New Civics scholars and practitioners aspire to move beyond curricula focused on voter participation and knowledge of government structures and mechanisms to instead prepare youth to act upon their values in ways that lead to systemic change. Critics of New Civics argue that this approach is a form of pervasive leftist politics on campuses that seek to train youth activists with particular political agendas.
Purpose and Research Questions:
New Civics scholars must contend with conservative critiques as they envision curricula and programs to encourage greater civic action and engagement universally. Because these curricula and programs embrace nontraditional notions of civic action, they must garner some modicum of public trust to gain broad traction in schools and nonprofit organizations. Opponents of New Civics frame it as exclusively leftist, “politically correct,” and hostile to alternative views. These accusations may convince an already skeptical public that New Civics advances a particular political agenda, rather than modes of civic action and engagement in a democratic and pluralistic society. We analyze the extent to which these critiques have merit.
Research Design:
Our approach explores the curricula, programs, and social movements associated with New Civics. We contextualize these critiques within historical campus culture wars that portray the university as an echo chamber of liberal politics lacking intellectual diversity, with special attention to contemporary debates about free speech and identity on campus. Finally, we consider the extent to which a conservative New Civics practice is possible and whether New Civics needs to embrace a more inclusive ideological stance to mitigate critiques.
Findings/Results:
We discuss the possibility of scholars and practitioners transcending the culture-war framework to pursue their cardinal goal of preparing all youth to initiate and engage in action that leads to social change.
AllenD.LightJ. S. (2015). Introduction. In AllenD.LightJ. S. (Eds.), From voice to influence: Understanding citizenship in a digital age (pp. 35–55). The University of Chicago Press.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (2009). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.
7.
CampbellD. E. (2012). Introduction. In CampbellD. E.LevinsonM.HessF. M. (Eds.), Making civics count: Citizenship education for a new generation (pp. 247–258). Harvard Education Press.
D’SouzaD. (1991). Illiberal education: The politics of race and sex on campus. The Free Press.
12.
EaganK.StolzenbergE. B.ZimmermanH.AragonM.SaysonH.Rios-AguilarC. (2017). The American freshman: National norms Fall 2016. Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles. https://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/TheAmericanFreshman2016.pdf
13.
FinnC. E.Jr. (1989). Context for governance: Public dissatisfaction and campus accountability. In SchusterJ. H.MillerL. H., & Associates (Eds.), Governing tomorrow’s campus: Perspectives and agendas (pp. 180–189). American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing.
14.
FournierR. (2017). Rural public high schools: Community, belonging, and service. In HunterJ. D.OlsonR. S. (Eds.), The content of their character: Inquiries into the varieties of moral formation (pp. 47–70). Finstock & Tew.
15.
FukuyamaF. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
GingoldJ. (2013). Building an evidence-based practice of action civics: The current state of assessments and recommendations for the future (CIRCLE Working Paper #78). Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life, Tufts University. http://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/building-case-action-civics
19.
GinwrightS.CammarotaJ. (2006). Introduction. In GinwrightS.NogueraP.CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth (1st ed., pp. xiii–xxii). Routledge.
20.
GrossN.SimmonsS. (Eds.). (2014). Professors and their politics. John Hopkins University Press.
21.
HartmanA. (2019). A war for the soul of America: A history of the culture wars. University of Chicago Press.
HasteH. (2004). Constructing the citizen. Political Psychology, 25(3), 413–439.
24.
HasteH. (2017, August). The New Civics ECSP story so far: Defining “New Civics” and contributing to the field. New Civics Early Career Scholars Program (ECSP), Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://ecsp.gse.harvard.edu/our-statement
25.
HasteH.BermudezA. (2017). The power of story: Historical narratives and the construction of civic identity. In CarreteroM.BergerS.GreverM. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of research in historical culture and education (pp. 427–447). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_23
HirschE. D.Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Houghton Mifflin.
28.
HunterJ. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. Basic Books.
29.
KahneJ.HodginE.Eidman-AadahlE. (2016). Redesigning civic education for the digital age: Participatory politics and the pursuit of democratic engagement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1132646
30.
KahneJ.MiddaughE. (2006). Is patriotism good for democracy? A study of high school seniors’ patriotic commitments. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(8), 600–607.
KimballR. (1990). Tenured radicals: How politics has corrupted our higher education. Harper & Row.
33.
LevineP. (2012). Education for civil society. In CampbellD. E.LevinsonM.HessF. M. (Eds.), Making civics count: Citizenship education for a new generation (pp. 37–56). Harvard Education Press.
34.
LevinsonM. (2012). No citizen left behind. Harvard University Press.
LillaM. (2017). The once and future liberal: After identity politics. Oxford University Press.
37.
LindenbergerH. (1990). The history in literature: On value, genre, institutions. Columbia University Press.
38.
LucasC. J. (1996). Crisis in the academy: Rethinking higher education in America. St. Martin’s Press.
39.
LukianoffG.HaidtJ. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Press.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013, May). Spotlight: The status of rural education. In The condition of education (pp. 70–76). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_tla.pdf
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004160
