This paper analyzes the determinants of legislation to increase state gasoline taxes from 1985 to 2013. It closely considers the motives of the political actors considering adoption, comparing the predictive power responsive government and excessive government theories. It finds strong evidence for responsive governments: traffic fatalities per-capita and the proportion of bridges deemed structurally deficient are among the strongest predictors of state gas tax increases. The conclusion of this paper is that gasoline tax increases in the American states represents a case of responsive taxation.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.. 1994. Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review88 (4): 811–28.
2.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.. 2000. A dynamic model of state budget outcomes under divided partisan government. Journal of Politics62 (4): 1035–69.
3.
BaumgartnerFrank R.LeechBeth L.. 1998. Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BeckNathaniel. 2018, October. Estimating grouped data models with a binary dependent variable and fixed effect via logit vs OLS: The impact of dropped units. ArXiv:1810.12105 [Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12105 (accessed January 30, 2019).
5.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.. 1992. Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science36 (3): 715–42.
6.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.. 1994. The politics of tax increases in the states. American Journal of Political Science38 (3): 855–59.
7.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 1995. Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics110 (3): 769–98.
8.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 2003. Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature41 (1): 7–73.
9.
BestSamuel J.TeskePaul. 2002. Explaining state internet sales taxation: New economy, old-fashioned interest group politics. State Politics & Policy Quarterly2 (1): 37–51.
10.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesBradford S.. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrennanGeoffreyBuchananJames M.. 1980. The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BroganMichael. 2012. The politics of budgeting: Evaluating the effects of political election on state-level budget forecast errors. Public Administration Quarterly36 (1): 84–115.
13.
ButlerDaniel M.NickersonDavid W.. 2011. Can learning constituency opinion affect how legislators vote? Results from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science6 (1): 55–83.
14.
CaugheyDevinWarshawChristopher. 2018. Policy preferences and policy change: Dynamic responsiveness in the American states, 1936–2014. American Political Science Review112 (2): 249–66.
15.
CrowleyGeorge R.HofferAdam J.. 2018, January3. Earmarking tax revenues: Leviathan’s secret weapon?. In For your own good: Taxes, paternalism, and fiscal discrimination in the twenty-first century, edited by Excerpt from HofferAdam J.NesbitTodd. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3171202 (accessed January 30, 2019).
16.
DavisJohn C.Nicholson-CrottySean. 2016. Partisanship and tax competition in the American states. Journal of Public Policy36 (3): 437–56.
17.
DeckerChristopher S.WoharMark E.. 2007. Determinants of state diesel fuel excise tax rates: The political economy of fuel taxation in the United States. The Annals of Regional Science41 (1): 171–88.
18.
DesmaraisBruce A.HardenJeffrey J.BoehmkeFrederick J.. 2015. Persistent policy pathways: Inferring diffusion networks in the American states. American Political Science Review109 (2): 392–406.
19.
DilgerRobert Jay. 1998. Does politics matter? Partisanship’s impact on state spending and taxes, 1985–95. State and Local Government Review30 (2): 139–44.
20.
DyeThomas R.1966. Politics, economics, and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
GamkharShama. 2000. Is the response of state and local highway spending symmetric to increases and decreases in federal highway grants?Public Finance Review28 (1): 3–25.
22.
GamkharShama. 2003. The role of federal budget and trust fund institutions in measuring the effect of federal highway grants on state and local government highway expenditure. Public Budgeting & Finance23 (1): 1–21.
23.
GarandJames C.1988. Explaining government growth in the U.S. states. American Political Science Review82 (3): 837–49.
24.
GoldenShelley D.RibislKurt M.PerreiraKrista M.. 2014. Economic and political influence on tobacco tax rates: A nationwide analysis of 31 years of state data. American Journal of Public Health104 (2): 350–57.
25.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavid. 1996. A niche theory of interest representation. The Journal of Politics58 (1): 91–111.
26.
HansenSusan B.1983. The politics of taxation: Revenue without representation. New York: Praeger.
27.
HayesThomas J.DennisChristopher. 2014. State adoption of tax policy: New data and new insights. American Politics Research42 (6): 929–55.
