The present exploratory research examined the possibility that commitment in close relationships among lower class individuals, despite greater strains on those relationships, buffers them from poorer subjective well-being (SWB). In two samples of close relationship dyads, we found that when partners reported high commitment to the relationship, the typical deficits in relatively lower class individuals’ well-being compared to their upper-class counterparts, assessed as life satisfaction among romantic couples (Study 1) and negative affect linked to depression among ethnically diverse close friendships (Study 2), were mitigated. Conversely, when partners reported low commitment to the relationship, relatively lower class individuals reported poorer well-being than their upper-class counterparts. These patterns were not found with actors’ commitment. Implications of these findings for upending the class divide in SWB are discussed.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.
3.
AndersenS. M.ChenS. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.
4.
ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.
5.
BaldwinM. W. (1995). Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 547–552. doi:10.1177/0265407595124008
6.
BodenmannG. (1997). Dyadic coping—A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.
7.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
8.
BramlettM. D.MosherW. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States(Vital health statistics, Series 23, Number 2). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
9.
CampbellK. E.MarsdenP. V.HurlbertJ. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8, 97–117. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(86)80017-X
10.
ChenS.BoucherH. C.TapiasM. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151–179. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.151
11.
CohenS.GottliebB. H.UnderwoodL. G. (2000). Social relationships and health. In CohenS.UnderwoodL. G.GottliebB. H. (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
CohenS.McKayG. (1984). Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In BaumA.TaylorS. E.SingerJ. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (pp. 253–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
14.
CongerR. D.RueterM. A.ElderG. H. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54–71.
15.
DakinJ.WamplerR. (2008). Money doesn’t buy happiness, but it helps: Marital satisfaction, psychological distress, and demographic differences between low- and middle-income clinic couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 300–311. doi:10.1080/01926180701647512
16.
DestinM.Rheinschmidt-SameM.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Status-based identity: A conceptual approach integrating the social psychological study of socioeconomic status and identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 270–289. doi:10.1177/1745691616664424
17.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
18.
DienerE.OishiS.LucasR. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
19.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
20.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.VeretteJ. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00199.x
21.
DushC. M. K.AmatoP. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607–627. doi:10.1177/0265407505056438
22.
DyrenforthP. S.KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702. doi:10.1037/a0020385
23.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
24.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956
25.
GarciaR.KennyD. A.LedermannT. (2015). Moderation in the actor-partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 22, 8–29. doi:10.1111/pere.12060
26.
HowellR. T.HowellC. J. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 536–560. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.536
27.
ImpettE. A.KoganA.EnglishT.JohnO.OveisC.GordonA. M.KeltnerD. (2012). Suppression sours sacrifice: Emotional and relational costs of suppressing emotions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 707–720. doi:10.1177/0146167212437249
28.
JoelS.GordonA. M.ImpettE. A.MacDonaldG.KeltnerD. (2013). The things you do for me: Perceptions of a romantic partner’s investments promote gratitude and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 1333–1345.
29.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage: Implications for policy and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 171–174. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00358.x
30.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
KennyD. A. (2015, October). An interactive tool for the estimation and testing moderation in the actor-partner interdependence model using structural equation modeling [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://davidakenny.shinyapps.io/APIMoM/
32.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 246–250. doi:10.1177/0963721411414654
33.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546–572. doi:10.1037/a0028756
34.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.
35.
LinkB. G.LennonM. C.DohrenwendB. P. (1993). Socioeconomic status and depression: The role of occupations involving direction, control, and planning. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1351–1387.
36.
LuoS.ChenH.YueG.ZhangG.ZhaoyangR.XuD. (2008). Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us?Journal of Personality, 76, 1231–1265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00520.x
37.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
38.
MatthewsK. A.RäikkönenK.EversonS. A.FloryJ. D.MarcoC. A.OwensJ. F.LloydC. E. (2000). Do the daily experiences of healthy men and women vary according to occupational prestige and work strain?Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 346–353.
39.
OakesJ. M.RossiP. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 56, 769–784.
40.
PappL. M.CummingsE. M.Goeke-MoreyM. C. (2009). For richer, for poorer: Money as a topic of marital conflict in the home. Family Relations, 58, 91–103. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00537.x
41.
PichlerF.WallaceC. (2009). Social capital and social class in Europe: The role of social networks in social stratification. European Sociological Review, 25, 319–332. doi:10.1093/esr/jcn050
42.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
43.
ReisH. T.CollinsW. A. (2004). Relationships, human behavior, and psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 233–237. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00315.x
44.
RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 543–550. doi:10.1037/a0021008
45.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.JrStokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
46.
RighettiF.ImpettE. A. (2017). Sacrifice in close relationships: Motives, emotions, and relationship outcomes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, e12342. doi:10.1111/spc3.12342
47.
RobinsR. W.CaspiA.MoffittT. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251–259. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.2.251
48.
RusbultC. E.BuunkB. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204. doi:10.1177/026540759301000202
49.
RusbultC. E.DavisJ. L.FinkelE. J.HannonP. A.OlsenN. (2001). Forgiveness of betrayal in close relationships: A dual-process model of the transformation from self-interested impulses to relationship-oriented actions. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
50.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
51.
RusbultC. E.OlsenN.DavisJ. L.HannonP. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.
SnibbeA. C.MarkusH. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703
55.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR.VaggP. R.JacobsG. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
56.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
57.
ThoitsP. A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416–423. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.4.416
58.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
