One of the first (conceptual) frameworks developed for understanding the relation of science and technology to the economy has been the linear model of innovation. The model postulated that innovation starts with basic research, is followed by applied research and development, and ends with production and diffusion. The precise source of the model remains nebulous, having never been documented. Several authors who have used, improved, or criticized the model in the past fifty years rarely acknowledged or cited any original source. The model usually was taken for granted. According to others, however, it comes directly from V. Bush’s Science: The Endless Frontier ([1945] 1995). This article traces the history of the linear model, suggesting that it developed in three steps corresponding to three scientific communities looking at science analytically. The article argues that statistics is a main reason the model is still alive despite criticisms, alternatives, and having been proclaimed dead.
Ames, E.1961. Research, invention, development and innovation. American Economic Review51(3): 370-381.
2.
Anthony, R. N., and J. S. Day. 1952. Management controls in industrial research organizations. Boston: Harvard University.
3.
Arendt, H.1958. The human condition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
4.
Battelle Columbus Labs. 1973. Interactions of science and technology in the innovative process: Some case studies. Washington: National Science Foundation.
5.
Bernal, J. D.1973. The social function of science. 1939. Reprint, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Bichowsky, F. R.1942. Industrial research. New York: Chemical Publishing.
7.
Bright, J. R.1969. Some management lessons from innovation research. Long Range Planning2(1): 36-41.
8.
Brozen, Y.1951a. Invention, innovation, and imitation. American Economic Journal41(2): 239-257.
9.
Brozen, Y.1951b. Research, technology and productivity. In Industrial productivity, edited by L. R. Tripp, 25-49. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
10.
Bush, V.1995. Science: The endless frontier. 1945. Reprint, North Stratford, NH: Ayer Co.
11.
Canadian Department of Reconstruction and Supply (DRS). 1947a. Research and scientific activity: Canadian federal expenditures 1938-1946. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
12.
Canadian Department of Reconstruction and Supply (DRS). 1947b. Research and scientific activity: Canadian federal expenditures, 1946 and 1947. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
13.
Canadian Department of Reconstruction and Supply (DRS). 1947c. Research and scientific activity: Provincial government expenditures: 1946-1947. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
14.
Canadian Dominion Bureau of Statistics. 1941. Survey of scientific and industrial laboratories in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
15.
Carter, C. F., and B. R. Williams. 1957. Industry and technical progress: Factors governing the speed of application of science. London: Oxford University Press.
16.
Carter, C. F., and B. R. Williams. 1958. Investment in innovation. London: Oxford University Press: 2.
17.
Carty, J. J.1916. The relation of pure science to industrial research. Reprint and Circular Series, no. 14. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
18.
Carty, J. J.1924. Science and business. Reprint and Circular Series, no. 24. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
19.
Cochrane, R. C.1978. The National Academy of Sciences: The first hundred years 1863-1963. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
20.
Cohen, I. B.1948. Science servant of men. Boston: Little, Brown.
21.
Congress for Cultural Freedom. 1955. Science and freedom. London: Martin Secker & Warburg.
22.
Daniels, G. H.1967. The pure-science ideal and democratic culture. Science156: 1699-1705.
23.
Dearborn, D. C., R. W. Kneznek, and R. N. Anthony. 1953. Spending for industrial research, 1951-1952. Cambridge, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
24.
Dennis, M. A.1987. Accounting for research: New histories of corporate laboratories and the social history of American science. Social Studies of Science17: 479-518.
25.
Edgerton, D. E. H.1987. Science and technology in British business history. Business History29(4): 84-103.
26.
Edgerton, D. E. H.1993. British research and development after 1945: A re-interpretation. Science and Technology Policy47(2): 10-16.
27.
Edgerton, D. E. H.2004. The linear model did not exist. In The science-industry nexus: History, policy, implications, edited by K. Grandin, N. Worms, and S. Widmalm, 31-57. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications.
28.
Edgerton, D. E. H., and S. M. Horrocks. 1994. British industrial research and development before 1945. Economic History Review67(2): 213-238.
29.
