 204–236.
42.
VenegasC (2010) New Directions in International Studies: Digital Dilemmas – The State, the Individual, and Digital Media in Cuba. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
VicariS (2010) Measuring collective action frames: a linguistic approach to frame analysis. Poetics38(5): 504–525.
44.
VicariS (2014) Exploring the Cuban blogosphere: discourse networks and informal politics. New Media & Society doi: 10.1177/1461444814529285.
ZhuoX (2009) The political blogosphere in China: a content analysis of the blogs regarding the dismissal of Shanghai leader Chen Liangyu. New Media & Society11: 1003–1022.
