This article challenges a key tacit assumption underpinning legal and ethical instruments in health care, namely, that people are ideally bounded, independent, and often also strategically rational individuals. Such an understanding of personhood has been criticized within feminist and other critical scholarship as being unfit to capture the deeply relational nature of human beings. In the field of medicine, however, it also causes tangible problems. I propose that a solidarity-based perspective entails a relational approach and as such helps to formulate new solutions to complex ethical and regulatory questions, ranging from caring for people at the end of their lives to improving policies for organ donation and better governance of health data. It also underscores the importance of universal health care. Although a solidarity-based perspective does not require health to be seen as an individually enforceable right, it does influence our understanding of individual rights: it draws attention to how their meaning is shaped by shared social practices. I conclude by arguing that, in light of current pressures for medicine to become more personalized, using a relational understanding of personhood to shape policies and practices is a much needed endeavor.
AdairA.WigmoreS. J.. 2011. “Paid Organ Donation: The Case Against.” The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England93 (3): 191–92.
2.
BalkanD.1966. The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion. Boston, MA: Deacon Press.
3.
BattersbyC.2007. The Sublime, Terror and Human Difference. London, UK: Routledge.
4.
BaylisF.KennyN. P.SherwinS.. 2008. “A Relational Account of Public Health Care Ethics.” Public Health Ethics1 (3): 196–209.
5.
BeyleveldD.BrownswordR.. 2007. Consent in the Law. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
6.
Bird-DavidN. 2004. “Illness-images and Joined Beings: A Critical/Nayaka Perspective on Intercorporeality.” Social Anthropology12 (3): 325–39.
7.
BoasH.2009. “The Value of Altruism—The Political Economy of Organ Supply.” PhD thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv.
8.
BrimelowA.2009. “Israel Organ Donors to Get Transplant Priority.” BBC News(December 17). Accessed August 24, 2014. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8416443.stm.
9.
Budin-LjøsneI.HarrisJ. R.. 2016. “Patient and Interest Organizations’ Views on Personalized Medicine: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Medical Ethics17 (1): 28.
10.
ButlerJ.1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
11.
CharlesC.GafniA.WhelanT.. 1997. “Shared Decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What Does it Mean? (Or It Takes at Least Two to Tango).” Social Science & Medicine44 (5): 681–92.
CohenG. A. (1995). Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CookS. D. N.WagenaarH.. 2012. “Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present toward an Epistemology of Practice.” American Review of Public Administration42 (1): 3–38.
15.
DickensonD.2013. Me Medicine vs. We Medicine: Reclaiming Biotechnology for the Common Good. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
DouglasB.2017. “The mtDNA of Human Rights.” Science, Technology, & Human Values43 (1): 86–94.
17.
DouzinasC.2000. The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century. Oxford, UK: Hart.
18.
DoveE. S.JolyY.KnoppersB. M.. 2011. “Power to the People: A Wiki-governance Model for Biobanks.” Genome Biology13 (5): 158.
19.
DoveE. S.KellyS. E.LuciveroF.MachiroriM.DheensaS.PrainsackB.. 2017. “Beyond Individualism: Is There a Place for Relational Autonomy in Clinical Practice and Research?” Clinical Ethics12 (3): 150–65.
20.
EpsteinC.2013. “Theorizing Agency in Hobbes’s Wake: The Rational Actor, the Self, or the Speaking Subject?” International Organization67 (2): 287–316.
21.
ESF (European Science Foundation). 2012. Personalised Medicine for the European Citizen—Towards More Precise Medicine for The Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Disease. Strasbourg, France: ESF.
22.
FosterC.2009. Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law. Oxford, UK: Hart.
23.
FoxR. C.SwazeyJ.. 2008. Observing Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
GawandeA.2014. Being Mortal. London, UK: Profile.
25.
GilliganCarol C.1982. In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
HackingI.2006. “Making Up People.” London Review of Books28 (6): 23–26.
27.
HedgecoeA.2004. The Politics of Personalised Medicine: Pharmacogenetics in the Clinic. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
HowardR. E.1995. “Human Rights and the Search for Community.” Journal of Peace Research32 (1): 1–8.
30.
JacobMarie-Andree. 2012. Matching Organs with Donors: Legality and Kinship in Transplants. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31.
JuengstE.McGowanM. L.FishmanJ. R.SetterstenR. A.. 2016. “From ‘Personalized’ to ‘Precision’ Medicine: The Ethical and Social Implications of Rhetorical Reform in Genomic Medicine.” Hastings Center Report46 (5): 21–33.
32.
KayeD. H.2013. “The Genealogy Detectives: A Constitutional Analysis of Familial Searching.” American Criminal Law Review50 (1): 109–63.
33.
KayeJ.WhitleyEdgar A.KanellopoulouNadjaCreeseSadieHughesKay J.LundDavid. 2011. “Dynamic Consent: A Solution to a Perennial Problem?” BMJ343:d6900–d6900.
KitsonAlisonMarshallAmyBassettKatherineZeitzKathryn. 2013. “What Are the Core Elements of Patient-centred Care? A Narrative Review and Synthesis of the Literature from Health Policy, Medicine and Nursing.” Journal of Advanced Nursing69 (1): 4–15.
36.
KoenigBarbara A.2014. “Have We Asked Too Much of Consent?” Hastings Center Report44 (4): 33–34.
37.
KoenigB. A.Gates-WilliamsJ.. 1995. “Understanding Cultural Difference in Caring for Dying Patients.” The Western Journal of Medicine163 (3): 244–49.
38.