Forrest, J. E.1991. Models of the process of technological innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management3(4): 439-452.
30.
Freeman, C.1982. The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Freeman, C.1996. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change53(1): 27-39.
32.
Furnas, C. D. (ed.) 1948. Research in Industry: Its Organization and Management. Princeton NJ: D van Nostrand.
33.
Gerritsen, J. C.1961. Government expenditures on R&D in France and the United Kingdom. EPA/AR/4209. Paris: OEEC.
34.
Gerritsen, J. C.1963. Government expenditures on R&D in the United States of America and Canada. DAS/PD/63.23. Paris: OECD.
35.
Godin, B.2003a. Measuring science: Is there basic research without statistics? Social Science Information42(1): 57-90.
36.
Godin, B.2003b. The emergence of S&T indicators: Why did governments supplement statistics with indicators? Research Policy32(4): 679-691.
37.
Godin, B.2004. The new economy: What the concept owes to the OECD. Research Policy33(5): 579-690.
38.
Godin, B.2005a. Research and development: How the “D” got into R&D. Science and Public Policy33(1): 59-76.
39.
Godin, B.2005b. The rise of innovation surveys: Measuring a fuzzy concept. In Measurement and statistics on science and technology: 1920 to the present, by B. Godin. London: Routledge.
40.
Godin, B.2006. The knowledge-based economy: Conceptual framework or buzzword. Journal of Technology Transfer31(1): 17-30.
41.
Graham, M. B. W., and B. H. Pruitt. 1991. R&D for industry: A century of technical innovation at Alcoa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Heerding, A.1986. The history of N. V. Philips’ Gloeilampenfabriken. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Holland, M, and W. Spraragen. 1933. Research in Hard Times. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
44.
Horrocks, S. M.1999. The nature and extent of British industrial research and development, 1945-1970. ReFresh29(Autumn): 5-9.
45.
Hounshell, D. A., and J. K. Smith. 1988. Science and corporate strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902-1980. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Hounshell, D. A.1980. Edison and the pure science ideal in 19th century America. Science207(441): 612-617.
47.
Hounshell, D. A.1996. The evolution of research in the United States. InEngines of innovation: US industrial research at the end of an era, edited by R. S. Rosenbloom and W. J. Spencer. Boston: Harvard Business School.
48.
Huxley, J. S.1934. Scientific research and social needs. London: Watts and Co.
49.
IIT Research Institute. 1968. Technology in retrospect and critical events in science (TRACES). Washington: National Science Foundation.
50.
Irvine, J., and B. R. Martin. 1984. Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Frances Pinter.
51.
Kelly, P., M. Kranzberg, F. A. Rossini, N. R. Baker, F. A. Tarpley, and M. Mitzner1975. Technological innovation: A critical review of current knowledge, vol. 1. Report submitted to the National Science Foundation. Atlanta, GA: Advanced Technology and Science Studies Group, Georgia Tech.
52.
Kline, R.1995. Construing technology as applied science: Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis86(2): 194-221.
53.
Kline, S. J.1985. Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management28(2): 36-45.
54.
Kuznets, S.1962. Inventive Activity: Problems of Definition and Measurement, in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 19-51.
55.
Layton, E. T.1976. American ideologies of science and engineering. Technology and Culture17(4): 688-700.
56.
Lazure, A. C.1957. Why research and development contracts are distinctive. In Research and Development Procurement Law, edited by A. C. Lazure and A. P. Murphy, 255-264. Washington, DC: Federal Bar Journal.
57.
Little, A. D.1963. Patterns and problems of technical innovation in American industry. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
58.
Lloyd, G. E. R.1966. Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Lobkowicz, N.1967. Theory and practice: History of a concept from Aristotle to Marx. London: University of Notre Dame.
60.
Machlup, F.1962. The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
Maclaurin, W. R.1949. Invention and innovation in the radio industry. New York: Macmillan: 97.
62.
Maclaurin, W. R.1953. The sequence from invention to innovation and its relation to economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics67(1): 97-111.
63.
Mansfield, E.1968. The economics of technological change. New York: W. E. Norton.
