The most consensually shared insight in leadership research may be that in understanding leadership effectiveness, multiple elements of leadership should be considered: different leader behaviors, psychological traits and states, demographic attributes, etc. The notion that leadership consists of multiple elements begs the question of whether these elements have interactive effects, but the empirical study of interactive effects of elements of leadership is far less common. Studying interacting elements of leadership has particularly strong potential to bridge siloed perspectives in leadership research, however: When interactive effects concern elements drawn from different research perspectives, their interpretation requires theory bridging these perspectives. An integrative review of empirical studies of interacting elements of leadership can therefore uniquely contribute to the development of integrative theory bridging siloed perspectives in leadership research. Drawing on 117 empirical papers reporting tests of interactions of elements of leadership, we provide such a review. We identify four perspectives on such interactions, which we call the relationship, status, social identity, and congruence perspectives. We also outline how the field can build towards integration of these perspectives.
Abu BakarH.McCannR. M.2018. An examination of leader-member dyadic politeness of exchange and servant leadership on group member performance. International Journal of Business Communication, 55: 501–525.
2.
AteşN. Y.TarakciM.PorckJ.van KnippenbergD.GroenenP. J. F.2020. The dark side of visionary leadership in strategy implementation: Strategic alignment, strategic consensus, and commitment. Journal of Management, 46: 637–665.
3.
AwamlehR.GardnerW. L.1999. Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. Leadership Quarterly, 10: 345–373.
4.
BaeK. W.LeeD.SohnH.2019. How to increase participation in telework programs in U.S. federal agencies: Examining the effects of being a female supervisor, supportive leadership, and diversity management. Public Personnel Management, 48: 565–583.
5.
BanksG. C.McCauleyK. D.GardnerW. L.GulerC. E.2016. A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. Leadership Quarterly, 27: 634–652.
6.
BediA.AlpaslanC. M.GreenS.2016. A meta-analytical review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139: 517–536.
7.
BlauP. M.1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
8.
ByrneD.1971. The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction. Human Relations, 24: 201–207.
9.
ByunG.DaiY.LeeS.KangS.2017. Leader trust, competence, LMX, and member performance: A moderated mediation framework. Psychological Reports, 120: 1137–1159.
10.
CarterM. Z.MossholderK. W.FeildH. S.ArmenakisA. A.2014. Transformational leadership, interactional justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of racial and gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Group and Organization Management, 39: 691–719.
11.
CartonA. M.MurphyC.ClarkJ. R.2014. A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performances. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1544–1570.
12.
CellarD. F.SidleS.GoudyK.O’BrienD.2001. Effect of leader style, leader sex, and subordinate personality on leader evaluations and future subordinate motivation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16: 61–72.
13.
ChangC.- H.JohnsonR. E.2010. Not all leader-member exchanges are created equal: Importance of leader identity. Leadership Quarterly, 21: 796–808.
14.
ConnellyS.RuarkG.2010. Leadership style and activating potential moderators of the relationships among leader emotional displays and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 21: 745–764.
15.
CopelandM. K.2016. The impact of ethical, authentic, transformational leadership on leader effectiveness. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 13: 79–97.
16.
CornelisI.Van HielA.De CremerD.2011. Birds of a feather: Leader-follower similarity and procedural fairness effects on cooperation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20: 388–415.
17.
CroninM. A.StoutenJ.van KnippenbergD.2021. The theory crisis in management research: Solving the right problem. Academy of Management Review, 46: 667–683.
18.
De CremerD.2006a. When authorities influence followers’ affect: The interactive effect of procedural justice and transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15: 322–351.
19.
De CremerD.2006b. Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 79–93.
20.
De CremerD.2007. Emotional effects of distributive justice as a function of autocratic leader behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37: 1385–1404.
21.
De CremerD.AlbertsH. J. E. M.2004. When procedural fairness does not influence how positive I feel: The effects of voice and leader selection as a function of belongingness need. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34: 333–344.
22.
De CremerD.van DijkeM.MayerD. M.2010. Cooperating when “you” and “I” are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1121–1133.
23.
De CremerD.van KnippenbergD.2002. How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 858–866.
24.
De CremerD.van KnippenbergD.2004. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95: 140–155.
25.
De CremerD.van KnippenbergB.van KnippenbergD.MullendersD.StinglhamberF.2005. Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 3–12.
26.
De CremerD.WubbenM.2010. When does voice have to be more than only listening? Procedural justice effects as a function of confident leadership. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9: 69–78.
27.
DemirtasO.2015. Ethical leadership influence at organizations: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 126: 273–284.
