The Effect of CW-FIT on Group Engagement During Virtual Instruction

Abstract

There is a need to adapt research-based behavior management interventions so they have utility for virtual instruction. In this study, we investigated whether Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT) would increase group engagement for a first-grade inclusive class during virtual reading instruction. Results of the single case ABAB design indicated a functional relation between CW-FIT and increased group engagement. Secondary measures of students’ (a) screen match (i.e., appropriate screen activity) during instruction and (b) attendance did not have clear relations with CW-FIT implementation. Overall, these results suggest behavioral interventions with evidence of effectiveness for increasing engagement during in-person instruction may have similar effects during virtual instruction.

Keywords

behavior management group contingency virtual instruction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bruhn

A. L.

McDaniel

S. C.

(2021). Tier 2: Critical issues in systems, practices, and data. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 29(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426620949859

Caldarella

Williams

Hansen

B. D.

Wills

H. P.

(2015). Managing student behavior with Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: An observational study in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(5), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0664-3

Caldarella

Wills

H. P.

Anderson

D. H.

Williams

(2019). Managing student behavior in the middle grades using class-wide function-related intervention teams. RMLE Online, 42(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1654799

Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports . (2020a, March). Creating a PBIS behavior teaching matrix for remote instruction. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/creating-a-pbis-behavior-teaching-matrix-for-remote-instruction

Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports . (2020b, March). Responding to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak through PBIS. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/responding-to-the-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-outbreak-through-pbis

Cramer

(2020). Sorry kids. Snow days are probably over. New York, NY: The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/snow-days-online-school.html

Digital Learning Collaborative . (2019). Snapshot 2019: A review of K-12 online, blended, and digital learning. Retrieved from https.//www.digitallearningcollab.com

Educator’s for Excellence . (2021). Voices from the classroom: A survey of America’s educators. Retrieved from https://e4e.org/sites/default/files/teacher_survey_2021_digital.pdf

Hanley

G. P.

(2010). Toward effective and preferred programming: A case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391754

10.

Hott

Randolph

K. M.

Josephson

Heinger

(2021). Implementing electronic Check-In/Check-Out to reduce challenging school bus behavior. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211004446

11.

Hume

Loftin

Lantz

(2009). Increasing independence in autism spectrum disorders: A review of three focused interventions. Journal of ASD and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1080300907512

12.

Kamps

Wills

Bannister

H. D.

Heitzman-Powell

Kottwitz

Hansen

Fleming

(2015). Class-wide function-related intervention teams “CW-FIT” efficacy trial outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300714565244

13.

Kamps

Wills

Heitzman-Powell

Laylin

Szoke

Hobohm

Culey

(2011). Class-wide function-based intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711398935

14.

Kennedy

M. J.

Boyle

J. R.

(2021). That really escalated quickly—online learning moves into the mainstream: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211006052

15.

Kim

J. Y.

Fienup

D. M.

(2021). Increasing access to online learning for students with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466921998067.

16.

Lum

J. D. K.

Radley

K. C.

Tingstrom

D. H.

Dufrene

B. A.

Olmi

D. J.

Wright

S. J.

(2019). Tootling with a randomized independent group contingency to improve high school classwide behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718792663

17.

Maggin

D. M.

Pustejovsky

J. E.

Johnson

A. H.

(2017). A meta-analysis of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior: An update. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517716900

18.

McDaniel

S. C.

Bruhn

A. L.

(2016). Using a changing-criterion design to evaluate the effects of check-in/check-out with goal modification. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(4), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715588263

19.

Monson

K. D.

Caldarella

Anderson

D. H.

Wills

H. P.

(2020). Improving student behavior in middle school art classrooms: Initial investigation of CW-FIT Tier 1. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718762744

20.

National Center on Intensive Intervention . (2020, June). Behavioral intervention tools chart. Retrieved from https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/bintervention

21.

Parker

R. I.

Vannest

K. J.

Davis

J. L.

Sauber

S. B.

(2010). Combining non-overlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006

22.

Parsons

M. B.

Rollyson

J. H.

Reid

D. H.

(2012). Evidence-based staff training: A guide for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391819

23.

Rosenbloom

Wills

H. P.

Mason

Huffman

J. M.

Mason

B. A.

(2019). The effects of a technology-based self-monitoring intervention on on-task, disruptive, and task-completion behaviors for adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 5047–5062. https://doi.rg/10.1007/s10803019042094.

24.

Samudre

M. D.

LeJeune

L. M.

Ascetta

K. E.

Dollinger

(2021). A systematic review of general educator behavior management training. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24(2), 109830072110207. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007211020784

25.

Skinner

C. H.

Skinner

C. F.

Skinner

A. L.

Cashwell

T. H.

(1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968833

26.

Speight

Kucharczyk

(2021). Leveraging positive behavior supports to improve engagement in virtual settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643421992704

27.

U.S. Census Bureau . (2021). Coronavirus pandemic impact on how children received education, by select characteristics: United States. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/data.html

28.

Vannest

K. J.

Ninci

(2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038

29.

Wang

Degoll

(2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073

30.

What Works Clearinghouse . (2017). What works Clearinghouse standards handbook. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_v4.pdf

31.

Wills

H. P.

Kamps

Hansen

B. D.

Conklin

Bellinger

Neaderhiser

Nsubuga

(2010). The class-wide function-based intervention team (CW-FIT) program. Preventing School Failure, 54(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880903496230

32.

Wills

Wehby

Caldarella

Kamps

Swinburne Romine

(2018). Classroom management that works: A replication trial of the CW-FIT program. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918771321