Transparency is often cited as essential to the trust stakeholders place in organizations. However, a clear understanding of the meaning and significance of transparency has yet to emerge in the stakeholder literature. We synthesize prior research to advance a conceptual definition of transparency and articulate its dimensions, and posit how transparency contributes to trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. We draw from this analysis to explicate the mechanisms organizations can employ that influence transparency perceptions.
AbrahamsonE.ParkC.1994. Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1302-1334.
2.
AgnewR.PiqueroN.CullenF.T.2009. General strain theory and white-collar crime. In SimpsonS.WeisburdD. (Eds.), The criminology of white-collar crime: 35-60. New York, NY: Springer.
3.
AkhigbeA.MartinA. D.2006. Valuation impacts of Sarbanes-Oxley: Evidence from disclosure and governance within the financial services industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30: 989-1006.
4.
AkkermansH.BogerdP.van DoremalenJ.2004. Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics. European Journal of Operational Research, 153: 445-456.
5.
AnandV.RosenC. C.2008. The ethics of organizational secrets. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17: 97-101.
6.
AnguloA.NachtmannH.WallerM. A.2004. Supply chain information sharing in a vender managed inventory partnership. Journal of Business Logistics, 25: 101-120.
7.
AustinJ.1962. How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
AwadN. F.KrishnanM. S.2006. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30: 13-28.
9.
BansalP.KistruckG.2006. Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67: 165-180.
10.
BennisW.GolemanD.O’TooleJ.2008. Transparency: How leaders create a culture of candor. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
BerggrenE.BernshteynR.2007. Organizational transparency drives company performance. Journal of Management Development, 26: 411-417.
12.
BerloD.1960. The process of communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
BernsteinE. S.2012. The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 181-216.
15.
BhatG.HopeO.KangT.2006. Does corporate governance transparency affect the accuracy of analyst forecasts?Accounting and Finance, 46: 715-532.
16.
BirdwhistellR.1970. Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
BloomfieldR.O’HaraM.1999. Market transparency: Who wins and who loses?Review of Financial Studies, 12: 5-35.
18.
BormanW. C.1997. 360 degree ratings: An analysis of assumptions and a research agenda for evaluating their validity. Human Resource Management Review, 7: 299-315.
19.
BriscoeF.MurphyC.2012. Sleight of hand? Practice opacity, third-party responses, and the interorganizational diffusion of controversial practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 553-584.
20.
BrunerJ. S.TagiuriR.1954. The perception of people. In LindzeyG. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology: 634-654. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21.
BushmanR.PiotroskiJ.SmithA.2004. What determines corporate transparency?Journal of Accounting Research, 2: 207-252.
22.
CampbellJ. L.2004. Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
CastroC. M.WilsonC.WangF.SchillingerD.2007. Babel babble: Physician’s use of unclarified medical jargon with patients. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31: 85-95.
24.
ChenM.MillerD.2012. Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6: 135-210.
25.
ChomskyN.1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
ChouL. F.WangA. C.WangT. Y.HuangM. P.ChengB. S.2008. Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations, 61: 1713-1742.
27.
ChristmannP.2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 747-760.
28.
ClairJ. A.BeattyJ. E.MacLeanT. L.2005. Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30: 78-95.
29.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A.2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 909-927.
30.
CoserR. L.1961. Insulation from observability and types of social conformity. American Sociological Review, 26: 28-39.
31.
CoxA. D.CoxD.MantelS. P.2010. Consumer response to drug risk information: The role of positive affect. Journal of Marketing, 74: 31-44.
32.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H.1984. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: 191-223. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
33.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H.1986. A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32: 191-233.
34.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H.TrevinoL. K.1987. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11: 355-366.
35.
DavisF. D.1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-340.
36.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.MayerR. C.TanH.2000. The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 563-576.
37.
DerlegaV.ChaikinA.1977. Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33: 102-114.
DruckmanJ.2001. On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?Journal of Politics, 63: 1041-1066.
40.