28.
DeRueD. S.NahrgangJ. D.WellmanN.HumphreyS. E.2011. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64: 7–52.
29.
DuckJ. M.FieldingK. S.2003. Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33: 387–401.
30.
DwertmannD. J. G.BoehmS. A.2016. Status matters: The asymmetric effects of supervisor-subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 44–64.
31.
DwertmannD. J. G.van KnippenbergD.2021. Capturing the state of the science to change the state of the science: A categorization approach to integrative reviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42: 104–117.
32.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109: 573–598.
33.
EaglyA. H.MakhijaniM. G.KlonskyB. G.1992. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111: 3–22.
34.
EdenD.LeviatanV.1975. Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 736–741.
EisenbergerR.KaragonlarG.StinglhamberF.NevesP.BeckerT. E.Gonzalez-MoralesM. G.Steiger-MuellerM.2010. Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1085–1103.
37.
EisenbergerR.ShossM. K.KaragonlarG.Gonzalez-MoralesM. G.WickhamR. E.BuffardiL. C.2014. The supervisor POS – LMX – subordinate POS chain: Moderation by reciprocation wariness and supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35: 635–656.
38.
ElsbachK. D.van KnippenbergD. (2020). Creating high-impact literature reviews: An argument for “integrative reviews”. Journal of Management Studies, 57: 1277–1289.
39.
ErdoganB.EndersJ.2007. Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 321–330.
40.
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C.2019. Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30: 111–132.
41.
GaddisB.ConnellyS.MumfordM. D.2004. Failure feedback as an affective event: Influences of leader affect on subordinate attitudes and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 15: 663–686.
42.
GerpottF. H.Van QuaquebekeN.SchlampS.VoelpelS. C.2019. An identity perspective on ethical leadership to explain organizational citizenship behavior: The interplay of follower moral identity and leader group prototypicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 156: 1063–1078.
43.
GiessnerS. R.van KnippenbergD.2008. “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105: 14–35.
44.
GiessnerS. R.van KnippenbergD.SleebosE.2009. License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 434–451.
45.
GlombT. M.HulinC. L.1997. Anger and gender effects in observed supervisor-subordinate dyadic interaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72: 261–307.
46.
GootyJ.YamarinoF. J.2016. The leader–member exchange relationship: A multisource, cross-level investigation. Journal of Management, 42: 915–935.
47.
GottfredsonR.WrightS.HeaphyE.2020. A critique of the leader-member exchange construct: Back to square one. Leadership Quarterly, 31: 101385.
48.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT.1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 175–208.
49.
GreenbaumR. L.MawritzM. B.BonnerJ. M.WebsterB. D.KimJ.2018. Supervisor expediency to employee expediency: The moderating role of leader-member exchange and the mediating role of employee unethical tolerance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39: 525–541.
50.
GrovesK. S.2014. Examining leader-follower congruence of social responsibility values in transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21: 227–243.
51.
HaggardD. L.ParkH. M.2018. Perceived supervisor remorse, abusive supervision, and LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39: 1252–1267.
52.
HeW.FehrR.YamK. C.LongL.- R.HaoP.2017. Interactional justice, leader–member exchange, and employee performance: Examining the moderating role of justice differentiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38: 537–577.
53.
HirstG.van DickR.van KnippenbergD.2009. A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 963–982.
54.
HoggM. A.2001. A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5: 184–200.
55.
HoogeboomM. A. M. G.WilderomC. P. M.2019. Advancing the transformational-transactional model of effective leadership: Integrating two classic leadership models with a video-based method. Journal of Leadership Studies, 13: 23–46.
56.
HughesL. W.AveyJ. B.2009. Transforming with levity: Humor, leadership, and follower attitudes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30: 540–562.
57.
HussainS.ShahzadK.2018. Role of supervisor's organizational embodiment and organizational identification on LMX and job performance relationship: A test of moderated-mediation model. Journal of Management Sciences, 5: 18–37.
58.
HussainS.ShahzadK.2019. The effects of supervisor's organizational embodiment and organizational identification on the LMX-creativity relationship. South Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 13: 99–115.
59.
JansonA.LevyL.SitkinS. B.LindE.2008. Fairness and other leadership heuristics: A four-nation study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17: 251–272.
60.
JaussiK. S.DionneS. D.2003. Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 14: 475–498.
61.
JianG.DalisayF.2017. Conversation at work: The effects of leader-member conversational quality. Communication Research, 44: 177–197.
62.
