Around the time of their adoption, reformers argued pensions would help encourage public employees to retire rather than remain in their jobs indefinitely. However, the significance of specific pension policies for retirements within numerous plans is not well-known. Using new data on service retirements from 81 state-employee defined-benefit plans between 2001 and 2019, I examine pensions’ relationship with retirements, while also accounting for other variables that might matter. The results indicate that early retirement incentives, relaxed post-retirement work restrictions, and higher employee pension contributions are all associated with more retirements, while increased employer contributions and cost-of-living adjustments are associated with fewer. As governments continue to consider fiscal reforms to retirement plans, they also should keep their personnel needs and pensions’ relationships with them in mind.
AliS. B.FrankH. A.2019. “Retirement Planning Decisions: Choices Between Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans.” The American Review of Public Administration49 (2): 218–35.
2.
AlmediaB.KenneallyK.MadlandD.2009. “The New Intersection on the Road to Retirement: Public Pensions, Economics, Perceptions, Politics, and Interest Groups.” In The Future of Public Employee Retirement Systems, edited by MitchellO. S.AndersonG.New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 294–326.
3.
AnziaS. F.2022. “Pensions in the Trenches: How Pension Spending is Affecting U.S. Local Government.” Urban Affairs Review58 (1): 3–32.
4.
AnziaS. F.MoeT. M.2017. “Polarization and Policy: The Politics of Public-Sector Pensions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly42 (1): 33–62.
5.
AsseburgJ.HombergF.2020. “Public Service Motivation or Sector Rewards? Two Studies on the Determinants of Sector Attraction.” Review of Public Personnel Administration40 (1): 82–111.
6.
BinderS. A.2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BlinderA. S.1981. “Private Pensions and Public Pensions: Theory and Fact. W.S.” Woytinski Lecture No. 5. University of Michigan Institute of Public Policy Studies.
8.
BoltonA.de FigueiredoJ. M.LewisD. E.2021. “Elections, Ideology, and Turnover in the US Federal Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory31:451–66.
9.
BrainardK.BrownA.2018. Spotlight on: Significant Reforms to State Retirement Systems. 1–97. Lexington, KY: National Association of State Retirement Administrators.
10.
BrainardK.BrownA.2021. NASRA Issue Brief: Cost-of-Living Adjustments. 1–16. Lexington, KY: National Association of State Retirement Administrators. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01633
11.
BrooksJ.2019. “Board on the Job: Public-Pension Governance in the United States (US) States.” Journal of Public Policy39 (1): 1–34.
12.
BrownK. M.2013. “The Link Between Pensions and Retirement Timing: Lessons From California Teachers.” Journal of Public Economics98:1–14.
13.
CameronA.MillerD. L.2015. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources50 (2): 317–72.
14.
ChalmersJ.JohnsonW. T.ReuterJ.2014. “The Effect of Pension Design on Employer Costs and Employee Retirement Choices: Evidence From Oregon.” Journal of Public Economics116:17–34.
15.
ChongD.CitrinJ.ConleyP.2001. “When Self-Interest Matters.” Political Psychology22 (3): 541–70.
16.
ClarkR. L.CraigL. A.WilsonJ. W.2003. A History of Public Sector Pensions in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
ClarkR. L.MorrillM. S.VanderweideD.2014. “Defined Benefit Pension Plan Distribution Decisions by Public Sector Employees.” Journal of Public Economics116:73–88.
18.
CondreyS. E.BattaglioR. P.2007. “A Return to Spoils? Revisiting Radical Civil Service Reform in the United States.” Public Administration Review67 (3): 425–36.
19.
CorreiaS.GuimarãesP.ZylkinT.2019. “Verifying the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Generalized Linear Models.”
20.
CorreiaS.GuimarãesP.ZylkinT.2020. “Fast Poisson Estimation With High-Dimensional Fixed Effects.” The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata20:95–115.
21.
CostrellR. M.McGeeJ. B.2010. “Teacher Pension Incentives, Retirement Behavior, and Potential for Reform in Arkansas.” Education Finance and Policy5 (4): 492–518.
22.
DahlströmC.HolmgrenM.2019. “The Political Dynamics of Bureaucratic Turnover.” British Journal of Political Science49 (3): 823–36.
23.
FrankH.GianakisG.NeshkovaM. I.2012. “Critical Questions for the Transition to Defined Contribution Pension Systems in the Public Sector.” The American Review of Public Administration42 (4): 375–99.
24.
FrenchE.JonesJ. B.2011. “The Effects of Health Insurance and Self-Insurance on Retirement Behavior.” Econometrica79 (3): 693–732.
