This study examines how urban American Indian high school students negotiate their civic identities within the settler colonial structures of urban American public schools.
Research Question:
How do urban American Indian students negotiate civic identities in spaces where civic concepts are taught, such as American history classes in an urban public high school and a Native Youth Council (Native YC)?
Research Design:
This critical participatory ethnographic study examines the negotiation of civic identity by 11 urban Indigenous students in social studies classes, a Native YC, and a school in Washington State, where the STI curriculum is taught. Safety zone theory and tribal critical race theory were used to understand students’ experiences and their stories from observations, participant interviews, and focus groups, which were employed as data.
Conclusions/Recommendations:
The study found that the social studies classes and Native YC were zones of sovereignty (ZoS), forwarding survivance and self-determination for Native students. Students learned about the Indigenous civic constructs of sovereignty, self-determination, dual citizenship, tribal self-government, and federal Indian policy inside and outside of school, all of which supported Native students in civic identity development. Recommendations on teaching Indigenous civic constructs to all students as part of teaching for critical democracy in public schools as a component of social studies classes and extracurricular activities are discussed.
BartonK. C.AveryP. G. (2016). Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods. In GitomerD.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 985–1038). American Educational Research Association.
4.
BegayeT. (2008). Modern democracy: The complexities behind appropriating Indigenous models of governance and implementation. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 459–470). Sage.
5.
BenallyC. (2014). Creating and negotiating Native spaces in public school systems: An Arizona example. Journal of American Indian Education, 53(3), 11–24.
6.
BenallyC. (2019a). Indigenizing the curriculum: Putting the “Native” into Native American content instruction mandates. Journal of American Indian Education, 58(3), 5–10.
7.
BenallyC. (2019b). “You need to go beyond creating a policy”: Opportunities for zones of sovereignty in Native American history instruction policies in Arizona. Journal of American Indian Education, 58(3), 11–33.
8.
BiestaG. (2007). Education and the democratic person: Towards a political conception of democratic education. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 740–769.
9.
BrayboyB. M. J. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446.
10.
BruyneelK. (2004). Challenging American boundaries: Indigenous people and the “gift” of U.S. citizenship. Studies in American Political Development, 18(1), 30–43.
11.
BruyneelK. (2016). Codename Geronimo: Settler memory and the production of American statism. Settler Colonial Studies, 6(4), 349–364.
CapricciosoR. (2010, January13). A sorry saga: Obama signs Native American apology resolution; fails to draw attention to it. Indian Country Today. https://indianlaw.org/node/529
15.
CaseM. (2018). Relentless business of treaties: How Indigenous land became U.S. property. Minnesota Historical Society Press.
16.
ChurchillW. (2004). Kill the Indian, save the man: The genocidal impact of American Indian residential schools. City Lights Books.
17.
CobbD. M. (2015). Say we are nations: Documents of politics and protest in Indigenous America since 1887. University of North Carolina Press.
18.
DeloriaV.Jr.WildcatD. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Fulcrum.
19.
DeloriaV.Jr.LytleC. M. (1998). The nations within: The past and future of American Indian sovereignty. University of Texas Press.
20.
DeyhleD.SwisherK. (1997). Chapter 3: Research in American Indian and Alaska Native education: From assimilation to self-determination. Review of Research in Education, 22(1), 113–194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X022001113
21.
FixicoD. L. (2014). From tribal to Indian: American Indian identity in the twentieth century. In SmithersG. D.NewmanB. N. (Eds.), Native diasporas: Indigenous identities and settler colonialism in the Americas (pp. 473–496). University of Nebraska Press.
22.
FrengS.FrengA.MooreH. (2007). Examining American Indians’ recall of cultural inclusion in school. Journal of American Indian Education, 46(2), 42–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24398568
23.
FurlanL. M. (2017). Indigenous cities: Urban Indian fiction and the histories of relocation. University of Nebraska Press.
24.
GarciaR. L.AhlerJ. G. (1992). Indian education: Assumptions, ideologies, strategies. In ReyhnerJ. (Ed.), Teaching American Indian students (pp. 13–32). University of Oklahoma Press.
GlennC. L. (2011). American Indian/First Nations schooling: From the colonial period to the present. Springer.
27.
GoldsteinA. (2014). Possessive investment: Indian removals and the affective entitlements of whiteness. American Quarterly, 66(4), 1077–1084.
28.
GrandeS. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Rowman and Littlefield.
29.
GrandeS. (2015). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Rowman and Littlefield.
30.
GrayshieldL.HurtadoD.DavisA. (2015). Indigenous knowledge and culture-based pedagogy: What educators serving Native children in mainstream educational institutions must know. In Aguilera-Black BearD.TippeconnicJ. W. III (Eds.), Voices of resistance and renewal: Indigenous leadership in education (pp. 179–192). University of Oklahoma Press.
31.
KendiI. X. (2017). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Hachette.
32.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 257–277). SAGE.
33.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
34.
LaukaitisJ. J. (2015). Community self-determination: American Indian education in Chicago, 1952–2006. SUNY Press.
35.
LevineP. (2007). The future of democracy: Developing the next generation of American citizens. University Press of New England.
LoboS. (2001). Is urban a person or a place? Characteristics of urban Indian Country. In LoboS.PetersK. (Eds.), American Indians and the urban experience (pp. 73–84). Altamira Press.
38.
LomawaimaK. T. (2013). The mutuality of citizenship and sovereignty: The society of American Indians and the battle to inherit America. Studies in American Indian Literatures, 25(2), 333–351.
39.
LomawaimaK. T. (2014). History without silos, ignorance versus knowledge, education beyond schools. History of Education Quarterly, 54(3), 349–355.