JohnsonR. E.LinS.- H.KarkR.Van DijkD.KingD. D.EsformesE.2017. Consequences of regulatory fit for leader–follower relationship quality and commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 90: 379–406.
63.
JohnsonS. K.DipboyeR. L.2008. Effects of charismatic content and delivery on follower task performance. Group & Organization Management, 33: 77–106.
64.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E.IliesR.GerhardtM.2002. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 765–780.
65.
KacmarK. M.CarlsonD. S.HarrisK. J.2013. Interactive effect of leaders’ influence tactics and ethical leadership on work effort and helping behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 153: 577–597.
66.
KacmarL. M.WittL. A.ZivnuskaS.GullyS. M.2003. The interactive effect of leader–member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 764–772.
67.
KaupillaO.- P.2016. When and how does LMX differentiation influence followers’ work outcomes? The interactive roles of one's own LMX status and organizational context. Personnel Psychology, 69: 357–393.
68.
KearneyE.2008. Age differences between leader and followers as a moderator of the relationship between transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 81: 803–811.
69.
KearneyE.ShemlaM.van KnippenbergD.ScholzF.2019. A paradox perspective on the interactive effects of visionary and empowering leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155: 20–30.
70.
KellowayE. K.WeigandH.McKeeM. C.DasH.2013. Positive leadership and employee well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20: 107–117.
71.
KhattabJ.van KnippenbergD.Nederveen PieterseA.HernandezM.2020. A network utilization perspective on the leadership advancement of minorities. Academy of Management Review, 45: 109–129.
72.
KirkpatrickS. A.LockeE. A.1996. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 36–51.
73.
KoivistoS.LipponenJ.2015. A leader's procedural justice, respect and extra-role behaviour: The roles of leader in-group prototypicality and identification. Social Justice Research, 28: 187–206.
74.
KoivistoS.LipponenJ.PlatowM. J.2013. Organizational and supervisory justice effects on experienced threat during change: The moderating role of leader in-group representativeness. Leadership Quarterly, 24: 595–607.
75.
LaiJ. Y. M.ChowC. W. C.LoiR.2018. The interactive effect of LMX and LMX differentiation on followers’ job burnout: Evidence from tourism industry in Hong Kong. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29: 1972–1998.
76.
LeeA.LyubovnikovaJ.TianA. W.KnightC.2020. Servant leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 93: 1–44.
77.
LeeA.WillisS.ChanA. W.2018a. Empowering leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39: 306–325.
78.
LeeD.ChoiY.YounS.ChunJ. U.2017. Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader-follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 141: 47–57.
79.
LeeJ.WangG.PiccoloR. F.2018b. Jekyll and Hyde leadership: A multilevel, multisample examination of charisma and abuse on follower and team outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25: 399–415.
80.
LegoodA.ThomasG.SacramentoC.2016. Leader trustworthy behavior and organizational trust: The role of the immediate manager for cultivating trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46: 673–686.
81.
LewisK. M.2000. When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21: 221–234.
82.
LiY.FuF.SunY.- M.YangB.2016. Leader–member exchange differentiation and team creativity: An investigation of nonlinearity. Human Relations, 69: 1121–1138.
83.
LianH.FerrisD. L.BrownD. J.2012. Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 41–52.
84.
LindE. A.van den BosK.2002. When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24: 181–223.
85.
LipponenJ.KoivistoS.OlkkonenM. E.2005. Procedural justice and status judgements: The moderating role of leader ingroup prototypicality. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 517–528.
86.
LordR. G.DayD. V.ZaccaroS. J.AvolioB. J.EaglyA. H.2017. Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 434–451.
87.
LordR. G.MaherK. J.1991. Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
88.
LukacikE.- R.BourdageJ. S.2019. Exploring the influence of abusive and ethical leadership on supervisor and coworker-targeted impression management. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34: 771–789.
89.
MackeyJ. D.FriederR. E.BreesJ. R.MartinkoM. J.2015. Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43: 1940–1965.
90.
MaoJ.- Y.ChiangJ. T.- J.ZhangY.GaoM.2017. Humor as a relationship lubricant: The implications of leader humor on transformational leadership perceptions and team performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24: 494–506.
91.
MartinR.ThomasG.LegoodA.Dello RussoS.2017. Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39: 151–168.
92.
MoS.ShiJ.2018. The voice link: A moderated mediation model of how ethical leadership affects individual task performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 152: 91–101.
93.
MorgansonV. J.MajorD. A.LitanoM. L.2017. A multilevel examination of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32: 379–393.
94.
NevesP.StoryJ.2015. Ethical leadership and reputation: Combined indirect effects on organizational deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 127: 165–176.
