In this research, the direct and indirect (via the satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence) associations of positive youth development (PYD) with science engagement dimensions were examined among 281 gifted primary school students in Hong Kong (Mage 8.42; 54% females). Using structural equation modeling, PYD was found to be indirectly associated with more science engagement and its selected dimensions (i.e., behavioral and emotional engagement) via its association with greater perceived satisfaction of the basic needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence. No direct effects were found between PYD and science engagement. Creating opportunities to foster gifted students’ positive characteristics could promote involvement in academic activities in science.
AlrashidiO.PhanH. P.NguB. H. (2016). Academic engagement: An overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p41
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
3.
ÅrdalE.HolsenI.DisethÅ.LarsenT. (2018). The five Cs of positive youth development in a school context: Gender and mediator effects. School Psychology International, 39(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034317734416
4.
ArnoldM. E.SillimanB. (2017). From theory to practice: A critical review of positive youth development program frameworks. Journal of Youth Development, 12(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2017.17
5.
BarrettP. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
6.
BuenconsejoJ.DatuJ. A. D. (2022). Towards an integrative paradigm of positive youth development: Implications for research, practice, and policy. Human Development, 66(6), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1159/000527122
7.
BuenconsejoJ. U.DatuJ. A. D. (2021). Positive youth development: A brief review of literature with implications for school-based psychological interventions. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 32(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2021.25
8.
BuenconsejoJ. U.DatuJ. A. D. (2024). Does positive youth development predict academic functioning and well-being outcomes? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence in Filipino adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 107, Article 101355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101355
9.
BuenconsejoJ. U.DatuJ. A. D.ChiuM. M.ChanR. C. H. (2022). Psychometric validity and measurement invariance of positive youth development in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Developmental Science, 27(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2078719
10.
BuenconsejoJ. U.DatuJ. A. D.LiuD. (2025). Grit, positive youth development, and school engagement among Filipino adolescents. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 40(135), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01038-1
11.
BuenconsejoJ. U.DatuJ. A. D.LiuD. P. (2024). Does grit predict thriving or is it the other way around? A latent cross-lagged panel model on the triarchic model of grit and the five Cs of positive youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 34(4), 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13011
12.
BurkhardB. M.RobinsonK. M.MurrayE. D.LernerR. M. (2020). Positive youth development: Theory and perspective. In HuppsS.JewellJ. D. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of child and adolescent development (pp. 2947–2958). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad310
13.
Casino-GarcíaA. M.García-PérezJ.Llinares-InsaL. I. (2019). Subjective emotional well-being, emotional intelligence, and mood of gifted vs. unidentified students: A relationship model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183266
14.
ChanY.-Y.HuiD.DickinsonA. R.ChuD.ChengD. K.-W.CheungE.KiW.-H.LauW.-H.WongJ.LoE. W. C.LukK.-M. (2010). Engineering outreach: A successful initiative with gifted students in science and technology in Hong Kong. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(1), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2009.2030178
15.
ChenB.-B.WiiumN.DimitrovaR. (2018). Factor structure of positive youth development: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.039
16.
ChenX.ChengL. (2023). Emotional intelligence and creative self-efficacy among gifted children: Mediating effect of self-esteem and moderating effect of gender. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010017
17.
ChoiD.KaufmanJ. C. (2021). Where does creativity come from? What is creativity? Where is creativity going in giftedness? In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 65–81). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_5
18.
ConwayR. J.HearyC.HoganM. J. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement properties of the five Cs model of positive youth development. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01941
19.
DatuJ. A. D.BuenconsejoJ. U. (2021). Academic engagement and achievement predict career adaptability. The Career Development Quarterly, 69(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12247
20.
DatuJ. A. D.FungE. (2023). Interpersonal strengths, basic psychological needs satisfaction at school, and well-being outcomes among high-ability adolescents in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316231156831
21.
DatuJ. A. D.YangL.MateoN. J. (2021). Are gritty students academically engaged in math and science?School Psychology, 36(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000433
22.
DatuJ. A. D.YuenM.FungE.ZhangJ.ChanS.WuF. (2022). The satisfied lives of gifted and gritty adolescents: Linking grit to career self-efficacy and life satisfaction. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(8), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221096082
23.
Erturan‐İlkerG.QuestedE.AppletonP.DudaJ. L. (2018). A cross‐cultural study testing the universality of basic psychological needs theory across different academic subjects. Psychology in the Schools, 55(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22113
24.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
25.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.BoydM. J.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M.SchmidK. L.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2014). Creation of short and very short measures of the five Cs of positive youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12039
26.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M.CallinaK.LernerR. M. (2014). Longitudinal analysis of a very short measure of positive youth development. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(6), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0093-z
27.
GreenJ.MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003
28.
GuayF. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211055355
29.
HairJ. F.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.BlackW. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). CENGAGE.
30.
HolsenI.GeldhofJ.LarsenT.AardalE. (2017). The five Cs of positive youth development in Norway: Assessment and associations with positive and negative outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416645668
31.
HornstraL.BakxA. W.MathijssenS.DenissenJ. J. (2020). Motivating gifted and non-gifted students in regular primary schools: A self-determination perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, Article 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101871
32.
HornstraL.van WeerdenburgM.van den BrandM.HoogeveenL.BakxA. (2022). High-ability students’ need satisfaction and motivation in pullout and regular classes: A quantitative and qualitative comparison between settings. Roeper Review, 44(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2071367
33.
