Abstract
This study aimed to analyse the application characteristics of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical trials for musculoskeletal disorders in China. This study included TCM clinical trials for musculoskeletal diseases conducted in China between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2023. Data were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov, the Chinese Clinical Registry, and the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry. Eligible trials were categorized as (1) explicitly specified PROs, (2) implicitly specified PROs (generic outcome concepts [e.g., pain] without naming a specific instrument), and (3) PROs not mentioned. Of 494 eligible trials, 446 (90.3%) used PROs as endpoints. Of 67,839 participants, 58,093 (85.6%) were in trials with specific PRO tools, 4,400 (6.5%) in trials with ambiguous PRO descriptions, and 5,346 (7.9%) in trials without PROs. Arthropathies (43.0%) were the most common condition among PRO-inclusive trials, and the Visual Analogue Scale was the most frequently used PRO tool. Primary sponsors showed significant regional imbalance, with most concentrated in eastern China. This study demonstrated a significant emphasis on PRO application in TCM clinical trials for musculoskeletal diseases in China, while also identifying gaps in standardization and regional distribution that require addressing.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