64.
Mees, C. E. K.1920. The organization of industrial scientific research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
65.
Mees, C. E. K. and J. A. Learmakers. 1950. The Organization of Industrial Scientific Research. New York: McGraw Hill.
66.
Meyer-Thurow, G.1982. The industrialization of invention: A case study from the German chemical industry. ISIS73: 363-381.
67.
Mirowski, P., and E.-M. Sent. 2002. Science bought and sold: Essays in the economics of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Mowery, D. C.1983a. Economic theory and government technology policy. Policy Sciences16: 27-43.
69.
Mowery, D. C.1983b. Industrial research and firm size: Survival, and growth in American manufacturing, 1921-1946: An assessment. Journal of Economic History63(4): 953-980.
70.
Mowery, D. C.1984. Firm structure, government policy, and the organization of industrial research: Great Britain and the United States, 1900-1950. Business History Review58(4): 504-531.
71.
Mowery, D. C.1986. Industrial research, 1900-1950. In The Decline of the British Economy, edited by B. Elbaum and W. Lazonick. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
72.
Mowery, D. C.1997. The Bush report after fifty years—Blueprint or relic? In Science for the 21st century: The Bush report revisited, edited by C. E. Barfield. Washington: AEI.
73.
Mowery, D. C., and N. Rosenberg. 1989. The US research system before 1945. In Technology and the pursuit of economic growth, edited by D. C. Mowery and N. Rosenberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Myers, S., and D. G. Marquis. 1969. Successful industrial innovations: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. NSF 69-17. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
75.
National Science Foundation. 1952. Second annual report of the NSF: Fiscal year 1952. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
76.
National Science Foundation. 1953. Federal funds for science. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
77.
National Science Foundation. 1957a. Basic research: A national resource. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
78.
National Science Foundation. 1957b. Federal funds for science: The federal research and development budget, fiscal years 1956, 1957, and 1958. NSF 57-24. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
79.
National Science Foundation. 1959. Science and engineering in American industry: Report on a 1956 survey. NSF 59-50. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
80.
National Science Foundation. 1962. Trends in funds and personnel for research and development, 1953-61. Reviews of data on R&D 33 (April), NSF 62-9. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
81.
Nelson, R. R.1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy67(3): 297-306.
82.
Nelson, R. R.1962. The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 549-583. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1962. The measurement of scientific and technical activities: Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and development. DAS/PD/62.47. Paris: OECD.
84.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1970. The measurement of scientific and technical activities: Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Paris.
85.
Ogburn, W. F., and S. C. Gilfillan. 1933. The influence of invention and discovery. In Recent Social Trends in the United States, vol. 1. Report of the President’s Research Committee on Social Trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.
86.
Perazich, G., and P. M. Field. 1940. Industrial research and changing technology. National Research Project. Report no. M-4. Philadelphia, PA: Work Progress Administration.
87.
Price, W. J., and L. W. Bass. 1969. Scientific research and the innovative process. Science164(3881): 802-806.
88.
Reich, L. S.1983. Irving Langmuir and the pursuit of science and technology in the corporate environment. Technology and Culture24(4): 199-221.
89.
Reich, L. S.1985. The making of American industrial research: Science and business at GE and Bell, 1876-1926. New York: Cambridge University Press.
90.
Reingold, N., and A. P. Molella. 1991. Theorists and ingenious mechanics: Joseph Henry defines science. In Science: American style, edited by N. Reingold, 127-155. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
91.
Roberts, R. E., and C. A. Romine. 1974. Investment in innovation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
92.
Rogers, E. M.1983. Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
93.
Rogers, E. M.1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
94.
Rosenberg, N.1994. Exploring the black box: Technology, economics, and history. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95.
Rothwell, R.1992. Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management22(3): 221-239.
96.
Rothwell, R., and W. Zegveld. 1985. Reindustrialization and technology. New York: Sharpe.
97.
Rowland, H. A.1902. A plea for pure science. In The physical papers of Henry Augustus Rowland, 593-613. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
98.