EijffingerS.GeraatsP.2006. How transparent are central banks?European Journal of Political Economy, 1: 1-21.
41.
EisenbergE. M.1984. Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51: 227-242.
42.
EisenbergE. M.WittenM. G.1987. Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. Academy of Management Review, 12: 418-426.
43.
ElsbachK. D.2004. Managing images of trustworthiness in organizations. In KramerR. M.CookK. S. (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches: 275-292. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
44.
EstesS. G.1937. The judgment of personality on the basis of brief records of behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
45.
EvansJ. H.HannanR. L.KrishnanR.MoserD. V.2001. Honesty in managerial reporting. The Accounting Review, 76: 537-559.
46.
FinelB. I.LordK. M.1999. The surprising logic of transparency. International Studies Quarterly, 43: 315-339.
47.
FinneyH.C.LesieurH.R.1982. A contingency theory of organisation crime. In BacharachS. B. (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations: 255-299. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
48.
FissP. C.ZajacE. J.2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173-1193.
49.
FleischmannK. R.WallaceW. A.2005. A covenant with transparency: Opening the black box of models. Communications of the ACM, 48: 93-97.
50.
FloodM.HuismanR.KoedijkK.MahieuR.1999. Quote disclosure and price discovery in multiple-dealer financial markets. Review of Financial Studies, 1: 37-59.
51.
FombrunC.RindovaV.2000. The road to transparency: Reputation management at Royal Dutch/Shell. In SchultzM.HatchM. J.LarsenM. H. (Eds.), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand: 77-97. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
FrazierM. L.JohnsonP. D.GavinM.GootyJ.SnowD. B.2010. Organizational justice, trustworthiness, and trust: A multifoci examination. Group & Organization Management, 35: 39-76.
53.
GaaJ. C.2009. Corporate governance and the responsibility of the board of directors for strategic financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 90: 179-197.
54.
GabarroJ.1978. The development of trust influence and expectations. In AthosA. G.GabarroJ. J. (Eds.), Interpersonal behavior: Communication and understanding in relationships: 290-303. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
GamsonW.FiremanB.RytinaS.1982. Encounters with unjust authority. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
56.
GanesanS.1997. Dimensions and levels of trust: Implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters, 3: 439-448.
57.
GarciaS. M.2002. Power and the illusion of transparency in negotiations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17: 133-144.
58.
GoffmanE.1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
59.
GranadosN.GuptaA.KauffmanR. J.2005. Transparency strategy in internet-based selling. In TomakK. (Ed.), Advances in the economics of IS: 80-112. Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group.
60.
GranadosN.GuptaA.KauffmanR. J.2006. The impact of IT on market information and transparency: A unified theoretical framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(3): 148-178.
61.
GranadosN.GuptaA.KauffmanR. J.2008. Designing online selling mechanisms: Transparency levels and prices. Decision Support Systems, 4: 729-745.
62.
GranadosN.GuptaA.KauffmanR. J.2010. Information transparency in business-to-consumer markets: Concepts, framework, and research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21: 207-226.
63.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR.2008. Introduction. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.Sahlin-AnderssonK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 1-46. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
HagtvedtH.2011. The impact of incomplete typeface logos on perceptions of the firm. Journal of Marketing, 75: 86-93.
65.
HannanM. T.PolosL.CarrollG. R.2003. The fog of change: Opacity and asperity in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 399-432.
HowlettE. A.BurtonS.BatesK.HugginsK.2009. Coming to a restaurant near you? Potential consumer responses to nutrition information disclosure on menus. Journal of Consumer Research, 36: 494-503.
68.
HuntS. A.BenfordR. D.SnowD. A.1994. Identity fields: Framing processes and the social construction of movement identities. In LaranaE.JohnstonH.GusfieldJ. R. (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity: 185-208. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
69.
JahansooziJ.2006. Organization-stakeholder relationships: Exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development, 25: 942-955.
70.
