The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of the Class-Wide Function-related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT) program, a group contingency intervention for whole classes, and for students with disruptive behaviors who are at risk for emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD). The CW-FIT program includes four elements designed from empirical studies on the assessment and treatment of problem behavior: (a) teaching socially appropriate communicative skills to access attention or brief escape; (b) extinction of or eliminating potential reinforcement (attention, escape) for problem behavior; (c) strengthening alternative or replacement behaviors, that is, differential reinforcement at individual levels within the context of peer groups with shared group contingencies; and (d) self-management for program maintenance. Procedures were designed to fit within a School-wide Positive Behavior Support framework as Tier II interventions. The CW-FIT implementation was completed in six classes drawn from three schools with 107 students and 8 target students with EBD risks. Results showed clinically important improvements. Group on-task data improved during CW-FIT over baseline levels. For target EBD risk students, results included decreased disruptive behaviors and increased on-task behavior during CW-FIT. Implications for teachers and practitioners are discussed; improved student behavior translates to important levels of increased instruction time in urban classrooms.
Babyak, A.E., Luze, G.J., & Kamps, D.M. ( 2000). The good game: Behavior management for diverse classrooms . Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 216-223.
2.
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. ( 1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
3.
Campbell, J. ( 2004). Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs. Behavioral Modification, 28, 234-246.
4.
Campbell, S. ( 1994). Behavior problems in preschool children: A review of recent research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 36, 113-149.
5.
Carpenter, S.L., & McKee-Higgins, E. (1996). Behavior management in inclusive classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 195-203.
6.
Cashwell, T.H., Skinner, C.H., & Smith, E.S. ( 2001). Increasing second-grade students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors via direct instruction, group reinforcement, and progress feedback: A replication and extension. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 161-175.
7.
Crouch, P.L., Gresham, F.M., & Wright, W.R. ( 1985). Interdependent and independent group contingencies with immediate and delayed reinforcement for controlling classroom behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 177-187.
8.
Doggett, A.R., Edwards, R.P., Moore, J.W., Tingstrom, D.H., & Wilczynski, S.M. (2001). An approach to functional assessment in general education classroom settings. School-Psychology Review, 30, 313-328.
9.
Dunst, C., Hamby, D., & Trivette, C. ( 2004). Guidelines for calculating effect sizes for practice-based research syntheses. Asheville, NC: Winterberry Research Perspectives, Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute.
10.
Embry, D.D. ( 2002). The good behavior game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273-297.
11.
Epstein, M., Nordness, P., Gallagher, K., Nelson, R., Lewis, L., & Schrepf, S. ( 2005). School as the entry point: Assessing adherence to the basic tenets of the wraparound approach. Behavioral Disorders , 30, 85-93.
12.
Ervin, R., Radford, P., Bertsch, K., Piper, A., Ehrhardt, K., & Poling A. ( 2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 193-210.
13.
Golly, A.M., Stiller, B., & Walker, H.M. ( 1998). First Step to Success: Replication and social validation of an early intervention program. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 243-250.
14.
Greenwood, C., Kratochwill, T., & Clements, M. ( 2008). Elementary school-wide prevention models: Real models and real lessons learned (Greenwood, Kratowill, Clemens, & Horner, Eds.). New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
Hanley, G.P., Iwata, B.A., & McCord, B. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 36, 147-186.
16.
Horner, R.H., & Sugai, G. ( 2005). School-wide positive behavior support: An alternative approach to discipline in schools. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Positive behavior support (pp. 359-390). New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., & Horner, H.F. ( 2000). A school-wide approach to student discipline. The School Administrator, 57, 20-24.
18.
Horner, R.H., Todd, A.W., Lewis-Palmer, T., Irvin, L.K., Sugai, G., & Boland, J.B. ( 2004). The School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing School-wide Positive Behavior Support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3-12.
19.
Kamps, D., Wendland, M., & Culpepper, M. ( 2006). Functional assessment as a tool for designing interventions for students with behavioral risks in general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 128-143.
20.
Kamps, D.M., Ellis, C., Mancina, C., Wyble, J., & Greene, L. ( 1995). Case studies using functional analysis for young children with behavior risks. Education and Treatment of Children, 18, 243-260.
21.
Kamps, D.M., Kravits, T., Rauch, J., Kamps, J.L., & Chung, N. ( 2000). A prevention program for students with or at risk for ED: Moderating effects of variation in treatment and classroom structure. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 141-154.
22.
Kamps, D.M., Tankersley, M., & Ellis, C. ( 2000). Social skills interventions for young at-risk students: A 2-year follow-up study. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 310-324.
23.
Kauffman, J., & Landrum, T. ( 2008). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Kennedy, C. ( 2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
Kern, L., Dunlap, G., Childs, K.E., & Clarke, S. ( 1994). Use of a classwide self-management program to improve the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 445-458.