HuQ.LiP.JiangB.LiuB. (2023). Impact of a controlling coaching style on athletes’ fear of failure: Chain mediating effects of basic psychological needs and sport commitment.Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1106916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106916
34.
JenE. (2017). Affective interventions for high-ability students from 1984–2015: A review of published studies. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17715305
35.
KaplanH. (2018). Teachers’ autonomy support, autonomy suppression and conditional negative regard as predictors of optimal learning experience among high-achieving Bedouin students. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9405-y
36.
KozinaA.WiiumN.GonzalezJ.-M.DimitrovaR. (2019). Positive youth development and academic achievement in Slovenia. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9457-y
37.
LernerJ. V.BowersE. P.MinorK.BoydM. J.MuellerM. K.SchmidK. L.NapolitanoC. M.Lewin-BizanS.LernerR. M. (2013). Positive youth development: Processes, philosophies, and programs. In LernerR. M.EasterbrooksM. A.MistryJ.WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (pp. 365–392). John Wiley & Sons.
38.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestsdottirS.NaudeauS.JeličićH.AlbertsA.MaL.SmithL. M.BobekD. L.Richman-RaphaelD.SimpsonI.ChristiansenE. D.von EyeA. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272461
39.
LernerR. M.von EyeA.LernerJ.Lewin-BizanS.BowersE. (2010). Special issue introduction: The meaning and measurement of thriving: A view of the issues. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 39(7), 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9531-8
40.
LiX.ShekD. T. L. (2020). Objective outcome evaluation of a leadership course utilising the positive youth development approach in Hong Kong. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1696944
41.
MartinA. J. (2008). How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive-methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.01.002
42.
NiemiecC. P.RyanR. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
45.
QiS.HuaF.ZhouZ.ShekD. T. L. (2022). Trends of positive youth development publications (1995–2020): A scientometric review. Applied Research Quality Life, 17(1), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09878-3
46.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
47.
ReillyT. S. (2009). Talent, purpose, and goal orientations: Case studies of talented adolescents. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130903358519
48.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (2018). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental approach for promoting creative productivity in young people. In PfeifferS. I.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley-NicponM. (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 185–199). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-012
49.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (2021). The three ring conception of giftedness: A change in direction from being gifted to the development of gifted behaviors. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 335–355). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_19
50.
RomerD.HansenD. (2021). Positive youth development in education. In KernM. L.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of positive education (pp. 75–108). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64537-3_4
51.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
52.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
53.
SchindlerM.RottB. (2016). Networking theories on giftedness—What we can learn from synthesizing Renzulli’s domain general and Krutetskii’s mathematics-specific theory. Education Sciences, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010006
54.
ShekD. T.LeungH. (2013). Positive youth development, life satisfaction, and problem behaviors of adolescents in intact and non-intact families in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2013.00018
55.
SiegleD. (2018). Understanding underachievement. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 285–297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8
56.
SkinnerE. A.KindermannT. A.ConnellJ. P.WellbornJ. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). Taylor & Francis.
57.
SnyderK. E.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597
58.
SternbergR. J. (2019). Teaching and assessing gifted students in STEM disciplines through the augmented theory of successful intelligence. High Ability Studies, 30(1–2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1528847
59.
SunR. C.ShekD. T. (2012). Positive youth development, life satisfaction and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: A replication. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9786-9
60.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science.Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
61.
SunR. C. F. (2016). Student misbehavior in Hong Kong: The predictive role of positive youth development and school satisfaction. Applied Research Quality Life, 11(3), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9395-x
62.
TianL.ChenH.HuebnerE. S. (2014). The longitudinal relationships between basic psychological needs satisfaction at school and school-related subjective well-being in adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0495-4
63.
TianL.HanM.HuebnerE. S. (2014). Preliminary development of the adolescent students' basic psychological needs at school scale. Journal of Adolescence, 37(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.005
64.
TourreixE.BesançonM.GonthierC. (2023). Non-cognitive specificities of intellectually gifted children and adolescents: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Intelligence, 11(7), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11070141
65.
UrbanJ. B.Lewin-BizanS.LernerR. M. (2009). The role of neighborhood ecological assets and activity involvement in youth developmental outcomes: Differential impacts of asset poor and asset rich neighborhoods. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.07.003
66.
VansteenkisteM.RyanR. M.SoenensB. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
67.
WangC. K. J.LiuW. C.KeeY. H.ChianL. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), Article e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
68.
WangM.-T.DegolJ. (2014). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
69.
WangM.-T.FredricksJ. A.YeF.HofkensT. L.LinnJ. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008
70.
WangP.JiaL. (2023). How adolescents gain academic achievement in cumulative family risk? The role of basic psychological needs and future orientation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(7), 1911–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02543-x
71.
WiiumN.DimitrovaR. (2019). Positive youth development across cultures: Introduction to the special issue. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-019-09488-7
72.
WongP. W.-C.KwokK.-W.ChowS.-L. (2022). Validation of positive youth development scale and implications for adolescent in Hong Kong community. Child & Youth Care Forum, 51(5), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-021-09658-6
73.
WongZ. Y.LiemG. A. D.ChanM.DatuJ. A. D. (2024). Student engagement and its association with academic achievement and subjective well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000833
74.
YuL.ShekD. T. L. (2021). Positive youth development attributes and parenting as protective factors against adolescent social networking addiction in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 9, Article 649232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.649232
75.
ZhouJ.HuebnerE. S.TianL. (2021). The reciprocal relations among basic psychological need satisfaction at school, positivity and academic achievement in Chinese early adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 71, Article 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101370