JordanJ.PeekJ.RosengrenE.2000. The market reaction to the disclosure of supervisory actions: Implications for bank transparency. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3: 298-319.
71.
KahnemanD.TverskyA.1984. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39: 341-350.
72.
KaneG. C.FichmanR. G.2009. The shoemaker’s children: Using wikis for information systems teaching, research, and publication. MIS Quarterly, 33: 1-17.
73.
KaplanS.2008. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19: 729-752.
74.
KapteinM.2008. Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 923-947.
75.
KellyH. H.1966. A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiation. In ArchibaldK. (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict: Original papers and discussion: 49-73. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
76.
KhannaT.PalepuK.SrinivasanS.2004. Disclosure practices of foreign companies interacting with U.S. markets. Journal of Accounting Research, 2: 475-508.
77.
KochanT. A.RobinsteinS. A.2000. Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11: 367-386.
78.
KomarS.BrownD. J.KomarJ. A.RobieC.2008. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 140-154.
79.
KramerR. M.LewickiR. J.2010. Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. Academy of Management Annals, 4: 245-277.
80.
KuhbergerA.1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75: 23-55.
81.
LarssonR.BengtssonL.HenrikssonK.SparksJ.1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9: 285-305.
82.
LarzelereR. E.HustonT. L.1980. The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43: 595-604.
83.
LeuzC.Oberholzer-GeeF.2006. Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81: 411-439.
84.
LevinI.SchneiderS.GaethG.1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76: 149-188.
85.
LewickiR. J.BarryB.SaundersD. M.2010. Essentials of negotiation, 5th ed.Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
86.
LewickiR. J.BunkerB. B.1995. Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In BunkerB. B.RubinJ. Z. (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: 133-174. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
87.
LewickiR. J.BunkerB. B.1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 114-139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88.
LiebeskindJ.1997. Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6: 623-663.
89.
MadhavanA.PorterD.WeaverD.2005. Should securities markets be transparent?Journal of Financial Markets, 3: 265-287.
90.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 123-136.
91.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709-734.
92.
MayerR. C.GavinM. B.2005. Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?Academy of Management Journal, 48: 874-888.
93.
McFarlandL. A.RyanA. M.2000. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 812-821.
94.
McFarlandL. A.RyanA. M.2006. Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36: 979-1016.
95.
McGaugheyS. L.2002. Strategic interventions in intellectual asset flows. Academy of Management Review, 27: 248-274.
MillerH.1996. The multiple dimensions of information quality. Information Systems Management, 13: 79-83.
98.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J.1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what actually counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853-887.
99.
NakayachiK.WatabeM.2005. Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary “hostage posting” on trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 1-17.
100.
NdoforH. A.LevitasE.2004. Signaling the strategic value of knowledge. Journal of Management, 30: 685-702.
101.
NewcombT.1953. An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60: 393-404.
102.
NicolaouA. I.McKnightD. H.2006. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17: 332-351.
103.
NormanS. M.AvolioB. J.LuthansF.2010. The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 21: 350-364.
104.
O’TooleJ.BennisW.2009. What’s needed next: A culture of candor. Harvard Business Review, 87(6): 54-61.
105.
PaganoM.RoellA.1996. Transparency and liquidity: A comparison of auction and dealer markets with informed trading. Journal of Finance, 2: 579-611.
106.
PanyK.SmithC. H.1982. Auditor association with quarterly financial information: An empirical test. Journal of Accounting Research, 20: 472-481.
107.
PatelS. A.BalicA.BwakiraL.2002. Measuring transparency and disclosure at firm-level in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 3: 325-337.
108.
PerottiE. C.von ThaddenE.2005. Dominant investors and strategic transparency. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 21: 76-102.
109.
PeterG. H.SalvatoreP.BalaI.2011. Innovation impacts of using social bookmarking systems. MIS Quarterly, 35: 629-643.
110.
PfarrerM. D.DecellesK. A.SmithK. G.TaylorM. S.2008. After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33: 730-749.
111.
