Amid increasing global inequality and diverse value systems, this study examined how economic resources at both individual and country levels moderate the associations between values and wellness (i.e., subjective well-being and health). Using data from the World Values Survey across 75 countries, the findings challenged the prevailing assumption that a social focus is inherently more adaptive for the economically disadvantaged. Instead, results suggested that personal-focused values were more advantageous in low (vs. high)-resource contexts. At the country level, the negative association between self-enhancement and wellness was attenuated or reversed in lower HDI countries. At the individual level, self-enhancement and openness to change were more positively—or less negatively—associated with wellness among lower-class individuals, while self-transcendence and conservation were more strongly associated with wellness among higher-class individuals. These findings highlight the context-dependent nature of value-wellness relationships and the social responsibility of those from more affluent backgrounds.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AleksandraC.AdrianW.OlgaB. (2022). Social position and personal versus social focus: A multinational study of managerial values. Social Psychological Bulletin, 17, e8265. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.8265
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
5.
BellerJ. (2021). Personal values and mortality: Power, benevolence and self-direction predict mortality risk. Psychology & health, 36(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1761976
6.
BianchiE. C. (2020). How the economy shapes the way we think about ourselves and others. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.007
7.
BobowikM.BasabeN.PáezD.JiménezA.BilbaoM. (2011). Personal values and well-being among Europeans, Spanish natives and immigrants to Spain: Does the culture matter?Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9202-1
8.
CareyR. M.MarkusH. R. (2017). Social class shapes the form and function of relationships and selves. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.031
9.
ChancelL.PikettyT.SaezE.ZucmanG. (Eds.). (2022). World inequality report 2022. Harvard University Press.
10.
ChandolaT.JenkinsonC. (2000). Validating self-rated health in different ethnic groups. Ethnicity & Health, 5(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/713667451
11.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
12.
Collet-SabéJ.TortA. (2015). What do families of the “professional and managerial” class educate their children for? The links between happiness and autonomy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.814531
13.
CorneilleO.GawronskiB. (2024). Self-reports are better measurement instruments than implicit measures. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(12), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00376-z
14.
DawkinsR. (2016). The selfish gene (40th anniversary edition.). Oxford University Press.
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
DuH.GotzF. M.KingR. B.RentfrowP. J. (2022). The psychological imprint of inequality: Economic inequality shapes achievement and power values in human life. Journal of Personality, 92(1), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12758
18.
DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000008
19.
EloI. T. (2009). Social class differentials in health and mortality: Patterns and explanations in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115929
20.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
21.
EvansO.RubinM. (2021). In a class on their own: Investigating the role of social integration in the association between social class and mental well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(5), 690–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190
22.
FischerR.KarlJ. A. (2022). Unraveling values and well-being—Disentangling within- and between-person dynamics via a psychometric network perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(6), 1338–1355. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000449
23.
GreenfieldP. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014726
24.
GroszM. P.SchwartzS. H.LechnerC. M. (2021). The longitudinal interplay between personal values and subjective well-being: A registered report. European Journal of Personality, 35(6), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211012923
25.
HanelP. H. P.WolfradtU.WolfL. J.CoelhoG. L. d. H.MaioG. R. (2020). Well-being as a function of person-country fit in human values. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18831-9
26.
HanelP. H. P.ZacharopoulosG.MegadonG.MaioG. (2017). Detecting sinusoidal patterns from circumplex models of psychological constructs. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wh92k
27.
HeisigJ. P.SchaefferM. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053
28.
HookerE. D.AlgoeS. B. (2022). Integrating research on social class and social relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(8), e12698. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12698
29.
HookerE. D.CamposB.ZoccolaP. M.DickersonS. S. (2018). Subjective socioeconomic status matters less when perceived social support is high. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 981–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732387
30.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton university press.
31.
JoshanlooM.GhaediG. (2009). Value priorities as predictors of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.016
32.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
33.
KarabatiS.CemalcilarZ. (2010). Values, materialism, and well-being: A study with Turkish university students. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.04.007
34.
KasserT.AhuviaA. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.85
35.
KrausM. W.CallaghanB. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of public versus private contexts. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616659120
36.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357
37.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414654
38.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
39.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
40.
