Relying on the work on creative prototype and role theory, we demonstrate that having a creative identity can lead to moral objection depending on the implication of the act for one’s identity as a creative individual. In a pilot study using a survey of working adults, we find that employees’ creative identities and their intention to object in moral situations are positively and significantly correlated. Utilizing measurement-of-mediation (Study 1) and experimental mediation (Studies 2–4) approaches, we test and find support for the mediating role of norm-breaking motives predicting moral objection. In Studies 2–4, we find that creative identities lead to moral objection when moral objection is counter-normative and not when it is an expected, normative behavior. Across five studies (N = 1,327), utilizing both experimental and correlational methods, this paper shows that creative identities can prompt moral objection when such objection is counter-normative, aligning with the creative prototype and reinforcing a creative identity through norm-breaking motives. We extend prior theories on the consequences of creativity, the creative prototype, creative identities, and their link with moral acts.
ActonB. P.FotiR. J.LordR. G.GladfelterJ. A.2019. Putting emergence back in leadership emergence: A dynamic, multilevel, process-oriented framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 30: 145-164.
3.
AquinoK.FreemanD.ReedA.IILimV. K.FelpsW.2009. Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97: 123-141.
4.
AquinoK.ReedA.II. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 1423-1440.
5.
AshforthB. E.GioiaD. A.RobinsonS. L.TreviñoL. K.2008. Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33: 670-684.
6.
BarronF.HarringtonD. M.1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32: 439-476.
7.
BaucusM. S.NortonW. I.Jr.BaucusD. A.HumanS. E.2008. Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 81: 97-115.
8.
Bowes-SperryL.PowellG. N.1999. Observers’ reactions to social-sexual behavior at work: An ethical decision making perspective. Journal of Management, 25: 779-802.
9.
BreidenthalA. P.LiuD.BaiY.MaoY.2020. The dark side of creativity: Coworker envy and ostracism as a response to employee creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161: 242-254.
10.
BurkeP. J.1991. Identity processes and social distress. American Sociological Review, 56: 836-849.
11.
ChenA.TreviñoL. K.2023. The consequences of ethical voice inside the organization: An integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8: 1316-1335.
12.
ChenA.TreviñoL. K.HumphreyS. E.2020. Ethical champions, emotions, framing, and team ethical decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105: 245-273.
13.
CramwinckelF. M.van DijkE.ScheepersD.van den BosK.2013. The threat of moral refusers for one’s self-concept and the protective function of physical cleansing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49: 1049-1058.
14.
CrossS. E.MarkusH. R.1994. Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: 423-438.
15.
DetertJ. R.2013, June. Courage at work: What it is, why it matters, and how to develop it. Presented at New Directions in Leadership Research Conference, INSEAD, France.
16.
DetertJ. R.EdmondsonA. C.2011. Implicit voice theories: Taken-for granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 461-488.
17.
DiMaggioP.1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 263-287.
18.
DollingerS. J.2007. Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43: 1025-1035.
19.
DunganJ. A.YoungL.WaytzA.2019. The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85: 103848.
ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M.2003. Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 283-301.
22.
FarmerS.TierneyP.Kung-McIntyreK.2003. Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 618-630.
23.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G.2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41: 1149-1160.
24.
FiskeS.TaylorS.1991. Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
25.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37: 504-528.
26.
GuilfordJ. P.1967. The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
GuptaN.JangY.MednickS. C.HuberD. E.2012. The road not taken: Creative solutions require avoidance of high frequency responses. Psychological Science, 23: 288-294.
28.
HannahS. T.AvolioB. J.MayD. R. 2011. Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36: 663-685.
29.
HayesA. F.2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
HelsonR.RobertsB.AgronickG.1995. Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 1173-1183.
31.
HuangL.PatersonT. A.2017. Group ethical voice: Influence of ethical leadership and impact on ethical performance. Journal of Management, 43: 1157-1184.
32.
JaussiK. S.RandelA. E.DionneS. D.2007. I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19: 247-258.
33.
JoshiP. D.FastN. J.2013. Power and reduced temporal discounting. Psychological Science, 24: 432-438.
34.
KandlerC.RiemannR.AngleitnerA.SpinathF. M.BorkenauP.PenkeL.2016. The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111: 230-249.
35.
KarpoffJ. M.LeeD. S.MartinG. S.2008. The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43: 581-612.
36.
KasofJ.1995. Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8: 311-366.
37.
KatzA. N.GiacommelliL.1982. The subjective nature of creativity judgments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20: 17-20.
38.
KatzA. N.ThompsonM.1993. On judging creativity: By one’s acts shall ye be known (and vice versa). Creativity Research Journal, 6: 345-362.
39.
KatzD.KahnR. L.1978. The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
40.
KatzJ. H.MannT. C.ShenX.GoncaloJ. A.FergusonM. J.2022. Implicit impressions of creative people: Creativity evaluation in a stigmatized domain. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 169: 104116.
41.
KeemS.ShalleyC. E.KimE.JeongI.2018. Are creative individuals bad apples? A dual pathway model of unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4): 416-431.
42.
KimS. H.VincentL. C.GoncaloJ. A.2013. Outside advantage: Can social rejection fuel creative thought?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142: 605-611.
43.
