Dependent group contingencies offer an efficient way to improve the behavior of an entire group of students, as the performance of only one or a few students needs to be monitored at a time. Prior literature reviews outlined the use of group contingency interventions with children in educational settings; however, these reviews did not exclusively examine dependent group contingencies or the varied conditions under which this intervention has been implemented. The purpose of this review was to classify the settings, populations, outcome measures, intervention components, and procedural parameters of dependent group contingencies across the research literature. We completed electronic database searches between 1970 and 2019 for experimental studies in APA PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, CINHAL Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Education Source, Academic Search Ultimate, and ProQuest and ancestral searches for the exact terms “dependent group contingenc*” OR “dependent group-oriented contingenc*” in the title, abstract, or author-defined keywords. The results of our review are summarized and discussed in terms of directions for future research and implications for practice.
AlbersA. E.GreerR. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction?Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00947188
2.
*AlricJ. M.BrayM. A.KehleT. J.ChafouleasS. M.TheodoreL. A. (2007). A comparison of independent, interdependent, and dependent group contingencies with randomized reinforcers to increase reading fluency. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573507301254
3.
*AzevedoL. B.VidoniC.DinsdaleS. (2016). Effects of “Fair Play Game” strategy on moderate to vigorous physical activity in physical education. Physical Educator, 73(4), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2016-V73-I4-7115
BrieschA. M.BrieschJ. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2015). Investigating the usability of classroom management strategies among elementary schoolteachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300714531827
6.
*BrieschA. M.HemphillE.DanielsB. (2013). Check your SLANT: Adapting self-management for use as a class-wide intervention. School Psychology Forum, 7(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/e644332012-001
7.
*BullaA. J.FriederJ. E. (2018). Self-management as a class-wide intervention: An evaluation of the “Self & Match” system embedded within a dependent group contingency. Psychology in the Schools, 55(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22109
8.
*CariveauT.KodakT. (2017). Programming a randomized dependent group contingency and common stimuli to promote durable behavior change. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.352
9.
*ColemanR. (1970). A conditioning technique applicable to elementary school classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3(4), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1970.3-293
10.
DeLeonI. G.IwataB. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519
11.
*DeshaisM. A.FisherA. B.KahngS. (2018a). A comparison of group contingencies on academic compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.505
12.
*DeshaisM. A.FisherA. B.KahngS. (2018b). A preliminary investigation of a randomized dependent group contingency for hallway transitions. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0002
13.
*FernezaP.JabotM.MaheadyL. (2013). The effects of group contingencies with randomized components on the homework accuracy of an 11th- and 12th-grade general science class. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 13(2), 100–121.
14.
GageN. A.CookB. G.ReichowB. (2017). Publication bias in special education meta-analyses. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917691016
15.
*GreshamF. M. (1983). Use of a home-based dependent group contingency system in controlling destructive behavior: A case study. School Psychology Review, 12, 195–199.
16.
*GreshamF. M.GreshamG. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698201600110
17.
*GrossT.DuhonG.ShutteG.RowlandJ. (2016). A comparison of group-oriented contingencies for addition fluency. Contemporary School Psychology, 20(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0054-x
18.
HanleyG. P.PiazzaC. C.FisherW. W.ContrucciS. A.MaglieriK. A. (1997). Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459
19.
*HansenS. D.Lignugaris/KraftB. (2005). Effects of a dependent group contingency on the verbal interactions of middle school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 30(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290503000204
20.
*HartmanK.GreshamF. (2016). Differential effectiveness of interdependent and dependent group contingencies in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2015.1056922
21.
*HeeringP. W.WilderD. A. (2006). The use of dependent group contingencies to increase on-task behavior in two general education classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(3), 459–468.
22.
HornerR. H.BlitzC.RossS. W. (2014). The importance of contextual fit when implementing evidence-based interventions [ASPE Issue Brief]. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Human Services Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
23.
*JonesM.BoonR. T.ForeC.BenderW. N. (2008). “Our Mystery Hero!” A group contingency intervention for reducing verbally disrespectful behaviors. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(2), 61–69.
24.
KelleyM. L.HefferR. W.GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1989). Development of a modified treatment evaluation inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 11(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960495
25.
KennedyC. H. (2002). The maintenance of behavior change as an indicator of social validity. Behavior Modification, 26(5), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/014544502236652
26.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
27.
LitowL.PumroyD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341
28.
LittleS. G.Akin-LittleA.O’NeillK. (2015). Group contingency interventions with children—1980-2010: A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 39(2), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/e615342013-001
29.
*LynchA.TheodoreL. A.BrayM. A.KehleT. J. (2009). A comparison of group-oriented contingencies and randomized reinforcers to improve homework completion and accuracy for students with disabilities. School Psychology Review, 38(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2009.12087816
30.
MagginD. M.JohnsonA. H.ChafouleasS. M.RubertoL. M.BerggrenM. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50(5), 625–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.06.001
31.
MagginD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.JohnsonA. H. (2017). A meta-analysis of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior: An update. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517716900
32.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
33.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, Article b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
34.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
35.
PiantaR. (2001). Student–teacher relationship scale–Short form. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
36.
*RalstonS. B. (2012). Effect of dependent group contingencies on homework completion and accuracy [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut]. ProQuest Information & Learning. https://www.proquest.com/docview/896626346
37.
*ReitmanD.MurphyM. A.HuppS. D. A.O’CallaghanP. M. (2004). Behavior change and perceptions of change: Evaluating the effectiveness of a token economy. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 26(2), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v26n02_02
38.
RomeoF. (1998). The negative effects of using a group contingency system of classroom management. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(2), 130–133.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 189–204.
41.
*ShapiroE. S.AlbrightT. S.AgerC. L. (1986). Group versus individual contingencies in modifying two disruptive adolescents’ behavior. Professional School Psychology, 1(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090503
42.
*ShapiroE. S.GoldbergR. (1986). A comparison of group contingencies for increasing spelling performance among sixth grade students. School Psychology Review, 15(4), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1986.12085256
43.
*SpeltzM. L.ShimamuraJ. W.McReynoldsW. T. (1982). Procedural variations in group contingencies: Effects on children’s academic and social behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(4), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1982.15-533
44.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Defining and describing schoolwide positive behavior support. In SailorW.DunlopG.SugaiG.HornerR. (Eds.), Issues in clinical child psychology: Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 307–326). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09632-2_13
45.
*TheodoreL. B.BrayM.KehleT. (2004). A comparative study of group contingencies and randomized reinforcers to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 19(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.19.3.253.40280
46.
*VidoniC.AzevedoL.EberlineA. (2012). Effects of a group contingency strategy on middle school physical education students’ heart rates. European Physical Education Review, 18(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x11430652
47.
*VidoniC.LeeC.AzevedoL. (2014). Fair Play Game: A group contingency strategy to increase students’ active behaviours in physical education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.847834
48.
*VidoniC.WardP. (2006). Effects of a dependent group-oriented contingency on middle school physical education students’ fair play behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9012-z
49.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 4.1). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
50.
*WilliamsonB. D.Campbell-WhatleyG. D.LoY. (2009). Using a random dependent group contingency to increase on-task behaviors of high school students with high incidence disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20445
51.
*WilliamsonD. A.WilliamsonS. H.WatkinsP. C.HughesH. E. (1992). Increasing cooperation among children using dependent group-oriented reinforcement contingencies. Behavior Modification, 16(3), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455920163007
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