PhilippeD.DurandR.2011. The impact of norm-conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 969-993.
112.
PirsonM.MalhotraD.2011. Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders?Organization Science, 22: 1087-1104.
113.
PotoskyD.2008. A conceptual framework for the role of the administration medium in the personnel assessment process. Academy of Management Review, 33: 629-648.
114.
PratA.2005. The wrong kind of transparency. American Economic Review, 95: 862-877.
115.
RawlinsB. L.2008. Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. Public Relations Journal, 2(2): 1-21.
116.
RondeT.2001. Trade secrets and information sharing. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10: 391-417.
117.
RosengrenE.1999. Will Greater disclosure and transparency prevent the next banking crisis? In HunterW.KaufmanG.KruegerT., (Eds.), The Asian financial crisis: Origins, implications, and solutions: 369-378. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
118.
RowleyT. J.MoldoveanuM.2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28: 204-219.
119.
SacksH.SchegloffE.JeffersonG.1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 4: 696-735.
120.
SchifferS.1972. Meaning. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
121.
SeidmanD.2009a. Building trust by trusting. BusinessWeek, 4145: 76.
SerpaR.1985. Creating a candid corporate culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 4: 425-430.
125.
SetiaP.RajagopalanB.SambamurthyV.CalantoneR.2010. How peripheral developers contribute to open-source software development. Information Systems Research, 23: 144-163.
126.
ShannonC.WeaverW.1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
127.
ShepherdD. A.SutcliffeK. M.2011. Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36: 361-380.
128.
SheppardB.ShermanD.1998. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23: 422-437.
129.
SimsR. R.BrinkmannJ.2003. Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 243-256.
130.
SinghJ.SirdeshmukhD.2000. Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 28: 150-167.
131.
SonensheinS.HerzensteinM.DholakiaU. M.2011. How accounts shape lending decisions through fostering perceived trustworthiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115: 69-84.
132.
StreetC. T.MeisterD. B.2004. Small business growth and internal transparency: The role of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28: 473-506.
133.
SuttonI.CallahanA. L.1987. The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 405-436.
134.
StarbuckW. H.GreveA.HedbergB. T.1978. Responding to crisis. In SmartC. F.StandburyW. T. (Eds.), Studies in crisis management: 111-137. Montreal, CA: Butterworth and Co.
135.
TapscottD.TicollD.2003. The naked corporation: How the age of transparency will revolutionize business. New York, NY: Free Press.
136.
TaylorJ.Van EveryE.2000. The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
137.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211: 453-458.
138.
VenkateshV.DavisF. D.2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal fields studies. Management Science, 46: 186-204.
139.
VishwanathT.KaufmannD.2001. Toward transparency: New approaches and their application to financial markets. World Bank Research Observer, 16: 41-57.
140.
VorauerJ. D.ClaudeS.1998. Perceived versus actual transparency of goals in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 371-385.
141.
VorauerJ. D.RossM.1999. Self-awareness and feeling transparent: Failing to suppress one’s self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35: 415-440.
142.
WalkerE. T.MartinA. W.McCarthyJ. D.2008. Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1): 35-76.
143.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WernsingT. S.PetersonS. J.2008. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34: 89-126.
144.
WalumbwaF. O.LuthansF.AveyJ. B.OkeA.2011. Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organization Behavior, 32: 4-24.
145.
WatzlawickP.BeavinJ. H.JacksonD. D.1967. Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies & paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
146.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J.1998. The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 127-153.
147.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J.2001. Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 202-228.
148.
WilliamsC. C.2005. Trust diffusion: The effects of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Business & Society, 44: 357-368.
149.
WilliamsC. C.2008. Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3): 232-264.
150.
WilsonE.2000. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
151.
WinklerB.2000. Which kind of transparency? On the need for clarity in monetary policy-making. Working paper No. 26, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.
152.
WolfeR. A.PutlerD. S.2002. How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups?Organization Science, 13: 64-80.
153.
ZhuK.2004. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Science, 50: 670-685.