LambekM.2013. “The Continuous and the Discontinuous Person: Two Dimensions of Ethical Life.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute19 (4): 837–58.
39.
LaurieG. T.2001. “Challenging Medical-legal Norms: The Role of Autonomy, Confidentiality, and Privacy in Protecting Individual and Familial Group Rights in Genetic Information.” Journal of Legal Medicine22 (1): 1–54.
40.
LaurieG. T.2014. “Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional and Legal Implications.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics42 (1): 53–63.
41.
LockeJ. (1689) 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MacfarlaneA.1978. The Origins of English Individualism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43.
MackenzieC.StoljarN.. 2000. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
MansonN. C.O’NeillO.. 2007. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MeyersD.1994. Subjection and Subjectivity. New York: Routledge.
46.
MurdochI.1992. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London, UK: Chatto and Windus.
47.
NAS [US] (National Academy of Sciences). 2011. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. Washington, DC: NAS.
48.
NealP.1988. “Hobbes and Rational Choice Theory.” The Western Political Quarterly41 (4): 635–52.
49.
NedelskyJ.1990. “Law, Boundaries and the Bounded Self.” Representations30:162–89.
50.
NedelskyJ.2011. Law’s Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
NHS (National Health Services) Scotland. 2016. “Realising Realistic Medicine: Chief Medical Officer’s Annual Report 2015–2016.” Accessed April 15, 2017. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0051/00514513.pdf.
52.
O’NeillO.2003. “Some Limits of Informed Consent.” Journal of Medical Ethics29 (1): 4–7.
53.
PowersM.FadenR.. 2006. Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
PrainsackB.2014. “Personhood and Solidarity: What Kind of Personalized Medicine Do We Want?” Personalized Medicine11 (7): 651–57.
55.
PrainsackB.2015. “Is Personalized Medicine Different? (Reinscription: The Sequel). Response to Troy Duster.” British Journal of Sociology66 (1): 28–35.
56.
PrainsackB. 2017. Personalized Medicine: Empowered Patients in the 21st Century?New York City: New York University Press.
57.
PrainsackB.BuyxA.. 2013. “A Solidarity-based Approach to the Governance of Research Biobanks.” Medical Law Review21 (1): 71–91.
58.
PrainsackB.BuyxA.. 2016. “Thinking Ethical and Regulatory Frameworks in Medicine from the Perspective of Solidarity on Both Sides of the Atlantic.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics37 (6): 489–501.
59.
PrainsackB.BuyxA.. 2017. Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
PriaulxN.WrigleyA., Eds. 2013. Ethics, Law and Society, Vol. V. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
61.
RadinMargaret J.1996. Contested Commodities. The Trouble with Trade in Sex, Children, Body Parts, and Other Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
ReardonJ.2005. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
RichardsonJ.2007. “The Law and the Sublime: Rethinking the Self and Its Boundaries.” Law and Critique18 (2): 229–52.
64.
SariolaS.SimpsonB.. 2011. “Theorising the ‘Human Subject’ in Biomedical Research: International Clinical Trials and Bioethics Discourses in Contemporary Sri Lanka.” Social Science & Medicine73 (4): 515–21.
65.
SchreiberM.2014. The Comfort of Kin: Samaritan Community, Kinship, and Marriage. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
66.
SharonT.2014. Human Nature in an Age of Biotechnology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
67.
SiedentopL.2014. Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
SimpsonB.2014. “Fifteen Century Problems for the Twenty-first Century Gift: Human Tissue Transactions in Ethnically Diverse Societies.” Anthropological Forum24 (4): 338–50.
69.
SimpsonB.2017. “A ‘We’ Problem for Bioethics and the Social Sciences: A Response to Barbara Prainsack.” Science, Technology, & Human Values43 (1): 45–55.
70.
StrathernM.1988. Gender of the Gift. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
71.
StraussA. L.FagerhaughS.SuczekB.WienerC.. 1982. “The Work of Hospitalised Patients.” Social Science & Medicine16 (9): 977–86.
72.
StraussA. L.FagerhaughS.SuczekB.WienerC.. (1985) 1997. Social Organization of Medical Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
73.
TaylorC.1985. “The Person.” In The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, edited by CarrithersM.CollinsS.LukesS., 257–81. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
74.
TaylorC.1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
TaylorM.2012. Genetic Data and the Law: A Critical Perspective on Privacy Protection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
TPM (Transplant Procurement Management). 2010. Accessed June 20, 2017. www.tpm.org.
77.
TsaiD. F. C. 2001. “How Should Doctors Approach Patients? A Confucian Reflection on Personhood.” Journal of Medical Ethics27 (1): 44–50.
78.
VollmannJ.SandowV.WäscherS.SchildmannJ., Eds. 2015. The Ethics of Personalized Medicine: Critical Perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
79.
WagenaarH.2004. “‘Knowing’ the Rules: Administrative Work as Practice.” Public Administration Review64 (6): 643–56.
80.
WeberG. M.MandlK. D.KohaneI.. 2014. “Finding the Missing Link for Big Biomedical Data.” The Journal of the American Medical Association311 (24): 2479–80.
81.
WiddowsH.2013. The Connected Self: The Ethics and Governance of the Genetic Individual. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
82.
ZeilerK.2007. “Who Am I? When Do ‘I’ Become Another? An Analytic Exploration of Identities, Sameness and Difference, Genes and Genomes.” Health Care Analysis15 (1): 25–32.
83.
ZeilerK.2014. “Neither Property nor Heroic Give, Neither Sacrifice nor Aporia: The Benefit of the Theoretical Lens of Sharing in Donation Ethics.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy17 (2): 171–81.