Ruttan, V. W.1959. Usher and Schumpeter on invention, innovation, and technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics73(4): 596-606.
99.
Sanderson, M.1972. Research and the firm in British industry, 1919-1939. Science Studies2: 107-151.
100.
Saren, M. A.1984. A classification and review of models of the intra-firm innovation process. R&D Management14 (1): 11-24.
101.
Scherer, F. M.1959. The investment decision phases in modern invention and innovation. In Patents and the corporation, edited by F. M. Schereret al.Boston: J. J. Galvin.
102.
Scherer, F. M.1965. Invention and innovation in the Watt-Boulton steam engine venture. Technology and Culture6: 165-187.
103.
Schmookler, J.1962. Comment on B.S. Sanders's paper, in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 78-83.
104.
Schmookler, J.1966. Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105.
Schopman, J.1989. Industrious science: Semiconductor research at the N. V. Philips’ Gloeilampenfabriken, 1930-1957. Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Sciences19(1): 137-172.
106.
Schumpeter, J.1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. 1912. Reprint, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107.
Schumpeter, J.1939. Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
108.
Shapley, W. H.1959. Problems of definition, concept, and interpretation of research and development statistics. In The Methodology of Statistics on R&D, National Science Foundation, NSF 59-36. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
109.
Shinn, T.1980. The genesis of French industrial research, 1880-1940. Social Science Information19(3): 607-640.
110.
Smith, J. K.1990. The scientific tradition in American industrial research. Technology and Culture31(1): 121-131.
111.
Solo, C. S.1951. Innovation in the capitalist process: A critique of the Schumpeterian theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics65(3): 417-428.
112.
Stevens, R.1941, A Report on Industrial Research as a National Resource: Introduction, Research: A National Resource (II): Industrial Research, NRC. Washington, DC: USGPO.
113.
Stokes, D. E.1997. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
114.
UK Committee on Industry and Trade. 1927. Factors in industrial and commercial efficiency, part I, ch. 4. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
115.
UK Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). 1958. Estimates of resources devoted to scientific and engineering R&D in British manufacturing industry, 1955. London: HMSO.
116.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1953. Scientific R&D in American industry: A study of manpower and costs. Bulletin no. 1148. Washington, DC: USGPO.
117.
U.S. Department of Defense. 1969. Project hindsight final report. Washington, DC: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering.
118.
U.S. National Research Council. 1920. Research laboratories in industrial establishments of the United States of America. Bulletin of the NRC vol. 1, part 2, March.
119.
U.S. National Research Council. 1941. Research: A national resource (II): Industrial research. National Resources Planning Board. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
120.
U.S. National Resources Committee. 1937. Technological trends and national policy. Washington, DC: National Resources Committee, Subcommittee on Technology.
121.
U.S. National Resources Committee. 1938. Research: A national resource. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
122.
U.S. President’s Scientific Research Board (PSRB). 1947. Science and public policy. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
123.
Usher, A. P.1954. A history of mechanical inventions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
124.
Utterback, J. M.1974. Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science183(4125): 620-626.
125.
Utterback, J. M., and W. J. Abernathy. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega3(6): 639-656.
126.
Vernon, R.1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics80(5): 190-207.
127.
von Humboldt, W. [1809] 1970. On the spirit and the organizational framework of intellectual institutions in Berlin. Minerva8(1970): 242-250.
128.
Werskey, G.1978. The visible college: The collective biography of British scientific socialists of the 1930s. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
129.
Williams, B. R.1967. Technology, investment and growth. London: Chapman and Hill.
130.
Wise, G.1980. A new role for professional scientists in industry: Industrial research at general electric, 1900-1916. Technology and Culture21(7): 408-429.
131.
Wise, G.1985. W. R. Whitney, General Electric, and the origins of US industrial research. New York: Columbia University Press.
132.
Zachary, G. P.1999. Endless frontier: Vannevar Bush, engineer of the American century. 1997. Reprint, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
133.
Zieber, W. E.1948. Organization charts in theory and practice. In Research in industry: Its organization and management, edited by C. C. Furnas, 71-89. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