26.
Lea, T., Bray, M., Kehle, T., & DioGuardi, R. ( 2004). Contemporary review of group-oriented contingencies for disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology , 20, 79-101.
27.
Lewis, T.J., & Sugai, G. ( 1996). Descriptive and experimental analysis of teacher and peer attention and the use of assessment-based intervention to improve pro-social behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 7-24.
28.
Lien-Thorne, S., & Kamps, D. ( 2005). Replication study of the First Step to Success early intervention program. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 19-33.
29.
McGinnis, E., Goldstein, A., Sprafkin, R., Gershaw, N.J., & Klein, P. ( 1997). Skill-streaming the elementary school child: A guide for teaching prosocial skill. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
30.
McQuillan, K., DuPaul, G.J., Shapiro, E.S., & Cole, C. ( 1996). Classroom performance of students with serious emotional disturbance: A comparative study of evaluation methods for behavior management . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 162-170.
31.
Mitchem, K., Young, K.R., West, R., & Benyo, J. ( 2001). CWPASM: A class-wide peer-assisted self-management program for general education classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 111-140.
32.
Nelson, J.R., Crabtree, M., Marchand-Martella, N., & Martella, R. ( 1998). Teaching good behavior in the whole school. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 4-9.
33.
Northup, J., Broussard, C., Jones, K., George, T., Vollmer, T.R., & Herring, M. ( 1995). The differential effects of teacher and peer attention on the disruptive classroom behavior of three children with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 227-228.
34.
Olive, M., & Smith, B. ( 2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, 313-324.
35.
Patterson, G.R., Reid, J.B., & Dishion, T.J. ( 1992). A social interactional approach: Antisocial boys (Vol. 4). Eugene, OR: Castalia .
36.
Rhode, G., Jenson, W., & Reavis, B. ( 1998). The Tough Kid Book: Practical Classroom Management Strategies . Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
37.
Rutherford, R., Quinn, M., & Mathur, S. ( 2004). Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders . New York, NY: Guilford.
38.
Safran, S.P., & Oswald, K. ( 2003). Positive behavior supports: Can schools reshape disciplinary practices? Exceptional Children, 69, 361-373.
39.
Salend, S.J., Reeder, E., Katz, N., & Russell, T. ( 1992). The effects of a dependent group evaluation system. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 32-42.
40.
Sheridan, S., (1995). The tough kid social skills curriculum. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
41.
Skinner, C.H., Cashwell, T.H., & Skinner, A.L. ( 2000). Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer-monitored group contingency program on students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 263-270.
42.
Skinner, C.H., Skinner, C.F., Skinner, A.L., & Cashwell, T.H. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 806-820.
43.
Smith, M.A., & Misra, A. ( 1992). A comprehensive management system for students in regular classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 92, 353-371.
44.
Stage, S.A., & Quiroz, D.R. ( 1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333-368.
45.
Stichter, J., Lewis, T., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. ( 2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 25-40.
46.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. ( 2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23-50.
47.
Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G., Hineman, M., Lewis, T.J., Nelson, C.M., . . . Reuf, M. ( 2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 2, 131-143.
48.
Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A., & Horner, R. ( 2001). School-wide evaluation tool. Eugene : University of Oregon. Available from pbis.org
49.
Tankersley, M. ( 1995). A group-oriented contingency management program: A review of research on the good behavior game and implications for teachers. Preventing School Failure, 40, 19-24.
50.
Tapp, J., Wehby, J.H., & Ellis, D. ( 1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 25-31.
51.
Theodore, L.A., Bray, M.A., Kehle, T.J., & Jenson, W.R. ( 2001). Randomization of group contingencies and reinforcers to reduce classroom disruptive behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 267-277.
52.
Thorne, S., & Kamps, D. ( 2008). The effects of a group contingency intervention on academic engagement and problem behavior reduction with at-risk students. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2, 12-18.
53.
Walker, H.M., Golly, A., Zolna McLane, J., & Kimmich, M. ( 2005). The Oregon First Step to Success replication initiative: Statewide results of an evaluation of the program’s impact. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 163-172.
54.
Walker, H.M., Severson, H.H., & Feil, E.G. ( 1991). Systematic screening for behavior disorders: SSBD. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
55.
Walker, H.M., Severson, H.H., Feil E.G., Stiller B., & Golly, A. ( 1998). First step to success: Intervening at the point of school entry to prevent antisocial behavior patterns. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 259-269.
56.
Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M., & Hammond, M. ( 2001). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 283-302.
57.
Young, K.R., West, R., Smith, D., & Morgan, D. ( 1997). Teaching self-management strategies to adolescents. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
