Much has been written about the linear model of innovation. While it may have been the dominant model used to explain technological innovation for decades, alternatives did exist. One such alternative—generally discussed as being the exact opposite of the linear model—is the demand-pull model. Beginning in the 1960s, people from different disciplines started looking at technological innovation from a demand rather than a supply perspective. The theory was that technological innovation is stimulated by market demand rather than by scientific discoveries. However, few traces of the demand-pull model remain in the literature today. This article looks at what happened to the demand-pull model from a historical perspective, at three points in time: birth, crystallization, and death. It suggests that the idea of demand as a factor explaining technological innovation emerged in the 1960s, was formalized into models in the 1970-1980s, then got integrated into “multidimensional” models. From then on, the demand-pull model disappeared from the literature, existing only as an object of the past, like the linear model of innovation.
AllenJ. A.1967a. Scientific Innovation and Industrial Prosperity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
2.
AllenJ. A.1967b. Studies in Innovation in the Steel and Chemical Industries. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
3.
BakerN. R.SiegmanJ.RubensteinA. H.1967. “The Effects of Perceived Needs and Means on the Generation of Ideas for Industrial Research and Development Projects.”IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementEM-14 (4): 156–63.
4.
BalconiM.BrusoniS.OresnigoL.2010. “In Defence of the Linear Model: An Essay.”ResearchPolicy39 (1): 1–13.
5.
BarnesB.1982. “The Science-technology Relationship: A Model and a Query”. Social Studies of Science12 (1): 166–72.
6.
BarnesB.EdgeD.1982. “The Interaction of Science and Technology.” In Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, edited by BarnesB.EdgeD., 147–54. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
7.
Battelle-Columbus Laboratories. 1973. Interactions of Science and Technology in the Innovative Process: Some Case Studies. Report to the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: NSF.
8.
BernalJ. D.(1967) 1939. The Social Function of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BlankD. M.StiglerG. J.1957. The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
BushV.(1995) 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. North Stratford, NH: Ayer Co.
11.
CaraçaJ.LundvallB.-A.MendonçaS.2009. “The Changing Role of Science in the Innovation Process: From Queen to Cinderella?”Technological Forecasting and Social Change76 (6): 861–67.
12.
CarterC. F.WilliamsB. R.1957. Industry and Technical Progress: Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChidamberS. R.KonH. B.1994. “A Research Retrospective of Innovation Inception and Success: The Technology-push, Demand-pull Question.”International Journal of Technology Management9 (1): 94–112.
14.
CoombsR.SaviottiP.WalshV.1987. Economics and Technological Change. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
DosiG.1982. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.”Research Policy11 (3): 147–62.
16.
DosiG.1988. “The Nature of the Innovation Process.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by DosiG.FreemanC.NelsonR. R.SilverbergG.SoeteL., 221–38. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf.
17.
EdgertonD.2004. “The Linear Model did not Exist.” In The Science-industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications, edited by GrandinK.WormsN.WidmalmS., 31–57. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History.
18.
FagerbergJ.VerspagenB.2009. “Innovation Studies: The Emerging Structure of a New Scientific Field.”Research Policy38 (2): 218–33.
19.
FreemanC.1971. The Role of Small Firms in Innovation in the United Kingdom since 1945, Report to the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms, HMSO, London, UK.
20.
FreemanC.1974. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
21.
FreemanC.1979. “The Determinants of Innovation: Market Demand, Technology, and the Response to Social Problems.”Futures11 (3): 206–15.
22.
FreemanC.1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 2nd Ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
FreemanC.1994. “The Economics of Technical Change.”Cambridge Journal of Economics18 (5): 463–514.
24.
FreemanC.1996. “The Greening of Technology and Models of Innovation.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change53 (1): 27–39.
25.
FreemanC.ClarkJ.SoeteL.1982. Unemployment and Technical Innovation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
26.
FurnasC. C.1948. Research in Industry: Its Organization and Management. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
27.
GeorghiouL.MetcalfeJ. S.GibbonsM.RayT.EvansJ. (1986), Post-innovation Performance: Technological Development and Competition. London, UK: Macmillan.
28.
GibbonsM.JohnsonC.1970. “Relationship between Science and Technology.”Nature227: (11 July): 125–27.
29.
GodinB.2006. “The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework.”Science, Technology and Human Values31 (6): 639–67.
30.
GodinB.2011. Innovation Studies: The Invention of a Specialty, Two parts, project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Montreal, INRS. Part II has been published in Minerva, 4, 2012.
31.
GruberW. H.MarquisD. G., eds. 1969. Factors in the Transfer of Technology. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
32.
HitchC. J.McKeanR. N.(1965) 1960. The Economics of Defense in the Nuclear Age, New York, NY: Atheneum.
33.
HollandM.1928. “Research, Science and Invention.” In A Century of Industrial Progress, edited by WileF. W., 312–34. New York: American Institute of the City of New York.
