People benefit immensely when they have close relationship partners who are instrumental (i.e., helpful) to their goal pursuit. However, little is known about what motivates partners’ continued instrumentality. Research on gratitude led us to examine whether, when, and why receiving expressions of gratitude for one’s instrumentality would increase people’s intentions to be instrumental to their romantic partner’s goal(s) in the future (future instrumentality intentions [FIIs]). In a correlational study (Study 1) and two experiments in which we manipulated expressed gratitude (Studies 2 and 3), gratitude receipt positively predicted FIIs. This finding persisted regardless of whether partners achieved their goal (Study 3). We identify potential mechanisms and show that gratitude receipt is particularly important for boosting FIIs among people in lower (vs. higher) quality relationships. These findings serve as a foundation for research examining antecedents to instrumentality and considering long-term consequences of gratitude receipt for support processes in romantic relationships.
AlgoeS. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x
2.
AlgoeS. B.GableS. L.MaiselN. C. (2010). It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01273.x
3.
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ.GableS. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(3), 425–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.425
4.
AlgoeS. B.KurtzL. E.HilaireN. M. (2016). Putting the “you” in “thank you” examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616651681
5.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (2004). Close relationships as including other in the self. In MashekD. J.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (pp. 27–41). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
BujangM. A.AdnanT. H. (2016). Requirements for minimum sample size for sensitivity and specificity analysis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10(10), https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/20418.8705
9.
CappuzzelloE. C.GereJ. (2018). The benefits of instrumental support for goal pursuit: A new perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417724019
10.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (2011). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 232–250). Sage.
11.
ElliottC.ColangeloM. F.GellesR. J. (2005). Social worth: A validation of social network measures. Social Forces, 84(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0121
12.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
13.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 950–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029008007
14.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W. (2015). Interpersonal attraction: In search of a theoretical Rosetta Stone. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 179–210). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-007
FitzsimonsG. M.FishbachA. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017907
17.
FitzsimonsG. M.ShahJ. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319
18.
FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266007
19.
ForestA. L.WalshR. M.KruegerK. L. (2021). Facilitating and motivating support: How support-seekers can affect the support they receive in times of distress. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(6), e12600. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12600
20.
GagnéF. M.LydonJ. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1
21.
GrantA. M.GinoF. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017935
22.
HartmanT. K.JonesB.HoggM. A. (2023). Theoretical, conceptual, and methodological advances in online research: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab021
23.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
24.
IwaiT.de França CarvalhoJ. V. (2022). Would you help me again? The role of moral identity, helping motivation and quality of gratitude expressions in future helping intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111719
KubackaK. E.FinkenauerC.RusbultC. E.KeijsersL. (2011). Maintaining close relationships: Gratitude as a motivator and a detector of maintenance behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1362–1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211412197
27.
KumarA.EpleyN. (2018). Undervaluing gratitude: Expressers misunderstand the consequences of showing appreciation. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1423–1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618772506
28.
LambertN. M.ClarkM. S.DurtschiJ.FinchamF. D.GrahamS. M. (2010). Benefits of expressing gratitude: Expressing gratitude to a partner changes one’s view of the relationship. Psychological Science, 21(4), 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364003
29.
LambertN. M.FinchamF. D. (2011). Expressing gratitude to a partner leads to more relationship maintenance behavior. Emotion, 11(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021557
30.
ManginJ. P. L.AlonsoA. S. (2006). Rescaling and transforming continuous non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: An essay of taxonomy. CIENCIA ergo-sum, Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria de Prospectiva, 13(2), 126–132.
31.
McCulloughM. E.KilpatrickS. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsonD. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect?Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249.
32.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297236003
33.
NiD.SongL. J.ZhengX.ZhuJ.ZhangM.XuL. (2022). Extending a helping hand: How receiving gratitude makes a difference in employee performance during a crisis. Journal of Business Research, 149, 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.055
34.
O’BrienE. R.ForestA. L. (2024). Happy Couples “see” Helpful Partners: Relationship quality predicts biased perceptions of partner instrumentality to one’s goals. Personal Relationships, 31(4), 1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12576
35.
OrehekE.ForestA. L.BarbaroN. (2018). A people-as-means approach to interpersonal relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617744522
36.
PalanS.SchitterC. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
37.
ParkY.VissermanM. L.SissonN. M.LeB. M.StellarJ. E.ImpettE. A. (2021). How can I thank you? Highlighting the benefactor’s responsiveness or costs when expressing gratitude. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 504–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520966049
38.
PekJ.HoyleR. H. (2016). On the (in) validity of tests of simple mediation: Threats and solutions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(3), 150–163. https://doi-org.pitt.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/spc3.12237
39.
PetersB. J.ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2018). Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(7), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12407
40.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
41.
ReisH. T. (2012). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of relationships and well-being. In MikulincerShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of the couple (pp. 27–40). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13748-002
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845.
44.
TangS.KarremansJ. C.OlphenJ. V. (2021). Commitment obstacles: Predicting initial relationship maintenance following commitment violations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211051894
45.
WalshR. M.ForestA. L. (2024). Expressing the good in bad times: Examining whether and why positive expressivity in negative contexts affects romantic partners’ responsive support provision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(3), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000449
46.
WeiM.RussellD. W.MallinckrodtB.VogelD. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041
47.
YuJ.ChaudhryS. J. (2023). “Thanks, but no thanks”: Gratitude expression paradoxically signals distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(1), 58–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspi0000435
48.
YumY. O.CanaryD. J.BaptistJ. (2015). The roles of culture and fairness in maintaining relationships: A comparison of romantic partners from Malaysia, Singapore, and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