Kish-GephartJ. J.DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.EdmondsonA. C.2009. Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 163-193.
44.
KundroT. G.RothbardN. P.2023. Does power protect female moral objectors? How and when moral objectors’ gender, power, and use of organizational frames influence perceived self-control and experienced retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 66: 306-334.
45.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M.1970. The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?New York, NY: Appieton-Century-Crofts.
46.
LatanéB.NidaS.1981. Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89: 308-324.
47.
LeeD.ChoiYYounS.ChunJ. U.2017. Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader-follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 141: 47-57.
48.
LemonsG.2010. Bar drinks, Rugas, and gay pride parades: Is creative behavior a function of creative self-efficacy? Creativity Research Journal, 22: 151-161.
49.
LePineJ. A.Van DyneL.1998. Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 853-868.
50.
LuJ. G.BrocknerJ.VardiY.WeitzE.2017. The dark side of experiencing job autonomy: Unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73: 222-234.
51.
LuaE.LiuD.ShalleyC. E.2024. Multilevel outcomes of creativity in organizations: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45: 209-233.
52.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS.1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98: 224-253.
53.
MayerD. M.NurmohamedS.TreviñoL. K.ShapiroD. L.SchminkeM.2013. Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121: 89-103.
54.
McCallG. J.SimmonsJ. L.1978. Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
55.
McCraeR. R.1987. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 1258-1265.
56.
MiceliM. P.RoachB. L.NearJ. P.1988. The motivations of anonymous whistle-blowers: The case of federal employees. Public Personnel Management, 17: 281-296.
57.
MillikenF. J.MorrisonE. W.HewlinP. F.2003. An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 1453-1476.
58.
MinsonJ. A.MoninB.2012. Do-gooder derogation: Disparaging morally motivated minorities to defuse anticipated reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3: 200-207.
59.
MoninB.SawyerP. J.MarquezM. J.2008. The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95: 76-93.
60.
MorrisonE. W.2011. Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 373-412.
61.
MorrisonE. W.2014. Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1: 173-197.
62.
MorrisonE. W.2023. Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10: 79-107.
63.
MorrisonE. W.Wheeler-SmithS. L.KamdarD.2011. Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1): 183-191.
64.
MoscoviciS.1976. Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
65.
MulderL. B.AquinoK.2013. The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121: 219-230.
66.
NgT. W.YamK. C.2019. When and why does employee creativity fuel deviance? Key psychological mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104: 1144-1163.
67.
NiuW.SternbergR.2002. Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36: 269-288.
68.
OcB.KouchakiM.2024. The more the merrier: How psychological standing and work group size explain managers’ willingness to communicate about unethical conduct in their work group. Journal of Business Ethics, 190: 775-786.
69.
PetkusE.1996. The creative identity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30: 188-196.
70.
PetrouP.van der LindenD.SalcescuO. C.2020. When breaking the rules relates to creativity: The role of creative problem-solving demands and organizational constraints. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54: 184-195.
71.
ProudfootD.FathS.2021. Signaling creative genius: How perceived social connectedness influences judgments of creative potential. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47: 580-592.
72.
RileyA.BurkeP. J.1995. Identities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58: 61-73.
73.
RudowiczE.HuiA.1997. The creative personality: Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12: 139-157.
74.
RuncoM. A.BahledaM. D.1986. Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20: 93-98.
75.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU.2013, January. Life after p-hacking. In Meeting of the society for personality and social psychology: 17-19. New Orleans, LA.
76.
SimontonD. K.1999. Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian?Psychological Inquiry, 10: 309-328.
77.
SingelisT.SharkeyW.1995. Culture, self-construal, and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26: 622-644.
78.
SlussD. M.van DickR.ThompsonB. S.2011. Role theory in organizations: A relational perspective. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychologyvol. 1: 505-534. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
79.
SrivastavaS.GuglielmoS.BeerJ. S.2010. Perceiving others’ personalities: Examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98: 520-534.
80.
SternbergR. J.1985. Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49: 607-627.
81.
SternbergR. J.1990. Prototypes of competence and in-competence. In SternbergR. J.KolliganJ. (Eds.), Competence Reconsidered: 117-145. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
82.
SternbergR. J.2018. A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12: 50-67.
83.
StrykerS.BurkeP. J.2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63: 284-297.
84.
SuttonR. I.2001. The weird rules of creativity. Harvard Business Review, 79: 94-103.
85.
SuttonR. I.2002. Weird ideas that work: 11.5 practices for promoting, managing, and sustaining innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.
86.
SwannW. B. J.BossonJ.2010. Self and identity. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed.): 589-628. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
87.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M.2002. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1137-1148.
88.
TostL. P.GinoF.LarrickR. P.2012. Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 53-65.
89.
VaderaA. K.AguileraR. V.CazaB. B.2009. Making sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 553-586.
90.
VincentL. C.KouchakiM.2016. Creative, rare, entitled, and dishonest: How commonality of creativity in one’s group decreases an individual’s entitlement and dishonesty. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1451-1473.
91.
WellmanN.MayerD. M.OngM.DeRueD. S.2016. When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 793-814.
92.
WellsL. E.1978. Theories of deviance and the self- concept. Social Psychology, 41: 189-204.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
