Technology: Processes of Assessment and Choice, Report of the Committee on Science and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives ( Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, July 1969).
2.
International Social Science Journal25, no. 3 (Paris: UNESCO, 1973).
3.
Francois Hetman, Society and the Assessment of Technology (Paris: OECD, 1973).
4.
John Ziman, Public Knowledge: The Social Dimension of Science (Cambridge : University Press, 1968).
5.
Wolf Hafele , "Hypotheticality and the New Challenges: The Pathfinder Role of Nuclear Energy," Minerva12 (1974): 303-322.
National Academy of Engineering, A Study of Technological Assessment , Report of the Committee on Public Engineering Policy of the National Academy of Engineering to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives (Washington, D.C.: USGPO, August 1969), cf. esp. pp. 9-21, 32-34.
8.
Arthur W. Murphy , "NEPA and the Licensing Process: Environmentalist Magna Carta or Agency Coup de Grace?", Columbia Law Review72, no. 6 (October 1972): 963-1007.
9.
Frederick R. Anderson, NEPA in the Courts: A Legal Analysis of the National Environmental Policy Act (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973).
10.
Joshua Lederberg , "The Freedoms and the Control of Science: Notes from the Ivory Tower," Southern California Law Review45, no. 2 (Spring 1972 ): 596-615.
11.
J.R. Ravetz, "Conclusion: The Future of Science," in J.R. Ravetz, Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1971), pt. 5, pp. 405-436.