40.
LomawaimaK. T.McCartyT. L. (2002). When tribal sovereignty challenges democracy: American Indian education and the democratic ideal. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 279–305.
41.
LomawaimaK. T.McCartyT. L. (2006). “To remain an Indian”: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. Teachers College Press.
42.
LomawaimaK. T.McCartyT. L. (2014). Concluding commentary: Revisiting and clarifying the safety zone. Journal of American Indian Education, 53(3), 63–67.
43.
MacMullenI. (2015). Civics beyond critics: Character education in a liberal democracy. Oxford University Press.
44.
MartinezD.SageG.OnoA. (2016). Urban American Indians: Reclaiming Native space. Praeger.
45.
McCartyT. L. (2018). Twelfth annual Brown lecture in education research: So that any child may succeed: Indigenous pathways toward justice and the promise of Brown. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18768549
46.
McCartyT. L.WymanL. T.NicholasS. E. (2013). Activist ethnography with Indigenous youth: Lessons from humanizing research on language and education. In ParisD.WinnM. T. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 81–104). SAGE.
47.
MeansR.WolfM. (1995). Where white men fear to tread: The autobiography of Russell Means. Macmillan.
48.
MirraN.MorrellE. D.CainE.ScorzaD.FordA. (2013). Educating for a critical democracy: Civic participation reimagined in the Council of Youth Research. Democracy and Education, 21(1), Article 3.
PalmerD.CaldasB. (2017). Critical ethnography. In KingK. A.LaiY.-J.MayS. (Eds.), Research methods in language and education: Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed., pp. 381–392). Springer.
52.
PewewardyC. (2005). Ideology, power, and the miseducation of Indigenous peoples in the United States. In WilsonW. A.BirdM Y. (Eds.), For Indigenous eyes only: A decolonization handbook (pp. 139–156). School of American Research.
53.
PewewardyC. D.LeesA.Clark-ShimH. (2018). The transformational Indigenous praxis model: Stages for developing critical consciousness in Indigenous education. Wicazo Sa Review, 33(1), 38–69.
ReyhnerJ.EderJ. (2017). American Indian education: A history. University of Oklahoma Press.
56.
RossE. W.VinsonK. D. (2017). Insurrectionist pedagogies and the pursuit of dangerous citizenship. Rethinking social studies: Critical pedagogy in pursuit of dangerous citizenship (pp. 35–70). Information Age.
57.
RubinB. C. (2007). “There’s still not justice”: Youth civic identity development amid distinct school and community contexts. Teachers College Record, 109(2), 449–481.
58.
RubinB. C. (2012). Making citizens: Transforming civic learning for diverse social studies classrooms. Routledge.
59.
RubinB. C. (2016). We come to form ourselves bit by bit: Educating for citizenship in post-conflict Guatemala. American Educational Research Journal, 53(3), 639–672. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216646871
RubinB. C.HayesB. F. (2010). “No backpacks” versus “drugs and murder”: The promise and complexity of youth civic action research. Harvard Educational Review, 80(3), 352–379. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.80.3.p709264772m6186g
62.
SabzalianL. (2019a). Indigenous children’s survivance in public schools. Routledge.
63.
SabzalianL. (2019b). The tensions between Indigenous sovereignty and multicultural citizenship education: Toward an anticolonial approach to civic education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(3), 311–346.
64.
SabzalianL.ShearS. B.SnyderJ. (2021). Standardizing Indigenous erasure: A TribalCrit and QuantCrit analysis of K–12 U.S. civics and government standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(3), 321–359.
65.
SageG. (2018). Urban Indian identity: Who are we anyway? In MartinezD.SageG.OnoA. (Eds.), Urban American Indians: Reclaiming Native space (pp. 85–105). Prager.
ShreveB. G. (2012). Red Power rising: The National Indian Youth Council and the origins of Native activism. University of Oklahoma Press.
68.
SimpsonA. (2011). Settlement’s secret. Cultural Anthropology, 26(2), 205–217.
69.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Zed Books.
70.
TaniK. M. (2015). States' rights, welfare rights, and the “Indian Problem”: Negotiating citizenship and sovereignty, 1935–1954. Law and History Review, 33(1), 1–40.
71.
TeminD. M. (2018). Custer’s sins: Vine Deloria Jr. and the settler-colonial politics of civic inclusion. Political Theory, 46(3), 357–379.
72.
TenganT. P. (2005, November). Unsettling ethnography: Tales of an ’Ōiwi in the anthropological slot. Anthropological Forum, 15(3), 247–256.
73.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
74.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In ParisD.WinnM. T. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–248). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544329611
VizenorG. (2008). Survivance: Narratives of Native presence. University of Nebraska Press.
77.
WalkerR. (2016, Fall). Since Time Immemorial: Schools in Washington State must teach Native history. Indian Country Today, pp. 36–39.
78.
WemigwaseS.TuckE. (2019). Research before and after the academy: Learning participatory Indigenous methods. In WindchiefS.SanT. Pedro (Eds.), Applying Indigenous research methods (pp. 76–85). Routledge.
79.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
80.
WindchiefS.San PedroT. (2019). Applying Indigenous research methods. Routledge.
81.
WriterJ. H. (2010). Broadening the meaning of citizenship education: Native Americans and tribal nationhood. Action in Teacher Education, 32(2), 70–81.
82.
WoodardS. (2018). American apartheid: The native American struggle for self-determination and inclusion. Ig Publishing.
83.
YounissJ. (2011). Civic education: What schools can do to encourage civic identity and action. Applied Developmental Science, 15(2), 98–103. doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2011.560814
84.
YounissJ.McLellanJ. A.YatesM. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040005008
