Using the staggered adoption of anti-recharacterization laws (ARLs) as an exogenous shock to creditor rights, we study the effects of creditor rights on borrowers’ accounting conservatism. By forbidding securitized assets from being recharacterized as collateral for secured debt, ARLs protect securitization creditors at the expense of non-securitization creditors. Given the conflict of interest between these creditors, we argue that non-securitization creditors may demand more conservative accounting in response to their decreasing rights. Consistent with this argument, we find an increase in borrowers’ accounting conservatism after ARL adoption. To further support our demand-side argument, we present evidence that the effect of ARLs on accounting conservatism is stronger for borrowers with a higher likelihood of securitizing assets, those with unsecured creditors, and those with loan contracts that include more financial covenants. We also find a stronger effect for borrowers that are more likely to default, as captured by their credit risk, and for borrowers that are more difficult to monitor, as indicated by their poor information environment. Overall, our study establishes a link between creditor rights and borrowers’ accounting conservatism. We also add to the literature by offering novel evidence that creditors’ demand for accounting conservatism shapes borrowers’ financial reporting practices.
AghamollaC.LiN. (2018). Debt contract enforcement and conservatism: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(5), 1383–1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12238
2.
AhmedA. S.BillingsB. K.MortonR. M.Stanford-HarrisM. (2002). The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 867–890. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.867
3.
AhmedA. S.DuellmanS. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2–3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.01.005
AierJ. K.ChenL.PevznerM. (2014). Debtholders’ demand for conservatism: Evidence from changes in directors’ fiduciary duties. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 993–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12062
6.
AnZ.ChenC.NaikerV.WangJ. (2020). Does media coverage deter firms from withholding bad news? Evidence from stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101664
AttigN. (2024). Relaxed financial constraints and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05353-9
9.
AttigN.BrockmanP.RahamanM. M. (2020). Do creditors have a say on dividends: Evidence from a quasi experiment [Working paper]. Dalhousie University.
BakerH. K.NofsingerJ. R.SpielerA. C. (2020). Being a lender not a borrower: The bond market. In The savvy investor’s guide to building wealth through traditional investments (pp. 59–87). Emerald Publishing Limited.
12.
BallR.KothariS. P.NikolaevV. V. (2013). On estimating conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review, 88(3), 755–787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50371
13.
BallR.KothariS. P.RobinA. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00012-4
14.
BallR.ShivakumarL. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
15.
BasuS. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(97)00014-1
BoubakriN.GhoumaH. (2010). Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10), 2481–2499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.006
18.
BrockmanP.UnluE. (2009). Dividend policy, creditor rights, and the agency costs of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.03.007
ChenP. C. (2016). Banks’ acquisition of private information about financial misreporting. The Accounting Review, 91(3), 835–857. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51222
21.
ChengC. A.HuangH. H.LiY. (2015). Hedge fund intervention and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 392–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12076
22.
ChoS. S.El GhoulS.GuedhamiO.SuhJ. (2014). Creditor rights and capital structure: Evidence from international data. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.10.007
23.
ChuY. (2020). Collateral, ease of repossession, and leases: Evidence from antirecharacterization laws. Management Science, 66(7), 2951–2974. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3338
24.
DattaS.Iskandar-DattaM.PatelA. (1999). Bank monitoring and the pricing of corporate public debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00060-9
25.
DiamondD. W. (1991). Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 689–721. https://doi.org/10.1086/261775
26.
DonovanJ.FrankelR. M.MartinX. (2015). Accounting conservatism and creditor recovery rate. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2267–2303. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51045
27.
ErsahinN. (2020). Creditor rights, technology adoption, and productivity: Plant-level evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 33(12), 5784–5820. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa038
28.
EstyB. C.MegginsonW. L. (2003). Creditor rights, enforcement, and debt ownership structure: Evidence from the global syndicated loan market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126763
FangB. (2021). Creditor rights, bankruptcy resolution, and the role of accounting quality. [Working paper]. University of Toronto.
31.
FavaraG.GaoJ.GiannettiM. (2021). Uncertainty, access to debt, and firm precautionary behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.04.010
32.
FernandesN.FerreiraM. A. (2008). Does international cross-listing improve the information environment. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.06.002
33.