28.
HeckelmanJac C.DoughertyKeith L.. 2010. Majority rule versus supermajority rules: Their effects on narrow and broad taxes. Public Finance Review38 (6): 738–61.
29.
HinesJames R.ThalerRichard H.. 1995. The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives9 (4): 217–26.
30.
JacobyWilliam G.SchneiderSaundra K.. 2009. A new measure of policy spending priorities in the American states. Political Analysis17 (1): 1–24.
31.
KatzEthan. 2001. Bias in conditional and unconditional fixed effects logit estimation. Political Analysis9 (4): 379–84.
32.
KiewietD. RoderickMcCubbinsMathew D.. 1985. Congressional appropriations and the electoral connection. Journal of Politics47 (1): 59–82.
33.
KlarnerCarl. 2013. State partisan balance data, 1937 – 2011. Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20403 (accessed January 30, 2019).
34.
KnightBrian G.2000. Supermajority voting requirements for tax increases: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics76 (1): 41–67.
35.
KoneSusan L.WintersRichard F.. 1993. Taxes and voting: Electoral retribution in the American states. Journal of Politics55 (1): 22–40.
36.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.. 2012. The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 148–66.
37.
LeducSylvainWilsonDaniel. 2017. Are state governments roadblocks to federal stimulus? Evidence on the flypaper effect of highway grants in the 2009 Recovery Act. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy9 (2): 253–92.
38.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.RiceTom W.. 1985. Government growth in the United States. The Journal of Politics47 (1): 2–30.
39.
LoweryDavidBerryWilliam D.. 1983. The growth of government in the United States: An empirical assessment of competing explanations. American Journal of Political Science27 (4): 665–94.
40.
LowryRobert C.AltJames E.FerreeKaren E.. 1998. Fiscal policy outcomes and electoral accountability in American states. American Political Science Review92 (4): 759–74.
41.
MatsusakaJohn G.2010. Popular control of public policy: A quantitative approach. Quarterly Journal of Political Science5 (2): 133–67.
42.
MikesellJohn. 2007. Changing state fiscal capacity and tax effort in an era of devolving government, 1981–2003. Publius: The Journal of Federalism37 (4): 532–50.
43.
NelsonMichael A.2002. Using excise taxes to finance state government: Do neighboring state taxation policy and cross-border markets matter?Journal of Regional Science42 (4): 731–52.
44.
NesbitTodd M.KreftSteven F.. 2009. Federal grants, earmarked revenues, and budget crowd-out: State highway funding. Public Budgeting & Finance29 (2): 94–110.
45.
NiemiRichard G.StanleyHarold W.VogelRonald J.. 1995. State economies and state taxes: Do voters hold governors accountable?American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 936.
46.
OwyangMichael T.PigerJeremyWallHoward J.. 2005. Business cycle phases in US states. Review of Economics and Statistics87 (4): 604–16.
47.
PachecoJulianna. 2013. The thermostatic model of responsiveness in the American states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (3): 306–32.
48.
PropheterGeoffrey. 2012. Political determinants of state e-commerce sales tax policy. Politics & Policy40 (4): 657–79.
49.
RoseShanna. 2010. Institutions and fiscal sustainability. National Tax Journal63 (4, Part 1): 807–37.
50.
RubinIrene S.2019. The politics of public budgeting: Getting and spending, borrowing and balancing. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
51.
ShepsleKenneth A.1989. Studying institutions: Some lessons from the rational choice approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics1 (2): 131–47.
52.
SmithMark A.1997. The nature of party governance: Connecting conceptualization and measurement. American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 1042–56.
53.
TannenwaldRobertCowanJonathan. 1997. Fiscal capacity, fiscal need, and fiscal comfort among U.S. states: New evidence. Publius: The Journal of Federalism27 (3): 113–26.
54.
TausanovitchChris. 2019. Why are subnational governments responsive?The Journal of Politics81 (1): 334–42.
55.
WintersRichard. 1976. Party control and policy change. American Journal of Political Science20 (4): 597–636.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
