Although both Democrats and Republicans tend to be more tolerant of democratic norm violations that benefit their own party, this pattern is not always symmetrical, even when political stakes appear identical. Two experiments (N = 2,352) tested competing explanations: that partisans differ in democratic commitment, their tendency to rationalize violations as legitimate, or the values they prioritize (e.g., voter access vs. election integrity). Both parties rationalized weaker opposition to beneficial violations as more democratic. However, Republicans in Study 1 were more responsive to partisan advantage without showing similarly greater democratic rationalization and more tolerant of mail-in voting restrictions regardless of partisan benefit. These differences disappeared in Study 2 when different violations were tested, suggesting such asymmetries are issue-specific rather than fixed. Overall, the findings suggest that partisan gaps in support for democratic norm violations reflect the politicization of particular practices more than stable differences in commitment to democracy.
AtkesonL. R.AlvarezR. M.HallT. E.SinclairJ. A. (2014). Balancing fraud prevention and electoral participation: Attitudes toward voter identification. Social Science Quarterly, 95(5), 1381–1398. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12110
2.
BarberM.HolbeinJ. B. (2020). The participatory and partisan impacts of mandatory vote-by-mail. Science Advances, 6(35), eabc7685. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7685
3.
BiggersD. R. (2019). Does partisan self-interest dictate support for election reform? Experimental evidence on the willingness of citizens to alter the costs of voting for electoral gain. Political Behavior, 41(4), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9481-5
4.
BiggersD. R.BowlerS. (2022). Citizen assessment of electoral reforms: Do evaluations of fairness blunt self-interest?Political Behavior, 44(1), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09723-9
5.
BiggersD. R.BowlerS. (2023). How priming fairness and priming constitutionality impact the effect of partisan self-interest on citizen support for election reforms. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(1), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad010
6.
ClaassenR. L.EnsleyM. J. (2016). Motivated reasoning and yard-sign-stealing partisans: Mine is a likable rogue, yours is a degenerate criminal. Political Behavior, 38(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9313-9
7.
ClaassenR. L.EnsleyM. J.RyanJ. B. (2025). Do fans make poor referees? Exploring citizens’ reactions to partisan gamesmanship. Political Behavior, 47, 1295–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09990-2
8.
DahlR. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
9.
DahlR. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
10.
DittoP. H.LiuB. S.ClarkC. J.WojcikS. P.ChenE. E.GradyR. H.CelnikerJ. B.ZingerJ. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916177467
GidengilE.StolleD.Bergeron-BoutinO. (2022). The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 61(4), 901–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12502
13.
GrahamM. H.SvolikM. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052
14.
HardenJ. J.CamposA. (2023). Who benefits from voter identification laws?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(7), e2217323120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217323120
15.
KaneJ. V. (2017). Why can’t we agree on ID? Partisanship, perceptions of fraud, and public support for voter identification laws. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(4), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx041
16.
KrishnarajanS. (2023). Rationalizing democracy: The perceptual bias and (un)democratic behavior. American Political Science Review, 117, 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000806
17.
KteilyN. S.BrandtM. J. (2025). Ideology: Psychological similarities and differences across the ideological spectrum reexamined. Annual Review of Psychology, 76(1), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020124-115253
18.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
LevitskyS.ZiblattD. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.
21.
LittvayL.McCoyJ. L.SimonovitsG. (2024). It’s not just Trump: Americans of both parties support liberal democratic norm violations more under their own president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(3), 1044–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae042
MalkaA.CostelloT. H. (2023). Professed democracy support and openness to politically congenial authoritarian actions. American Politics Research, 51, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221109532
24.
MannC. B.GronkeP.AdonaN. (2020). Framing automatic voter registration: Partisanship and public understanding of automatic voter registration: Part of special symposium on election sciences. American Politics Research, 48(6), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20922525
25.
McCoyJ.SimonovitsG.LittvayL. (2020). Democratic hypocrisy: Polarized citizens support democracy-eroding behavior when their own party is in power [Preprint]. Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-sk4k9
PainterD. L.FernandesJ. (2024). “The big lie”: How fact checking influences support for insurrection. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(7), 892–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221103179
29.
PlattJ. (1964). Strong inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science, 146(3642), 347–353.
SlaterD. (2022). Threats or gains: The battle over participation in America’s careening democracy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 699(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211070059
32.
TeasP. E. (2025). Partisan or principled? Explaining political differences in attitudes about democratic norm violations [Dissertation]. University of Illinois Chicago.
33.
TouchtonM.KlofstadC.UscinskiJ. (2020). Does partisanship promote anti-democratic impulses? Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 33, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1844218
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