25.
FriedbergL.TurnerS.2010. “Labor Market Effects of Pensions and Implications for Teachers.” Education Finance and Policy5 (4): 463–91.
26.
GailmardS.PattyJ. W.2007. “Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 873–89.
27.
GorinaE.HoangT.2020. “Pension Reforms and Public Sector Turnover.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory30 (1): 96–112.
28.
Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada. 2022. The Use of Early Retirement Incentives: State and Local Governments Should Not use ERIs for a Variety of Reasons. https://www.gfoa.org/materials/the-use-of-early-retirement-incentives. Accessed: 2022-06-13.
29.
GraebnerW.1980. A History of Retirement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
IlmanenA.KabillerD. G.SiegelL. B.SullivanR. N.2017. “Defined Contribution Retirement Plans Should Look and Feel More Like Defined Benefit Plans.” The Journal of Portfolio Management43 (2): 61–76.
31.
IppolitoR. A.1987. “Why Federal Workers Don’t Quit.” Journal of Human Resources22 (2): 281–99.
32.
KahnemanD.TverskyA.1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica47 (2): 263–92.
33.
KelloughJ. E.OsunaW.1995. “Cross-Agency Comparisons of Quit Rates in the Federal Service: Another Look at the Evidence.” Review of Public Personnel Administration15 (4): 58–68.
34.
LazearE.MooreR.1988. “Pensions and Turnover.” In Pensions in the U.S. Economy, edited by BodieZ.WiseD.Chicago, IL; Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 163–188.
35.
LazearE. P.1979. “Why is There Mandatory Retirement?” Journal of Political Economy87 (6): 1261–84.
36.
LeeY.-J.WilkinsV. M.2011. “More Similarities or More Differences? Comparing Public and Nonprofit Managers’ Job Motivations.” Public Administration Review71 (1): 45–56.
37.
LenzG. S.2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 821–37.
38.
LewisG. B.1991. “Turnover and the Quiet Crisis in the Federal Civil Service.” Public Administration Review51 (2): 145–55.
39.
Liss-LevinsonR.2020. Survey Results: Public Sector Employee Views on Finances and Employment Outlook due to COVID-19. Washington, DC: The Center for State and Local Government Excellence.
40.
MaciagM.2017. A Downsized Public Workforce May Be a Permanent Consequence of the Recession: State and Local Governments Still Haven’t Regained Many of the Jobs They Cut, and They’re Unlikely to Anytime Soon. Governing: The Future of States and Localities.
41.
MeierK. J.HicklinA.2008. “Employee Turnover and Organizational Performance: Testing a Hypothesis From Classical Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18 (4): 573–90.
42.
MitchellO. S.1988. “Worker Knowledge of Pension Provisions.” Journal of Labor Economics6 (1): 21–39.
43.
MorrillM. S.WestallJ.2019. “Social Security and Retirement Timing: Evidence From a National Sample of Teachers.” Journal of Pension Economics and Finance18 (4): 549–64.
44.
MunnellA. H.2012. State and Local Pensions: What Now?Washington, DC; Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
45.
MunnellA. H.HaverstickK.SotoM.2007. Why Have Defined Benefit Plans Survived in the Public Sector? 2. Boston, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
46.
Novy-MarxR.RauhJ.2011. “Public Pension Promises: How Big Are They and What Are They Worth?” The Journal of Finance66 (4): 1211–49.
47.
NyceS. A.2007. “Behavioral Effects of Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans.” Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance6 (3): 251–85.
48.
PapkeL. E.2019. “Retirement Choices by State and Local Public Sector Employees: The Role of Eligibility and Financial Incentives.” Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance18 (04): 515–28.
49.
PengJ.WangQ.2017. “Affordability of Public Pension Benefit: A Historical and Empirical Analysis of US State and Local Government Pension Contributions.” Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance16 (1): 21–42.
50.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R.1990. “The Motivational Bases of Public Service.” Public Administration Review50 (3): 367–73.
51.
QuinbyL. D.SanzenbacherG. T.2020. “Do Pensions Matter for Recruiting State and Local Workers?” State and Local Government Review52 (1): 6–17.
52.
RobertsA.2013. Large Forces: What’s Missing in Public Administration.
53.
ShorB.McCartyN.2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 530–51.
54.
SnellR.2012. “State Pension Reform, 2009-2011.” 1-6. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
55.
ThomM.2017. “The Drivers of Public Sector Pension Reform Across the U.S. States.” The American Review of Public Administration47 (4): 431–42.
56.
WeaverR. K.1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy6 (4): 371–98.
57.
WooldridgeJ. M.2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
