Public concern about urban sprawl has spurred states to offer incentives for land preservation, such as state income tax credits granted to donors of conservation easements. This study examines the effect of these tax credits on conservation easement donations to regional land trust organizations in the lower forty-eight states during the period from 1994 to 2005. Regression results indicate that a state income tax credit has a statistically significant impact on conservation easement donations only during the initial period of implementation. The results also show that donation rates are significantly impacted by the extent of state park land holdings.
AlcobaNatalie. 2003. Ownership proves key to efforts in U.S.: Conservation groups, states and companies buy acres of land to restrict development. The (Montreal) Gazette(August 6, 2003). A4.
2.
AndersonJohn E.1993. Land development, externalities, and Pigouvian taxes. Journal of Urban Economics33:1–9.
3.
BerryDavid. 1976. Preservation of open space and the concept of value. American Journal of Economics and Sociology35:113–24.
4.
BerryWilliam D.FordingRichard C.RingquistEvan J.HansonRussell L.KlarnerCarl E.. 2010. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the U.S. states: A re-appraisal. State Politics and Policy Quarterly10:117–35.
5.
BoydJamesCaballeroKathrynDavid SimpsonR.. 1999. The law and economics of habitat conservation: Lessons from an analysis of easement acquisitions. Discussion Paper 99 32, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-DP-99-32.pdf(accessed March 3, 2012).
6.
BrewerRichard. 2003. Conservancy: The land trust movement in America. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
7.
BruecknerJan K.2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review23:160–71.
8.
Business Wire. 1999. Largest conservation partnership in U.S. history completes purchase of 300,000 Acres in New York, Vermont and New Hampshire from champion international corporation. [News Release]. (August 6). Accessed March 3, 2012 from Lexis-Nexis.
CoughlinRobert E.BerryDavidPlautThomas. 1978. Differential assessment of real property as an incentive to open space preservation and farmland retention. National Tax Journal31:165–79.
11.
DaughertyArthur B.1977. The economics of federal tax incentives for conservation easement donation. National Tax Journal30:171–82.
FeenbergDanielCouttsElisabeth. 1993. An introduction to the TAXSIM model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12:189–94.
15.
HellersteinDanielNickersonCynthiaCooperJosephFeatherPeterGadsbyDwightMullarkey, DanielTegeneAbebayehuBarnardCharles. 2002. Farmland protection: The role of public preferences for rural amenities. Agricultural Economic Report No. 815, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer815/aer815.pdf(accessed March 3, 2012).
16.
IrwinElena G.2002. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics78:465–80.
17.
KlineJeffreyWichelnsDennis. 1998. Measuring heterogeneous preferences for preserving farmland and open space. Ecological Economics26:211–24.
ParkerDominic P. 2002. Cost-effective strategies for conserving private land: An economic analysis for land trusts and policymakers. Bozeman, MT: PERC. http://www.perc.org/pdf/land_trusts_02.pdf(accessed March 3, 2012).