95.
NielsenP. A.BoyeS.HoltenA.- L.JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B.2018. Are transformational and transactional types of leadership compatible? A two-wave study of employee motivation. Public Administration, 97: 413–428.
96.
NiuW.YuanQ.QianS.LiuZ.2018. Authentic leadership and employee job behaviors: The mediating role of relational and organizational identification and the moderating role of LMX. Current Psychology, 37: 982–994.
97.
OchalskiS.2016. The moderating role of emotional intelligence on the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. International Leadership Journal, 8: 68–87.
98.
PanJ.WuQ.ZhouW.LouY.2015. When is the leader's creativity related to the followers’ creativity? A cross-level examination in China. Innovation, 17: 364–382.
99.
PapagiannakisG.LioukasS.2018. Corporate environmental management: Individual-level drivers and the moderating role of charismatic leadership. European Management Review, 15: 475–489.
100.
ParkJ. H.CarterM. Z.DeFrankR. S.DengQ.2018. Abusive supervision, psychological distress, and silence: The effects of gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Journal of Business Ethics, 153: 775–792.
101.
PeiZ.PanY.SkitmoreM.FengT.2018. Leader-member exchange and prohibitive voice in nonprofit organizations in China: The moderating roles of superior-subordinate tenure matching. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29: 203–222.
102.
PiccoloR. F.BardesM.MayerD. M.JudgeT. A.2008. Does high quality leader-member exchange accentuate the effects of organizational justice?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17: 273–298.
103.
PlatowM. J.van KnippenbergD.2001. A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 1508–1519.
104.
PlatowM. J.van KnippenbergD.HaslamS. A.van KnippenbergB.SpearsR.2006. A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45: 303–320.
105.
PundtA.SchwarzbeckK.2018. Abusive supervision from an integrated self-control perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67: 473–497.
106.
QuR.JanssenO.ShiK.2017. Leader-member exchange and follower creativity: The moderating roles of leader and follower expectations for creativity. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28: 603–626.
107.
ReuversM.van EngenM. L.VinkenburgC. J.Wilson-EveredE.2008. Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17: 227–244.
108.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC.1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393–404.
109.
RousseauV.AubéC.2014. The reward-performance relationship in work teams: The role of leader behaviors and team commitment. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17: 645–661.
110.
RousseauV.AubéC.2018. When leaders stifle innovation in work teams: The role of abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 151: 651–664.
111.
SauerS. J.2011. Taking the reins: The effects of new leader status and leadership style on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 574–587.
112.
SchaubroeckJ. M.ShaoP.2012. The role of attribution in how followers respond to the emotional expression of male and female leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 23: 27–42.
113.
SchuhS. C.ZhangX.- A.TianP.2013. For the good or the bad? Interactive effects of transformational leadership with moral and authoritarian leadership behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 629–640.
114.
SeppäläT.LipponenJ.Pirttilä-BackmanA.- M.2012. Leader fairness and employees' trust in coworkers: The moderating role of leader group prototypicality. Group Dynamics, 16: 35–49.
115.
SharmaP. N.KirkmanB. L.2015. Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40: 193–237.
116.
SharoniG.ShkolerO.TzinerA.2015. Job engagement: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 15: 34–48.
117.
SolomonA.SteynR.2017. Leadership style and leadership effectiveness: Does cultural intelligence moderate the relationship?Acta Commercii, 17: a453.
118.
StamD.LordR. G.van KnippenbergD.WisseB.2014. An image of who we might become: Vision communication, possible selves, and vision pursuit. Organization Science, 25: 1172–1194.
119.
SteffensN. K.MuntK. A.van KnippenbergD.PlatowM. J.HaslamS. A.2021. Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review, 11: 35–72.
120.
ThauS.BennettR. J.MitchellM. S.MarrsM. J.2009. How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 79–92.
121.
ThompsonG.BuchR.GlasøL.2019. Servant leadership, span of control, and outcomes in a municipality context. Journal of General Management, 44: 87–95.
122.
TrianaM. D. C.RichardO. C.YücelI.2017. Status incongruence and supervisor gender as moderators of the transformational leadership to subordinate affective organizational commitment relationship. Personnel Psychology, 70: 429–467.
123.
TuY.LuX.ChoiJ. N.GuoW.2019. Ethical leadership and team-level creativity: Mediation of psychological safety climate and moderation of supervisor support for creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159: 551–565.
124.
TuckerS.TurnerN.BarlingJ.ReidE. M.ElvingC.2006. Apologies and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63: 195–207.
