Public sector pension funding varies significantly across the states, a phenomenon often linked with budget conditions, but do political factors also play a role? Utilizing data collected between 2000 and 2008, this article investigates the role of political, fiscal, and workforce characteristics as determinants of long-term pension funding, a measure with implications for fiscal sustainability and ongoing reform deliberations. Results suggest a significant relationship between pension funding and legislative partisanship, citizen ideology, public school employee coverage, and outstanding state debt. Certain other fiscal variables do not shape pension-funding levels independent of these factors, nor does executive partisanship.
AbramsBurton A.DouganWilliam R.. 1986. The effects of constitutional restraints on governmental spending. Public Choice49:101–16.
2.
BarrilleauxCharlesBerkmanMichael. 2003. Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly56:409–17.
3.
BerryWilliam D.FordingRichard C.RingquistEvan J.HansonRussell L.KlarnerCarl E.. 2010. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the U.S. states: A Re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly10:117–35.
4.
BohnHenningInmanRobert P.. 1996. Balanced budget rules and public deficits: Evidence from the U.S. states. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper #5533, Washington, DC.
5.
ButtAdam. 2012. Causes of defined benefit pension scheme funding ratio volatility and average contribution rates. Annals of Actuarial Science6:76–102.
6.
ChaneyBarbara A.CopleyPaul A.StoneMary S.. 2002. The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy21:287–313.
7.
ClucasRichard A.2007. Legislative professionalism and the power of state house leaders. State Politics & Policy Quarterly7:1–19.
8.
CoggburnJerrel D.KearneyRichard C.. 2010. Trouble keeping promises? An analysis of underfunding in state retiree benefits. Public Administration Review70:97–108.
9.
CoyleIan M.2012. A local government practitioner’s view of the sustainability of defined-benefit pension plans. Public Administration Review72:786–87.
10.
GiertzJ. FredPapkeLeslie. 2007. Public pension plans: Myths and realities for state budgets. National Tax Journal60:305–23.
11.
GoslingJames J.2009. Budgetary politics in American governments, 5th ed. New York: Routledge.
JohnsonRichard W.1997. Pension underfunding and liberal retirement benefits among state and local government workers. National Tax Journal50:113–42.
14.
KaSangjoonTeskePaul. 2002. Ideology and professionalism: Electricity regulation and deregulation over time in the American states. American Politics Research30:323–43.
15.
KennedyPeter. 2003. A guide to econometrics, 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
KlarnerCarl. 2003. Measurement of the partisan balance of state government. State Politics & Policy Quarterly3:309–19.
17.
KrauseGeorge A.MeluskyBenjamin F.. 2012. Concentrated powers: Unilateral executive authority and fiscal policymaking in the American states. Journal of Politics74:98–112.
18.
KrolRobertSvornyShirley. 2007. Budget rules and state business cycles. Public Finance Review35:530–44.
19.
LaheyKaren EilersMichelsonStuartChieffeNatalieBajtelsmitVickie. 2008. Retirement plans for college faculty at public institutions. Financial Services Review17:323–41.
20.
LevinsonArik. 1998. Balanced budgets and business cycles: Evidence from the states. National Tax Journal51:715–32.
21.
LevinsonArik. 2007. Budget rules and state business cycles: A comment. Public Finance Review35:545–49.
22.
MitchellOlivia S.McCarthyDavidWisniewskiStanley C.ZornPaul. 2001. Developments in state and local pension plans. In Pensions in the public sector, eds. MitchellOlivia S.HusteadEdwin C., 11–40. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23.
MitchellOlivia S.SmithRobert S.. 1994. Pension funding in the public sector. The Review of Economics and Statistics76:278–90.
24.
MullinsDaniel R.WallinBruce A.. 2004. Tax and expenditure limitations: Introduction and overview. Public Budgeting and Finance24:2–15.
25.
MunnellAlicia H.AubryJean-PierreQuinbyLaura. 2011. Public pension funding in practice. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance10:247–68.
26.
MunnellAlicia H.HaverstickKellyAubryJean-PierreGolub-SassAlex. 2008. Why don’t some states and localities pay their required pension contributions? Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, State and Local Pension Brief #7, Boston College, MA.
27.
NiceDavid C.1986. State support for constitutional balanced budget requirements. Journal of Politics48:134–42.
28.
PengJun. 2004. Public pension funds and operating budgets: A tale of three states. Public Budgeting & Finance24:59–73.
29.
PetersonPaul. 1995. The price of federalism. Washington DC: Brookings.
ProvostColin. 2006. The politics of consumer protection: Explaining state attorney general participation in multi-state lawsuits. Political Research Quarterly59:609–18.
32.
RetkwaRosalyn. 1990. New York state plan alters funding method. Pension World29:6.
33.
RoseShanna. 2010. Institutions and fiscal sustainability. National Tax Journal63:807–38.
34.
SavchakElisha CarolBarghothiA. J.. 2007. Retention constituency influence on judicial decisions in the states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly7:394–415.
35.
SchneiderMarguerite. 2005. The status of U.S. public pension plans: A review with policy considerations. Review of Public Personnel Administration25:107–37.
36.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., Robert P. Van Houweling, Samuel J. Abrams, and Peter C. Hanson. 2009. The Senate electoral cycle and bicameral appropriations politics. American Journal of Political Science53:343–359.
37.
SteffenKaren. 2001. State employee plans. In Pensions in the public sector, eds. MitchellOlivia S.HusteadEdwin C., 41–65. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
38.
Von HagenJurgen. 1991. A note on the empirical effectiveness of formal fiscal restraints. Journal of Public Economics44:199–210.
39.
WagnerGary A.2001. Political control and public sector savings: Evidence from the states. Public Choice109:149–73.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
