We extend event system theory (EST) to conceptualize proactive events and examine how event duration, timing, criticality, and disruption are related to two phases of change associated with an organizationally initiated event. Specifically, we explore the impact of a new sustainability monitoring system on energy consumption using longitudinal archival data from 87 manufacturing units of a Fortune 200 multinational firm. We use a variant of mixed-effects discontinuous growth modeling (DGM) to test EST propositions related to initial and longer-term changes associated with implementing the monitoring system. Results indicate that while the new sustainability monitoring system is effective in reducing within-unit energy consumption on average, there are significant differences in change magnitude between units. The magnitude of change during the pre-post phase was related to between-unit differences in event duration, timing, criticality, and disruption. Longer-term change patterns were related to between-unit differences in managerial criticality behaviors. The results empirically validate several of EST’s core propositions and provide an illustration of how DGM can be modified to study events that vary in onset and duration across entities.
AbrahamsonE.1991. Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16: 586-612.
2.
AbramovG.KautzJ.MielletS.DeaneF. P.2022. The influence of attachment style, self-protective beliefs, and feelings of rejection on the decline and growth of trust as a function of borderline personality disorder trait count. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44: 773-786.
3.
AininS.NaqshbandieM. N.DezdenS.2016. Impact of adoption of green IT practices on organizational performance. Quality and Quantity, 50: 1029-1048.
AltmanL. K.1995. Big doses of chemotherapy drug killed patient, hurt 2d. New York Times, March24.
6.
ArthurJ. B.HuntleyC. L.2005. Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1159-1170.
7.
AtasuA.van WassenhoveL. N.2012. An operations perspective on product take-back legislation for E-waste: Theory, practice, and research needs. Production and Operations Management, 21: 407-422.
8.
BaronJ. N.DobbinF. R.JenningsP. D.1986. War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in US industry. American Journal of Sociology, 92: 350-383.
9.
BednarP. M.WelchC.2020. Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22: 281-298.
10.
BlieseP. D.AdlerA. B.FlynnP. J.2017. Transition processes: A review and synthesis integrating methods and theory. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4: 263-286.
11.
BlieseP. D.LangJ. W.2016. Understanding relative and absolute change in discontinuous growth models: Coding alternatives and implications for hypothesis testing. Organizational Research Methods, 19: 562-592.
12.
BlieseP. D.MaltarichM. A.HendricksJ. L.HofmannD. A.AdlerA. B.2019. Improving the measurement of group-level constructs by optimizing between-group differentiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104: 293-302.
13.
BlieseP. D.McGurkD.ThomasJ. L.BalkinT. J.WesenstenN.2007. Discontinuous growth modeling of adaptation to sleep setting changes: Individual differences and age. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78: 485-492.
14.
BlieseP. D.PloyhartR. E.2002. Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5: 362-387.
15.
BlieseP. D.WangM.2020. Results provide information about cumulative probabilities of finding significance: Let’s report this information. Journal of Management, 46: 1275-1288.
16.
BonannoG. A.2004. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?American Psychologist, 59: 20-28.
BradleyB. H.PostlethwaiteB. E.KlotzA. C.HamdaniM. R.BrownK. G.2012. Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 151-158.
19.
BuerhausP. I.1999. Lucian Leape on the causes and prevention of errors and adverse events in health care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31: 281-286.
20.
CampbellJ. L.1997. Recent trends in institutional political economy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17: 15-56.
21.
ChenY.LiuD.TangG.HoganT. M.2021. Workplace events and employee creativity: A multistudy field investigation. Personnel Psychology, 74: 211-236.
22.
DamL.PetkovaB. N.2014. The impact of environmental supply chain sustainability programs on shareholder wealth. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34: 586-609.
23.
DavisF. D.1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-340.
24.
DavisF. D.BagozziR. P.WarshawR. P.1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35: 982-1003.
25.