125.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L.2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 349–361.
126.
UllrichJ.ChristO.van DickR.2009. Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 235–244.
127.
ValleM.KacmarK. M.ZivnuskaS.HartingT.2019. Abusive supervision, leader-member exchange, and moral disengagement: A moderated-mediation model of organizational deviance. Journal of Social Psychology, 159: 299–312.
128.
van DijkeM.De CremerD.MayerD. M.2010. The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 488.
129.
van DijkeM.De CremerD.MayerD. D.Van QuaquebekeN.2012. When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 235–248.
130.
van GilsS.Van QuaquebekeN.BorkowskiJ.van KnippenbergD.2018. Respectful leadership: Reducing performance challenges posed by leader role incongruence and gender dissimilarity for (male) followers. Human Relations, 71: 1590–1610.
131.
van KnippenbergB.van KnippenbergD.2005. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 25–37.
132.
van KnippenbergD.2019. The social psychology of personality and leadership: A person-in-situation perspective. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology, 2nd ed.: 777–802. New York: Oxford University Press.
133.
van KnippenbergD.De CremerD.van KnippenbergB.2007. Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16: 113–140.
134.
van KnippenbergD.HoggM. A.2003. A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 243–295.
135.
van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B.2013. A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?Academy of Management Annals, 7: 1–60.
136.
van KnippenbergD.StamD.2014. Visionary leadership. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations: 241–259. New York: Oxford University Press.
137.
van KnippenbergD.van KnippenbergB.De CremerD.HoggM. A.2004. Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15: 825–856.
138.
VecchioR. P.JustinJ. E.PearceC. L.2008. The utility of transactional and transformational leadership for predicting performance and satisfaction within a path-goal theory framework. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81: 71–82.
139.
VenusM.StamD.van KnippenbergD.2013. Leader emotion as a catalyst of effective leader communication of visions, value-laden messages, and goals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122: 53–68.
140.
Waismel-ManorR.BergerE.DiksteinE.TzinerA.2010. Two of a kind? Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors: The moderating role of leader-member similarity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40: 167–181.
141.
WangD.FengT.LawtonA.2017a. Linking ethical leadership with firm performance: A multi-dimensional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145: 95–109.
142.
WangL.JiangW.LiuZ.MaX.2017b. Psychological and neurological predictors of abusive supervision. Human Performance, 30: 155–168.
143.
WeiF.LiY.ZhangY.LiuS.2018. The interactive effect of authentic leadership and leader competency on followers’ job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 153: 763–773.
144.
WiesekeJ.AhearneM.LamS. K.van DickR.2009. The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73: 123–145.
145.
WijayaN. H. S.2019. Proactive personality, LMX, and voice behavior: Employee-supervisor sex (dis)similarity as a moderator. Management Communication Quarterly, 33: 86–100.
146.
WolframH.- J.MohrG.2009. Transformational leadership, team goal fulfillment, and follower work satisfaction: The moderating effect of deep-level similarity in leadership dyads. Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 15: 260–274.
147.
WuL.- Z.KwanH. K.YimF. H.- K.ChiuR. K.HeX.2015. CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 130: 819–831.
148.
WuQ.CormicanK.ChenG.2020. A meta-analysis of shared leadership: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27: 49–64.
149.
YadavL. K.YadavN.2018. Gender stereotyping of leadership: A study of transformational leadership and commitment in public sector banks in India. Paradigm, 22: 30–45.
150.
ZhangS.TuY.2018. Cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employee family and life satisfaction: The moderating role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 152: 1085–1097.
151.
ZhangX.LiN.UllrichJ.van DickR.2015a. Getting everyone on board: The effect of differentiated transformational leadership by CEOs on top management team effectiveness and leader-rated firm performance. Journal of Management, 41: 1898–1933.
152.
ZhangY.WaldmanD. A.HanY.LiX.2015b. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 538–566.
153.
ZhangZ.JiaM.GuL.2012. Transformational leadership in crisis situations: Evidence from the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23: 4085–4108.
154.
ZhaoH.LiuW.LiJ.YuX.2019. Leader-member exchange, organizational identification, and knowledge hiding: The moderating role of relative leader-member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40: 834–848.
155.
ZhengY.GrahamL.EpitropakiO.SnapeE.2020. Service leadership, work engagement, and service performance: The moderating role of leader skills. Group & Organization Management, 45: 43–74.
156.
ZhuJ.LiaoZ.YamK. C.JohnsonR. E.2018. Shared leadership: A state-of-the-art review and future research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39: 834–853.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