FichE. M.HarfordJ.TranA. L. (2023). Disloyal managers and shareholders’ wealth. Review of Financial Studies, 36(5), 1837–1888. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac070
34.
García LaraJ. M.García OsmaB.PenalvaF. (2009). Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(1), 161–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1
35.
García LaraJ. M.García OsmaB.PenalvaF. (2011). Conditional conservatism and cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 16(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-010-9133-4
36.
García LaraJ. M.García OsmaB.PenalvaF. (2016). Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.003
37.
GhanbariN. (2019). Do creditor rights affect financial contracts? Evidence from the anti-recharacterization statute [working paper]. Norwegian School of Economics.
38.
GilchristS.YankovV.ZakrajšekE. (2009). Credit market shocks and economic fluctuations: Evidence from corporate bond and stock markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(4), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.03.017
39.
GormleyT. A.KimB. H.MartinX. (2012). Do firms adjust their timely loss recognition in response to changes in the banking industry?Journal of Accounting Research, 50(1), 159–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2011.00429.x
40.
GormleyT. A.MatsaD. A. (2016). Playing it safe? Managerial preferences, risk, and agency conflicts. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.08.002
HadlockC. J.PierceJ. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909–1940. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009
43.
HuiK. W.KlasaS.YeungP. E. (2012). Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.007
JangerE. J. (2003). The death of secured lending. Cardozo Law Review, 25, 1759–1788.
46.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
47.
KetteringK. C. (2008). True sales of receivables: A purpose analysis. American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 16, 511–562.
48.
KhanM.WattsR. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2–3), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
49.
KravetT. D. (2014). Accounting conservatism and managerial risk-taking: Corporate acquisitions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2–3), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.04.003
50.
KyröläinenP.TanI.KarjalainenP. (2013). How creditor rights affect the value of cash: A cross-country study. Journal of Corporate Finance, 22, 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.06.001
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329518
54.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
55.
LauxV.RayK. (2020). Effects of accounting conservatism on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(1), Article 101319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101319
56.
LemmonM.LiuL. X.MaoM. Q.NiniG. (2014). Securitization and capital structure in nonfinancial firms: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1787–1825. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12128
57.
LeoneA. J.WuJ. S.ZimmermanJ. L. (2006). Asymmetric sensitivity of CEO cash compensation to stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.04.001
58.
LiS.WhitedT.M.WuY. (2016). Collateral, taxes, and leverage. Review of Financial Studies, 29(6), 1453–1500. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw008
ManchirajuH.PandeyV.SubramanyamK. R. (2021). Shareholder litigation and conservative accounting: Evidence from universal demand laws. The Accounting Review, 96(2), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0097
MesterL. J.NakamuraL. I.RenaultM. (2007). Transactions accounts and loan monitoring. Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl018
67.
MinnisM.SutherlandA. (2017). Financial statements as monitoring mechanisms: Evidence from small commercial loans. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), 197–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12127
68.
MoroA.MareschD.FerrandoA. (2018). Creditor protection, judicial enforcement and credit access. The European Journal of Finance, 24(3), 250–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2016.1216871
QiY.RothL.WaldJ. (2017). Creditor protection laws, debt financing, and corporate investment over the business cycle. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0016-1
71.
QianJ.StrahanP. E. (2007). How laws and institutions shape financial contracts: The case of bank loans. The Journal of Finance, 62(6), 2803–2834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01293.x
SharpeS. A. (1990). Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: A stylized model of customer relationships. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1069–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02427.x
77.
TanL. (2013). Creditor control rights, state of nature verification, and financial reporting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.001
78.
TutD. (2019). Creditor rights, debt capacity and securities issuance: Evidence from anti-recharacterization laws [Working paper]. Toronto Metropolitan University.
WangY.XiaH. (2014). Do lenders still monitor when they can securitize loans?Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2354–2391. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu006
81.
WattsR.ZimmermanJ. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall Inc.
WattsR. L. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting-part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.287
Wittenberg-MoermanR. (2008). The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2–3), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.08.001
86.
YungK.NafarN. A. (2014). Creditor rights and corporate cash holdings: International evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 33, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.03.011
87.
ZhangJ. (2008). The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.06.002
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