DhanorkarS. S.SiemsenE.LindermanK. W.2018. Promoting change from the outside: Directing managerial attention in the implementation of environmental improvements. Management Science, 64: 2535-2556.
26.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
27.
ErogluI.KurtA. C.ElwakilO. S.2016. Stock market reaction to quality, safety, and sustainability awards in logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 37: 329-345.
28.
FontenotS. F.2013. The Affordable Care Act and electronic health care records. Physician Executive, 39: 72-76.
29.
GersickC. J.HackmanJ. R.1990. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47: 65-97.
30.
HaleD.Jr.PloyhartR. E.ShepherdW.2016. A two-phase longitudinal model of a turnover event: Disruption, recovery rates, and moderators of collective performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 906-929.
31.
HawnO.ChatterjiA. K.MitchellW.2018. Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 949-976.
32.
HendricksK. B.SinghalV. R.2003. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 21: 501-522.
33.
HochJ. E.DulebohnJ. H.2013. Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23: 114-125.
34.
HofmannD. A.StetzerA.1998. The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 644-657.
35.
JiangL.YinD.LiuD.2019. Can joy buy you money? The impact of the strength, duration, and phases of an entrepreneur’s peak displayed joy on funding performance. Academy of Management Journal, 62: 1848-1871.
36.
JoshiS.LiY.2016. What is corporate sustainability and how do firms practice it? A management accounting research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2): 1-11.
37.
KhuntiaS.PattanayakJ. K.HiremathG. S.2018. Is the foreign exchange market adaptive? The empirical evidence from India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 19: 261-285.
38.
KimY.PloyhartR. E.2014. The effects of staffing and training on firm productivity and profit growth before, during, and after the Great Recession. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 361-389.
39.
KramerA.ChungW.2015. Work demands, family demands, and BMI in dual-earners families: A 16-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1632.
40.
KrassD.NedorezovT.OvchinnikovA.2013. Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management, 22: 1035-1055.
41.
LangJ. W. B.BlieseP. D.2009. General mental ability and two types of adaptation to unforeseen change: Applying discontinuous growth models to the task-change paradigm. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 411-428.
42.
LeapeL. L.1994. Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272: 1851-1857.
43.
LeapeL. L.BatesD. W.CullenD. J.CooperJ.DemonacoH. J.GallivanT.HalliseyR.IvesJ.LairdN.LaffelG.1995. Systems analysis of adverse drug errors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274: 35-43.
44.
LeitchS.WarrenM. J.2010. ETHICS: The past, present and future of socio-technical systems design. In IFIP International Conference on the History of Computing: 189-197. Berlin: Springer.
45.
LiH.HausknechtJ. P.DragoniL.2020. Initial and longer-term change in unit-level turnover following leader succession: Contingent effects of outgoing and incoming leader characteristics. Organization Science, 31: 458-476.
46.
LinW.ShaoY.LiG.GuoY.ZhanX.2021. The psychological implications of COVID-19 on employee job insecurity and its consequences: The mitigating role of organization adaptive practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106: 317-329.
47.
LiuD.ChenY.LiN.2021. Tackling the negative impact of COVID-19 on work engagement and taking charge: A multi-study investigation of frontline health workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106: 185-198.
48.
LiuD.MorgesonF. P.ZhuJ.FanX.2023. Event-oriented organizational behavior research: A multilevel review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 49: 2148-2186.
49.
LucasR. E.2007. Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16: 75-79.
50.
LukićJ.RadenkovićM.Despotović-ZrakićM.LabusA.BogdanovićZ.2017. Supply chain intelligence for electricity markets: A smart grid perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 19: 91-107.
51.
LyonT. P.ShimshackJ. P.2015. Environmental disclosure: Evidence from Newsweek’s green companies rankings. Business & Society, 54: 632-675.
52.
MannoP. T.BravoJ.ManfredoM.LeonR. C.2013. Water markets and sustainable water use in Almeria, Spain: Assessing the readiness for organizational change. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 9: 208-222.
