Race, equity, and justice remain challenging yet critical topics for education researchers in the contemporary U.S. context. Meaningful engagement with these topics requires researchers to critically acknowledge dominant paradigms and intentionally design research approaches that meaningfully center race and ethnicity. This research note offers innovative and tested methods for qualitative data collection that enable researchers to engage in deeper dialogues on race and ethnicity with participant-collaborators: (1) purposeful sampling to reflect racial/ethnic diversity within the group under investigation, (2) “matched” and “mixed” focus groups to center participants’ social identities, and (3) vignettes with auditory and visual depictions to facilitate discussion. Each proved beneficial for in-depth and rich data collection, fostering deeper analyses, discussions, and recommendations for practice.
BellN. S.VélezV.FordD. Y.CollierZ.ZubacaN.SalimS. B.SlusarzE.ParkS.SukumarJ. (2025). QuantCrit principles of practice for disrupting racialized injustices in special education. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 34(1), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct202551524
Brown-JeffyS.CooperJ. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 65–84.
CheslerM. A.Young Jr.A. (Eds.) (2013). Faculty identities and the challenge of diversity: Reflections on teaching in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634685
6.
DavenportA.PasqueP. A. (2014). Adding breadth and depth to university residential communities: A phenomenological study of faculty in residence. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 40(2), 46–65.
7.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.SchutzP. A. (2014). Researching race within educational psychology contexts. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.957828
8.
DiAngeloR. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
9.
DillardC. B. (2000). The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(6), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050211565
10.
DillardC. B. (2008). Re-membering culture: Bearing witness to the spirit of identity in research. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320701845848
Dixon-RománE.NicholsT. P.Nyame-MensahA. (2020). The racializing forces of/in AI educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1667825
13.
FryerC.MackintoshS.StanleyM.CrichtonJ. (2012) Qualitative studies using in-depth interviews with older people from multiple language groups: Methodological systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05719.x
14.
GarciaN. M.LópezN.VélezV. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675
15.
GurinP.NagdaB. A.ZúñigaX. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogues. Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
HallJ. N. (2020). Focus groups: Culturally responsive approaches for qualitative inquiry and program evaluation. Myers Education Press.
HarrisJ. (2018). Uncomfortable learning: Teaching race through discomfort in higher education. In Ahad-LegardyB.PoonO. A. (Eds.), Difficult subjects (pp. 248–265). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444220-18
19.
HaynesC.JosephN. M.PattonL. D.StewartS.AllenE. L. (2020). Toward an understanding of intersectionality methodology: A 30-year literature synthesis of Black women’s experiences in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 751–787. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946822
20.
HowardG. (2016). We can’t teach what we don’t know: White teachers, multiracial schools (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
21.
HughesR. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00107
22.
JacobS. A.FurgersonS. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(42), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1718
23.
KalafatJ.GaglianoC. (1996). The use of simulations to assess the impact of an adolescent suicide response curriculum. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 26(4), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278x.1996.tb00839.x
24.
KohliR.PizarroM.NevárezA. (2017). The “new racism” of K–12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686949
LangS. A.TebbenE.LuckeyS. W.HurnsK. W.FoxE. G.FordD. Y.AnsariA.PasqueP. A. (2024). Early childhood teachers’ dispositions, knowledge, and skills related to diversity, inclusion, equity, and justice. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 67, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.12.005
27.
LedesmaM. C.CalderónD. (2015). Critical race theory in education: A review of past literature and a look to the future. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557825
28.
LeonardoZ. (2013). Race frameworks: A multidimensional theory of racism and education. Teachers College Press.
29.
LeonardoZ. (2017). The story of schooling: Critical race theory and the educational racial contract. In GulsonK.LeonardoZ.GillbornD. (Eds.), The edge of race: Critical examinations of education and race/racism (pp. 137–148). Routledge.
30.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
31.
LynchJ.MannionG. (2016). Enacting a place-responsive research methodology: Walking interviews with educators. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(4), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1163271
32.
Mac RuaircG.GartlandS.HeinzM.Rodríguez-EntrenaM. J. (2025). Diversity, equity and democracy in school leadership: Troublesome concepts in troubled times. In HeinzM.Rodríguez-EntrenaM. J.Mac RuaircG. (Eds.), Professional learning for diversity, equity and democracy: Big ideas for better schools (pp. 24–46). Routledge.
33.
MilnerH. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
34.
MurrayJ. (2023). What is the purpose of education? A context for early childhood education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 31(3), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2023.2238399
35.
Neal-BarnettA.StadulisR.MurrayM.PayneM. R.ThomasA.SalleyB. B. (2011). Sister circles as a culturally relevant intervention for anxious Black women. Clinical Psychology, 18(3), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2011.01258.x
36.
NgE.FitzsimmonsT.KulkarniM.OzturkM. B.AprilK.BanerjeeR.MuhrS. L. (2025). The anti-DEI agenda: Navigating the impact of Trump’s second term on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion, 44(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2025-0116
37.
NxumaloF.RossK. M. (2019). Envisioning Black space in environmental education for young children. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592837
38.
ObenauerW. G. (2024). Counteracting threats to DEI with good trouble and innovation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17(4), 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.47
39.
PasqueP. A.alexandere. (Eds.). (2022). Advancing culturally responsive research and researchers: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003126621
40.
PasqueP. A.CheslerM. A.YoungA. A. (2013). Issues of research design and reflexivity. In ChelserM. A.Young Jr.A. (Eds.), Faculty identities and the challenge of diversity (pp. 21–36). Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634685
41.
PasqueP. A.PattonL. D.GaylesJ. G.GoodenM. A.HenfieldM. S.MilnerH. R.PetersA.StewartD. L. (2022). Unapologetic educational research: Addressing anti-blackness, racism, and white supremacy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086211060451
42.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
43.
PresserL. (2004). Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Social Problems, 51(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.82
44.
RosiekJ. (2019). Critical race theory meets posthumanism: Lessons from a study of racial resegregation in public schools. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(1), 73–92. https://doi/org/10.1080/13613324.2018.1468746
45.
SchmidE.GarrelsV.SkålandB. (2024). The continuum of rapport: Ethical tensions in qualitative interviews with vulnerable participants. Qualitative Research, 24(5), 1253–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941231224600
46.
SchwandtT. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). SAGE.
47.
ShangguanY.ChenS.LiX. (2024). Minimum enclosing ball synthetic minority oversampling technique from a geometric perspective. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.03526
48.
SingletonG. E. (2021). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools and beyond (3rd ed.). Corwin.
49.
Smith-MaddoxR.SolórzanoD. G. (2002). Using critical race theory, Paulo Freire’s problem-posing method, and case study research to confront race and racism in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800105
50.
StewartD. L. (2021). Performing goodness in qualitative research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1962560
51.
SueD. W. (2015). Race talk and the conspiracy of silence: Understanding and facilitating difficult dialogues on race. John Wiley & Sons.
52.
ToliverS. R. (2020) Can I get a witness? Speculative fiction as testimony and counterstory. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20966362
VianoS.BakerD. J. (2020). How administrative data collection and analysis can better reflect racial and ethnic identities. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x20903321
55.
WarikooN.SinclairS.FeiJ.Jacoby-SenghorD. (2016). Examining racial bias in education: A new approach. Educational Researcher, 45(9), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16683408
WhitingG. W.FordD. Y.GranthamT. C.Moore IIIJ. J. (2008). Considerations for conducting culturally responsive research in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 31(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2008-784
58.
ZuberiT.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216386278
59.
ZhangY.Hennebry-LeungM. (2023). A review of using photo-elicitation interviews in qualitative education research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231185456