34.
HollomonJ. H.(1968) 1965. “Science and Innovation.” In Economics of Research and Development, edited by TyboutR. A., 251–57. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
35.
HollomonM.1967. “Technology Transfer.” In Technology Transfer and Innovation, edited by National Planning Association and National Science Foundation, 32–36, Proceedings of a Conference. May 15-17, 1966, NSF 67-5, NSF, Washington, DC.
36.
HowellsJ.1997. “Rethinking the Market-technology Relationship for Innovation.”Research Policy25 (8): 1209–19.
37.
IIT Research Institute1968-69. “Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science (TRACES).”Report to the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: NSF.
38.
KamienK. I.SchwartzN. L.1975. “Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature13 (1): 1–37.
39.
KamienK. I.SchwartzN. L.1982. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
KellerA.1984. “Has Science Created Technology?”Minerva22 (2): 160–82.
41.
KimW.LeeJ. D.2009. “Measuring the Role of Technology-push and Demand-pull in the Dynamic Development of the Semiconductor Industry: The Case of the Global DRAM market.”Journal of Applied Economics. 12 (1): 83–108.
42.
KleinknechtA.VerspagenB.1990. “Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-Examined.”Research Policy. 19: 387–94.
43.
KlineS. J.1985. “Innovation is Not a Linear Process.”Research Management28 (July-August): 36–45.
44.
KlineS. J.RosenbergN.1986. “An Overview of Innovation.” In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, edited by LaudanR.RosenbergN., 275–305. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
45.
KoselleckR.1975. “The Historical-political Semantics of Asymmetric Counter concepts.” In Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, edited by KoselleckR., 155–91. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
46.
KranzbergM.1967. “The Unity of Science-technology.”American Scientist. 55 (1): 48–66.
47.
KreilkampK.1971. “Hindsight and the Real World of Science Policy.”Science Studies1 (1): 43–66.
48.
LangrishJ.1974. “The Changing Relationship between Science and Technology.”Nature250 (23 August): 614–16.
49.
LangrishJ.GibbonsM.EvansW. G.JevonsF. R.1972. Wealth from Knowledge: Studies of Innovation in Industry. London, UK: Macmillan.
50.
LittleA. D.1963. Patterns and Problems of Technical Innovation in American Industry. Report to the National Science Foundation. USGPO, Washington, DC.
51.
LittleA. D.1965. Management Factors Affecting Research and Exploratory Development. Report submitted to the US Department of Defense. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering.
52.
LittleA. D., and Industrial Research Institute1973. Barriers to Innovation in Industry: Opportunities for Public Policy Changes. Report to the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: USGPO.
53.
MachlupF.1962. “The Supply of Inventors and Inventions.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by National Bureau of Economic Research, 143–69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
MaclaurinW. R.1949. Invention and Innovation in the Radio Industry. New York: Macmillan.
55.
MansfieldE.1968. The Economics of Technological Change. New York: Norton.
56.
MarquisD.1969. “The Anatomy of Successful Innovations.”Innovation Newsletter1 (7): 29–37.
57.
MartinG.WillensR. H.1967. Coupling Research and Production. New York: Interscience Publishers.
58.
MayrO.1976. “The Science-technology Relationship.” Technology and Culture. Reprinted in Barnes, B., and D. Edge. 1982. “The Interaction of Science and Technology.” In Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, 155–163. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
59.
MorganM. S.1999. “Learning from Models.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by MorganM. S.MorrisonM., 347–88. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MoweryD.RosenbergN.1979. “The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies.”Research Policy8 (2): 102–53.
61.
MulkayM. J.1975. “Three Models of Scientific Development.”Sociological Review23 (3): 509–26.
62.
MyersS. 1965. “Attitude and Innovation.”International Science and Technology46: 91–103.
63.
MyersS.1967. Technology Transfer and Industrial Innovation. Washington, DC: National Planning Association.
64.
MyersS.MarquisD.1969. “Successful Industrial Innovation: A Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms.”Report to the NSF, Washington, DC.
65.
National Bureau of Economic Research1962. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
NelsonR. R.1959. “The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature.”Journal of Business. 32 (2): 297–306.
67.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1977. “In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation.”Research Policy6 (1): 36–76.
68.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
69.
NelsonR. R.PeckM. J.KalachekE. D.1967. Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
70.
NemetG. F.2009. “Demand-pull, Technology-push, and Government-led Incentives for Non-incremental Technical Change.”Research Policy38 (5): 700–709.
71.
NewbyH.1992. “One Society, One Wissenschaft: A 21st Century Vision.”Science and Public Policy19 (1): 7–14.
72.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1971. Science, Growth and Society: A New Perspective. Paris, France: OECD.
73.
PinchT. J.BijkerW. E.1987. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by BijkerW. E.HughesT. P.PinchT., 23–50. Cambridge: MIT Press.