53.
MarkmanG. D.2022. Will your study make the world a better place?Journal of Management Studies, 59: 1597-1603.
54.
MarlerJ. H.FisherS. L.2013. An evidence-based review of e-HRM and strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 23: 18-36.
55.
MatsuoH.2015. Implications of the Tohoku earthquake on Toyota’s coordinating mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International Journal of Production Economics, 161: 217-227.
56.
McFarlandL. A.ReevesS.PorrW. B.PloyhartR. E.2020. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on job search behavior: An event transition perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105: 1207-1217.
57.
MorgesonF. P.2005. The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 497-508.
58.
MorgesonF. P.DeRueD. S.2006. Event criticality, urgency, and duration: Understanding how events disrupt teams and influence team leader intervention. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 271-287.
59.
MorgesonF. P.MitchellT. R.LiuD.2015. Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40: 515-537.
60.
MuthulinghamS.CorbettC. J.BenartziC.OppenheimB.2013. Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 15: 596-615.
61.
NarasimhanR.SchoenherrT.JacobsB. W.KimM. K.2015. The financial impact of FSC certification in the United States: A contingency perspective. Decision Sciences, 46: 527-563.
62.
NgwenyameO.NielsenP. A.2014. Using organizational influence processes to overcome information system implementation barriers: Lessons from a longitudinal case study of SPI implementation. European Journal of Information Systems, 23: 205-222.
63.
NiJ. Z.MelnykS. A.RitchieW. J.FlynnB. B.2016. Why be first if it doesn’t pay? The case of earlier adopters of C-TPAT supply chain security certification. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36: 1161-1181.
64.
OcasioW.1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187-206.
65.
PieperJ. R.MaltarichM. A.NybergA. J.ReillyG.RayC.2023. Collective turnover response over time to a unit-level shock. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108: 1001-1026.
66.
Pirola-MerloA.HärtelC.MannL.HirstG.2002. How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. Leadership Quarterly, 13: 561-581.
67.
RafterN.HickeyA.CondellS.ConroyR.O’ConnorP.VaughnD.WilliamsD.2014. Adverse events in healthcare: Learning from mistakes. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 108: 273-277.
68.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69.
ResnickD.2003. The Jessica Santillan tragedy: Lessons learned. Hastings Center Report, 33: 15-20.
70.
RoeR. A.2008. Time in applied psychology: The study of “what happens” rather than “what is.”European Psychologist, 13: 37-52.
71.
SchepkerD. J.BlieseP. D.2023. Using mixed-effect growth models to examine time as a predictor of interest and between-firm differences over time. In HillA. D.McKennyA. F.O’KaneP.ParoutisS. (Eds.), Methods to improve our field (Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 14): 79-99. Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-838720220000014005
72.
ShippA. J.JansenK. J.2011. Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36: 76-101.
73.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B.2003. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
SroufeR.2003. Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management, 12: 416-431.
75.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G.1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 22-39.
76.
TsuiA. S.2022. From traditional research to responsible research: The necessity of scientific freedom and scientific responsibility for better societies. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9: 1-32.
77.
TushmanM. L.NeumanW. H.RomanelliE.1981. Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. California Management Review, 29: 29-44.
78.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2022. The sustainable development goals report 2022. New York: UN DESA. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/.
79.
VenkateshV.DavisF. D.2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46: 186-204.
80.
WeickK.1979. The social psychology of organizing. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
81.
WestphalJ. D.GulatiR.ShortellS. M.1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366-394.
82.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J.1994. Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 367-390.
83.
WinterS.BerenteN.HowisonJ.ButlerB.2014. Beyond the organizational “containers:” Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work. Information & Organization, 24: 250-269.
ZampouE.PlitsosS.KarageannakiA.MourtosI.2014. Towards a framework for energy-aware information systems in manufacturing. Computers in Industry, 65: 419-433.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