LeiteÂ.RamiresA.VidalD. G.e SousaH. F. P.DinisM. A. P.FidalgoA. (2021). Hierarchical cluster analysis of human value priorities and associations with subjective well-being, subjective general health, social life, and depression across Europe. Social Sciences, 10(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10020074
41.
LevineC. S. (2017). Psychological buffers against poor health: The role of the socioeconomic environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.028
42.
LevineC. S.AtkinsA. H.WaldfogelH. B.ChenE. (2016). Views of a good life and allostatic load: Physiological correlates of theories of a good life depend on the socioeconomic context. Self and Identity, 15(5), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1173090
43.
LorahJ. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0061-2
44.
MaM. Z. (2021). Testing the parasite-stress theory of sociality based on the circular model of human values: A multilevel analysis approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110277
45.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
46.
MansteadA. S. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
MiyamotoY.YooJ.LevineC. S.ParkJ.BoylanJ. M.SimsT.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS.KawakamiN.KarasawaM.CoeC. L.LoveG. D.RyffC. D. (2018). Culture and social hierarchy: Self- and other-oriented correlates of socioeconomic status across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000133
OgiharaY. (2018). Economic shifts and cultural changes in individualism: A cross-temporal perspective. In ÜskülA. e. K.OishiS. (Eds.), Socioeconomic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives (pp. 247–270). Oxford University Press.
51.
OishiS.ChaY.KomiyaA.OnoH. (2022). Money and happiness: The income-happiness correlation is higher when income inequality is higher. PNAS Nexus, 1(5), pgac224. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac224
52.
OishiS.DienerE.LucasR. E.SuhE. M. (2009). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Culture and Well-Being, 25(8), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511006
53.
ParkH.LauA. S. (2016). Socioeconomic status and parenting priorities: Child independence and obedience around the world. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12247
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
56.
PiffP. K.RobinsonA. R. (2017). Social class and prosocial behavior: Current evidence, caveats, and questions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 6–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.003
57.
PiffP. K.StancatoD. M.CôtéS.Mendoza-DentonR.KeltnerD. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(11), 4086–4091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118373109
58.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
59.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
60.
SagivL.SchwartzS. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200003/04)30:2<177::AID-EJSP982>3.0.CO;2-Z
SantosH. C.VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617700622
63.
SassenbergK.EllemersN.ScheepersD. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.008
64.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6
65.
SchwartzS. H. (2009). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In ShaverM. M. P. R. (Ed.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-012
66.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
67.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ. (2022). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the revised Portrait Value Questionnaire. Assessment, 29(5), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121998760
68.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.VecchioneM.DavidovE.FischerR.BeierleinC.RamosA.VerkasaloM.LönnqvistJ.-E.DemirutkuK. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
69.
SchwartzS. H.SortheixF. M. (2018). Values and subjective well-being. In DienerS. O. E.TayL. (Ed.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
70.
SchwartzS. H.VerkasaloM.AntonovskyA.SagivL. (1997). Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x
SortheixF. M.LönnqvistJ.-E. (2014). Personal value priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113504621
73.
SortheixF. M.LönnqvistJ. E. (2015). Person-group value congruence and subjective well-being in students from Argentina, Bulgaria and Finland: The role of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2193
74.
SortheixF. M.SchwartzS. H. (2017). Values that underlie and undermine well-being: Variability across countries. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2096
75.
StapletonL. M. (2014). Incorporating sampling weights into single- and multilevel analyses. In RutkowskiL.von DavierM.RutkowskiD. (Eds.), Handbook of international large scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis (pp. 377–402). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16061-23
76.
TorelliC. J.KaikatiA. M. (2009). Values as predictors of judgments and behaviors: The role of abstract and concrete mindsets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013836
77.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Westview Press.
78.
UrtamoA.KautiainenH.PitkäläK. H.StrandbergT. E. (2018). Association of midlife value priorities with health-related quality of life, frailty and mortality among older men: A 26-year follow-up of the Helsinki Businessmen Study (HBS). Quality of Life Research, 27, 1269–1275. https://doi.org/stable/44856245
79.
WuJ.BallietD.YuanM.LiW.ChenY.JinS.LuanS.Van LangeP. A. M. (2025). Social class and prosociality: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 151(3), 285–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000469
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