74.
PivaM. C.VivarelliM.2007. “Is Demand-pulled Innovation Equally Important in Different Groups of Firms.”Cambridge Journal of Economics31 (5): 691–710.
75.
PriceW. J.BassL. W.1969. “Scientific Research and the Innovative Process.”Science164 (16 May): 802–6.
76.
RogersE. M.1983. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.
77.
RosenbergN.1969. “The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanism and Focusing Devices.”Economic Development and Cultural Change18 (1): 1–24.
78.
RosenbergN.1974. “Science, Invention and Economic Growth.”The Economic Journal84 (333): 90–108.
79.
RothwellR.1977. “The Characteristics of Successful Innovators and Technically Progressive Firms.”R&D Management7 (3): 191–206.
80.
RothwellR.1992. “Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s.”R&D Management22 (3): 221–39.
81.
RothwellR.1994. “Industrial Innovation: Success, Strategy, Trends.” In Handbook of Industrial Innovation, edited by DogsonM.RothwellR., 33–53. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
82.
RothwellR.RobertsonA. B.1973. “The Role of Communications in Technological Innovation.”Research Policy2 (3): 204–25.
83.
RothwellR.ZegveldW.1985. Reindustrialization and Technology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
84.
RubensteinA. H.DoudsC. F.1969. “A Program of Research on Coupling Relations in Research and Development.”IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementEM-16 (4): 137–43.
85.
SchererF. M.1982. “Demand-pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited.”The Journal of Industrial Economics30 (3): 225–37.
86.
Schmidt-TiedemannK. J.1982. “A New Model of the Innovation Process.”Research Management25 (2): 18–21.
87.
SchmochU.2007. “Double-boom and the Comeback of Science-push and Market-pull.”Research Policy36 (7): 1000–15.
88.
SchonD. A.1967. Technology and Change: The Impact of Invention and Innovation on American Social and Economic Development. New York: Delta Books.
89.
SchmooklerJ.1962. “Changes in Industry and in the State of Knowledge as Determinants of Industrial Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by National Bureau of Economic Research, 195–232. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90.
SchmooklerJ.1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91.
SchmooklerJ.1968. “Catastrophe and Utilitarianism in the Development of Basic Science.” In Economics of Research and Development, edited by TyboutR. A., 19–33. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
92.
SherwinC. W.IsensonR. S., and Defense Documentation Center (U.S.)1966. First Interim Report on Project Hindsight (Summary). Washington, DC: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, Department of Defense.
93.
SherwinC. W.IsensonR. S.1969. “Project Hindsight: A Defense Department Study of the Utility of Research.”Science156 (23 June): 1571–77.
94.
SPRU1972. “Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation.”Report on Project SAPPHO, Center for the Study of Industrial Innovation, London, UK.
95.
StevensR.1941. “Introduction.” In Research: A National Resource (II): Industrial Research, edited by US National Research Council, 5–16. Washington, DC: National Resources Planning Board.
96.
TaitJ.WilliamsR.1999. “Policy Approaches to Research and Development: Foresight, Framework and Competitiveness”. Science and Public Policy26 (2): 101–12.
97.
ToulminS. 1969. “Innovation and the Problem of Utilization.” in Factors in the Transfer of Technology, edited by GruberW. H.MarquisD. G., 24–38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98.
UK Privy Council1946. Scientific Man-power: Report of a Committee Appointed by the Lord President of the Council. London, UK: HMSO.
99.
US Department of Commerce1967. Technological Innovation: Its Environment and Management. Washington, DC: USGPO.
100.
US Department of Defense1969. Project Hindsight: Final Report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Office of the Director of Defense Research Engineering.
101.
US National Academy of Sciences1966. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Principles of Research-engineering Interaction, Washington, DC: Material Advisory Board, Division of Engineering, National Research Council, USGPO.
102.
UtterbackJ. M.1971. “The Process of Technological Innovation within the Firm.”The Academy of Management Journal14 (1): 75–88.
103.
UtterbackJ. M.1974. “Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology.”Science183 (15 February): 620–26.
104.
van den EndeJ.DolfsmaW.2005. “Technology-push, Demand-pull and the Shaping of Technological Paradigms: Patterns in the Development of Computing Technology.”Journal of Evolutionary Economics15 (1): 83–99.
105.
WalshV.1984. Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry: Demand-pull and Discovery-push?Research Policy13 (4): 211–34.
106.
WalshV. M.TownsendJ. F.AchilladclisB. G.FreemanC.1979. Trends in Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry. Brighton: University of Sussex.
107.
WeinbergA. M.1962. “Criteria for Scientific Choice.”Minerva1 (2): 158–617.
108.
WiseG.1985. “Science and Technology.”OSIRIS1 (1): 229–46.
109.
ZimanJ.1991. “A Neural Net Model of Innovation.”Science and Public Policy18 (1): 65–75.
